Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 39, Issue 4, 0412013(2019)
Interferometric Projection Fourier Transform Profilometry Based on Cube Beam Splitting Prism
Fig. 4. Interference patterns. (a) Simulated interference fringe when θ=3.55°; (b) simulated interference fringe when θ=3.57°; (c) simulated interference fringe when θ=3.58°; (d) actual interference fringe when θ=2°; (e) actual interference fringe when θ=3°
Fig. 6. Object to be measured. (a) Physical object and deformed fringe pattern; (b) phase unwrapping pattern
Fig. 7. Phase distribution maps of the same row of each calibration plane at different positions. (a) Before unwrapping; (b) after unwrapping
Fig. 8. Calibration results of measurement system. (a) Parameter a; (b) parameter b
Fig. 9. Experiment results. (a) Three coordinate machine measurement chart; (b) three-dimensional topography of object; (c) error distribution map
Fig. 10. Calibration plane 9 error analysis. (a) Fringe pattern; (b) fringe pattern in line 300; (c) Fourier spectrum; (d) phase unwrapping pattern
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Xiaoyan Li, Yongfu Wen, Haobo Cheng, Hengyu Wu, Huaying Wang. Interferometric Projection Fourier Transform Profilometry Based on Cube Beam Splitting Prism[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(4): 0412013
Category: Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology
Received: Nov. 7, 2018
Accepted: Dec. 25, 2018
Published Online: May. 10, 2019
The Author Email: