Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 60, Issue 23, 2314007(2023)

Research on Section Quality of 304 Stainless Steel Thick Plate Cut by Ultra-High Power Laser Under Different Process Parameters

Xinsheng Shi1,2,3, Haojie Zhang1,2,3, Honghao Ge1,2,3, Liang Cai4, Dezhi Cheng4, Qunli Zhang1,2,3, Rangda Wu4, and Jianhua Yao1,2,3、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Institute of Laser Advanced Manufacturing, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, Zhejiang, China
  • 2College of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, Zhejiang, China
  • 3Collaborative Innovation Center of High-End Laser Manufacturing Equipment, Hangzhou 310014, Zhejiang, China
  • 4Penta Laser (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd., Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(15)
    30 kW ultra-high power laser cutting CNC machine tool
    Laser cutting area. (a) Schematic diagram of laser cutting area; (b) principle diagram of laser cutting area
    Cutting quality evaluation. (a) Schematic diagram of slit width and taper; (b) surface roughness diagram
    Schematic diagram of taper
    Cutting test scheme
    Macro topography. (a) Front view of cut sample; (b) side view of cut sample
    Influence of process parameters on slit width. (a) Laser power; (b) cutting speed; (c) auxiliary gas pressure; (d) defocus amount
    Influence of process parameters on perpendicularity. (a) Laser power; (b) cutting speed; (c) auxiliary gas pressure; (d) defocus amount
    Influence of process parameters on roughness. (a) Laser power; (b) cutting speed; (c) auxiliary gas pressure; (d) defocus amount
    • Table 1. Chemical composition of 304 stainless steel

      View table

      Table 1. Chemical composition of 304 stainless steel

      MaterialMass fraction /%
      CMnPSSiCrNiNFe
      3040.082.000.0450.0300.7518.00‒20.008.00‒10.500.10Bal.
    • Table 2. Orthogonal test table of L25(45)

      View table

      Table 2. Orthogonal test table of L25(45)

      LevelLaser power /WCutting speed /(mm·min-1Auxiliary gas pressure /barDefocus amount /mm
      110000200127
      210000275149
      3100003501611
      4100004251813
      5100005002015
      612500200127
      712500275149
      8125003501611
      9125004251813
      10125005002015
      1115000200127
      1215000275149
      13150003501611
      14150004251813
      15150005002015
      1617500200127
      1717500275149
      18175003501611
      19175004251813
      20175005002015
      2120000200127
      2220000275149
      23200003501611
      24200004251813
      25200005002015
    • Table 3. L25(45) orthogonal test scale

      View table

      Table 3. L25(45) orthogonal test scale

      Experimental groupUpper surface slit width /mmLower surface slit width /mmPerpendicularity /mmUpper roughness /mmMiddle roughness /mmLower roughness /mm
      2-10.58981.44320.85350.17230.44140.3821
      2-20.75751.30690.54940.12100.33240.3134
      2-30.86561.03260.16700.09720.25230.1953
      2-40.98851.35460.36610.12390.32280.2593
      2-5Not cutting through
      2-60.84301.33910.49610.12370.28430.1964
      2-71.01711.17250.15540.11080.28040.2866
      2-81.15891.15940.00050.12020.27450.2385
      2-90.60211.07000.46790.15230.34450.2534
      2-10Not cutting through
      2-110.57501.33000.75500.17120.30420.3519
      2-120.71081.25200.54130.10930.29690.4746
      2-130.78201.26280.48080.17450.23820.2639
      2-140.87400.99000.11600.14220.27770.2954
      2-150.93051.16430.23380.14650.21420.2473
      2-160.79351.58030.78680.13000.28620.3403
      2-170.89301.31220.41920.09360.30130.3816
      2-181.05551.38930.33380.12460.33930.5189
      2-191.19151.09800.09350.16580.24940.4223
      2-200.64981.30580.65600.09560.31060.4352
      2-211.01501.55360.53860.09290.29400.3036
      2-221.21181.53380.32200.12100.28720.3682
      2-230.66500.97900.31400.13650.33440.3407
      2-240.77020.79400.02380.20740.33340.3752
      2-250.80830.78030.02800.17850.21340.2597
    • Table 4. Range analysis of slit width on upper surface

      View table

      Table 4. Range analysis of slit width on upper surface

      FactorLaser power(A)Cutting speed(B)Auxiliary gas pressure(C)Defocus amount(D)
      K10.800350.863260.819950.64350
      K20.905280.918040.877500.77580
      K30.774460.905400.775540.85678
      K40.916660.916660.892001.00132
      K50.894060.894060.823031.03430
      Range0.116310.053400.116460.39080
      Primary and secondary relationD>C>A>B
      Optimal horizontal solutionA3B1C3D1
    • Table 5. Perpendicularity range analysis

      View table

      Table 5. Perpendicularity range analysis

      FactorLaser power(A)Cutting speed(B)Auxiliary gas pressure(C)Defocus amount(D)
      K10.484000.686000.573030.56654
      K20.279970.397460.337360.46020
      K30.425380.259220.351440.24526
      K40.457860.457860.344540.32554
      K50.245280.245280.476630.29275
      Range0.238720.440720.235670.32128
      Primary and secondary relationB>D>A>C
      Optimal horizontal solutionA5B3C4D3
    • Table 6. Range analysis of middle roughness

      View table

      Table 6. Range analysis of middle roughness

      FactorLaser power(A)Cutting speed(B)Auxiliary gas pressure(C)Defocus amount(D)
      K10.337230.322020.318720.34556
      K20.295920.299640.282940.29755
      K30.266240.287740.296180.26580
      K40.297360.297360.278760.29014
      K50.292480.292480.294500.27882
      Range0.070990.034280.039960.06674
      Primary and secondary relationA>D>C>B
      Optimal horizontal solutionA3B3C4D3
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Xinsheng Shi, Haojie Zhang, Honghao Ge, Liang Cai, Dezhi Cheng, Qunli Zhang, Rangda Wu, Jianhua Yao. Research on Section Quality of 304 Stainless Steel Thick Plate Cut by Ultra-High Power Laser Under Different Process Parameters[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2023, 60(23): 2314007

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Lasers and Laser Optics

    Received: Nov. 8, 2022

    Accepted: Feb. 6, 2023

    Published Online: Dec. 4, 2023

    The Author Email: Jianhua Yao (lam@zjut.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/LOP222991

    Topics