High Power Laser and Particle Beams, Volume. 34, Issue 5, 056006(2022)

Asymmetrical operation characteristics of natural circulation lead-bismuth reactor under ocean conditions

Xu Wang, Ya’nan Zhao*, Pengcheng Zhao, and Tao Yu
Author Affiliations
  • School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang 421200, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(22)
    Schematic diagram of TALL-3D experimental device (a) and node diagram (b)
    Rolling flow comparison
    Heaving flow comparison
    SNCLFR-10 reactor structure sketch (a) and node diagram (b)
    Natural circulation flow
    Temperature of the core
    Natural circulation flow under inclined condition
    Effect of inclined angle on core parameters
    Variation of core outlet temperature (a) and flow (b)
    Effect of inclination angle on core flow (a) and outlet temperature(b)
    Natural circulation flow under heaving condition
    Effect of heaving period (a) and amplitude(b) on flow
    Variation of core temperature (a) and natural circulation flow (b)
    Effect of heaving period (a) and amplitude(b) on flow
    Natural circulation flow under rolling condition
    Effect of rolling amplitude (a) and period (b) on flow
    Variation of core temperature (a) and natural circulation flow (b)
    Effect of rolling amplitude (a) and period (b) on flow
    Effect of rolling period (a) and amplitude (b) on core outlet temperature
    • Table 1. Formula of RELAP5 program for liquid LBE

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Formula of RELAP5 program for liquid LBE

      parameterthermodynamic properties
      density${\rho _{{\rm{LBE}}} }[{\rm{kg}} \cdot {{\rm{m}}^{ - 3} }] = 11\;096.0 - 1.303\;6 \times {T_{{\rm{LBE}}} }$
      saturation vapor pressure${p_s}_{({\rm{LBE}})}[{\rm{Pa}}] = 1.11 \times {10^{10}} \cdot \exp \Bigg( - \dfrac{{22\;552.0}}{{{T_{{\rm{LBE}}}}}}\Bigg)$
      heat capacity${c_p}_{({\rm{LBE}})}[{\rm{J}} \cdot {\rm{k}}{{\rm{g}}^{ - 1}} \cdot {{\rm{K}}^{ - 1}}] = 159.0 - 2.72 \times {10^{ - 2}} \times {T_{{\rm{LBE}}}} + 7.12 \times {10^{ - 6}} \times T_{{\rm{LBE}}}^2$
      internal energy${U_{({\rm{LBE}})}}[{\rm{J}} \cdot {\rm{k}}{{\rm{g}}^{ - 1}}] = 159.0({T_{{\rm{LBE}}}} - {T_{\rm{M}}}) + \dfrac{{2.72 \times {{10}^{ - 2}}({T^2}_{{\rm{LBE}}} - {T^2}_{\rm{M}})}}{2} + \dfrac{{7.12 \times {{10}^{ - 6}}({T^3}_{{\rm{LBE}}} - {T^3}_{\rm{M}})}}{3}$${T_{\rm{M}}} = 398.15K$
      enthalpy${h_{({\rm{LBE}})}}[{\rm{J}} \cdot {\rm{k}}{{\rm{g}}^{ - 1}}] = U + pv$
      entropy${{{S}}_{({\rm{LBE}})}}[{\rm{J}} \cdot {\rm{k}}{{\rm{g}}^{ - 1}} \cdot {{\rm{K}}^{ - 1}}] = 159.0\ln \dfrac{{{T_{{\rm{LBE}}}}}}{{{T_{\rm{M}}}}} + 2.72 \times {10^{ - 2}}({T_{{\rm{LBE}}}} - {T_{\rm{M}}}) + \dfrac{{7.12 \times {{10}^{ - 6}}({T^2}_{{\rm{LBE}}} - {T^2}_{\rm{M}})}}{2}$
      thermal coefficient of expansion${\beta _{({\rm{LBE}})}}[{{\rm{K}}^{ - 1}}] = \dfrac{1}{{(8\;383.2 - {T_{{\rm{LBE}}}})}}$
      pressure coefficient of expansion${\kappa _{({\rm{LBE}})}}[{\rm{P}}{{\rm{a}}^{ - 1}}] = \dfrac{1}{{(11\;096.0 - 1.303\;6{T_{{\rm{LBE}}}}){{(1\;773.0 + 0.104\;9{T_{{\rm{LBE}}}} + 2.87 \cdot {{10}^{ - 4}}T_{{\rm{LBE}}}^{ - 4})}^2}}}$
      viscosity${\eta _{({\rm{LBE}})}}[{\rm{Pa}} \cdot {\rm{s}}] = 4.94 \times {10^{ - 4}} \times \exp \left( {\dfrac{{754.1}}{{{T_{{\rm{LBE}}}}}}} \right)$
      surface tension${\sigma _{({\rm{LBE}})}}[{\rm{N}} \cdot {{\rm{m}}^{ - 1}}] = 0.367 - 5.5 \cdot {10^{ - 5}}\left( {{T_{{\rm{LBE}}}} - 1\;073.15} \right)$
      thermal conductivity${\lambda _{({\rm{LBE}})}}[{\rm{W}} \cdot {{\rm{m}}^{ - 1}} \cdot {{\rm{K}}^{ - 1}}] = 3.61 + 1.517 \times {10^{ - 2}}{T_{{\rm{LBE}}}} - 1.741 \times {10^{ - 6}}T_{{\rm{LBE}}}^2$
    • Table 2. Comparison of experimental value and calculated value of natural circulation

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Comparison of experimental value and calculated value of natural circulation

      parameterMH flow/(kg/s)TS flow/(kg/s)total flow/(kg/s)MH inlet temperature/KMH outlet temperature/KTS inlet temperature/KTS outlet temperature/K
      experiment0.2380.2930.533473.28556.63457.53567.14
      extension0.2420.290.533473.19559.99473.19565.44
      error/%−1.681.02300.019−0.6030.4920.300
      RELAP5-3D0.2380.2960.534473.2561.23473.2561.75
      error/%0−1.023−0.1870.017−0.8260.4900.950
    • Table 3. Comparison of design values and calculated values of key parameters in core

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Comparison of design values and calculated values of key parameters in core

      parameterpower/MWinlet temperature/Koutlet temperature/Kflow/(kg/s)flow rate(m/s)
      design value10533663529.40.12356
      extension10533.52659.63529.280.12133
      error/%0−0.0980.5080.0221.804
      RELAP5-3D10533.34659.1529.840.12123
      error/%0−0.0640.588−0.0831.886
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Xu Wang, Ya’nan Zhao, Pengcheng Zhao, Tao Yu. Asymmetrical operation characteristics of natural circulation lead-bismuth reactor under ocean conditions[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2022, 34(5): 056006

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category:

    Received: Nov. 9, 2021

    Accepted: Jan. 4, 2022

    Published Online: Jun. 2, 2022

    The Author Email: Ya’nan Zhao (chinazhaoyanan@hotmail.com)

    DOI:10.11884/HPLPB202234.210474

    Topics