Chinese Optics, Volume. 18, Issue 2, 343(2025)

Visible polarization characteristics of airport ground material based on BPDF correction

Hong-yang ZOU1, Jun-tong ZHAN1、*, Wen-jun LI3, Su ZHANG1, Qiang FU1, Jin DUAN2, Ying-chao LI1, and Hong-yu LIU1
Author Affiliations
  • 1National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Space Optoelectronics Technology, Jilin Key Laboratory of Space Optoelectronics Technology, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun 130022, China
  • 2College of Electronic Information Engineering, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun 130022, China
  • 3Suzhou City University, Suzhou 251311, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(16)
    Geometric relationship between the three scattering components
    Spherical projection
    Target dispersion characteristics
    Polarization calibration system
    Indoor multi-angle BRDF testing system
    Relationship between detection angle versus line polarization when the relative azimuth is 180° and incident angles are 20°, 40°, and 60°
    Simulation results of line polarizability in the range of at an incidence angle of 60° (left: control model; middle: modified BPDF model; right: experimental measurements)入射角为60°下,范围内线偏振度仿真结果(左侧为对照模型,中间为修正后BPDF模型,右侧为实验测量值);
    Comparison between the modified model and experimental results when incident angle and detection angle both are 60°
    Simulation results when incidence angles are 10°, 20°, 30°, 40°, 50°, and 60° in the range of detection angles of 60° and relative azimuth angles of 90° to 270°
    Relationship between incident zenith angle and DOLP for a range of relative azimuth angles of 180° and detection angles of 60°. (a) 45# steel plate; (b) A3 iron plate; (c) portland cement; (d) epoxy resin
    Relationship between DOLP of four targets and detection angle when are 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7 and 0.9均方根粗糙度分别为0.1,0.3,0.5,0.7和0.9时,4种材料的线偏振度随探测角的变化情况
    Relationship between DOLP and detection angle for four kinds of objectives when n are 1.1, 1.3, 1.5, 1.7, and 1.9
    • Table 1. DOLP calibration results

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. DOLP calibration results

      Polarized light(DOLP) Incident light(DOLP) Emerging lightMaximum error (%)
      10.9663.4%
      45°10.9752.5%
      90°10.9722.8%
      135°10.9693.1%
    • Table 2. Fitting results of parameters

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Fitting results of parameters

      材料${\varepsilon _{\text{i}}}$${\varepsilon _{\text{r}}}$$\delta/\mu {\mathrm{m}}$${\delta ^*}/\mu {\mathrm{m}}$${{{k}}_{\rm{s}}}$${{{k}}_{\rm{m}}}$${{{k}}_{\rm{v}}}$
      45#钢板4.56−2.540.1880.1950.9020.0450.003
      A3铁板14.14−9.550.3020.3060.5210.3340.015
      硅酸盐水泥1.371.480.3180.3280.3110.3270.009
      环氧树脂2.69−1.620.1200.1220.7730.2020.031
    • Table 3. Root mean square error of simulated and measured DOLP values of four targets for different detection angles

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Root mean square error of simulated and measured DOLP values of four targets for different detection angles

      材料RMSE1RMSE2精度提升/%
      45#钢板0.06340.01954.39%
      A3铁板0.05140.01144.00%
      硅酸盐水泥0.08590.04424.17%
      环氧树脂0.06770.01515.26%
    • Table 4. Root mean square error of simulated and measured DOLP values of four targets when incidence angle changes

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. Root mean square error of simulated and measured DOLP values of four targets when incidence angle changes

      材料RMSE1RMSE2精度提升/%
      45#钢板0.06750.02144.61%
      A3铁板0.05830.01484.35%
      硅酸盐水泥0.05730.02643.09%
      环氧树脂0.06810.02304.51%
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Hong-yang ZOU, Jun-tong ZHAN, Wen-jun LI, Su ZHANG, Qiang FU, Jin DUAN, Ying-chao LI, Hong-yu LIU. Visible polarization characteristics of airport ground material based on BPDF correction[J]. Chinese Optics, 2025, 18(2): 343

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category:

    Received: Sep. 5, 2024

    Accepted: Nov. 12, 2024

    Published Online: May. 19, 2025

    The Author Email:

    DOI:10.37188/CO.2024-0158

    Topics