Establishing the standardised growth curves of Late Pleistocene fossil teeth for electron spin resonance dating

Manchen HUANG; Fei HAN; Ping XIAO; Mengqi LI; Feng GAO

doi:10.11889/j.0253-3219.2024.hjs.47.010001

NUCLEAR TECHNIQUES, Volume. 47, Issue 1, 010001(2024)

Establishing the standardised growth curves of Late Pleistocene fossil teeth for electron spin resonance dating

Manchen HUANG1... Fei HAN1,*, Ping XIAO2, Mengqi LI1 and Feng GAO3 |Show fewer author(s)

Author Affiliations

¹Yunnan Key Laboratory of Earth System Science, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China

²College of Teacher Education, Yuxi Normal University, Yuxi 653100, China

³Yunnan Institute of Cultural Relics & Archaeology, Kunming 650500, China

show less

Abstract Get PDF(in Chinese)

Figures & Tables(13)

Fig. 1. ESR signal spectrogram of tooth enamel

Download full size

View in Article

Fig. 2. Dose response curves of fossil samples from the Late Pleistocene site Jinhong Naminan(a) Schematic of the dose response, (b) Correlation diagram between D₀and I_m

Download full size

View in Article

Fig. 3. Linear and exponential correlations between the ESR signal intensities of the fossil samples and D_E values (color online)

Download full size

View in Article

Fig. 4. Comparison of D_E values obtained usingthe ADM and linear (triangles) and exponential SGCs (dots)

Download full size

View in Article

Fig. 5. SGC obtained using the average method for Late Pleistocene enamel samples

Download full size

View in Article

Fig. 6. Comparison of D_E values obtained using the ADM andSGC produced by the average method

Download full size

View in Article

Fig. 7. Photographs of the NMN13-2 sample used to produce the SGC using the representative sample method (a) Occlusal surface, (b) Lingual surface, (c) Labial surface

Download full size

View in Article

Fig. 8. Dose response curve of the standard sample NMN13-2

Download full size

View in Article

Fig. 9. Comparison of D_E values obtained using the ADMand SGC produced by the representative sample method

Download full size

View in Article

Table 1. Locality information of the fossil samples used to establish the SGCs in this study

View table

View in Article

Table 1. Locality information of the fossil samples used to establish the SGCs in this study

遗址编号 Number	遗址名称 Sites	遗址时代 Period	化石样品数量 Number of fossil samples	参考文献 Reference
1	景洪娜咪囡Naminan	晚更新世Upper Pleistocene	11	未发表Unpublished
2	农克硝洞Xiaodong	晚更新世Upper Pleistocene	9	未发表Unpublished
3	临沧大岩脚洞Dayanjiaodong	中更新世Middle Pleistocene	1	未发表Unpublished
4	开远架吉Jiaji	中更新世Middle Pleistocene	1	未发表Unpublished
5	江川甘棠菁Gantangqing	中更新世Middle Pleistocene	1	未发表Unpublished
6	郧县梅铺Meipu	中更新世Middle Pleistocene	3	[14]
7	沂源骑子鞍山Anshan	中更新世Middle Pleistocene	3	[15]
8	阳原后沟Hougou	中更新世Middle Pleistocene	2	[16]
9	张家口尚义Shangyi	中更新世Middle Pleistocene	1	未发表Unpublished

Table 2. Comparison of D_Evalues obtained using the ADM and linear and exponential SGCs

View table

View in Article

Table 2. Comparison of D_Evalues obtained using the ADM and linear and exponential SGCs

样品编号 Sample No.	ADM-D_E/ Gy	误差Error / Gy	York线性方程York fitting			指数方程Exponential fitting
样品编号 Sample No.	ADM-D_E/ Gy	误差Error / Gy	SGC-D_E^*/ Gy	误差Error / Gy	偏差Discrepancy / %	SGC-D_E^*/ Gy	误差Error / Gy	偏差Discrepancy / %
NKXD-1	35.70	2.87	33.37	1.36	-6.5	30.67	1.86	-14.1
NKXD-2	30.00	3.00	34.78	1.26	15.9	31.88	1.85	6.3
NKXD-3	19.45	1.12	26.66	1.43	37.1	24.94	1.22	28.2
NKXD-7	41.79	1.19	60.43	3.15	44.6	53.91	3.65	29.0
NKXD-8	33.82	2.44	33.90	0.35	0.2	31.13	1.41	-8.0
NKXD-9	27.80	0.69	38.32	2.11	37.8	34.91	2.63	25.6
NKXD-12	41.36	1.26	61.17	4.93	47.9	54.54	3.02	31.9
NKXD-13	42.68	1.95	51.98	2.94	21.8	46.63	3.42	9.3
NKXD-15	45.56	2.03	55.57	3.56	22.0	49.72	2.83	9.1

Table 3. Comparison of D_E values obtained using the ADM and SGC produced by the average method

View table

View in Article

Table 3. Comparison of D_E values obtained using the ADM and SGC produced by the average method

样品编号 Sample No.	ADM-D_E / Gy	误差 Error / Gy	平均法SGC-D_E^Average method SGC-D_E^ / Gy	误差 Error / Gy	偏差 Discrepancy / %
NKXD-1	35.70	2.87	30.47	0.88	-14.6
NKXD-2	30.00	3.00	31.67	0.78	5.6
NKXD-3	19.45	1.12	24.77	1.13	27.4
NKXD-7	41.79	1.19	53.57	1.16	28.2
NKXD-8	33.82	2.44	30.93	1.12	-8.5
NKXD-9	27.80	0.69	34.69	1.20	24.8
NKXD-12	41.36	1.26	54.20	1.80	31.0
NKXD-13	42.68	1.95	46.34	1.25	8.6
NKXD-15	45.56	2.03	49.41	1.43	8.5

Table 4. Comparison of D_E values obtained using the ADM and SGC produced by the representative sample method

View table

View in Article

Table 4. Comparison of D_E values obtained using the ADM and SGC produced by the representative sample method

样品编号 Sample No.	ADM-D_E / Gy	误差 Error / Gy	代表样品法SGC-D_E^Representative method SGC-D_E^ / Gy	误差 Error / Gy	偏差 Discrepancy / %
NMN13-1	18.46	0.96	14.55	0.58	-21.2
NMN13-3	17.49	0.88	14.77	0.52	-15.6
NMN13-4	19.23	1.03	19.24	0.53	0.1
NMN13-5	18.08	1.52	18.07	0.49	-0.1
NMN13-6	17.41	0.80	19.30	0.68	10.9
NMN97-1	11.97	0.48	10.09	0.39	-15.7
NMN97-2	13.82	0.48	12.98	0.61	-6.1
NMN97-3	13.37	0.56	12.58	0.79	-5.9
NMN97-4	17.95	0.60	13.35	0.46	-25.6
NMN97-5	15.61	0.38	13.73	0.67	-12.0

Tools

Get Citation

Copy Citation Text

Manchen HUANG, Fei HAN, Ping XIAO, Mengqi LI, Feng GAO. Establishing the standardised growth curves of Late Pleistocene fossil teeth for electron spin resonance dating[J]. NUCLEAR TECHNIQUES, 2024, 47(1): 010001

Download Citation

EndNote(RIS)BibTex Plain Text

Set citation alerts for article

Save article for my favorites

Paper Information

Category: Research Articles

Received: Aug. 28, 2023

Accepted: --

Published Online: Mar. 7, 2024

The Author Email: HAN Fei (韩非)

DOI:10.11889/j.0253-3219.2024.hjs.47.010001

Topics

laser devices and laser physics

Lasers and Laser Optics

Laser physics

laser manufacturing

Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology

Table 1. Locality information of the fossil samples used to establish the SGCs in this study

Table 1. Locality information of the fossil samples used to establish the SGCs in this study

Table 2. Comparison of DEvalues obtained using the ADM and linear and exponential SGCs

Table 2. Comparison of DEvalues obtained using the ADM and linear and exponential SGCs

Table 3. Comparison of DE values obtained using the ADM and SGC produced by the average method

Table 3. Comparison of DE values obtained using the ADM and SGC produced by the average method

Table 4. Comparison of DE values obtained using the ADM and SGC produced by the representative sample method

Table 4. Comparison of DE values obtained using the ADM and SGC produced by the representative sample method

微信扫一扫：分享

Table 2. Comparison of D_Evalues obtained using the ADM and linear and exponential SGCs

Table 2. Comparison of D_Evalues obtained using the ADM and linear and exponential SGCs

Table 3. Comparison of D_E values obtained using the ADM and SGC produced by the average method

Table 3. Comparison of D_E values obtained using the ADM and SGC produced by the average method

Table 4. Comparison of D_E values obtained using the ADM and SGC produced by the representative sample method

Table 4. Comparison of D_E values obtained using the ADM and SGC produced by the representative sample method