Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 43, Issue 4, 0429001(2023)

Simulation of Light Scattering and Imaging of Relay Wall in Non-Line-of-Sight Imaging

Yujie Fang1,2、affaff, Xia Wang1,2、aff*, Zhibin Sun3,4、aff**, and Binghua Su2、aff
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Imaging Technology and System, Ministry of Education, School of Optics and Photonics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
  • 2Beijing Institute of Technology, Zhuhai, Zhuhai 519000, Guangdong, China
  • 3National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
  • 4University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(21)
    Influence of different scattering characteristics of reflective surfaces on target signals in non-line-of-sight imaging
    Non-line-of-sight imaging based on intensity. (a) Plastic letters and ceramic tile; (b) plaster figure and ceramic tile; (c) plaster figure and lime wall; (d) plastic letters and lime wall
    Reflection distribution. (a) Blinn-Phong model; (b) Torrance-Sparrow model; (c) combined model
    Schematic diagram of scenario setting of computer simulation
    Non-line-of-sight simulated images of targets with different scattering characteristics under Lambertian relay wall
    Comparison of STD of non-line-of-sight images with different scattering characteristics. (a) S of 0; (b) S of 3%; (c) S of 5%
    Non-line-of-sight images with different scattering characteristics. (a) S: 3%, Ga: 15°; (b) S: 3%, Ga: 30°; (c) S: 3%, Ga: 45°
    • Table 1. Combined schemes of target and relay wall with different scattering characteristics

      View table

      Table 1. Combined schemes of target and relay wall with different scattering characteristics

      Combined schemeExample
      Smooth target+smooth relay wallPlastic letters+ceramic tile
      Smooth target+rough relay wallPlastic letters+lime wall
      Rough target+smooth relay wallPlaster figure+ceramic tile
      Rough target+rough relay wallPlaster figure+lime wall
    • Table 2. Material classification that may be associated with different scattering combinations

      View table

      Table 2. Material classification that may be associated with different scattering combinations

      Gaussian angle+diffuse reflectionSpecular 0Specular 5%Specular 10%
      10°+20%Matte wall coating,satinFlat paint,plastic,polished woodSmooth plastic,painted wood,rough metal
      30°+60%Matte plastic,glossy fabricPaper,glossy satinHard plastic,flat paint
      50°+80%Frosted metal,frosted plasticGround glass,rough metalSmooth paper,withe wall
    • Table 3. Composition scheme for surface scattering of target

      View table

      Table 3. Composition scheme for surface scattering of target

      Diffusion /%100.099.999.899.799.699.599.499.399.299.1
      Specular /%00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9
    • Table 4. Design of different levels for multiple factors

      View table

      Table 4. Design of different levels for multiple factors

      No.FactorLevel
      1S03%5%
      2Ga10°15°30°45°50°
      3S+G+L0+95%+5%0+80%+20%0+60%+40%0+40%+60%0+20%+80%0+5%+95%
      4S+G+L3%+95%+2%3%+80%+17%3%+60%+37%3%+40%+57%3%+20%+77%3%+5%+92%
      5S+G+L5%+95%+0%5%+80%+15%5%+60%+35%5%+40%+55%5%+20%+75%5%+5%+90%
    • Table 5. Experimental schemes with different factor combinations

      View table

      Table 5. Experimental schemes with different factor combinations

      S03%5%
      Factor No.2,32,42,5
    • Table 6. Simulation parameter setting

      View table

      Table 6. Simulation parameter setting

      ParameterDescription
      Scattering of obstacle and target background100% Lambert reflector
      Scattering of target and relay wallExperimental settings
      Sampling number1000×1000
      Beam number8×107
      Wavelength850 nm
    • Table 7. Computer configuration

      View table

      Table 7. Computer configuration

      DeviceDescription
      CPUi7-10700K
      RAM32 GB
      Display cardGeForce RTX 3070
      Display RAM8 GB
    • Table 8. STD data of non-line-of-sight images at S of 0

      View table

      Table 8. STD data of non-line-of-sight images at S of 0

      Ga /(°95%+5%80%+20%60%+40%40%+60%20%+80%5%+95%
      100.40000.33950.25370.17100.08740.0292
      150.26460.22400.16910.11400.05990.0247
      300.11290.09600.07500.05350.03350.0220
      450.06550.05760.04710.03700.02760.0216
      500.05770.05130.04270.03440.02660.0215
    • Table 9. STD data of non-line-of-sight images at S of 3%

      View table

      Table 9. STD data of non-line-of-sight images at S of 3%

      Ga /(°95%+2%80%+17%60%+37%40%+57%20%+77%5%+92%
      100.40690.34310.25980.17630.09250.0337
      150.27390.23200.17720.12200.06790.0313
      300.12240.10600.08430.06280.04220.0290
      450.07380.06600.05520.04500.03510.0283
      500.06540.05900.05030.04200.03380.0282
    • Table 10. STD data of non-line-of-sight images at S of 5%

      View table

      Table 10. STD data of non-line-of-sight images at S of 5%

      Ga /(°95%+080%+15%60%+35%40%+55%20%+75%5%+90%
      100.41050.34710.26310.17970.09640.0372
      150.27850.23690.18240.12820.06810.0372
      300.12960.11310.08400.07020.05030.0372
      450.08100.07340.06300.05280.04350.0371
      500.07260.06650.05800.05010.04250.0373
    • Table 11. Results of test 1 using variance analysis

      View table

      Table 11. Results of test 1 using variance analysis

      SourceSSdfMSFp
      Error0.064200.003
      Distance0.30510.30595.5880
      Scattering angle0.13740.03410.7710
      Test 10.09350.0195.8240.002
    • Table 12. Results of test 2 using variance analysis

      View table

      Table 12. Results of test 2 using variance analysis

      SourceSSdfMSFp
      Error0.064200.003
      Distance0.35110.351110.3670
      Scattering angle0.13440.03310.5020
      Test 20.09550.0195.9350.002
    • Table 13. Results of test 3 using variance analysis

      View table

      Table 13. Results of test 3 using variance analysis

      SourceSSdfMSFp
      Error0.064200.003
      Distance0.39210.392121.0820
      Scattering angle0.12740.0329.8080
      Test 30.09350.0195.7750.002
    • Table 14. Results of multi-factors using variance analysis

      View table

      Table 14. Results of multi-factors using variance analysis

      SourceSSdfMSFp
      Error0.192780.002
      Distance1.04511.045423.9950
      Specular0.00320.0010.5600.573
      Gaussian and Lambert0.28150.05622.7760
      Scattering angle0.39840.09940.3550
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Yujie Fang, Xia Wang, Zhibin Sun, Binghua Su. Simulation of Light Scattering and Imaging of Relay Wall in Non-Line-of-Sight Imaging[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2023, 43(4): 0429001

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Scattering

    Received: Jun. 20, 2022

    Accepted: Sep. 13, 2022

    Published Online: Feb. 16, 2023

    The Author Email: Wang Xia (angelniuniu@bit.edu.cn), Sun Zhibin (zbsun@nssc.ac.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/AOS221341

    Topics