[2] HH de Boer, Z Obertová, E Cunha et al. Strengthening the role of forensic anthropology in personal identification: position statement by the Board of the Forensic Anthropology Society of Europe (FASE). Forensic Sci Int, 315(2020).

[3] S Blau, J Roberts, E Cunha et al. Re-examining so-called ‘secondary identifiers’ in disaster victim identification (DVI): why and how are they used?. Forensic Sci Int, 345(2023).

[4] K Wright, A Mundorff, J Chaseling et al. A new disaster victim identification management strategy targeting “near identificationthreshold” cases: experiences from the boxing day tsunami. Forensic Sci Int, 250, 91-97(2015).

[5] M Iino, Y Aoki. The use of radiology in the Japanese tsunami DVI process. Journal of Forensic Radiology and Imaging, 4, 20-26(2016).

[6] J Chaikunrat, P Pongpanitanon, M Petju. Victim identification in the tsunami disaster in Thailand. J Health Sci, 20, 897-902(2011).

[7] L Olivieri, D Mazzarelli, B Bertoglio et al. Challenges in the identification of dead migrants in the Mediterranean: the case study of the Lampedusa shipwreck of October 3rd 2013. Forensic Sci Int, 285, 121-128(2018).

[8] C Cattaneo, D De Angelis, D Mazzarelli et al. The rights of migrants to the identification of their dead: an attempt at an identification strategy from Italy. Int J Leg Med, 137, 145-156(2023).

[9] MK Spradley, NP Herrmann, CB Siegert et al. Identifying migrant remains in South Texas: policy and practice. Forensic Sci Res, 4, 60-68(2018).

[10] BE Anderson, MK Spradley. The role of the anthropologist in the identification of migrant remains in the American Southwest. Acad Forensic Pathol, 6, 432-438(2016).

[11] V Pinchi, M Focardi, F Pradella et al. Day to day issues in the forensic identification practice related to illegal immigration in Italy. J Forensic Odontostomatol, 35, 157-165(2017).

[12] F Dedouit, F Savall, FZ Mokrane et al. Virtual anthropology and forensic identification using multidetector CT. Br J Radiol, 87(2014).

[13] D Franklin, L Swift, A Flavel. ‘Virtual anthropology’ and radiographic imaging in the forensic medical sciences. Egypt J Forensic Sci, 6, 31-43(2016).

[14] RJ Wilson, JD Bethard, EA DiGangi. The use of orthopedic surgical devices for forensic identification. J Forensic Sci, 56, 460-469(2011).

[15] RI Matoso, N Benedicto Ede, SH de Lima et al. Positive identification of a burned body using an implanted orthopedic plate. Forensic Sci Int, 229, 168.e1-168.e5.(2013).

[16] HK Khartade, V Meshram, SP Garg et al. Identification of skeletal remains by orthopaedic implant: a case report and brief review of the literature. Med Sci Law, 61, 150-154(2021).

[17] G Wilcher. The use of multiple exostoses in the identification of incinerated human remains: a case report. Med Sci Law, 48, 82-86(2008).

[18] B Hulewicz, GW Wilcher. The use of thoracolumbar and hip joint dysmorphism in identification. J Forensic Sci, 48, 842-847(2003).

[19] GW Wilcher, B Hulewicz. 3. Positive identification of a decomposed body using a trilogy of identification criteria: a case report. Med Sci Law, 45, 267-272(2005).

[20] D De Angelis, D Gibelli, E Palazzo et al. Skeletal idiopathic osteosclerosis helps to perform personal identification of unknown decedents: a novel contribution from anatomical variants through CT scan. Sci Justice, 56, 260-263(2016).

[21] M Angyal, K Dérczy. Personal identification on the basis of antemortem and postmortem radiographs. J Forensic Sci, 43, 1089-1093(1998).

[22] CP Campobasso, AS Dell'Erba, M Belviso et al. Craniofacial identification by comparison of antemortem and postmortem radiographs: two case reports dealing with burnt bodies. Am J Forensic Med Pathol, 28, 182-186(2007).

[23] DH Ubelaker, A Shamlou, A Kunkle. Contributions of forensic anthropology to positive scientific identification: a critical review. Forensic Sci Res, 4, 45-50(2018).

[24] CN Stephan, B Amidan, H Trease et al. Morphometric comparison of clavicle outlines from 3D bone scans and 2D chest radiographs: a shortlisting tool to assist radiographic identification of human skeletons. J Forensic Sci, 59, 306-313(2014).

[25] CN Stephan, AP Winburn, AF Christensen et al. Skeletal identification by radiographic comparison: blind tests of a morphoscopic method using antemortem chest radiographs. J Forensic Sci, 56, 320-332(2011).

[26] AZ Mundorff, G Vidoli, J Melinek. Anthropological and radiographic comparison of vertebrae for identification of decomposed human remains. J Forensic Sci, 51, 1002-1004(2006).

[27] JP Hogge, JM Messmer, MF Fierro. Positive identification by post-surgical defects from unilateral lambdoid synostectomy: a case report. J Forensic Sci, 40, 688-691(1995).

[28] JL Bennett, DC Benedix. Positive identification of cremains recovered from an automobile based on presence of an internal fixation device. J Forensic Sci, 44, 1296-1298(1999).

[29] M Slaus, D Strinović, V Petrovecki et al. Contribution of forensic anthropology to identification process in Croatia: examples of victims recovered in wells. Croat Med J, 48, 503-512(2007).

[30] BJ Adams, RC Maves. Radiographic identification using the clavicle of an individual missing from the Vietnam conflict. J Forensic Sci, 47, 369-373(2002).

[31] M Salado Puerto, D Abboud, JP Baraybar et al. The search process: integrating the investigation and identification of missing and unidentified persons. Forensic Sci Int Synerg, 3(2021).

[32] S Nakhaeizadeh, IE Dror, RM Morgan. Cognitive bias in forensic anthropology: visual assessment of skeletal remains is susceptible to confirmation bias. Sci Justice, 54, 208-214(2014).

[33] LP Busby, JL Courtier, CM Glastonbury. Bias in radiology: the how and why of misses and misinterpretations. Radiographics, 38, 236-247(2018).

[34] KM Kyllonen, KL Monson, MA Smith. Postmortem and antemortem forensic assessment of pediatric fracture healing from radiographs and machine learning classification. Biology (Basel), 11, 749(2022).

[35] AM Wu, C Bisignano, S James et al. Global, regional, and national burden of bone fractures in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis from the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet Healthy Longev, 2, e580-e592(2021).

[36] D Komar, S Lathrop. Frequencies of morphological characteristics in two contemporary forensic collections: implications for identification. J Forensic Sci, 51, 974-978(2006).

[37] M Vaz, FS Benfica. The experience of the Forensic Anthropology Service of the Medical Examiner's Office in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Forensic Sci Int, 179, e45-e49(2008).

[38] A Cappella, D Gibelli, Z Obertová et al. The utility of skeletal and surgical features for the personal identification process: a pilot study. J Forensic Sci, 64, 1796-1802(2019).

[39] MM Blessing, PT Lin. Identification of bodies by unique serial numbers on implanted medical devices. J Forensic Sci, 63, 740-744(2018).

[40] H Takeshita, T Nagai, M Sagi et al. Forensic identification using multiple lot numbers of an implanted device. Med Sci Law, 54, 51-53(2014).

[41] AH Bukhamseen, AA Aldhameen, NT Alzayyat et al. The use of orthopedic surgical devices for forensic identification: a systematic review. Acta Biomed, 93(2022).

[42] EK Simpson, RA James, DA Eitzen et al. Role of orthopedic implants and bone morphology in the identification of human remains. J Forensic Sci, 52, 442-448(2007).

[43] H ElHawary, A Baradaran, J Abi-Rafeh et al. Bone healing and inflammation: principles of fracture and repair. Semin Plast Surg, 35, 198-203(2021).

[44] CH Durão, R Pinto, C Ribeiro et al. Importance of a national arthroplasty register for identification by medical examiner. Rev Bras Ortop, 47, 651-655(2015).

[45] E Cunha, J Pinheiro, JA Siegel, PJ Saukko. Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences, 76-82(2013).

[47] BP Cunningham, S Brazina, S Morshed et al. Fracture healing: a review of clinical, imaging and laboratory diagnostic options. Injury, 48, S69-S75(2017).

[48] Z Obertová, A Leipner, C Messina et al. Postmortem imaging of perimortem skeletal trauma. Forensic Sci Int, 302(2019).

[49] S Blau, S Robertson, M Johnstone. Disaster victim identification: new applications for postmortem computed tomography. J Forensic Sci, 53, 956-961(2008).

[50] HM Garvin, MK Stock. The utility of advanced imaging in forensic anthropology. Acad Forensic Pathol, 6, 499-516(2016).