Fig. 1. Schematic examples for Rayleigh-based techniques. (a) Distributed Rayleigh backscatter analysis for the measurement of strain changes ε, temperature T, radiation, and RH. Length change measurement due to Fresnel reflection shift is indicated. (b) Examples for quasi-distributed sensing based on sensitized fiber sections or transducing elements. (c) Example for distributed strain sensing in PFGI-POFs and the evaluation of length change distribution from backscatter shift analysis.

Fig. 2. Large-strain dependencies of (a) BGS and (b) BFS in a POF. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [115]. Copyright 2014, American Institute of Physics.

Fig. 3. BFS distributions measured when a 50 m-long section was (a) strained and (b) heated. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [126]. Copyright 2014, IEEE.

Fig. 4. Distributions of (a) BGS and (b) BFS, measured when a 10 cm-long section was heated. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [126]. Copyright 2014, IEEE.

Fig. 5. Distributions of (a) BGS and (b) BFS, measured by simplified BOCDR when a 46 cm-long section of the POF was heated. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [127]. Copyright 2015, IEEE.

Fig. 6. Distributions of (a) BGS and (b) BFS, measured using a noise-suppression technique when a 1 m-long section was heated. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [128]. Copyright 2019, Optical Society of America.

Fig. 7. Temporal variations of (a) BGS and (b) BFS, measured when dynamic strain was applied to a 1 m-long section. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [128]. Copyright 2019, Optical Society of America.

Fig. 8. Reflection spectra of a PFGI-POF-FBG with controlled FBG spatial dimensions using a femtosecond laser (plane-by-plane method). (a) Single-peak spectrum, (b) multiple-peak spectrum, (c) phase mask method, and (d) six-FBG array inscribed in a PFGI-POF using a femtosecond laser. Reproduced with permission from Refs. [134,136,137]. Copyright 2017, IEEE; 2018, IEEE; 2016, Elsevier.

Fig. 9. Wavelength responses of PFGI-POF-FBGs to (a) strain, (b) pressure, (c) temperature, and (d) RH. Reproduced with permission from Refs. [131,138,139]. Copyright 2020, Elsevier; 2017, IEEE; 2017, IEEE.

Fig. 10. (a) Experimental setup for monitoring the health condition of a cantilever beam. (b) Comparative vibration snapshot of the time-dependent wavelength response of a free-free metallic beam; measured using silica FBGs (blue) and PFGI-POF-FBGs (red) at the same position. Reproduced with permission from Refs. [134,139]. Copyright 2017, IEEE; 2017, IEEE.

Fig. 11. (a) Exoskeleton with the flexible supports positioned on the shank region. (b) Schematic representation of the assembled flexible support using a PFGI-POF-FBG array, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), and thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU). Reprinted from Ref. [151], licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Fig. 12. Schematic representation of PFGI-POF-FBG array embedded in cork insole for gait pattern measurements. Reprinted from Ref. [155], licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Fig. 13. Example of a textile bound FBG-POF sensor array. (a) The fiber embedment process, (b) the final geosynthetic strip, and (c) the OTDR trace showing the FBGs in the first 50 m of POF.