Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 38, Issue 3, 328003(2018)
Research Progresses on Theory and Experiments of Photonic Crystal Micronano Sensing Technology
Figures & Tables(19)
![Schematics and electric field distributions of several typical 1D PC nanobeam cavities. (a) Dielectric-mode cavity[8]; (b) air-mode cavity[9]; (c) slot-based cavity[10]](/Images/icon/loading.gif){kind=icon}
Fig. 1. Schematics and electric field distributions of several typical 1D PC nanobeam cavities. (a) Dielectric-mode cavity[8]; (b) air-mode cavity[9]; (c) slot-based cavity[10]
Fig. 4. 1D nanobeam cavity PC sensors based on side-cavity-coupling. (a) Multiplexing sensor array with multiple nanobeams[61-63]; (b) dual-parameter sensor based on double nanobeam cavity cascading[64]
Fig. 5. Design of 1D nanobeam cavity PC sensor array based on multi-cavity and multi-channel. (a) 32-channel parallel integrated sensor array[65]; (b) branch-cascaed additional filters[66]; (c) own FSR performance of each branch after direct optimization[67]
Fig. 6. Designs of 2D PC sensor array based on multi-cavity and single-channel. (a) Series integrated sensor array[68-69]; (b)-(d) side-cavity-coupled integrated sensor array[70-71]
Fig. 7. Designs of 2D slab PC sensor array based on multi-cavity and multi-channel. (a)-(c) Dua-channel sensor arrays[73-74]; (d) three-channel sensor arrays[75]; (e)-(f) four-channel sensor arrays[76-77]
Fig. 8. Design of sensor arrays based on PC cavity and filter cascading. (a) From reference [78]; (b) from reference [79]
Fig. 9. (a) 64-cavity integrated sensor array[80]; (b) on-chip multi-functional sensor platform[81]
Table 1. Studies for improving Q factor value of nanobeam cavity
View tableTable 1. Studies for improving Q factor value of nanobeam cavity
Reference Structure Q Research type [3] 256 Experiment [4] 105 Experiment [5] 6.3×107 Experiment [6] 1.49×105 Experiment [7] 7.5×105 Experiment [8] 109 Experiment
Table 1. 0 2D slab PC structure with guided-mode resonance applied in sensing field
View tableTable 1. 0 2D slab PC structure with guided-mode resonance applied in sensing field
Reference Structure Q Sensitivity /(nm·RIU-1) Detection limit /RIU Analyte Research type [57] 7.1761×104 902 10-6 Liquid Simulation [58] 1.06×104 >800 1.6×10-7 Liquid Experiment [59] 5.5×103 298 1.3×10-6 Liquid Experiment [60] 1.8×104 94.5 3×10-6 Liquid Experiment
Table 2. 1D PC dielectric-mode nanobeam cavity applied in sensing field
View tableTable 2. 1D PC dielectric-mode nanobeam cavity applied in sensing field
Reference Structure Q Sensitivity Analyte Research type [11] 3.6×104 386 nm·RIU-1 Glucose solution Experiment [12] 2.7×104 269 nm·RIU-1 Liquid Experiment [13] 106 190 nm·RIU-1 Gas Simulation [14] 104 10-5 Gas Experiment [15] 106 98 nm·RIU-1 Liquid Experiment [16] 1.3×104 428 nm·RIU-1 NaCl solution Experiment [17] 3.5×104 58 nm·RIU-1 Ternary liquid mixture Experiment
Table 3. 1D PC air-mode nanobeam cavity applied in sensing field
View tableTable 3. 1D PC air-mode nanobeam cavity applied in sensing field
Referece Structure Q Sensitivity /(nm·RIU-1) Analyte Research type [18] 2.5×105 - Nano-particle Experiment [19] 770 461 Liquid Experiment [9] 104 537.8 Liquid Simulation [20] 104 389 Liquid Simulation [21] 105 252 Gas Simulation
Table 4. 1D PC slot-based nanobeam cavity applied in sensing field
View tableTable 4. 1D PC slot-based nanobeam cavity applied in sensing field
Reference Structure Q Sensitivity /(nm·RIU-1) Analyte Research type [22] 3×103 700 Sucrose solution Experiment [23] 104 410 NaCl solution Experiment [24] 6.08×106 460 Liquid Simulation [25] 103 234 Gas Experiment [26] 105 851 Gas Simulation [27] 4.5×107 - Polystyrene particles Simulation [28] 7×103 451 Ethanol solution Experiment [10] 107 900 Gas Simulation [29] 1.14×107 451 Liquid Simulation
Table 5. 1D PC surface-mode cavity applied in sensing field
View tableTable 5. 1D PC surface-mode cavity applied in sensing field
Reference Structure Q Sensitivity /(nm·RIU-1) Research type [30] 2097 1017.98 Simulation [31] <50 2184 Experiment
Table 6. 2D slab PC point-defect cavity with high quality factor
View tableTable 6. 2D slab PC point-defect cavity with high quality factor
Reference Structure Q Research type [32] 4.5×104 Experiment [33] 105 Simulation [34] 106 Experiment [35] 3×103 Experiment [36] 103 Simulation [37] 9.3×103 Experiment [38] 106 Simulation
Table 7. 2D PC point-defect cavity applied in biochemical sensing field
View tableTable 7. 2D PC point-defect cavity applied in biochemical sensing field
Reference Structure Q Sensitivity Analyte Research type [39] about 3×103 - Bio-molecule Simulation [40] 2.676×104 15 ng/mL Biomacro-molecule Experiment [41] 1.4×104 3.35 pg/mL Antibiotic proteins combined with biotin Experiment [42] 2.966×103 131.70 nm/RIU Liquid Simulation [43] - - Biomacro-molecule Simulation [44] - - Biomacro-molecule Experiment
Table 8. 2D PC heterostructure cavity applied in sensing field
View tableTable 8. 2D PC heterostructure cavity applied in sensing field
Reference Structure Q Sensitivity /(nm·RIU-1) Analyte Research type [45] 6×105 - - Experiment [46] 3.82×106- 1.01×106 171,360 Gas Simulation [47] 5×104 150 Liquid Experiment [48] 2.6×104 510 Gas Experiment [49] 2.5×104 235 Liquid Experiment
Table 9. 2D PC slow-light waveguide applied in sensing field
View tableTable 9. 2D PC slow-light waveguide applied in sensing field
Reference Structure Detection limit Analyte Research type [50] 0.2 fg Bovine serum albumin Experiment [51] 10-4 Methane Experiment [52] 10-6 Acetylene Simulation [53] 1.56×10-6 Gas Simulation
Tools
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Wang Chao, Sun Fujun, Fu Zhongyuan, Zhou Jian, Ding Zhaoxiang, Tian Huiping. Research Progresses on Theory and Experiments of Photonic Crystal Micronano Sensing Technology[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2018, 38(3): 328003
Paper Information
Special Issue:
Received: Oct. 26, 2017
Accepted: --
Published Online: Apr. 2, 2018
The Author Email: Huiping Tian (hptian@bupt.edu.cn)
© Copyright 2018-2021 | Chinese Laser Press.
All Rights Reserved 沪ICP备15018463号-20