Fig. 1. Experimental results of 3D distance gated imaging^[32]. (a) 950m slice imaging; (b) 1250m slice imaging; (c) reflectivity reconstruction image; (d) depth reconstruction image

Fig. 2. Detection and reconstruction method of target image based on distance spectrum^[33]

Fig. 3. Comparison of results of polarization dehazing^[37]. (a) Original data and (b) Schechner polarization dehazing image with sky area; (c) original data and (d) polarization dehazing image obtained by new method without sky area

Fig. 4. Magnified views of experimental results obtained by underwater imaging method^[38]. (a1)(a2) Underwater original images; (b1)(b2) underwater images for polarized light

Fig. 5. Image of fiber bundle without correction and images after correction with different modes^[42]

Fig. 6. Local image and image corrected by CAOMG method for mouse brain tissues^[44]. (a)Local image; (b)image corrected by CAOMG method

Fig. 7. Experimental design diagrams of wavefront shaping technology^[13]. (a) Speckle pattern is formed after plane wave focusing on scattering medium; (b) light is refocused by wavefront shaping

Fig. 8. Experimental light path of scattering imaging based on optical transmission matrix^[14]

Fig. 9. Experimental results of scanning imaging method based on speckle correlation^[15]. (a) Fluorescent speckle image of target object; (b) average value of 9 speckle autocorrelation images; (c) target image without dielectric occlusion;(d) reconstructed target of Fig. 9(b)

Fig. 10. Concept and numerical results of single-shot non-invasive scattering imaging through strong scattering medium^[16]. (a) Concept schematic; (b) image captured by camera; (c) autocorrelation of image captured by camera; (d) reconstructed target image

Fig. 11. Results of experimental imaging through standard scattering medium (scale bar: 200 pixel)^[49]. (a) Reference speckle pattern; (b) speckle pattern of unknown object; (c) image retrieved by deconvolution algorithm;(d) pattern of wide-field imaging

Fig. 12. Experimental setup and results^[51]. (a) Experimental setup; (b)(c) experimental results. Scale bar: 1000μm

Fig. 13. Schematic of experimental setup of scattering imaging beyond memory effect range^[52]

Fig. 14. Experimental results of scattering imaging with prior information^[53]. (a) Collected speckle image; (b) autocorrelation image of speckle image; (c) result reconstructed by phase recovery algorithm; (d) autocorrelation image of referenced object “2”; (e) autocorrelation image of object “1” to be tested; (f) reconstructed image of object “1”; (g) mixed autocorrelation image; (h) autocorrelation image of referenced object “1”; (i) reconstructed imag

Fig. 15. Reconstructed results of wide-field speckle correlated imaging^[18]. (a) Speckle and its autocorrelation image of dual targets; (b) mask corresponding to Fig. 15(a); (c) autocorrelation reconstruction image of Fig. 15(a); (d) speckle and its autocorrelation image of two other targets; (e) mask corresponding to Fig. 15(d); (f) autocorre

Fig. 16. Comparison of light paths of scattering imaging based on single-shot speckle correlation and coherent diffraction imaging^[16,54]. (a) Scattering imaging based on single-shot speckle correlation; (b) coherent diffraction imaging

Fig. 17. Comparison of original object image and reconstruction results^[17]. (a) Original object image; (b) direct detection of hidden target;(c) image reconstructed by single-shot coherent power spectrum technology; (d) image reconstructed by traditional CDI

Fig. 18. Experimental light path and reconstructed results of PIE method for wide-field scattering imaging^[56]. (a) Experimental light path; (b) target; (c) reconstructed image

Fig. 19. Schematics of experimental setup and shower curtain effect^[58]. (a) Schematic of experimental setup; (b) object is closely attached to the scattering medium which is imaged onto the detector; (c) object is far from the scattering medium

Fig. 20. Experimental results of scattering imaging via correlated imaging technique^[23]. (a) Target of interest (marked by circles); (b) speckle pattern; (c) PSF of square area; (d) reconstructed result of autocorrelation image of Fig. 20(b) and Fig. 20(c); (e) PSF of three-slit area; (f) reconstructed result of autocorrelation image of Fig. 20

Fig. 21. Experimental setup and results of NLoS imaging of single-shot speckle correlation method (scale bar: 20 pixel)^[16]. (a) Schematic of experimental light path; (b) image captured by camera; (c) reconstructed target image; (d) original target image

Fig. 22. Experimental results of NLoS imaging^[20]. (a) NLoS associated example for long exposure; (b) NLoS associated example for short exposure; (c) experimental reconstruction results with varying exposure lengths; (d) comparison of reconstruction results of different methods

Fig. 23. Experimental diagram of non-line-of-sight imaging of computational periscope^[61]