Chinese Journal of Ship Research, Volume. 17, Issue 3, 246(2022)
Simulation and experimental verification of main ballast tank blowing based on short circuit blowing model
Figures & Tables(9)
![[in Chinese]](/Images/icon/loading.gif){kind=icon}
Table 1. Working condition parameters
View tableView in ArticleTable 1. Working condition parameters
工况 气源体积 通海孔通径 气源压力PF0/MPa 1 VF=V0 DN 65 3.10 2 DN 65 5.05 3 VF=3V0 DN 150 2.13 4 DN 150 3.15 5 VF=2V0 DN 65 2.16 6 DN 150 2.16
Table 2. Comparison of simulation and experimental results (
V F=V 0)View tableView in ArticleTable 2. Comparison of simulation and experimental results (
V F=V 0)VF=V0 实验结果 仿真结果 水舱峰 压相对 误差δ/% 通海孔 通径 气源压力 PF0/MPa 吹除 时间t/s $P_{ {\text{max} } }^{ {\text{Exp} } }$ 吹除 时间t/s $P_{ {\text{max} } }^{ {\text{Sim} } }$ DN 65 3.10 17~20 0.310 8 19.16 0.325 7 4.79 5.05 14~17 0.406 4 15.30 0.435 3 7.11 DN 80 1.15 23~26 0.160 4 29.42 0.153 9 4.05 2.16 15~18 0.207 4 18.04 0.206 0 0.68 15.36 7~10 0.571 6 7.19 0.645 8 12.98 DN 100 2.12 14~17 0.166 9 15.43 0.169 8 1.74 20.90 5~8 0.539 2 5.01 0.616 0 14.24 DN 125 2.21 13~16 0.125 4 12.92 0.145 3 15.87 24.52 6~9 0.394 4 3.64 0.526 2 33.42
Table 3. Comparison of simulation and experimental results (
V F=2V 0)View tableView in ArticleTable 3. Comparison of simulation and experimental results (
V F=2V 0)VF=2V0 实验结果 仿真结果 水舱峰 压相对 误差δ/% 通海孔 通径 气源压力 PF0/MPa 吹除 时间t/s $P_{ {\text{max} } }^{ {\text{Exp} } }$ 吹除 时间t/s $P_{ {\text{max} } }^{ {\text{Sim} } }$ DN 65 1.17 24~27 0.200 0 30.95 0.192 2 3.90 2.16 18~21 0.266 6 21.88 0.265 2 0.53 3.12 16~19 0.323 6 18.34 0.326 9 1.02 4.06 14~17 0.376 5 16.30 0.381 7 1.38 5.04 14~17 0.424 2 14.87 0.434 7 2.48 6.19 13~16 0.477 4 13.66 0.492 8 3.23 8.15 12~15 0.557 4 12.23 0.584 4 4.84 DN 150 2.16 9~12 0.130 3 11.36 0.135 9 4.30 4.10 7~10 0.154 2 7.04 0.165 4 7.26 5.17 7~10 0.170 1 6.10 0.182 0 7.00 8.17 7~10 0.196 1 4.75 0.226 1 15.30 12.20 7~10 0.240 2 3.91 0.279 7 16.44 16.13 6~9 0.286 0 3.45 0.327 9 14.65 18.03 6~9 0.295 4 3.29 0.350 0 18.48 20.16 6~9 0.291 8 3.14 0.373 9 28.14 23.17 6~9 0.317 4 2.96 0.406 3 28.01 25.09 5~8 0.329 0 2.86 0.426 3 29.57
Table 4. Comparison of simulation and experimental results (
V F=3V 0)View tableView in ArticleTable 4. Comparison of simulation and experimental results (
V F=3V 0)VF=3V0 实验结果 仿真结果 水舱峰 压相对 误差δ/% 通海孔 通径 气源压力 PF0/MPa 吹除 时间t/s $P_{ {\text{max} } }^{ {\text{Exp} } }$ 吹除 时间t/s $P_{ {\text{max} } }^{ {\text{Sim} } }$ DN 150 1.13 14~17 0.122 0 20.42 0.125 4 2.79 2.13 8~11 0.130 0 11.25 0.136 8 5.23 3.15 8~11 0.142 5 8.34 0.152 1 6.74 4.14 6~9 0.155 3 6.94 0.167 6 7.92 5.14 6~9 0.169 4 6.08 0.183 2 8.15 6.17 6~9 0.182 6 5.48 0.198 8 8.87 7.14 6~9 0.195 0 5.07 0.213 2 9.33 8.13 6~9 0.207 3 4.74 0.227 4 9.70 9.15 6~9 0.218 8 4.47 0.241 5 10.37 10.32 6~9 0.230 9 4.22 0.257 3 11.43 12.23 4~7 0.248 5 3.89 0.282 1 13.52 14.11 4~7 0.263 4 3.65 0.305 4 15.95 15.07 4~7 0.270 2 3.55 0.317 0 17.32 16.14 4~7 0.273 4 3.44 0.329 6 20.56 18.23 3~6 0.300 7 3.26 0.353 5 17.56 20.28 3~6 0.288 9 3.12 0.376 1 30.18 23.15 3~6 0.308 0 2.95 0.406 7 32.05 25.02 3~6 0.306 1 2.86 0.426 0 39.17
Tools
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Qi YI, Boqun LIN, Wanliang ZHANG, Yu QIAN, Wentian ZOU, Kang ZHANG. Simulation and experimental verification of main ballast tank blowing based on short circuit blowing model[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2022, 17(3): 246
Paper Information
Category: Ship Design and Performance
Received: Jul. 22, 2021
Accepted: --
Published Online: Mar. 25, 2025
The Author Email:
© Copyright 2018-2021 | Chinese Laser Press.
All Rights Reserved 沪ICP备15018463号-20