Journal of Resources and Ecology, Volume. 11, Issue 5, 454(2020)

Effects of Forest Types and Environmental Factors on Soil Microbial Biomass in a Coastal Sand Dune of Subtropical China

Wei GAO1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4, Meimei LIN5,5, Yongrong HUANG3,3, Shide HUANG3,3, Gongfu YE3,3, and Zhiqun HUANG1,1,2,2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Institute of Geography, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China
  • 1福建师范大学地理研究所,福州 350007
  • 2Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Humid Subtropical Eco-Geographical Process, Fuzhou 350007, China
  • 2湿润亚热带生态—地理过程教育部重点实验室, 福州 350007;
  • 3Research Institute of Ecological Environment, Fujian Academy of Forestry, Fuzhou 350012, China
  • 3福建省林业科学研究院生态环境研究所,福州 350012
  • 4Qingdao Technical College, Qingdao 266520, Shandong, China
  • 4青岛职业技术学院,山东青岛 266520
  • 5Department of Geology and Geography, Georgia Southern University, Savannah, GA 31419, USA
  • 5南乔治亚大学地质地理系,萨凡纳GA 31419,美国
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(11)
    Fig. 1
    Fig. 2
    Fig. 3
    Fig. 4
    Fig. 5
    Fig. 6
    Fig. 7
    • Table 1.

      Detailed site characteristics and topsoil properties of the five forest stands on the southeastern coast of China

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1.

      Detailed site characteristics and topsoil properties of the five forest stands on the southeastern coast of China

      VariableEucalyptusPineAcaciaCasuarinasSecondary forest
      Stand age (yr)11212222>50
      Forest average DBH (cm)15.6021.0021.1017.909.70
      Mean tree height (m)11.4013.9012.5014.905.60
      Tree density (ind ha-1)1300150095016001400
      Litterfall (mg ha-1 yr-1)12.32ab12.99a10.06b10.08b12.67a
      Litter C (g kg-1)473.40bc499.70ab513.60a497.70ab495.80c
      Litter N (g kg-1)9.21c6.58d15.10b8.83c16.41a
      Litter C:N ratio51.55b77.12a34.07c56.43b28.05c
      Litter cellulose (g kg-1)114.80d217.90b172.10c275.20a157.40c
      Litter lignin (g kg-1)179.90e365.90b449.30a227.50d300.60c
      Litter lignin: N ratio19.60c56.50a29.80b25.80b18.30c
      Root Biomass (mg ha-1)2.16ab1.05b1.84ab3.04a2.77a
      Root C (g kg-1)376.40ab365.10b304.80c412.70a378.00ab
      Root N (g kg-1)5.70c6.30c10.50b19.70a19.20a
      Root C: N ratio69.90a63.50a29.00b20.90b19.80b
      Bulk density (g cm-3)1.36b1.23cd1.28bc1.45a1.17d
      pH5.00b4.65c4.73c4.71c6.57a
      Total C (g kg-1)6.65b4.33b4.08b3.17b12.71a
      Total N (g kg-1)0.54b0.53bc0.53bc0.27c1.26a
      Soil C: N ratio11.97a8.12b7.70b11.58a9.91ab
      Soil NH4+-N concentration (μg g-1)3.52c3.78c6.27b4.38c7.00a
      Soil NO3--N concentration (μg g-1)0.20b1.14b1.47b0.87b18.20a
      Total inorganic N (μg g-1)2.30b3.90b6.50b3.10b25.80a
      Soil DOC (mg kg-1)56.20b40.40b42.20b53.30b84.80a
      Soil DON (mg kg-1)2.80bc3.30bc6.80b0.60c22.5a0
      Available P (mg kg-1)0.57b0.61b1.26b0.89b20.49a
      Exchangeable Mg (mg kg-1)0.28b0.33b0.26b0.32b0.71a
    • Table 2.

      Soil pH, soil bulk density, soil C and N content, and soil C: N ratio for the different forests (N=4)

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2.

      Soil pH, soil bulk density, soil C and N content, and soil C: N ratio for the different forests (N=4)

      Soil depth (cm)Forest typesSoil pHBulk density (g cm-3)Soil C content (g kg-1)Soil N content (g kg-1)Soil C: N
      0-10Eucalyptus 5.00±0.08b1.36±0.04b6.65±2.67b0.54±0.09b11.97±2.91a
      Pine4.65±0.13c1.23±0.06cd4.33±1.21b0.53±0.04bc8.12±1.80b
      Acacia4.73±0.12c1.28±0.10bc4.08±0.35b0.53±0.05bc7.7±0.08b
      Casuarinas 4.71±0.08c1.45±0.04a3.17±0.69b0.27±0.05c11.58±1.08a
      Secondary forest6.57±0.22a1.17±0.04d12.71±4.94a1.26±0.34a9.91±1.23ab
      10-20Eucalyptus 4.71±0.18b1.47±0.04a1.85±0.34b0.31±0.07b6.16±0.91a
      Pine4.72±0.19b1.43±0.02a1.96±0.51b0.31±0.02b6.32±1.50a
      Acacia4.76±0.09b1.39±0.09a1.68±0.13b0.31±0.03b5.46±0.30a
      Casuarinas 4.92±0.05b1.47±0.04a1.25±0.22b0.14±0.02c9.27±1.26a
      Secondary forest6.50±0.69a1.31±0.02b4.57±0.93a0.54±0.09a8.44±1.15a
    • Table 3.

      Pearson correlations between seasonal variations of soil MBC and MBN and soil temperature as well as water content

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3.

      Pearson correlations between seasonal variations of soil MBC and MBN and soil temperature as well as water content

      Forest typesT—MBCT—MBNW—MBCW—MBN
      0-10 cm10-20 cm0-10 cm10-20 cm0-10 cm10-20 cm0-10 cm10-20 cm
      Eucalyptus-0.216-0.007-0.421-0.937**0.3880.1700.3460.760**
      Pine-0.027-0.151-0.629**-0.709**0.2570.576*0.0660.522*
      Acacia-0.640**-0.217-0.857**-0.786**0.537*0.0570.553*0.082
      Casuarinas -0.269-0.132-0.785**-0.773**0.1000.3520.619*0.592*
      Secondary forest-0.178-0.346-0.158-0.4130.734**0.713**0.618*0.819**
    • Table 4.

      Pearson correlations between soil MBC and MBN and properties of soil, litter and fine roots

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4.

      Pearson correlations between soil MBC and MBN and properties of soil, litter and fine roots

      Soil depth (cm)VariableMBNTCTNBulk densitypHLitterfallLitter CLitter NRoot biomassRoot CRoot N
      0-10MBC0.750**0.697**-0.030-0.609**0.899**0.202-0.500*0.651**0.301-0.3880.326
      MBN10.820**-0.050-0.586**0.915**0.408-0.624**0.671**0.151-0.1880.505*
      10-20MBC0.855**0.904**0.274-0.585**0.787**0.474*-0.459*0.447*0.113-0.453*0.178
      MBN10.926**-0.130-0.646**0.952**0.419-0.593**0.643**0.243-0.2150.510*
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Wei GAO, Meimei LIN, Yongrong HUANG, Shide HUANG, Gongfu YE, Zhiqun HUANG. Effects of Forest Types and Environmental Factors on Soil Microbial Biomass in a Coastal Sand Dune of Subtropical China[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2020, 11(5): 454

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Forest Ecosystem

    Received: Mar. 15, 2020

    Accepted: May. 21, 2020

    Published Online: Oct. 17, 2020

    The Author Email: Zhiqun HUANG (zhiqunhuang@hotmail.com)

    DOI:10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2020.05.003

    Topics