Photonics Research, Volume. 9, Issue 6, 992(2021)
Steering paradox for Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen argument and its extended inequality
[1] A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?. Phys. Rev., 47, 777-780(1935).
[2] E. Schrödinger. Discussion of probability relations between separated systems. Naturwissenschaften, 23, 807-812(1935).
[3] H. M. Wiseman, S. J. Jones, A. C. Doherty. Steering, entanglement, nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Phys. Rev. Lett., 98, 140402(2007).
[4] J. S. Bell. On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox. Physics, 1, 195-200(1964).
[5] N. Brunner, D. Cavalcanti, S. Pironio, V. Scarani, S. Wehner. Bell nonlocality. Rev. Mod. Phys., 86, 419-478(2014).
[6] J. Clauser, M. Horne, A. Shimony, R. Holt. Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett., 23, 880-884(1969).
[7] N. D. Mermin. Extreme quantum entanglement in a superposition of macroscopically distinct states. Phys. Rev. Lett., 65, 1838-1840(1990).
[8] D. Collins, N. Gisin, N. Linden, S. Massar, S. Popescu. Bell inequalities for arbitrarily high-dimensional systems. Phys. Rev. Lett., 88, 040404(2002).
[9] D. M. Greenberger, M. Kafatos, M. A. Horne, A. Zeilinger. Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory, and Conceptions of the Universe, 69(1989).
[10] L. Hardy. Nonlocality for two particles without inequalities for almost all entangled states. Phys. Rev. Lett., 71, 1665-1668(1993).
[11] A. Aspect, P. Grangier, G. Roger. Experimental tests of realistic local theories via Bell’s theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett., 47, 460-463(1981).
[12] J. W. Pan, D. Bouwmeester, M. Daniell, H. Weinfurter, A. Zeilinger. Experimental test of quantum nonlocality in three-photon Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger entanglement. Nature, 403, 515-519(2000).
[13] Y. H. Luo, H.-Y. Su, H.-L. Huang, X.-L. Wang, T. Yang, L. Li, N.-L. Liu, J.-L. Chen, C.-Y. Lu, J.-W. Pan. Experimental test of generalized Hardy’s paradox. Sci. Bull., 63, 1611-1615(2018).
[14] M. D. Reid, P. D. Drummond, E. G. Cavalcanti, W. P. Bowen, P. K. Lam, H. A. Bachor, U. L. Andersen, G. Leuchs. The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox: from concepts to applications. Rev. Mod. Phys., 81, 1727-1751(2009).
[15] D. J. Saunders, S. J. Jones, H. M. Wiseman, G. J. Pryde. Experimental EPR-steering using Bell-local states. Nat. Phys., 6, 845-849(2010).
[16] K. Sun, J. S. Xu, X. J. Ye, Y. C. Wu, J. L. Chen, C. F. Li, G. C. Guo. Experimental demonstration of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering game based on the all-versus-nothing proof. Phys. Rev. Lett., 113, 140402(2014).
[17] S. Armstrong, M. Wang, R. Y. Teh, Q. H. Gong, Q. Y. He, J. Janousek, H. A. Bachor, M. D. Reid, P. K. Lam. Multipartite Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering and genuine tripartite entanglement with optical networks. Nat. Phys., 11, 167-172(2015).
[18] A. J. Bennet, D. A. Evans, D. J. Saunders, C. Branciard, E. G. Cavalcanti, H. M. Wiseman, G. J. Pryde. Arbitrarily loss-tolerant Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering allowing a demonstration over 1 km of optical fiber with no detection loophole. Phys. Rev. X, 2, 031003(2012).
[19] J. Schneeloch, P. B. Dixon, G. A. Howland, C. J. Broadbent, J. C. Howell. Violation of continuous-variable Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering with discrete measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett., 110, 130407(2013).
[20] M. Fadel, T. Zibold, B. Decamps, P. Treutlein. Spatial entanglement patterns and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering in Bose-Einstein condensates. Science, 360, 409-413(2018).
[21] F. Dolde, I. Jakobi, B. Naydenov, N. Zhao, S. Pezzagna, C. Trautmann, J. Meijer, P. Neumann, F. Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup. Room-temperature entanglement between single defect spins in diamond. Nat. Phys., 9, 139-143(2013).
[22] M. Dabrowski, M. Parniak, W. Wasilewski. Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox in a hybrid bipartite system. Optica, 4, 272-275(2017).
[23] D. Cavalcanti, P. Skrzypczyk, G. H. Aguilar, R. V. Nery, P. H. S. Ribeiro, S. P. Walborn. Detection of entanglement in asymmetric quantum networks and multipartite quantum steering. Nat. Commun., 6, 7941(2015).
[24] Q. Zeng, B. Wang, P. Li, X. Zhang. Experimental high-dimensional Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering. Phys. Rev. Lett., 120, 030401(2018).
[25] J. L. Chen, H. Y. Su, Z. P. Xu, A. K. Pati. Sharp contradiction for local-hidden-state model in quantum steering. Sci. Rep., 6, 32075(2016).
[26] N. D. Mermin. Quantum mysteries refined. Am. J. Phys., 62, 880-887(1994).
[27] S. H. Jiang, Z. P. Xu, H. Y. Su, A. K. Pati, J. L. Chen. Generalized Hardy’s paradox. Phys. Rev. Lett., 120, 050403(2018).
[28] [28] 28For example, the maximal violation value for the usual three-setting steering inequality (8) is 1+2 sin 2α. Hence, only when α>arcsin3−122≈0.1873 can the usual LSI be violated. However, the pure state violates the GLSI (7) for the whole region α∈(0,π/2); thus, the GLSI is stronger than the usual LSI in detecting the EPR steerability of pure entangled states.
[29] P. G. Kwiat, K. Mattle, H. Weinfurter, A. Zeilinger. New high-intensity source of polarization-entangled photon pairs. Phys. Rev. Lett., 75, 4337-4341(1995).
[30] E. Wigner. On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium. Phys. Rev., 40, 749-760(1932).
[31] J. L. Chen, X. J. Ye, C. Wu, H. Y. Su, A. Cabello, L. C. Kwek, C. H. Oh. All-versus-nothing proof of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering. Sci. Rep., 3, 02143(2013).
[32] R. Uola, A. C. S. Costa, H. C. Nguyen, O. Gühne. Quantum steering. Rev. Mod. Phys., 92, 015001(2020).
[33] C. Branciard, E. G. Cavalcanti, S. P. Walborn, V. Scarani, H. M. Wiseman. One-sided device-independent quantum key distribution: security, feasibility, and the connection with steering. Phys. Rev. A, 85, 010301(2012).
[34] P. Skrzypczyk, D. Cavalcanti. Maximal randomness generation from steering inequality violations using qudits. Phys. Rev. Lett., 120, 260401(2018).
[35] Y. Guo, S. Cheng, X. Hu, B. Liu, E. Huang, Y. Huang, C. Li, G. Guo, E. G. Cavalcanti. Experimental measurement-device-independent quantum steering and randomness generation beyond qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett., 123, 170402(2019).
[36] M. Piani, J. Watrous. Necessary and sufficient quantum information characterization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering. Phys. Rev. Lett., 114, 060404(2015).
[37] K. Sun, X. Ye, Y. Xiao, X. Xu, Y. Wu, J. Xu, J. Chen, C. Li, G. Guo. Demonstration of Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen steering with enhanced subchannel discrimination. npj Quantum Inf., 4, 12(2018).
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Tianfeng Feng, Changliang Ren, Qin Feng, Maolin Luo, Xiaogang Qiang, Jing-Ling Chen, Xiaoqi Zhou, "Steering paradox for Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen argument and its extended inequality," Photonics Res. 9, 992 (2021)
Category: Quantum Optics
Received: Oct. 6, 2020
Accepted: Mar. 17, 2021
Published Online: May. 20, 2021
The Author Email: Changliang Ren (renchangliang@hunnu.edu.cn), Jing-Ling Chen (chenjl@nankai.edu.cn), Xiaoqi Zhou (zhouxq8@mail.sysu.edu.cn)