Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 61, Issue 12, 1211007(2024)

Single-Frequency Structured Light Phase Unwrapping Algorithm Based on Central Curl Splitting

Beibei Ye, Jun Liu*, Ming Gao, and Qingsong Wang
Author Affiliations
  • School of Opto-Electronical Engineering, Xi'an Technological University, Xi'an 710021, Shaanxi, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(17)
    Calculation of central curl
    Calculation of second-order difference
    Phase unwrapping based on central curl segmentation
    Phase information of simulation object. (a) Initial phase; (b) wrapping phase
    Simulation phase unwrapping result. (a) Region where the central curl is not 0; (b) branch-cutting method; (c) least-squares method; (d) central curl segmentation method
    Experimental device diagram
    Phase solution of blade image. (a) Blade experimental diagram; (b) wrapping phase diagram; (c) bivalent mask template; (d) absolute phase diagram
    Blade phase unwrapping results of different algorithms. (a) Branch-cutting method; (b) least-squares method; (c) central curl segmentation method
    Distribution of phase values in the 300th line. (a) Before phase-unwrapping; (b) after phase-unwrapping
    3D point cloud map of the blade
    Comparison experimental device diagram of blade surface measurement
    Phase solution of gauge block image. (a) Gauge block physical diagram; (b) wrapping phase; (c) absolute phase
    3D point cloud image of gauge block
    • Table 1. Comparison of phase unwrapping of different algorithms

      View table

      Table 1. Comparison of phase unwrapping of different algorithms

      ParameterBranch-cutting methodLeast-squares methodCentral curl segmentation
      PSNR /dB38.877132.175661.6444
      MSE /pixel0.860148.29030.0842
      SSIM0.99490.99590.9999
    • Table 2. Running time of different algorithms

      View table

      Table 2. Running time of different algorithms

      ParameterBranch-cutting methodLeast-squares methodCentral curl segmentation
      Time /s3.000.162.89
    • Table 3. Comparison of blade measurement data

      View table

      Table 3. Comparison of blade measurement data

      Blade measurementHeight of highest point of blade back /mmDistance between two sides of blade edge /mmDistance between two sides of blade tenon /mm
      Point cloud dataDisplacement sensor dataPoint cloud dataDisplacement sensor dataPoint cloud dataDisplacement sensor data
      Position 118.6718.7021.1821.2426.0726.01
      Position 218.6518.6721.1621.2326.0526.00
      Position 318.6018.6621.1821.2426.0526.00
      Position 418.5818.6421.1821.2426.0426.01
      Position 518.5218.6021.1521.2326.0326.00
      Position 618.4718.5521.1621.2326.0526.01
      Position 718.4518.5021.1721.2426.0326.00
      Position 818.4218.4621.1821.2426.0226.00
      Position 918.4018.4121.1821.2426.0426.00
      Position 1018.3818.4021.2021.2426.0326.00
    • Table 4. Comparison of measuring data of gauge block

      View table

      Table 4. Comparison of measuring data of gauge block

      Measuring positionMeasurement data /mmStandard data /mm
      Position 130.0530.00
      Position 230.0630.00
      Position 330.0430.00
      Position 430.0230.00
      Position 529.9830.00
      Position 630.0330.00
      Position 730.0530.00
      Position 830.0630.00
      Position 930.0230.00
      Position 1029.9730.00
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Beibei Ye, Jun Liu, Ming Gao, Qingsong Wang. Single-Frequency Structured Light Phase Unwrapping Algorithm Based on Central Curl Splitting[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2024, 61(12): 1211007

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Imaging Systems

    Received: Jul. 14, 2023

    Accepted: Sep. 19, 2023

    Published Online: Jun. 5, 2024

    The Author Email: Jun Liu (junliu1990@163.com)

    DOI:10.3788/LOP231727

    CSTR:32186.14.LOP231727

    Topics