Photonics Research, Volume. 11, Issue 4, 533(2023)

Continuous variable quantum conference network with a Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger entangled state

Yue Qin1, Jingxu Ma1, Di Zhao1, Jialin Cheng1, Zhihui Yan1,2, and Xiaojun Jia1,2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Quantum Optics and Quantum Optics Devices, Institute of Opto-Electronics, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
  • 2Collaborative Innovation Center of Extreme Optics, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(6)
    Visualization of QC protocol. A quantum server distributes the entangled state to all legitimate participants. They establish a common key based on multipartite quantum correlations. The N participants are notified through the QC protocol, where N participants are named as Bobj (j=1,2,…,N).
    Schematic of the experimental setup. NOPA1,2, nondegenerate optical parametric amplifier; PM, phase modulator; AM, amplitude modulator; HWP1,2, half-wave plate; PBS1,2, polarizing optical beam splitter; DBS, dichroic beam splitter; BS1, 90/10 optical beam splitter; BS2, 50/50 optical beam splitter; BS3, 80/20 (90/10) optical beam splitter; HR, mirror with high reflection; BHD1−4, balanced homodyne detector. (a^1,a^4) and (a^2,a^3) are phase-quadrature and amplitude-quadrature squeezed states, respectively. b^1,b^2,b^3, and b^4 combine a quadripartite GHZ state.
    Calculated key rate k of the CV QC system versus the transmission loss when the thermal noise variances are taken as ω=1.5 (red line), ω=3.5 (cyan line), and ω=5.5 (blue line), respectively.
    Calculated dependences of the key rate k on the transmission loss for different squeezing factors r and the extra noise factor r′. The red, green, and blue traces correspond to squeezing factors r of 0.46, 0.92, and 1.38 when r′ equals r, respectively.
    Measured variances of the amplitude and phase quadratures and the cross correlation variances of the Bobs’ received modes b^j′ when (a)–(f) 1−η=0.1 and (g)–(l) 1−η=0.2, respectively. (a), (g) Δ2x^B1; (b), (h) Δ2x^B2; (c), (i) Δ2p^B1; (d), (j) Δ2p^B2; (e), (k) Δ2(x^B1+x^B2); (f), (l) Δ2(p^B1+p^B2). The black and red lines correspond to the SNL and corresponding noise power, respectively. The analysis frequency is 3 MHz and the measurement parameters of the SA: RBW 30 kHz; VBW 30 Hz.
    Calculated key rate k and experiment result versus transmission loss. Two different transmission losses of the lossy channels are investigated, 1−η=0.1 and 1−η=0.2. Using the experimentally determined parameters r=0.46 and r′=0.58, the red trace curves the theoretical result of the QC key rate versus transmission loss, while the data points are numerically calculated key rate k from experimentally obtained CM VB.
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Yue Qin, Jingxu Ma, Di Zhao, Jialin Cheng, Zhihui Yan, Xiaojun Jia, "Continuous variable quantum conference network with a Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger entangled state," Photonics Res. 11, 533 (2023)

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Quantum Optics

    Received: Nov. 17, 2022

    Accepted: Jan. 31, 2023

    Published Online: Mar. 9, 2023

    The Author Email: Xiaojun Jia (jiaxj@sxu.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.1364/PRJ.481168

    Topics