Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 60, Issue 21, 2106002(2023)

Overlapping Spectrum Classification and Demodulation of Fiber Bragg Grating Sensing Network Based on CWT-PSO Algorithm

Jinhua Hu1,2、*, Bingli Zheng1, Yujing Deng1, Danping Ren1,2, and Jijun Zhao1,2
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Information and Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056038, Hebei , China
  • 2Hebei Key Laboratory of Security Protection Information Sensing and Processing, Handan 056038, Hebei , China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(10)
    Schematic diagram of FBG sensing system with flexible number of nodes
    FBG overlapping spectral signals and its CWT signals. (a) FBG spectral signals with different degrees of overlap; (b) CWT signals under different scale factors
    Change of extreme points of CWT signal under different degrees of overlap. (a) Extreme points of CWT signal of partially overlapped spectra vary with different degrees of overlap; (b) ratio of extreme points at different center wavelength gaps
    Flow chart of proposed algorithm
    Influence of different parameters on demodulation error. (a) FBG spectral signals under different degrees of overlap; (b) average detection error under different iterations; (c) average detection error under different population sizes; (d) average detection error under different weight factors
    Peak detection error under different degrees of overlap. (a) FBG spectral signals under different degrees of overlap; (b) average detection error of each peak
    FBG overlapping spectrum signals
    • Table 1. Classification results of FBG verlapping spectra under different degrees of overlap

      View table

      Table 1. Classification results of FBG verlapping spectra under different degrees of overlap

      PeakλBi /nmLi /nmri'Overlap
      11548.3250.2220.999Non
      21549.6140.2220.997Non
      31550.9530.1821.008Partial
      41551.2190.1821.008Partial
      51552.9410.1881.032Partial
      61553.1710.1901.032Partial
      71555.2740.2641.579Complete
      81555.3920.2641.579Complete
    • Table 2. Comparison of demodulation errors of different algorithms

      View table

      Table 2. Comparison of demodulation errors of different algorithms

      Average error /pmAverage time /s
      FBG1FBG2FBG3FBG4FBG5FBG6FBG7FBG8
      Mexh-CWT-8.26.2-6.81.8-9.26.4-13.69.20.084
      PSO-0.8-0.20.400.20.2-1.8-0.85.437
      DPSO0-0.2-0.400-0.80.40.23.851
      SSA-0.070.120.150.040.050.18-0.12-0.024.327
      CWT-PSO-0.230.01-3.483.10-0.17-0.070.200.201.521
    • Table 3. Comparison of FBG demodulation errors of different algorithms on channel 2

      View table

      Table 3. Comparison of FBG demodulation errors of different algorithms on channel 2

      Average error /pmAverage time /s
      FBG1FBG2FBG3FBG4FBG5FBG6
      Mexh-CWT-4.6-3.2-5.22.6-5.44.00.109
      PSO0.20-0.80.40-1.03.736
      DPSO0.40.20.20003.551
      SSA0.060.13-0.050.090.12-0.052.448
      CWT-PSO-2.102.09-3.403.29-2.472.490.958
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Jinhua Hu, Bingli Zheng, Yujing Deng, Danping Ren, Jijun Zhao. Overlapping Spectrum Classification and Demodulation of Fiber Bragg Grating Sensing Network Based on CWT-PSO Algorithm[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2023, 60(21): 2106002

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Fiber Optics and Optical Communications

    Received: Aug. 31, 2022

    Accepted: Nov. 8, 2022

    Published Online: Oct. 26, 2023

    The Author Email: Jinhua Hu (hujh84@hebeu.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/LOP222432

    Topics