Chinese Journal of Lasers, Volume. 52, Issue 4, 0402405(2025)
Multi‐Physical Field Coupling Analysis and Experimental Research in Annular Laser and Tube‐Electrode Electrochemical Hybrid Processing for Small Holes with Large Depth‐to‐Diameter Ratios
Fig. 1. Schematic diagrams of hybrid machining device and electrode for hybrid machining. (a) Hybrid machining device; (b) electrode for hybrid machining
Fig. 2. Multi-physical field coupling mechanisms in annular laser and tube-electrode electrochemical hybrid machining
Fig. 3. Simulation model of annular laser and tube-electrode electrochemical hybrid machining. (a) 2D symmetric simulation model; (b) magnified detail in Fig.3(a)
Fig. 4. Distributions of flow fields in hybrid processing. (a) Flow field distribution within inter-electrode gap; (b) flow speeds on workpiece surface under different inter-electrode gaps; (c) flow speeds in inter-electrode gap under different entrance pressures; (d) flow speed at line under different depth-to-diameter ratios
Fig. 5. Distributions of temperature fields in hybrid processing. (a) Interaction process between hybrid energy field and material; (b) relationship between workpiece surface temperature and machining time; (c) enlarged view at A in Fig.5(b); (d) variation of electrolyte temperature with machining time; (e) enlarged view at B in Fig.5(d)
Fig. 6. Distributions of current density values in hybrid processing. (a) Relationship among voltage, laser power and surface current density of workpiece in hybrid machining process; (b) enlarged view in Fig. 6(a)
Fig. 7. Distributions of gases in hybrid processing. (a) Variation of overall gas volume fraction with processing voltage and laser power; (b) relationship among processing voltage, laser power and gas volume fraction at 25 μm from workpiece surface
Fig. 8. Distributions of electrolyte conductivities in hybrid processing. (a) Relationship between processing voltage and conductivity without laser; (b) relationship between laser power and conductivity in hybrid machining process
Fig. 9. Variations of material removal depths in hybrid processing. (a) Relationship between processing voltage and removal depth when laser power is 0‒10 W; (b) enlarged view in Fig.9(a); (c) relationship between processing time and removal depth with laser power of 25 W
Fig. 10. Morphologies and microstructures of deep small holes. (a) Optical morphology of deep small hole in electrochemical machining; (b) optical morphology of deep small hole in hybrid machining; (c) SEM image of deep small hole in hybrid machining; (d) enlarged view of region A in Fig.10(c); (e) enlarged view of region B in Fig.10(c)
Fig. 11. Elemental distributions for regions A and B in Fig. 10(c). (a)(e) Ti; (b)(f) V; (c)(g) Al; (d)(h) O; (i)(j) EDS results
Fig. 12. Roughness values of deep small holes prepared by electrochemical machining (ECM) and hybrid machining (LECHM)
Fig. 13. Annular laser and tube-electrode electrochemical hybrid machining mechanism and material removal mechanism
|
|
|
|
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Yongbo Xu, Han Hu, Wanda Xie, Ke Chen, Ye Ding, Hao Tong, Lijun Yang. Multi‐Physical Field Coupling Analysis and Experimental Research in Annular Laser and Tube‐Electrode Electrochemical Hybrid Processing for Small Holes with Large Depth‐to‐Diameter Ratios[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2025, 52(4): 0402405
Category: Laser Micro-Nano Manufacturing
Received: Sep. 12, 2024
Accepted: Nov. 11, 2024
Published Online: Jan. 20, 2025
The Author Email: Tong Hao (tonghao@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn), Yang Lijun (yljtj@hit.edu.cn)
CSTR:32183.14.CJL241200