Journals Articles Conferences News About CLP
Submit a paper Email Alert
Search
Search
Articles
Journals
News
Advanced Search
Top Searches
2D MaterialsTransformation opticsQuantum PhotonicsSmall lasersSemiconductor UV PhotonicsSupersymmetric microring laser arrays

Chinese Journal of Lasers, Volume. 46, Issue 8, 0810002(2019)

Influence of Receiving Numerical Aperture and Rough Target Size on Ghost Imaging via Sparsity Constraint

Chenglong Wang1,2, Wenlin Gong1、*, Xuehui Shao3, and Shensheng Han1
Author Affiliations
  • 1 Key Laboratory for Quantum Optics, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China
  • 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 3 National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Aerospace Intelligent Control, Beijing 100089, China
    • show less
    AbstractGet PDF(in Chinese)
    Figures&Tables (3)
    Equations (0)
    References (24)
    Cited By (5)
    Tools
    Paper Information
    Topics
    Figures & Tables(3)
    Schematic of experimental GISC setup for rough surface target

    Fig. 1. Schematic of experimental GISC setup for rough surface target

    Download full size
    Experimental results of GISC for binary rough surface target. (A) Binary targets made of metal plate; (B) experimental results of GISC in different NA and L, where (a)-(j) correspond to NA=2.41×10-5, 4.82×10-5, 9.64×10-5, 1.93×10-4, 3.86×10-4, 7.71×10-4, 1.54×10-3, 3.08×10-3, 6.17×10-3, 1.23×10-2, respectively; (C) SSIM in different NA and L

    Fig. 2. Experimental results of GISC for binary rough surface target. (A) Binary targets made of metal plate; (B) experimental results of GISC in different NA and L, where (a)-(j) correspond to NA=2.41×10-5, 4.82×10-5, 9.64×10-5, 1.93×10-4, 3.86×10-4, 7.71×10-4, 1.54×10-3, 3.08×10-3, 6.17×10-3, 1.23×10-2, respectively; (C) SSIM in different NA and L

    Download full size
    Experimental results of GISC for gray-scale rough surface target. (A) Gray-scale targets made of film; (B) experimental results of GISC in different NA and L, where (a)-(j) correspond to NA=2.41×10-5, 4.82×10-5, 9.64×10-5, 1.93×10-4, 3.86×10-4, 7.71×10-4, 1.54×10-3, 3.08×10-3, 6.17×10-3, 1.23×10-2, respectively; (C) SSIM in different NA and L

    Fig. 3. Experimental results of GISC for gray-scale rough surface target. (A) Gray-scale targets made of film; (B) experimental results of GISC in different NA and L, where (a)-(j) correspond to NA=2.41×10-5, 4.82×10-5, 9.64×10-5, 1.93×10-4, 3.86×10-4, 7.71×10-4, 1.54×10-3, 3.08×10-3, 6.17×10-3, 1.23×10-2, respectively; (C) SSIM in different NA and L

    Download full size
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Chenglong Wang, Wenlin Gong, Xuehui Shao, Shensheng Han. Influence of Receiving Numerical Aperture and Rough Target Size on Ghost Imaging via Sparsity Constraint[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2019, 46(8): 0810002

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Set citation alerts for article
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: remote sensing and sensor

    Received: Mar. 1, 2019

    Accepted: Apr. 8, 2019

    Published Online: Aug. 13, 2019

    The Author Email: Gong Wenlin (gongwl@siom.ac.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/CJL201946.0810002

    Topics

    laser devices and laser physics
    Lasers and Laser Optics
    Laser physics
    laser manufacturing
    Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology