A Comparative Decomposition Analysis of the Factors Driving Energy-related Carbon Emissions from Three Typical Provinces in China: Jiangsu, Henan and Inner Mongolia

Xianzhao* LIU

doi:10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2020.05.006

Journal of Resources and Ecology, Volume. 11, Issue 5, 483(2020)

A Comparative Decomposition Analysis of the Factors Driving Energy-related Carbon Emissions from Three Typical Provinces in China: Jiangsu, Henan and Inner Mongolia

Xianzhao* LIU^*

Author Affiliations

School of Resource, Environment and Safety Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201, Hunan, China

show less

Figures & Tables(11)

Fig. 1. Fig. 1

Fig. 2. Fig. 2

Fig. 3. Fig. 3

Fig. 4. Fig. 4

Fig. 5. Fig. 5

Fig. 6. Fig. 6

Table 1.
Coefficients of the eight fossil energy resources used in carbon emission calculations
View table
View in Article
Table 1.
Coefficients of the eight fossil energy resources used in carbon emission calculations
Coefficients Raw coal Coke Crude oil Gasoline Kerosene Diesel oil Fuel oil Natural gas
e_i 0.7143 0.9714 1.4286 1.4714 1.4714 1.4571 1.4286 13.300
p_i 0.7559 0.8550 0.5857 0.5538 0.5714 0.5921 0.6185 0.4483

Table 2.
Cumulative decomposition results of various factors in the three provinces during 1996-2017 (unit: ×10⁶ t)

View table

View in Article

Table 2.
Cumulative decomposition results of various factors in the three provinces during 1996-2017 (unit: ×10⁶ t)

Provinces	ΔC_T	ΔC_EG	ΔC_ES	ΔC_EI	ΔC_PS	ΔC_UL	ΔC_RPR	ΔC_UPEC	ΔC_RPEC
Henan	102.87	270.03	-9.76	-158.80	4.62	6.74	-4.93	0.14	-5.17
Jiangsu	181.89	373.04	-5.92	-210.89	6.17	6.60	-1.51	6.94	7.46
Inner Mongolia	153.36	246.98	-4.04	-99.35	0.10	1.40	-2.19	1.15	9.31

Table 3.
Statistical indicators related to carbon emissions in the three provinces during the period of 1996-2017 (unit: %)
View table
View in Article
Table 3.
Statistical indicators related to carbon emissions in the three provinces during the period of 1996-2017 (unit: %)
Provinces PGR AGGR ACREI AUGR GRRPR AGRUPEC AGRRPEC AGRCC
Henan 18.33 34.66 -3.35 8.23 -38.93 0.10 -1.92 -1.45
Jiangsu 12.92 40.86 -3.34 7.22 -57.02 7.81 26.08 -1.13
Inner Mongolia 9.64 26.98 -3.01 2.92 -38.28 2.29 32.35 -0.57

Table 4.
Decomposition results of various factors affecting carbon emissions in the three provinces during different periods (unit: ×10⁶ t)

View table

View in Article

Table 4.
Decomposition results of various factors affecting carbon emissions in the three provinces during different periods (unit: ×10⁶ t)

Periods	Provinces	ΔC_T	ΔC_EG	ΔC_ES	ΔC_EI	ΔC_PS	ΔC_UL	ΔC_RPR	ΔC_UPEC	ΔC_RPEC
The 9th Five-Year(1996-2000)	Henan	2.71	26.48	-0.42	-25.65	1.00	1.22	-0.90	0.83	0.15
	Jiangsu	-16.41	36.73	-2.04	-50.73	0.74	0.91	-0.27	-2.22	0.47
	Inner Mongolia	5.02	16.33	-0.58	-9.84	0.15	0.16	-0.12	-0.89	-0.19
The 10th Five-Year(2001-2005)	Henan	78.40	57.30	2.75	19.78	0.34	0.41	-1.11	-2.99	1.92
	Jiangsu	83.50	58.67	3.71	15.34	1.37	2.00	-0.18	2.80	-0.21
	Inner Mongolia	70.84	51.52	2.18	3.76	0.20	0.36	-0.23	8.31	4.75
The 11th Five-Year (2006-2010)	Henan	6.76	101.11	-0.30	-89.64	1.27	1.30	-1.20	-3.88	-1.90
	Jiangsu	55.88	96.61	-2.01	-44.83	1.00	1.04	-0.16	3.16	1.07
	Inner Mongolia	61.21	83.06	-2.60	-28.70	0.23	0.79	-0.83	6.51	2.75
The 12th Five-Year (2011-2015)	Henan	-58.55	73.62	-10.03	-121.07	0.63	1.24	-1.33	-1.21	-0.40
	Jiangsu	12.19	91.74	-5.60	-78.64	0.36	0.77	-0.27	2.69	1.14
	Inner Mongolia	-31.51	69.83	-2.31	-85.40	0.14	0.56	-0.61	-12.08	-1.64
Initial stage of the 13th Five-Year(2016-2017)	Henan	14.57	14.31	-6.38	6.88	0.19	0.31	-0.22	2.22	-2.74
	Jiangsu	-2.15	18.22	-0.16	-21.53	0.18	0.21	-0.08	0.73	0.28
	Inner Mongolia	-13.04	7.36	-1.33	-22.04	0.07	0.05	-0.16	0.18	2.83

Table 5.
Description of statistical indices related to carbon emissions in the three provinces during different periods (unite: %)

View table

View in Article

Table 5.
Description of statistical indices related to carbon emissions in the three provinces during different periods (unite: %)

Statistical indicators	The 9th Five-Year(1996-2000)			The 10th Five-Year(2001-2005)			The 11th Five-Year(2006-2010)			The 12th Five-Year(2011-2015)			Initial stage of the 13th Five-Year (2016-2017)
Statistical indicators	Henan	Jiangsu	Inner Mongolia	Henan	Jiangsu	Inner Mongolia	Henan	Jiangsu	Inner Mongolia	Henan	Jiangsu	Inner Mongolia	Henan	Jiangsu	Inner Mongolia
PGR	3.00	3.05	2.85	-1.83	3.12	0.91	0.14	2.79	2.36	0.98	0.98	1.18	0.28	0.38	0.36
AGGR	10.54	12.82	11.93	14.38	24.76	16.67	15.03	16.03	22.23	10.19	10.59	10.36	7.81	7.20	4.00
ACREI	-7.06	-10.29	-4.88	4.43	3.34	1.27	-8.51	-4.88	-4.77	-10.66	-6.37	-8.35	3.54	-7.48	-10.13
AUGR	6.54	12.98	2.43	6.37	4.37	2.10	4.64	4.18	3.54	3.87	1.87	1.62	3.42	1.54	1.36
GRRPR	-5.89	-19.51	-6.07	-8.23	-13.76	-6.49	-8.93	-18.06	-13.42	-10.57	-12.13	-8.48	-3.22	-3.22	-2.14
AGRUPEC	4.25	-15.80	-10.26	-7.21	54.98	139.46	-10.16	15.74	49.46	-3.30	7.15	-18.51	26.81	5.37	4.82
AGRRPEC	0.20	11.79	-2.62	5.21	-3.97	75.26	-1.21	73.03	15.24	-0.52	18.21	-5.31	-33.10	11.44	45.18
AGRCCR	-0.63	-3.05	-0.66	1.77	2.24	2.38	-0.81	-1.24	-2.16	-6.32	-2.62	2.09	-16.65	-2.59	-3.69

Tools

Get Citation

Copy Citation Text

Xianzhao* LIU. A Comparative Decomposition Analysis of the Factors Driving Energy-related Carbon Emissions from Three Typical Provinces in China: Jiangsu, Henan and Inner Mongolia[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2020, 11(5): 483

Download Citation

EndNote(RIS)BibTex Plain Text

Set citation alerts for article

Save article for my favorites

Paper Information

Category: Resource Economy

Received: Mar. 16, 2020

Accepted: Apr. 22, 2020

Published Online: Oct. 17, 2020

The Author Email: LIU Xianzhao* (1100095@hnust.edu.cn)

DOI:10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2020.05.006

Topics

Resource Economy

Research Articles

Table 1. Coefficients of the eight fossil energy resources used in carbon emission calculations

Table 1. Coefficients of the eight fossil energy resources used in carbon emission calculations

Table 2. Cumulative decomposition results of various factors in the three provinces during 1996-2017 (unit: ×106 t)

Table 2. Cumulative decomposition results of various factors in the three provinces during 1996-2017 (unit: ×106 t)

Table 3. Statistical indicators related to carbon emissions in the three provinces during the period of 1996-2017 (unit: %)

Table 3. Statistical indicators related to carbon emissions in the three provinces during the period of 1996-2017 (unit: %)

Table 4. Decomposition results of various factors affecting carbon emissions in the three provinces during different periods (unit: ×106 t)

Table 4. Decomposition results of various factors affecting carbon emissions in the three provinces during different periods (unit: ×106 t)

Table 5. Description of statistical indices related to carbon emissions in the three provinces during different periods (unite: %)

Table 5. Description of statistical indices related to carbon emissions in the three provinces during different periods (unite: %)

Table 1.
Coefficients of the eight fossil energy resources used in carbon emission calculations

Table 1.
Coefficients of the eight fossil energy resources used in carbon emission calculations

Table 2.
Cumulative decomposition results of various factors in the three provinces during 1996-2017 (unit: ×10⁶ t)

Table 2.
Cumulative decomposition results of various factors in the three provinces during 1996-2017 (unit: ×10⁶ t)

Table 3.
Statistical indicators related to carbon emissions in the three provinces during the period of 1996-2017 (unit: %)

Table 3.
Statistical indicators related to carbon emissions in the three provinces during the period of 1996-2017 (unit: %)

Table 4.
Decomposition results of various factors affecting carbon emissions in the three provinces during different periods (unit: ×10⁶ t)

Table 4.
Decomposition results of various factors affecting carbon emissions in the three provinces during different periods (unit: ×10⁶ t)

Table 5.
Description of statistical indices related to carbon emissions in the three provinces during different periods (unite: %)

Table 5.
Description of statistical indices related to carbon emissions in the three provinces during different periods (unite: %)