Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 44, Issue 12, 1228006(2024)
BRDF Correction Based on Wide-Field Images of Environment-2 Satellite
Fig. 1. Graph of RossThick kernel function changing with illumination observation geometry
Fig. 2. Graph of LiSparseR kernel function changs with illumination observation geometry
Fig. 3. Graph of RossThick Maignan kernel function changing with illumination observation geometry
Fig. 4. Normalized spectral response curves for each spectral segment of HJ-2A CCD. (a) CCD 1; (b) CCD 2; (c) CCD 3; (d) CCD 4
Fig. 5. Normalized spectral response curves for each spectral segment of HJ-2B CCD. (a) CCD 1; (b) CCD 2; (c) CCD 3; (d) CCD 4
Fig. 6. Scatter distributions of measured BRDF data in Dunhuang field. (a) Reflectance distribution at 490 nm; (b) reflectance distribution at 560 nm; (c) reflectance distribution at 660 nm; (d) reflectance distribution at 830 nm
Fig. 7. Scatter distribution of main plane measured BRDF data in Zhaodong (solar zenith angle is 42°). (a) Reflectance distribution at 490 nm; (b) reflectance distribution at 560 nm; (c) reflectance distribution at 660 nm; (d) reflectance distribution at 830 nm
Fig. 8. Flow chart of BRDF correction for wide-field images of Environment-2 Satellite
Fig. 9. Calculation results of image angle for HJ-2B_CCD1. (a) Solar zenith angle; (b) solar azimuth angle; (c) view zenith angle; (d) view azimuth angle
Fig. 11. Comparison of main plane model data fitting results in Dunhuang filed area (solar zenith angle is 50°). (a) 490 nm; (b) 560 nm; (c) 660 nm; (d) 830 nm
Fig. 12. Regression fitting results between simulation values of RTLSR model and RTMLSR model and all data in Dunhuang field area. (a)(e) 490 nm; (b)(f) 560 nm; (c)(g) 660 nm; (d)(h) 830 nm
Fig. 13. Comparison of main plane model data fitting results in Zhaodong area (solar zenith angle is 42°). (a) 490 nm; (b) 560 nm; (c) 660 nm; (d) 830 nm
Fig. 14. Regression fitting results between simulation values of RTLSR model and RTMLSR model and main plane data in Zhaodong area. (a)(e) 490 nm; (b)(f) 560 nm; (c)(g) 660 nm; (d)(h) 830 nm
Fig. 15. Comparison images of HJ-2B satellite multispectral camera before and after BRDF correction. (a) Uncorrected whole scene image; (b) atmospheric corrected whole scene image; (c) BRDF corrected whole scene image; (d) uncorrected partial map of Dunhuang filed area; (e) atmospheric corrected partial map of Dunhuang filed area; (f) BRDF corrected partial map of Dunhuang filed area
Fig. 16. Variation curves of reflectance before and after BRDF correction in each band in Dunhuang field area. (a) HJ-2B_CCD1_20210303; (b) HJ-2A_CCD4_20210126
Fig. 17. Variation curves of reflectance before and after BRDF correction in each band in Zhaodong area. (a) HJ-2A_CCD1_20210901; (b) HJ-2A_CCD2_20210917
|
|
|
|
|
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Haizhang Wu, Honglian Huang, Xiaobing Sun, Xiao Liu, Rufang Ti, Yuxuan Wang. BRDF Correction Based on Wide-Field Images of Environment-2 Satellite[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2024, 44(12): 1228006
Category: Remote Sensing and Sensors
Received: Jan. 22, 2024
Accepted: Mar. 18, 2024
Published Online: Jun. 7, 2024
The Author Email: Huang Honglian (hlhuang@aiofm.ac.cn)