Chinese Journal of Lasers, Volume. 48, Issue 3, 0311001(2021)

Fourier-Transform Method for Analyzing Angular Errors from Interferograms for Mosaic Grating Alignment

Jian Han1,2、*, Mingda Jiang1,2, Kai Zhang1,2, Dong Xiao1,2, and Yongtian Zhu1,2
Author Affiliations
  • 1National Astronomical Observatories/Nanjing Institute of Astronomical Optics & Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210042,China;
  • 2CAS Key Laboratory of Astronomical Optics & Technology, Nanjing Institute of Astronomical Optics & Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210042,China;
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(12)
    Mosaic grating coordinate system and alignment setup for 0-order. (a) Mosaic grating tiling parameters; (b) interferometer setup for 0-order of mosaic grating
    Filtering region of nine-pixel average algorithm
    Interference fringe pattern of mosaic grating G2 with the different misalignments
    A Fourier-transform (FT)-based fringe calculation algorithm of misalignment error in the mosaic grating interferometric technique
    Relationship between misalignment angle Δθy and micrometer-head reading in y direction (Δθx=0)
    Relationship between misalignment angle Δθx and micrometer-head reading in x direction (Δθy=0)
    Misalignment angle variation under different micrometer-head readings in the mosaic grating alignment system
    Error analysis of calculated misalignment angle. (a) Comparison of calculated and actual misalignment angles; (b) misalignment angle error distribution
    Interferogram fringe comparisons for slight angle variation. (a)(b) With 0.4 μrad difference of Δθx angle error; (c)(d) with 0.946 μrad difference of Δθy angle error
    • Table 1. Angular precision comparisons for Fourier-transform fringe calculation and the set angle

      View table

      Table 1. Angular precision comparisons for Fourier-transform fringe calculation and the set angle

      No.Δθx /μradΔθy /μradΔz /nm
      Set valueCalculated valueSet valueCalculated valueSet valueCalculated value
      18080.1400.0023158.12158.2
      200.0105160160.2078110.73110.74
      3109.91223030.1819254.61254.12
      43029.8061436060.1754316.31316.40
    • Table 2. Angular comparison for different micrometer-head readings

      View table

      Table 2. Angular comparison for different micrometer-head readings

      Angle Δθy calibrationAngle Δθx calibration
      Relativeposition/μmΔθx /μradRelativeposition/μmΔθy /μrad
      02.082654789867700.0463922748852
      0.52.53526508175270.50.2938363677108
      1.03.22537206994211.00.7203864363864
      1.53.67344820808181.51.7647825563767
      2.04.31049329039612.02.1876069811494
      2.54.79702506310792.52.5457884447918
      3.05.32476347173873.02.9642370964542
      3.56.08393367680593.54.0578362957872
      4.06.44688772094774.04.4267976178890
      4.57.21007985794114.54.7716809875211
      5.07.86374110208335.05.0750356366581
      5.58.30671265780605.55.6737606984746
      6.08.96993036156856.56.9679236214245
      6.59.72522068666097.57.7812553901410
      7.010.11785107085948.59.1578520400525
      7.510.81120345275159.59.8648688552040
      8.011.503255676941810.511.3261324212112
      8.511.998022182374811.512.0590578283417
      9.012.707098752054512.513.5580491207188
      9.513.279025546076214.515.0932106198199
      10.013.844089894449916.517.0530354239669
      11.015.226053414998618.519.2436857344570
      12.016.397620525834620.521.3697713075448
      13.017.679704253983522.523.5515972589135
    • Table 3. Misalignment angle resolution comparison for different fringe algorithms

      View table

      Table 3. Misalignment angle resolution comparison for different fringe algorithms

      AlgorithmΔθx /μradΔθy /μrad
      Fig.9(a)Fig.9(b)Fig.9(c)Fig.9(d)
      Peak algorithm6.315376.315372.358752.35875
      Nine-pixel average algorithm6.083936.446891.764782.54579
      Set value6.058836.462751.69292.63926
      Deviation0.0251-0.015860.07188-0.09347
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Jian Han, Mingda Jiang, Kai Zhang, Dong Xiao, Yongtian Zhu. Fourier-Transform Method for Analyzing Angular Errors from Interferograms for Mosaic Grating Alignment[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2021, 48(3): 0311001

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: spectroscopy

    Received: Jul. 30, 2020

    Accepted: Sep. 7, 2020

    Published Online: Feb. 2, 2021

    The Author Email: Han Jian (jhan@niaot.ac.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/CJL202148.0311001

    Topics