Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 41, Issue 10, 1012003(2021)

Depth Inversion of Coastal Waters Based on Bi-LSTM

Xinliang Pan1, Renhui Yang2, Tao Jiang1、*, Baikai Sui1, Chenxi Liu1, and Zhen Zhang1
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Geodesy and Geomatics, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266590, China
  • 2Southern China Surveying & Mapping Technology Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong 510221, China;
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(13)
    Study area and distribution of bathymetric points
    Overall technical roadmap for research
    Cell structure of LSTM
    Structure of Bi-LSTM
    Schematic diagram of 1D-CNN
    Charts of accuracy comparison. (a) Bi-LSTM model; (b) 1D-CNN model; (c) improved Stumpf model; (d) Stumpf model
    Results of 5-fold cross-validation
    Inversion result of Bi-LSTM and distribution of section lines
    Accuracy comparison of different models on different section lines. (a) Section line a; (b) section line b
    • Table 1. Band information of Sentinel-2A image

      View table

      Table 1. Band information of Sentinel-2A image

      Band numberBandCentral wavelength /μmSpatial resolution /m
      1Coastal aerosol0.44360
      2Blue0.49010
      3Green0.56010
      4Red0.66510
      5Vegetation red edge0.70520
      6Vegetation red edge0.74020
      7Vegetation red edge0.78320
      8NIR0.84210
      8aVegetation red edge0.86520
      9Water vapour0.94560
      10SWIR-Cirrus1.37560
      11SWIR1.61020
      12SWIR2.19020
    • Table 2. Accuracy comparison of different models

      View table

      Table 2. Accuracy comparison of different models

      ModelMRE /%RMSE /mMAE /m
      Bi-LSTM18.930.850.60
      1D-CNN33.121.040.76
      Improved Stumpf37.440.970.76
      Stumpf47.991.120.88
    • Table 3. Accuracy comparison of different models

      View table

      Table 3. Accuracy comparison of different models

      ModelMRE /%RMSE /mMAE /mR2
      Bi-LSTM18.440.880.630.93
      1D-CNN32.411.100.820.90
      ImprovedStumpf37.490.980.770.91
      Stumpf45.081.120.890.89
    • Table 4. Accuracy comparison of different models under different water depth intervals

      View table

      Table 4. Accuracy comparison of different models under different water depth intervals

      ModelEvaluation method0--2 m2--4 m4--6 m6--8 m8--10 m10--12 m
      MRE /%208.1729.6322.4911.387.618.62
      StumpfRMSE /m1.301.021.380.970.861.09
      MAE /m0.970.841.120.780.680.90
      MRE /%157.6522.3019.169.788.397.33
      Improved StumpfRMSE /m1.070.821.190.840.920.94
      MAE /m0.770.630.960.670.750.76
      MRE /%124.8927.0918.5813.778.705.68
      1D-CNNRMSE /m0.941.061.151.240.960.87
      MAE /m0.590.740.930.950.770.60
      MRE /%57.9216.8514.6910.488.535.11
      Bi-LSTMRMSE /m0.620.670.991.010.960.76
      MAE /m0.380.480.730.720.760.53
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Xinliang Pan, Renhui Yang, Tao Jiang, Baikai Sui, Chenxi Liu, Zhen Zhang. Depth Inversion of Coastal Waters Based on Bi-LSTM[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2021, 41(10): 1012003

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology

    Received: Nov. 2, 2020

    Accepted: Dec. 30, 2020

    Published Online: May. 8, 2021

    The Author Email: Tao Jiang (tjiang@126.com)

    DOI:10.3788/AOS202141.1012003

    Topics