Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 44, Issue 13, 1312002(2024)

Digital Photoelastic Stress Field Analysis Method Based on SANet

Haoxing He, Niannian Chen*, Ling Wu, Yong Fan, Xuejiao Zhang, and Chuan Qiu
Author Affiliations
  • School of Computer Science and Technology, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, Sichuan , China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(12)
    Stress analysis neural network
    Residual block
    Training process
    Loss variation. (a) Total loss; (b) branch loss
    Simulation data test results of three methods. (a) Wrapped isochromatic; (b)-(d) QGPU+SD; (e)-(g) DLPU+SD; (h)-(j) SANet; (k)-(m) ground truth
    Noise data test results of three methods. (a) Wrapped isochromatic; (b)-(d) QGPU+SD; (e)-(g) DLPU+SD; (h)-(j) SANet (without noise trained); (k)-(m) SANet; (n)-(p) ground truth
    Three indicator values of SANet model changed with noise. (a) MSE; (b) PSNR; (c) SSIM
    Test results of radial compression discs in actual scenarios. (a) Wrapped isochromatic; (b)-(d) QGPU+SD; (e)-(g) DLPU+SD; (h)-(j) SANet; (k)-(m) ground truth
    Test results of materials with different d and f. (a) Wrapped isochromatic; (b) output of SANet; (c) SANet output multiplied by scaling factor; (d) ground truth
    • Table 1. Training set parameters

      View table

      Table 1. Training set parameters

      ParameterValue
      R /mm10-30
      P /kN30-300
      f /(N·mm-17.222
      d /mm4.8
      Resolution /(pixel×pixel)256×256
      Noise standard deviation /rad0-0.5
    • Table 2. Comparison of calculation results between SANet and phased processing methods

      View table

      Table 2. Comparison of calculation results between SANet and phased processing methods

      MethodMSEPSNRSSIM
      σxσyτxyσxσyτxyσxσyτxy
      QGPU+SD1.645.491.1313.5120.6728.850.840.910.93
      DLPU+SD0.891.060.0211.3718.3541.560.690.790.97
      SANet0.020.050.0143.0945.7245.550.980.990.97
    • Table 3. Indicator values of noise test results

      View table

      Table 3. Indicator values of noise test results

      MethodMSEPSNRSSIM
      σxσyτxyσxσyτxyσxσyτxy
      QUPU+SD2.426.321.0910.1911.0224.540.360.370.78
      DLPU+SD0.921.600.0211.2816.1138.180.530.600.92
      SANet (without noise trained)0.391.650.6822.9021.8032.100.320.530.32
      SANet0.030.060.0141.4042.7044.810.950.920.94
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Haoxing He, Niannian Chen, Ling Wu, Yong Fan, Xuejiao Zhang, Chuan Qiu. Digital Photoelastic Stress Field Analysis Method Based on SANet[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2024, 44(13): 1312002

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology

    Received: Jan. 9, 2024

    Accepted: Mar. 21, 2024

    Published Online: Jul. 4, 2024

    The Author Email: Chen Niannian (chenniannian@swust.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/AOS240465

    Topics