Chinese Optics, Volume. 15, Issue 5, 878(2022)

Research progress of single molecule biological detection methods and applications

Wen-chao ZHOU1, Zheng-hao LI1,2, and Jie WU1,2
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Applied Optics, Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130033, China
  • 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(10)
    (a) Schematic diagram of the anionic Au25(SG)18 cluster-enhanced nanopore detection and (b) it′s corresponding current traces[18]
    Various material framework of zero-mode waveguide (ZMW) plasma nanopore[20]. (a)The autofluorescence of Al ZMW monoprotein was enhanced by deep ultraviolet plasma. (b) Au-Si zero-mode hybrid waveguides for enhanced single-molecule detection. (c)The plasma nanopore device structure enhances single-molecule fluorescence detection, which consists of nanopore prepared by gold film and nanopore prepared by independent silicon nitride film.
    Transporting C-A3 and mC-A3 through a wild-type aerolysin membrane channel[33]. (a) All-atom model of the full-length aerolysin nanopore system. Aerolysin (gray) was inserted into a lipid bilayer membrane (dark blue), while nucleotides (red) were placed at the entrance of the pore. (b) Structure of methylated and unmethylated oligonucleotides containing methylcytosine and cytosine, respectively. The only difference between them was the addition of a methyl group which is marked in red
    Magnetic bead seeding[35]. (a) Schematic of the magnetic bead seeding on HIH microwell arrays. (b) The bead distribution in arrays with varying well diameters, array pitches and well depths, for multiple-seeding cycles. (c,d) ×40 magnification bright field microscopy image of a microwell array before and after magnetic bead seeding, respectively. (e) ×100 magnification bright field microscopy image of a microwell array after seeding
    Schematic representation of digital ELISA[37]. (a) Antibody-coated beads captures the single target biomolecules, which are then detected by another antibody conjugated with a labeled antibody. Loading of beads into femtoliter well arrays for isolation and detection of single molecules. (b) Fluorescence image of a small section of the femtoliter well array after signals from single molecules are generated. While the majority of femtoliter chambers contain a bead from the assay, only a fraction of those beads possesses catalytic enzyme activity, indicative of a single, bound protein. (c) The concentration of protein in the bulk solution is correlated to the percentage of beads that have bound a protein molecule
    MicroRNA detection with digital single molecule detection technology[43]. (a) Individual miRNA molecules are captured by hybridization to probecoated paramagnetic beads, along with biotinylated detector probe. The streptavidin-conjugated enzyme is subsequently added to label the captured miRNA complex, to allow generation of a fluorescent signal upon incubation with a fluorogenic enzyme substrate. (b) Individual beads are loaded along with fluorogenic substrate into a femtoliter microwell array, which is subsequently sealed with oil. The number of fluorescent “on” wells is then counted as a digital readout of the target miRNA concentration
    Illustration of a WGM cavity excited by frustrated total internal reflection at a prism surface[51]
    Detection of virus particles of aptamer on solid substrates[79]
    Two CRISPR methods for detecting viral RNA[89]. (a) SHERLOCK assay; (b) DETECTR assay
    • Table 1. Advantages and disadvantages of various methods of single molecule biological detection

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Advantages and disadvantages of various methods of single molecule biological detection

      Single molecule methodsMain detection moleculesMain advantagesMain disadvantages
      NanoporeLong and short chains of DNA and RNA, proteins, and polypeptideRequired low sample volume; compact and simple; allows label free detection Prone to error; high cost
      SERSVirus, protein, biomarkersHigh sensitivity; high selectivityNonspecific binding with interfering molecule can give false signals
      Digital single moleculeNucleic acid, protein, small moleculeHigh specificity; quantitative; wide dynamic rangeLimited multiplexing capabilities; high cost
      WGMVirus, Protein conformation etc.High sensitivity; easy to manufacture; low costLow specificity, limited to frequency and wavelength
      CRISPRNucleic acidLow cost; high efficiencyNot suitable for multiple analyte detection, required sample pretreatment
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Wen-chao ZHOU, Zheng-hao LI, Jie WU. Research progress of single molecule biological detection methods and applications[J]. Chinese Optics, 2022, 15(5): 878

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Review

    Received: Jun. 14, 2022

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Sep. 29, 2022

    The Author Email:

    DOI:10.37188/CO.2022-0129

    Topics