Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 62, Issue 2, 0209001(2025)

Diagnostic Method for Exhaled Aerosol Particle Field Based on Digital In-Line Holography

Dechao Zhao1、*, Qieni Lü2, Huaying Wang1,3,4, Di Zhen1, and Zhongwei Sun1
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Mathematics and Physics, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056038, Hebei , China
  • 2School of Precision Instrument and Opto-Electronics Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
  • 3Hebei Computational Optical Imaging and Photoelectric Detection Technology Innovation Center, Handan 056038, Hebei , China
  • 4Hebei International Joint Research Center for Computational Optical Imaging and Intelligent Sensing, Handan 056038, Hebei , China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(14)
    Exhaled aerosol particle field experimental setup
    Processing results of the standard particle field holography. (a) Hologram; (b) reconstructed image; (c) binary image; (d) particle size distribution
    Exhaled aerosol hologram processing results. (a)‒(c) Healthy; (d)‒(f) influenza infection
    PDF (left) and CDF (right) of exhaled aerosol particle sizes for female volunteer No. 1. (a) Healthy; (b) infected
    PDF (left) and CDF (right) of exhaled aerosol particle sizes for male volunteer No. 9. (a) Healthy; (b) infected
    Results of characteristic diameter with different particle numbers
    Results for each volunteer with different particle numbers. (a) D10; (b) D32
    Results of characteristic diameter for 24 volunteers
    The relationship between correct rate and diagnostic criteria
    • Table 1. Dj, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation of healthy and infected volunteers

      View table

      Table 1. Dj, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation of healthy and infected volunteers

      IndexCharacteristic diameter (healthy)Characteristic diameter (infected)
      D10D32D43DN50D10D32D43DN50
      Dj /μm10.62417.24019.86610.09612.27019.86822.11911.360
      Standard deviation /μm1.0140.9461.9681.6571.3281.9062.2981.925
      CV /%9.545.499.9116.6410.829.5910.3916.95
    • Table 2. Test results based on Dj of healthy volunteer

      View table

      Table 2. Test results based on Dj of healthy volunteer

      Dj /μmCorrect rate /%
      Healthy volunteerInfected volunteer
      D10= 10.62448.5092.80
      D32= 17.24049.1490.79
      D43= 19.86653.8584.80
      DN50= 10.09653.5277.20
    • Table 3. Test results based on Dj of infected volunteer

      View table

      Table 3. Test results based on Dj of infected volunteer

      Dj /μmCorrect rate /%
      Healthy volunteerInfected volunteer
      D10= 12.27078.8064.72
      D32= 19.86888.9068.48
      D43= 22.11984.8864.55
      DN50= 11.36071.9552.09
    • Table 4. Diagnostic criteria

      View table

      Table 4. Diagnostic criteria

      Characteristic diameterD10D32D43DN50
      Benchmark value /μm11.4617.9320.1210.39
    • Table 5. Test results based on the diagnostic criteria

      View table

      Table 5. Test results based on the diagnostic criteria

      Diagnostic criteria /μmCorrect rate /%
      Healthy volunteerInfected volunteer
      D10= 11.4670.4376.26
      D32= 17.9381.6580.16
      D43= 20.1286.8475.30
      DN50= 10.3958.9167.88
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Dechao Zhao, Qieni Lü, Huaying Wang, Di Zhen, Zhongwei Sun. Diagnostic Method for Exhaled Aerosol Particle Field Based on Digital In-Line Holography[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2025, 62(2): 0209001

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Holography

    Received: May. 17, 2024

    Accepted: Jun. 11, 2024

    Published Online: Jan. 20, 2025

    The Author Email:

    DOI:10.3788/LOP241293

    CSTR:32186.14.LOP241293

    Topics