Journals Articles Conferences News About CLP
Submit a paper Email Alert
Search
Search
Articles
Journals
News
Advanced Search
Top Searches
2D MaterialsTransformation opticsQuantum PhotonicsSmall lasersSemiconductor UV PhotonicsSupersymmetric microring laser arrays

Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 57, Issue 16, 161006(2020)

Improved ViBe Moving Object Detection Algorithm to Eliminate Ghost and Shadow

Pengxiang Cui* and Fengqin Yu
Author Affiliations
  • School of Internet of Things Engeneering, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214122, China
    • show less
    AbstractGet PDF(in Chinese)
    Figures&Tables (6)
    Equations (0)
    References (12)
    Cited By (3)
    Tools
    Paper Information
    Topics
    Figures & Tables(6)
    Schematic diagram of foreground target extraction based on ViBe algorithm

    Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of foreground target extraction based on ViBe algorithm

    Download full size
    Flow chart of improved ViBe algorithm

    Fig. 2. Flow chart of improved ViBe algorithm

    Download full size
    Contrast diagram of simulation results of ghost detection and elimination. (a) Original video images; (b) traditional ViBe algorithm; (c) algorithm in Ref.[11]; (d) algorithm in Ref.[12]; (e) proposed algorithm

    Fig. 3. Contrast diagram of simulation results of ghost detection and elimination. (a) Original video images; (b) traditional ViBe algorithm; (c) algorithm in Ref.[11]; (d) algorithm in Ref.[12]; (e) proposed algorithm

    Download full size
    Contrast diagram of simulation results of shadow detection and elimination. (a) Original video images; (b) traditional ViBe algorithm; (c) algorithm in Ref.[11]; (d) algorithm in Ref.[12]; (e) proposed algorithm

    Fig. 4. Contrast diagram of simulation results of shadow detection and elimination. (a) Original video images; (b) traditional ViBe algorithm; (c) algorithm in Ref.[11]; (d) algorithm in Ref.[12]; (e) proposed algorithm

    Download full size

    • Table 1. Performance comparison of average accuracy for different algorithms

      View table

      Table 1. Performance comparison of average accuracy for different algorithms

      VideoTraditional ViBe algorithm[2]Method in Ref. [11]Method in Ref. [12]Our algorithm
      Baseline0.92750.92580.89300.9281
      Dynamic background0.54860.78610.83390.7516
      Camera jitter0.53850.81200.74830.8056
      Intermittent object motion0.65600.74890.71320.7542
      Shadow0.84390.80450.83510.8579
      Thermal0.93450.95360.89300.9458

    • Table 2. Comparison of processing speed of the four algorithms

      View table

      Table 2. Comparison of processing speed of the four algorithms

      VideoTraditional ViBe algorithm[2]Method in Ref. [11]Method in Ref. [12]Our algorithm
      HighwayII35.1228.2730.5833.27
      Cubicle31.5224.7327.1529.36
      BusStation31.1424.2526.8028.97
      PeopleInShade30.7523.8326.0228.26
      Bungalows31.2024.3126.8729.14
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Pengxiang Cui, Fengqin Yu. Improved ViBe Moving Object Detection Algorithm to Eliminate Ghost and Shadow[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(16): 161006

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Set citation alerts for article
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Image Processing

    Received: Nov. 22, 2019

    Accepted: Jan. 6, 2020

    Published Online: Aug. 5, 2020

    The Author Email: Pengxiang Cui (2858197960@qq.com)

    DOI:10.3788/LOP57.161006

    Topics

    laser devices and laser physics
    Lasers and Laser Optics
    Laser physics
    laser manufacturing
    Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology