AEROSPACE SHANGHAI, Volume. 41, Issue 3, 47(2024)
Overview of Takeover Control Technology for Failed Spacecraft
[10] Y OHKAMI, I KAWANO. Autonomous rendezvous and docking by engineering test satellite VII:a challenge of Japan in guidance,navigation and control-breakwell memorial lecture. Acta Astronautica, 53, 1-8(2003).
[11] J WILSON. Satellite hopes ride on orbital express-DARPA plans to extend the lives of satellites already in orbit by refueling and upgrading them in space. Aerospace America, 45, 30-35(2007).
[12] A BOSSE, W BARNDS, M BROWN et al. SUMO: spacecraft for universal modification of orbits, 5419, 36-46(2004).
[13] E MARTIN, E DUPUIS, J PIEDBOEUF et al. The TECSAS mission from a Canadian perspective, 1-11(2005).
[14] J MCGUIRE, B ROBERTS. Hubble robotic servicing and de-orbit mission:Risk reduction and mitigation, 6255(2007).
[15] H LIU, Y TAN, Y LIU et al. Development of Chinese large-scale space end-effector. Journal of Central South University, 18, 600-609(2011).
[16] R SARAVANAN, S RAMABALAN, C BALAMURUGAN. Evolutionary optimal trajectory planning for industrial robot with payload constraints. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 38, 1213-1226(2008).
[17] Z LIU, P HUANG, J YAN et al. Multi-objective genetic algorithms for trajectory optimization of space manipulator, 2810-2815(2009).
[18] K NANOS, F XYDI-CHRYSAFI, E PAPADOPOULOS. On impact de-orbiting for satellites using a prescribed impedance behavior, 2126-2131(2019).
[20] L ZONG, J LUO, M WANG. Optimal concurrent control for space manipulators rendezvous and capturing targets under actuator saturation. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 56, 4841-4855(2020).
[21] Y TSUDA, S NAKASUKA. New attitude motion following control algorithm for capturing tumbling object in space. Acta Astronautica, 53, 847-861(2003).
[25] A LEDKOV, V ASLANOV. Review of contact and contactless active space debris removal approaches. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 134, 100858(2022).
[26] B MOGHADDAM, R CHHABRA. On the guidance,navigation and control of in-orbit space robotic missions:A survey and prospective vision. Acta Astronautica, 184, 70-100(2021).
[28] T FUKUDA, S NAKAGAWA, Y KAWAUCHI et al. Structure decision method for self organising robots based on cell structures-CEBOT, 1-8(1989).
[29] T FUKUDA, Y KAWAUCHI, H ASAMA. Analysis and evaluation of cellular robotics (CEBOT) as a distributed intelligent system by communication information amount, 827-834(1990).
[31] M KORTMAN, S RUHL, J WEISE et al. Building block based iBoss approach: fully modular systems with standard interface to enhance future satellites, 2, 1-11(2015).
[33] H HAKIMA, M BAZZOCCHI, M EMAMI. A deorbiter CubeSat for active orbital debris removal. Advances in Space Research, 61, 2377-2392(2018).
[38] H CHANG, P HUANG, Y ZHANG et al. Distributed control allocation for spacecraft attitude takeover control via cellular space robot. Journal of Guidance,Control,and Dynamics, 41, 2499-2506(2018).
[39] H CHANG, P HUANG, Z LU et al. Inertia parameters identification for cellular space robot through interaction. Aerospace Science and Technology, 71, 464-474(2017).
[41] M SHAN, J GUO, E GILL. Review and comparison of active space debris capturing and removal methods. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 80, 18-32(2016).
[42] J FORSHAW, G AGLIETTI, S FELLOWES et al. The active space debris removal mission RemoveDebris. Part 1:From concept to launch. Acta Astronautica, 168, 293-309(2020).
[43] G AGLIETTI, B TAYLOR, S FELLOWES et al. The active space debris removal mission RemoveDebris. Part 2:In orbit operations. Acta Astronautica, 168, 310-322(2020).
[44] J FORSHAW, G AGLIETTI, N NAVARATHINAM et al. RemoveDEBRIS:An in-orbit active debris removal demonstration mission. Acta Astronautica, 127, 448-463(2016).
[45] L CERCÓS, R STEFANESCU, A MEDINA et al. Validation of a net active debris removal simulator within parabolic flight experiment, 9-27(2014).
[46] R AXTHELM, B KLOTZ, I RETAT et al. Net capture mechanism for debris removal demonstration mission, 18-21(2017).
[47] M SHAN, J GUO, E GILL et al. Validation of space net deployment modeling methods using parabolic flight experiment. Journal of Guidance,Control,and Dynamics, 40, 3319-3327(2017).
[54] J SI, Z PANG, Z DU et al. Dynamics modeling and simulation of a net closing mechanism for tether-net capture. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 1-16(2021).
[56] P HUANG, Z HU, Z MENG. Coupling dynamics modelling and optimal coordinated control of tethered space robot. Aerospace Science and Technology, 41, 36-46(2015).
[57] Y LIU, Z MA, F ZHANG, P HUANG. Time-varying formation planning and scaling control for tethered space net robot. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 59, 6717-6728(2023).
[58] Y LIU, P HUANG, F ZHANG et al. Distributed formation control using artificial potentials and neural network for constrained multiagent systems. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 28, 697-704(2018).
[59] Y ZHAO, F ZHANG, P HUANG et al. Impulsive super-twisting sliding mode control for space debris capturing via tethered space net robot. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 67, 6874-6882(2019).
[61] R ZOU, Y CHEN, H KOIVULA et al. The performance of BeiDou signals in high latitude area in Nordic countries, 1-6(2016).
[63] P HUANG, F ZHANG, J CAI et al. Dexterous tethered space robot:design,measurement,control,and experiment. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 53, 1452-1468(2017).
[64] P HUANG, Z MENG, J GUO et al. Tethered space robot: dynamics,measurement,and control(2017).
[66] S NISHIDA, S KAWAMOTO. Strategy for capturing of a tumbling space debris, 68, 113-120(2011).
[71] X LIU, H CHANG, P HUANG et al. Robust output-feedback predictive control for proximity eddy current detumbling with constraints and uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 59, 858-870(2022).
[72] X LIU, H CHANG, P HUANG. Eddy current de-tumbling large geostationary debris based on feedback linearization model predictive control. Aerospace Science and Technology, 112, 106641(2021).
[74] N GÓMEZ, S WALKER. Eddy currents applied to de-tumbling of space debris:Analysis and validation of approximate proposed methods. Acta Astronautica, 114, 34-53(2015).
[75] P COLMENAREJO, M GRAZIANO, G NOVELLI et al. On ground validation of debris removal technologies. Acta Astronautica, 158, 206-219(2019).
[77] R YOUNGQUIST, M NURGE, S STARR et al. A slowly rotating hollow sphere in a magnetic field:First steps to de-spin a space object. American Journal of Physics, 84, 181-191(2016).
[78] F SUGAI, S ABIKO, T TSUJITA et al. Development of an eddy current brake system for detumbling malfunctioning satellites, 325-330(2012).
[79] L KING, G PARKER, S DESHMUKH et al. Spacecraft formation-flying using inter-vehicle coulomb forces(2002).
[80] T BENNETT, D STEVENSON, E HOGAN et al. Prospects and challenges of touchless electrostatic detumbling of small bodies. Advances in Space Research, 56, 557-568(2015).
[84] M NORMAN, M PECK. Simplified model of a flux-pinned spacecraft formation. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 33, 814-822(2010).
[85] L JONES, M PECK. Stability and control of a flux-pinned docking interface for spacecraft, 1-12(2010).
[86] M SORGENFREI, L JONES, S JOSHI et al. Testbed validation of location-scheduled control of a reconfigurable flux-pinned spacecraft formation. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 50, 1235-1247(2013).
[87] J SHOER, M PECK. Flux-pinned interfaces for the assembly,manipulation,and reconfiguration of modular space systems. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 57, 667-688(2009).
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Panfeng HUANG, Yingbo LU, Fan ZHANG, Ya LIU. Overview of Takeover Control Technology for Failed Spacecraft[J]. AEROSPACE SHANGHAI, 2024, 41(3): 47
Category:
Received: Mar. 25, 2024
Accepted: --
Published Online: Sep. 3, 2024
The Author Email: