Chinese Journal of Ship Research, Volume. 20, Issue 1, 135(2025)

Ship local path planning method based on three-dimensional potential field model

Qunpeng WANG1... Longhao LI2,3, Hongxu GUAN4,5, Jialun LIU3,6,7, Jianzhe CAI4,5, Zhengrong SHA1 and Jinshui ZHANG1 |Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Shipping and Maritime Studies, Guangzhou Maritime University, Guangzhou 510725, China
  • 2School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China
  • 3Intelligent Transport System Research Center, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China
  • 4School of Navigation, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China
  • 5Hubei Key Laboratory of Inland Shipping Technology, Wuhan 430063, China
  • 6State Key Laboratory of Maritime Technology and Safety(Wuhan University of Technology), Wuhan 430063, China
  • 7National Engineering Research Center for Water Transport Safety, Wuhan 430063, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(16)
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    • Table 1. Settings for simulation parameters

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Settings for simulation parameters

      参数数值参数数值
      m/t2 000$ {k_2} $100
      $ \alpha $1.566×10−16K1
      $ \gamma $0.334 5$ \beta $6.667
      $ {T_i} $1$ N_{\mathrm{p}} $4
      $ {k_1} $1.5$ {\delta _{\max }} $/(°)35
    • Table 2. Motion model parameters K-T for the ship

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Motion model parameters K-T for the ship

      参数数值
      $ T_1/\mathrm{s} $11.454 0
      $ T_2/\mathrm{s} $5.199 2
      $ T_3/\mathrm{s} $3.838 2
      $ K/\mathrm{s}^{-1} $0.116 5
    • Table 3. Comparison of simulation results for single-ship encounter scenario

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Comparison of simulation results for single-ship encounter scenario

      方法最大转向角度/(°)平均舵幅/(°)路径长度/n mile曲线平滑度/rad
      传统人工势场34.2831.6172.1050.012
      改进人工势场43.3811.2922.2320.010
      三维势场21.8901.2512.2050.008
    • Table 4. Comparison of simulation results for single-ship crossing encounter scenario

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. Comparison of simulation results for single-ship crossing encounter scenario

      方法最大转向角度/(°)平均舵幅/(°)路径长度/n mile曲线平滑度/rad
      传统人工势场24.7152.9371.4280.830
      改进人工势场34.5158.1741.5170.737
      三维势场23.3461.7811.4320.659
    • Table 5. Comparison of simulation results for multi-ship encounter scenario

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 5. Comparison of simulation results for multi-ship encounter scenario

      方法最大转向角度/(°)平均舵幅/(°)路径长度/n mile曲线平滑度/rad
      传统人工势场42.5569.4982.0420.977
      改进人工势场28.7255.7512.0470.685
      三维势场17.3303.3071.9390.639
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Qunpeng WANG, Longhao LI, Hongxu GUAN, Jialun LIU, Jianzhe CAI, Zhengrong SHA, Jinshui ZHANG. Ship local path planning method based on three-dimensional potential field model[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2025, 20(1): 135

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Planning and Decision-making

    Received: Jul. 22, 2024

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Mar. 13, 2025

    The Author Email:

    DOI:10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.04076

    Topics