Acta Photonica Sinica, Volume. 52, Issue 2, 0210001(2023)
Evaluation of Camouflage Effectiveness Model Based on Disruptive Coloration and Background Guided Fusion
[1] C C CHANG, Y H LEE, C J LIN et al. Visual assessment of camouflaged targets with different background similarities. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 114, 527-541(2012).
[2] C J LIN, C C CHANG, Y H LEE. Developing a similarity index for static camouflaged target detection. The Imaging Science Journal, 62, 337-341(2013).
[3] C J LIN, C C CHANG, B S LIU. Developing and evaluating a target-background similarity metric for camouflage detection. PLoS One, 9, e87310(2014).
[4] X YANG, W D XU, Q JIA et al. MF-CFI: a fused evaluation index for camouflage patterns based on human visual perception. Defence Technology, 17, 1602-1608(2021).
[5] Jun YU, Haoyang LIU, Yunhui ZHANG et al. An evaluation method of optical camouflage effect based on contour deformation degree. Acta Photonica Sinica, 50, 0610001(2021).
[6] M STEVENS, S MERILAITA. Animal camouflage: current issues and new perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364, 423-427(2009).
[7] P G LOVELL, G D RUXTON, K V LANGRIDGE et al. Egg-laying substrate selection for optimal camouflage by quail. Curr Biol, 23, 260-264(2013).
[8] C KANG, M STEVENS, J Y MOON et al. Camouflage through behavior in moths: the role of background matching and disruptive coloration. Behavioral Ecology, 26, 45-54(2015).
[9] J TROSCIANKO, J SKELHORN, M STEVENS. Quantifying camouflage: how to predict detectability from appearance. BMC Evol Biol, 17, 7(2017).
[10] S FRASER, A CALLAHAN, D KLASSEN et al. Empirical tests of the role of disruptive coloration in reducing detectability. Proceedings of the Royal SocietyB:BiologicalSciences, 274, 1325-1331(2007).
[11] H M SCHAEFER, N STOBBE. Disruptive coloration provides camouflage independent of background matching. Proceedings of the Royal SocietyB:BiologicalSciences, 273, 2427-2432(2006).
[12] R T HANLON, C C CHIAO, L M MATHGER et al. Cephalopod dynamic camouflage: bridging the continuum between background matching and disruptive coloration. Philosophical transactions-Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 364, 429-437(2009).
[13] I C CUTHILL. Camouflage. Journal of Zoology, 308, 75-92(2019).
[14] N PRICE, S GREEN, J TROSCIANKO et al. Background matching and disruptive coloration as habitat-specific strategies for camouflage. Scientific Reports, 9, 7840(2019).
[15] A TORRALBA, A OLIVA, M S CASTELHANO et al. Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search. Psychological Review, 113, 766-786(2006).
[16] A CHHABRA, R V JENSEN. Direct determination of the f (α) singularity spectrum. Physical Review Letters, 62, 1327(1989).
[17] X BAI, N LIAO, W WU. Assessment of camouflage effectiveness based on perceived color difference and gradient magnitude. Sensors (Basel), 20, 4672(2020).
[18] W XUE, L ZHANG, X MOU et al. Gradient magnitude similarity deviation: a highly efficient perceptual image quality index. IEEE Trans Image Process, 23, 684-695(2014).
[19] T H HSU, L Z LIN. QFD with fuzzy and entropy weight for evaluating retail customer values. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 17, 935-958(2006).
[20] R ROSENHOLTZ, Y LI, Z JIN et al. Feature congestion: a measure of visual clutter. Journal of Vision, 6, 827-827(2006).
[21] A TOET. Image dataset for testing search and detection models. Optical Engineering, 40, 1760-1767(2001).
[22] J B CULPEPPER. Texture metric that predicts target detection performance. Optical Engineering, 54, 123101(2015).
[23] A TOET. Computational versus psychophysical bottom-up image saliency: a comparative evaluation study. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 33, 2131-2146(2011).
[24] A TOET, M A HOGERVORST. Review of camouflage assessment techniques, 1153604(2020).
[25] Y ZHAO, Y SONG, M SULAMAN et al. An image clutter metric based on multidirectional difference hash(2020).
[26] D L WILSON. Image-based contrast-to-clutter modeling of detection. Optical Engineering, 40, 1852-1857(2001).
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Yin ZHANG, Pengyuan DING, Guiyi ZHU, Mengwei SHI, Junhua YAN. Evaluation of Camouflage Effectiveness Model Based on Disruptive Coloration and Background Guided Fusion[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2023, 52(2): 0210001
Category:
Received: Aug. 2, 2022
Accepted: Oct. 14, 2022
Published Online: Mar. 28, 2023
The Author Email: YAN Junhua (yjh9758@126.com)