Acta Photonica Sinica, Volume. 52, Issue 2, 0210001(2023)

Evaluation of Camouflage Effectiveness Model Based on Disruptive Coloration and Background Guided Fusion

Yin ZHANG... Pengyuan DING, Guiyi ZHU, Mengwei SHI and Junhua YAN* |Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • Key Laboratory of Space Photoelectric Detection and Perception,Ministry of Industry and Information Technology,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 211106,China
  • show less
    References(26)

    [1] C C CHANG, Y H LEE, C J LIN et al. Visual assessment of camouflaged targets with different background similarities. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 114, 527-541(2012).

    [2] C J LIN, C C CHANG, Y H LEE. Developing a similarity index for static camouflaged target detection. The Imaging Science Journal, 62, 337-341(2013).

    [3] C J LIN, C C CHANG, B S LIU. Developing and evaluating a target-background similarity metric for camouflage detection. PLoS One, 9, e87310(2014).

    [4] X YANG, W D XU, Q JIA et al. MF-CFI: a fused evaluation index for camouflage patterns based on human visual perception. Defence Technology, 17, 1602-1608(2021).

    [5] Jun YU, Haoyang LIU, Yunhui ZHANG et al. An evaluation method of optical camouflage effect based on contour deformation degree. Acta Photonica Sinica, 50, 0610001(2021).

    [6] M STEVENS, S MERILAITA. Animal camouflage: current issues and new perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364, 423-427(2009).

    [7] P G LOVELL, G D RUXTON, K V LANGRIDGE et al. Egg-laying substrate selection for optimal camouflage by quail. Curr Biol, 23, 260-264(2013).

    [8] C KANG, M STEVENS, J Y MOON et al. Camouflage through behavior in moths: the role of background matching and disruptive coloration. Behavioral Ecology, 26, 45-54(2015).

    [9] J TROSCIANKO, J SKELHORN, M STEVENS. Quantifying camouflage: how to predict detectability from appearance. BMC Evol Biol, 17, 7(2017).

    [10] S FRASER, A CALLAHAN, D KLASSEN et al. Empirical tests of the role of disruptive coloration in reducing detectability. Proceedings of the Royal SocietyB:BiologicalSciences, 274, 1325-1331(2007).

    [11] H M SCHAEFER, N STOBBE. Disruptive coloration provides camouflage independent of background matching. Proceedings of the Royal SocietyB:BiologicalSciences, 273, 2427-2432(2006).

    [12] R T HANLON, C C CHIAO, L M MATHGER et al. Cephalopod dynamic camouflage: bridging the continuum between background matching and disruptive coloration. Philosophical transactions-Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 364, 429-437(2009).

    [13] I C CUTHILL. Camouflage. Journal of Zoology, 308, 75-92(2019).

    [14] N PRICE, S GREEN, J TROSCIANKO et al. Background matching and disruptive coloration as habitat-specific strategies for camouflage. Scientific Reports, 9, 7840(2019).

    [15] A TORRALBA, A OLIVA, M S CASTELHANO et al. Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search. Psychological Review, 113, 766-786(2006).

    [16] A CHHABRA, R V JENSEN. Direct determination of the f (α) singularity spectrum. Physical Review Letters, 62, 1327(1989).

    [17] X BAI, N LIAO, W WU. Assessment of camouflage effectiveness based on perceived color difference and gradient magnitude. Sensors (Basel), 20, 4672(2020).

    [18] W XUE, L ZHANG, X MOU et al. Gradient magnitude similarity deviation: a highly efficient perceptual image quality index. IEEE Trans Image Process, 23, 684-695(2014).

    [19] T H HSU, L Z LIN. QFD with fuzzy and entropy weight for evaluating retail customer values. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 17, 935-958(2006).

    [20] R ROSENHOLTZ, Y LI, Z JIN et al. Feature congestion: a measure of visual clutter. Journal of Vision, 6, 827-827(2006).

    [21] A TOET. Image dataset for testing search and detection models. Optical Engineering, 40, 1760-1767(2001).

    [22] J B CULPEPPER. Texture metric that predicts target detection performance. Optical Engineering, 54, 123101(2015).

    [23] A TOET. Computational versus psychophysical bottom-up image saliency: a comparative evaluation study. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 33, 2131-2146(2011).

    [24] A TOET, M A HOGERVORST. Review of camouflage assessment techniques, 1153604(2020).

    [25] Y ZHAO, Y SONG, M SULAMAN et al. An image clutter metric based on multidirectional difference hash(2020).

    [26] D L WILSON. Image-based contrast-to-clutter modeling of detection. Optical Engineering, 40, 1852-1857(2001).

    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Yin ZHANG, Pengyuan DING, Guiyi ZHU, Mengwei SHI, Junhua YAN. Evaluation of Camouflage Effectiveness Model Based on Disruptive Coloration and Background Guided Fusion[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2023, 52(2): 0210001

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category:

    Received: Aug. 2, 2022

    Accepted: Oct. 14, 2022

    Published Online: Mar. 28, 2023

    The Author Email: YAN Junhua (yjh9758@126.com)

    DOI:10.3788/gzxb20235202.0210001

    Topics