Acta Photonica Sinica, Volume. 52, Issue 2, 0210001(2023)
Evaluation of Camouflage Effectiveness Model Based on Disruptive Coloration and Background Guided Fusion
Figures & Tables(14)
Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of surface disruption characterization model
Fig. 6. Fitting curves of our method and subjective results in Search_2 dataset
Fig. 7. Fitting curves of our method and subjective results in CamData dataset
Table 1. Comparison results of subjective and objective consistency of detection probability of different methods in Search_2 dataset
View tableView in ArticleTable 1. Comparison results of subjective and objective consistency of detection probability of different methods in Search_2 dataset
Algorithm PLCC SRCC RMSE Ours（Back+Dis） 0.888 1 0.772 7 0.053 6 Ours（Back） 0.881 0 0.765 2 0.055 3 Ours（Dis） 0.213 5 0.181 0 0.118 1 PCDGM［ 17 ］0.800 2 0.690 5 0.070 0 UIQI［ 3 ］0.579 8 0.564 1 0.095 2 GabRat［ 9 ］0.045 3 0.185 1 0.116 8
Table 2. Comparison results of subjective and objective consistency of search time of different methods in Search_2 dataset
View tableView in ArticleTable 2. Comparison results of subjective and objective consistency of search time of different methods in Search_2 dataset
Algorithm PLCC SRCC RMSE Ours（Back+Dis） 0.873 9 0.774 5 2.340 0 Ours（Back） 0.869 4 0.773 5 2.377 9 Ours（Dis） 0.088 4 0.220 1 4.794 7 PCDGM［ 17 ］0.664 8 0.714 9 3.610 5 UIQI［ 3 ］0.643 7 0.666 9 3.683 4 GabRat［ 9 ］0.107 8 0.298 5 4.785 0
Table 3. Comparison results of subjective and objective consistency of detection probability of different methods in CamData dataset
View tableView in ArticleTable 3. Comparison results of subjective and objective consistency of detection probability of different methods in CamData dataset
Algorithm PLCC SRCC RMSE Ours（Back+Dis） 0.835 3 0.805 1 0.125 5 Ours（Back） 0.231 8 0.160 6 0.222 1 Ours（Dis） 0.817 1 0.769 1 0.131 6 PCDGM［ 17 ］0.349 7 0.332 0 0.213 9 UIQI［ 3 ］0.055 0 0.090 1 0.227 9 GabRat［ 9 ］0.579 0 0.569 3 0.186 1
Table 4. Comparison results of subjective and objective consistency of search time of different methods in CamData dataset
View tableView in ArticleTable 4. Comparison results of subjective and objective consistency of search time of different methods in CamData dataset
Algorithm PLCC SRCC RMSE Ours（Back+Dis） 0.834 0 0.759 9 0.726 8 Ours（Back） 0.146 9 0.009 5 1.217 5 Ours（Dis） 0.817 6 0.721 7 0.701 3 PCDGM［ 17 ］0.286 8 0.219 4 1.204 7 UIQI［ 3 ］0.193 1 0.047 0 1.194 6 GabRat［ 9 ］0.498 2 0.583 2 3.406 1
Table 5. Typical image evaluation results
View tableView in ArticleTable 5. Typical image evaluation results
Image number Edge disruption Surface
disruption
Texture similarity Structural similarity Color similarity Weight N results
Assessment
Detection probability Fig. 8 （a）0.486 4 0.950 1 0.779 4 0.249 4 0.446 6 0.873 2 0.878 7 0.142 9 Fig. 8 （c）0.454 1 0.808 2 0.789 5 0.193 5 0.400 1 0.856 1 0.731 3 0.500 0 Fig. 8 （e）0.281 9 0.450 5 0.838 9 0.624 4 0.593 9 0.080 6 0.694 8 0.887 1 Fig. 8 （g）0.286 2 0.284 9 0.740 0 0.560 5 0.444 8 0.095 1 0.383 7 0.967 7
Table 6. Results of mask error comparison experiments
View tableView in ArticleTable 6. Results of mask error comparison experiments
Mask Pixel number Assessment results Relative error/% True Mask 2 227 0.744 4 / Comparison Mask 1 2 340 0.752 3 1.061 2 Comparison Mask 2 2 220 0.747 1 0.362 7 Comparison Mask 3 1 965 0.721 8 3.036 0
Tools
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Yin ZHANG, Pengyuan DING, Guiyi ZHU, Mengwei SHI, Junhua YAN. Evaluation of Camouflage Effectiveness Model Based on Disruptive Coloration and Background Guided Fusion[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2023, 52(2): 0210001
Paper Information
Category:
Received: Aug. 2, 2022
Accepted: Oct. 14, 2022
Published Online: Mar. 28, 2023
The Author Email: YAN Junhua (yjh9758@126.com)
© Copyright 2018-2021 | Chinese Laser Press.
All Rights Reserved 沪ICP备15018463号-20