Optics and Precision Engineering, Volume. 31, Issue 20, 2930(2023)

Comparison of deviation in aircraft casing deformation measurement based on data mapping optimization

Hui LIU1...2, Jin LIANG1,*, Meitu YE1,2, Jianying GUO1,3 and Leigang LI2 |Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an70049, China
  • 2Innovation Lab, XTOP 3D Technology (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd., Shenzhen518060, China
  • 3Laboratory for Strength and Transmission,Aero Engine Corporation of China Sichuan Gas Turbine Research Institute,Mianyang621000,China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(20)
    Principles of data mapping optimization
    Neural network optimized by genetic algorithm
    Structure of neural network
    Testing site of casing
    Installation of structural static and fatigue tester
    Loading curve
    DIC measurement results
    FEM simulation results
    FPFH feature matching
    Point cloud registration results
    Predictive output and expected output of neural network
    Prediction error of neural network
    Schematic diagram of DIC grid and finite element grid
    Percentage error in grid mapping
    Data mapping optimization results
    maximum principal strain of FEM and DIC
    Deviation of strain comparison
    • Table 1. Data mapping error for different methods

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Data mapping error for different methods

      验证集

      采样编号

      BPNaturalLinerNearest
      均值标准差均值标准差均值标准差均值标准差
      10.563 11.311 80.594 21.427 41.052 21.668 71.290 22.067 7
      20.481 20.987 90.501 41.078 70.893 21.333 51.143 71.828 4
      30.489 10.891 00.491 00.898 10.940 81.199 71.379 72.018 9
      40.506 01.191 70.541 31.338 90.932 91.457 41.326 52.127 4
      50.653 41.554 80.665 51.719 50.970 31.379 41.449 12.444 3
      60.549 71.203 50.570 41.318 21.122 11.461 61.350 92.094 3
      70.531 11.090 20.573 11.339 41.006 21.359 31.288 72.129 5
      80.477 41.616 90.529 61.240 71.005 11.4881.296 12.133 8
      90.608 41.089 90.604 01.722 10.955 41.467 81.403 82.413 3
      100.521 91.223 60.557 61.234 11.037 11.6431.280 21.901 3
      110.489 60.930 40.525 71.401 20.939 81.380 41.263 42.066 3
      120.464 11.033 80.477 81.004 61.097 51.529 51.179 11.800 3
    • Table 2. Computational time efficiency analysis

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Computational time efficiency analysis

      方法BPNearestLinerNatural
      时间0.009 9780.060 5410.057 9160.082 570
    • Table 3. Full-field deformation deviation comparison

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Full-field deformation deviation comparison

      应变类型FEM应变场DIC应变场变形偏差场
      第一主应变(ε1
      第二主应变(ε2
      第三主应变(ε3
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Hui LIU, Jin LIANG, Meitu YE, Jianying GUO, Leigang LI. Comparison of deviation in aircraft casing deformation measurement based on data mapping optimization[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2023, 31(20): 2930

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Modern Applied Optics

    Received: Mar. 16, 2023

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Nov. 28, 2023

    The Author Email: LIANG Jin (liangjin@mail.xjtu.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.37188/OPE.20233120.2930

    Topics