Journal of Semiconductors, Volume. 44, Issue 7, 072802(2023)

2.83-kV double-layered NiO/β-Ga2O3 vertical p-n heterojunction diode with a power figure-of-merit of 5.98 GW/cm2

Tingting Han1、†, Yuangang Wang1、†, Yuanjie Lv*, Shaobo Dun*, Hongyu Liu*, Aimin Bu*, and Zhihong Feng**
Author Affiliations
  • National Key Laboratory of Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), Hebei Semiconductor Research Institute, Shijiazhuang 050051, China
  • show less

    This work demonstrates high-performance NiO/β-Ga2O3 vertical heterojunction diodes (HJDs) with double-layer junction termination extension (DL-JTE) consisting of two p-typed NiO layers with varied lengths. The bottom 60-nm p-NiO layer fully covers the β-Ga2O3 wafer, while the geometry of the upper 60-nm p-NiO layer is 10 μm larger than the square anode electrode. Compared with a single-layer JTE, the electric field concentration is inhibited by double-layer JTE structure effectively, resulting in the breakdown voltage being improved from 2020 to 2830 V. Moreover, double p-typed NiO layers allow more holes into the Ga2O3 drift layer to reduce drift resistance. The specific on-resistance is reduced from 1.93 to 1.34 mΩ·cm2. The device with DL-JTE shows a power figure-of-merit (PFOM) of 5.98 GW/cm2, which is 2.8 times larger than that of the conventional single-layer JTE structure. These results indicate that the double-layer JTE structure provides a viable way of fabricating high-performance Ga2O3 HJDs.

    1. Introduction

    Gallium oxide (Ga2O3) is considered to be competitive for high-power applications in the next generation because of its outstanding characteristics. For instance, its bandgap is ultra-wide (~4.8 eV), furthermore the theoretical breakdown field is as high as 8 MV/cm[1]. To evaluate the suitability of semiconductor materials for high-power applications, the Baliga’s figure-of-merit is commonly used, which is extremely high for Ga2O3, almost 4 times and 10 times larger than GaN and SiC[1].

    After years of development, there has been remarkable progress in Ga2O3-based metal–oxide–semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETs), Schottky barrier diodes (SBDs)[2-10] and photodetectors[11, 12]. Nevertheless, the absence of p-type Ga2O3 is still a main obstacle for the bipolar devices based on Ga2O3. To conquer the difficulty, a natively p-typed oxide of NiO is brought in to realize p-NiO/n-Ga2O3 HJDs[13]. Based on this technology, devices with Ron,sp and Vbr of 10.6 mΩ·cm2/1860 V and 3.5 mΩ·cm2/1059 V have been reported[14, 15]. However, the Vbr and PFOM (PFOM = Vbr2/Ron,sp) of reported NiO/β-Ga2O3 heterojunction p–n diodes were still far from the theoretic limit of the material.

    In this work, we demonstrated p-NiO/n-Ga2O3 vertical HJDs with a double-layer junction termination extension (DL-JTE) consisting of two p-typed NiO layers with varied lengths. The double-layer JTE structure effectively avoids electric field concentration and also allows more holes into the Ga2O3 drift layer to reduce drift resistance. The fabricated device with DL-JTE demonstrates high breakdown voltage of 2830 V and a small Ron,sp of 1.34 mΩ∙cm2, generating a high PFOM of 5.98 GW/cm2. The result indicates that the DL-JTE structure has great potential for fabricating high power devices.

    2. Material characterization and device fabrication

    Fig. 1 schematically illustrates the cross-sectional structure of the devices with JTE and DL-JTE fabricated on the same wafer. By using halide vapor phase epitaxy (HVPE), a drift layer of 7-μm lightly Si-doped n-type β-Ga2O3 was grown on a heavily Sn-doped (001) β-Ga2O3 substrate. The electron concentration of the β-Ga2O3 substrate and the drift layer is 1 × 1019 and 1.5 × 1016 cm−3, respectively. Electron-beam evaporation was employed for Ohmic metal deposition of 30/300 nm Ti/Au on the back of the wafer. Then a rapid thermal annealing was performed in a N2 atmosphere at 480 °C for 1 min to improve Ohmic contact. After that, RF magnetron sputtering was used to coat a full area NiO layer with 60-nm thickness on the upper surface of the sample at room temperature. Subsequently, another 60-nm p-NiO layer with 10 μm larger than the square anode electrode was sputtered with a lift-off process to form a double-layer junction termination extension (DL-JTE) structure. The power of the RF magnetron sputtering and the deposition rate of NiO are 80 W and 0.85 nm/min. The ratio of Ar/O2 is chosen to be 15/10 sccm. The target material is NiO ceramics with 99.99% purity. The hole concentration of the grown p-NiO layer is found to be around 1 × 1018 cm−3 after Hall measurements. Finally, the Ni/Au (50/300 nm) metal stack was formed on the p-NiO layer by electron-beam evaporation and lift-off process to make an Ohmic contact. The area of anode electrode is 100 × 100 μm2. Besides, the p-NiO/ n-Ga2O3 heterojunction diode with a single-layer JTE structure was also fabricated on the same wafer using the same device processing.

    (Color online) Cross-sectional schematic of the devices with DL-JTE/ JTE.

    Figure 1.(Color online) Cross-sectional schematic of the devices with DL-JTE/ JTE.

    3. Results and discussion

    The CV and 1/C2V characteristics of the β-Ga2O3 SBD without termination under 1 MHz are shown in Fig. 2. The concentration of N drift layer is confirmed to be around 1.5 × 1016 cm−3 according to

    (Color online) C–V and 1/C2–V characteristics of the Ga2O3 SBD without termination.

    Figure 2.(Color online) C–V and 1/C2–V characteristics of the Ga2O3 SBD without termination.

    Nd=2qϵsϵ0A2×1dC2dVAnode,

    where q, εs, ε0, A is the electron charge, relative dielectric constant, vacuum dielectric constant and the anode area, respectively.

    The forward current–voltage (I–V) characteristics in the linear-scale and Ron,sp of the fabricated NiO/β-Ga2O3 vertical HJDs with JTE and DL-JTE are shown in Fig. 3. The device with DL-JTE exhibited a lower Ron,sp (1.34 mΩ∙cm2) than that with JTE (1.93 mΩ∙cm2). The electron concentration and thickness of the NiO layer are only 1 × 1018 cm–3 and 60 nm, respectively, which cannot inject enough holes into the Ga2O3 drift layer. The second NiO layer under the anode is introduced in the DL-JTE, which will inject more holes into the Ga2O3 drift layer to reduce drift resistance. Therefore, a lower Ron,sp is realized by introducing DL-JTE. The turn-on voltage for both devices was about 2 V, which is higher than most Ga2O3-based SBDs, suggesting a higher barrier height.

    (Color online) Forward I–V curves and Ron,sp of devices with DL-JTE/ JTE.

    Figure 3.(Color online) Forward I–V curves and Ron,sp of devices with DL-JTE/ JTE.

    The reverse breakdown characteristics of the fabricated vertical HJDs with JTE and DL-JTE are shown in Fig. 4. Compared with the heterojunction diode with JTE exhibiting a Vbr of 2020 V, the one with DL-JTE yielded a much higher Vbr of 2830 V. With Vanode rising reversely, an almost constant leakage current was observed till the breakdown points were reached for both devices.

    (Color online) Breakdown characteristics of devices with DL-JTE/ JTE.

    Figure 4.(Color online) Breakdown characteristics of devices with DL-JTE/ JTE.

    To further evaluate the effect of the JTE and DL-JTE structure on the device electric field engineering, the electric field distributions of both devices were simulated using commercial TCAD software. As shown in Fig. 5, when VAnode reaches –2020 V, for the heterojunction diode with JTE, a peak electric field of 8 MV/cm is observed at the anode edge resulting from electric field concentration effect, while for that with the DL-JTE structure, the electric field spreads and the crowding is effectively relieved, resulting in a decreased peak field of 4.7 MV/cm at the anode edge, which increases to 8.1 MV/cm when reverse bias grows to 2830 V, while the other peak field around the second NiO layer remains at 3.9 MV/cm.

    (Color online) Simulated distributions of the electric field for the fabricated HJD with (a) JTE, (b) DL-JTE at bias of –2020 V, (c) DL-JTE at bias of –2830 V, and (d–f) the corresponding distribution of electric field versus position.

    Figure 5.(Color online) Simulated distributions of the electric field for the fabricated HJD with (a) JTE, (b) DL-JTE at bias of –2020 V, (c) DL-JTE at bias of –2830 V, and (d–f) the corresponding distribution of electric field versus position.

    Fig. 6 shows the Vbr vs Ron,sp plot of the most advanced HJDs[14-21], hetero-junction barrier Schottky (HJBS)[22-24] diodes, and SBDs[2-6] based on β-Ga2O3. Our HJD with DL-JTE is marked using a red star. As shown, the fabricated device with DL-JTE structures achieves a high Vbr of 2830 V. Together with the low Ron,sp value of 1.34 mΩ·cm2, a PFOM of 5.98 GW/cm2 is gotten, which is 2.8 times larger than that of a conventional single-layer JTE structure.

    (Color online) Vbr versus Ron,sp of β-Ga2O3-based diodes reported against our NiO/β-Ga2O3 HJD with DL-JTE.

    Figure 6.(Color online) Vbr versus Ron,sp of β-Ga2O3-based diodes reported against our NiO/β-Ga2O3 HJD with DL-JTE.

    4. Conclusion

    By introducing a double-layer junction termination extension structure, NiO/β-Ga2O3 vertical HJDs with significant improvement were realized. Compared with the one with JTE fabricated on the same sample, the device with DL-JTE has a lower Ron,sp of 1.34 mΩ·cm2 and a higher breakdown voltage of 2830 V, corresponding to a high power figure-of-merit of 5.98 GW/cm2, suggesting that NiO/β-Ga2O3 HJDs with DL-JTE have great potential in high power applications.

    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Tingting Han, Yuangang Wang, Yuanjie Lv, Shaobo Dun, Hongyu Liu, Aimin Bu, Zhihong Feng. 2.83-kV double-layered NiO/β-Ga2O3 vertical p-n heterojunction diode with a power figure-of-merit of 5.98 GW/cm2[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2023, 44(7): 072802

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Articles

    Received: Dec. 8, 2022

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Aug. 7, 2023

    The Author Email: Lv Yuanjie (yuanjielv@163.com), Dun Shaobo (yuanjielv@163.com), Liu Hongyu (yuanjielv@163.com), Bu Aimin (yuanjielv@163.com), Feng Zhihong (ga917vv@163.com)

    DOI:10.1088/1674-4926/44/7/072802

    Topics