Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, Volume. 42, Issue 8, 2353(2022)

A Comparative Study of the COD Hyperspectral Inversion Models in Water Based on the Maching Learning

Chun-ling WANG1,*... Kai-yuan SHI1,1; 2;, Xing MING3,3; *;, Mao-qin CONG3,3;, Xin-yue LIU3,3; and Wen-ji GUO3,3; |Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 11. School of Information Science and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
  • 33. Nanjing Institute of Software Technology, Institute of Software Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210049, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(11)
    The original spectral reflectance curve of water samples
    Spectral profiles of water samples after preprocess(a): SG smoothing; (b): MSC; (c): SG smoothing and MSC
    Relationship between the number of decision trees and model MSE on training sample(a): Random forest; (b): Adaboost; (c): XGBoost
    Sccetterplots of XGBoost inversion model based on different preprocessing methods(a): Original data; (b): MSC; (c): SG smoothing; (d): SG smoothing and MSC
    The variancecontribution rate of the first ten principal components about PCA
    • Table 1. Results of chemical oxgen demand (COD) statictical value of samples

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Results of chemical oxgen demand (COD) statictical value of samples

      数据集数量均值/
      (mg·L-1)
      最小值/
      (mg·L-1)
      最大值/
      (mg·L-1)
      SD/
      (mg·L-1)
      训练集1 238134.854.2216.725.0
      预测集310133.874.8258.624.3
      总样本集1 548134.654.2258.624.8
    • Table 2. The results of machine learning model based on orginal data

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. The results of machine learning model based on orginal data

      机器学习
      模型
      测试集指标训练时间
      /s
      R2RMSE/(mg·L-1)RPD
      多元线性0.4818.51.31.7
      随机森林0.8510.02.4146
      AdaBoost0.877.63.2194
      XGBoost0.917.13.498.9
    • Table 3. The results of machine learning model based on data processed by SG smoothing

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. The results of machine learning model based on data processed by SG smoothing

      机器学习
      模型
      测试集指标训练时间
      /s
      R2RMSE/(mg·L-1)RPD
      多元线性0.328.30.862
      随机森林0.8410.02.4188
      AdaBoost0.888.32.9165
      XGBoost0.917.03.570
    • Table 4. The results of machine learning model based on data processed by MSC

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. The results of machine learning model based on data processed by MSC

      机器学习
      模型
      测试集指标训练时间
      /s
      R2RMSE/(mg·L-1)RPD
      多元线性0.2129.10.842.2
      随机森林0.8210.32.4124
      AdaBoost0.8310.32.4178
      XGBoost0.907.33.372
    • Table 5. The results of machine learning model based on data processed by SG smoothing and MSC

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 5. The results of machine learning model based on data processed by SG smoothing and MSC

      机器学习
      模型
      测试集指标训练时间
      /s
      R2RMSE/(mg·L-1)RPD
      多元线性0.2129.10.842.2
      随机森林0.869.12.7145
      AdaBoost0.878.92.7163
      XGBoost0.927.13.472
    • Table 6. The result of the XGBoost model built based on the PCA method

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 6. The result of the XGBoost model built based on the PCA method

      特征提取方法测试集指标训练时间
      /s
      R2RMSE/(mg·L-1)RPD
      未经过PCA处理0.927.13.472
      PCA处理0.936.43.82.9
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Chun-ling WANG, Kai-yuan SHI, Xing MING, Mao-qin CONG, Xin-yue LIU, Wen-ji GUO. A Comparative Study of the COD Hyperspectral Inversion Models in Water Based on the Maching Learning[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2022, 42(8): 2353

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Orginal Article

    Received: Jun. 15, 2021

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Mar. 17, 2025

    The Author Email: WANG Chun-ling (wangchl@bjfu.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2022)08-2353-06

    Topics