Opto-Electronic Advances, Volume. 8, Issue 1, 240114-1(2025)

Ultra-high-Q photonic crystal nanobeam cavity for etchless lithium niobate on insulator (LNOI) platform

Zhi Jiang1, Cizhe Fang1,3, Xu Ran1, Yu Gao1, Ruiqing Wang1, Jianguo Wang2, Danyang Yao1、*, Xuetao Gan2、**, Yan Liu1,3, Yue Hao1, and Genquan Han1,3
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Wide-Bandgap Semiconductor Devices and Integrated Technology, School of Microelectronics, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Light Field Manipulation and Information Acquisition, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, and Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Optical Information Technology, School of Physical Science and Technology, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710129, China
  • 3Hangzhou Institute of Technology, Xidian University, Hangzhou 311200, China
  • show less

    The expansive spectral coverage and superior optical properties of lithium niobate (LN) offer a comprehensive suite of tools for exploring novel functionalities. Achieving high-quality (Q) photonic resonator cavities is crucial for enhancing light-matter interactions. However, this task is challenging as the device performance is heavily dependent on the fabrication quality of the LN. In this paper, we present experimental validation of an etchless approach to fabricating high-Q photonic crystal nanobeam cavities (PCNBCs). We successfully fabricate PCNBCs with Q factors exceeding 105 while maintaining high transmittance by capitalizing on the low waveguide loss and high fabrication tolerance of TE-polarized mode. Remarkably, the Q factor achieved here exceeds previous reports on etchless LN PCNBCs by over an order of magnitude. Benefiting from this advancement, we further explore a variety of optical functions, including thermo-optic tuning, optically induced bistability, and Fano line shapes generation. These findings present promising prospects for a versatile platform technique, facilitating the development of high-performance electro-optic or acousto-optic modulators, optical logic devices, and quantum photonics, highlighting its significant impact in the field of photonic integration.

    Introduction

    The interaction between light and matter establishes the first basis for essential components that enable on-chip photon manipulation technologies1. Conventional silicon-based photonic crystal nanobeam cavities (PCNBCs) strongly confine light with both high-quality (Q) factors and small mode volumes, dramatically enhancing these interactions2. Additionally, these cavities can further synergize with the thermo-optic (TO)3 or free-carrier dispersion (FCD) effect4, enabling a broad spectrum of applications across multiple disciplines. Notable examples include high-efficiency optical modulators and switches5,6, ultra-compact filters7, and advanced nonlinear optics8. However, the modulation speed of silicon photonics is primarily constrained by its inherent absorptive and nonlinear characteristics, which has led to a plateau in its development, making it challenging to satisfy the exponentially increasing demand for large-capacity interconnects and communications9. On the other hand, lithium niobate (LiNbO3, LN), although an “old” and extensively studied material, has played a crucial role in advancing photonics and acoustics for several decades10. From enabling high-speed optical communications11 to the development of acoustic filters used in mobile terminals12, LN has proven its versatility and reliability. Specifically, in photonics, its extraordinarily strong and highly linear electro-optic (Pockels) properties have propelled LN optical modulators into the Terabit era13.

    Inheriting the exceptional optical properties of LN, thin-film lithium niobate on insulator (LNOI) has recently been recognized as a cutting-edge platform that is leading another revolution in integrated photonics on chip1416. Contrasting with the CMOS-compatible process of silicon photonics, LNOI photonics encounters a significant barrier in manufacturing low-loss waveguides and nanoscale optical components10. The principal challenge is the high-quality etching of LN. While precise methods like ion beam etching17 and focused ion beam (FIB) milling18 are accurate, they can damage the crystal lattice and introduce ion contamination. An alternative technique, the femtosecond laser photolithography assisted chemo-mechanical etching (PLACE) technique1921, overcomes these issues and ensures an ultra-smooth surface but lacks sufficient etching selectivity for fabricating sophisticated structures such as PCNBC. Moreover, methods such as reactive ion etching (RIE) and inductively coupled plasma etching (ICP-RIE), while compatible with batch fabrication, suffer from significant redeposition issues10. These challenges collectively hinder the enhancement of optical performance in LN-based devices.

    Recently, a novel route has been proposed that involves spinning and patterning a low-refractive-index polymer (~1.5) on top of the LNOI substrate22. This approach allows for the creation of a polymer-loaded rib-waveguide capable of accommodating both transverse electric (TE) and transverse magnetic (TM) modes. Nonetheless, most research efforts have primarily focused on TM-polarized modes produced by photonic bound states in the continuum (BIC)23. On this etchless platform, various intriguing physical phenomena24,25 and high-performance key optical components have been demonstrated2628. In addition, many other novel applications have also been unlocked in the metasurfaces based on the BIC regime29,30. However, there are challenges when it comes to manufacturing high-Q resonator cavity devices due to the highly sensitive radiation losses of the TM mode associated with the polymer stripe widths. In comparison, the TE modes represent standard bound modes that propagate without radiation losses for any width within their supported range31. Therefore, the design strategy for the polymer/LN hybrid structure still has room to be developed.

    In this paper, we present an experimental demonstration highlighting the significant potential of TE-polarized polymer-loaded waveguides as a feasible pathway for the realization of highly efficient and productive nanocavities. To the best of our knowledge, the achieved Q factor is over one order of magnitude higher than any previously reported etchless LN PCNBCs (~0.1×10⁵)26,32. This remarkable enhancement in Q inspire a series of strong light-matter interaction phenomena, including highly efficient thermo-optic (TO) tuning, exceptionally strong optical bistability, and facile generation of Fano resonances. Our successful demonstration of high-Q LNOI photonic cavities represent a significant milestone towards the development of LN nanophotonics, merging the unique material properties of LN with versatile nanophotonic device design and fabrication methods. This breakthrough holds tremendous promise for a wide range of applications, including nonlinear photonics, electro-optic (EO) or acousto-optic (AO) tunable devices, optical logic devices, and quantum photonics.

    Methods

    Device design

    Figure 1(a) depicts the cross-section view of the polymer-loaded waveguide, which is placed on a y-cut LNOI substrate. The loaded polymer has a thickness of 0.4 μm and a width of w. To obtain the optimal w, the finite element method (FEM) is employed to model the propagation loss of this waveguide. In our simulations, the refractive index of the polymer is set to 1.53, and the refractive index of ordinary (no) and extraordinary (ne) for LN are 2.21 and 2.14, respectively. Figure 1(b) illustrates the relationship between the propagation loss and waveguide width w for different modes at the wavelength of 1550 nm. It is observed that TM modes exhibit minimal losses at certain specific waveguide widths. This behavior can be explained from the perspective of the photon potential23, as shown in the inset of Fig. 1(b). The energy of the TM mode can couple into the TE continuum through the edges of the waveguide due to the potential well of the TM mode being located within the TE continuum. By adjusting w, it is possible to eliminate coupling loss through destructive interference between the coupling channels. In this mechanism, the TM mode exhibits lower loss at w of 2.1 μm compared to 3.0 μm, due to stronger confinement within the potential well. By contrast, for TE modes, the potential well has the lowest energy and is not coupled with TE continuum in the LN substrate (not shown). Therefore, the propagation loss of TE modes is low and stable, decreasing as w increases. Consequently, TE modes are robust compared to TM modes, a characteristic of critical importance given that fabrication tolerances have a lesser impact on device performance.

    (a) The schematic of the polymer-loaded waveguide. (b) The waveguide loss of different optical modes vs. waveguide width w at 1550 nm. The inset illustrates the photonic potential distribution for the TM00 mode at various waveguide widths. The blue background represents the TE continuum. (c) The electric field (|Ey|) profiles for TM00 and TM01 modes. (d) The electric field (|Ez|) profiles for TE00 and TE01 modes.

    Figure 1.(a) The schematic of the polymer-loaded waveguide. (b) The waveguide loss of different optical modes vs. waveguide width w at 1550 nm. The inset illustrates the photonic potential distribution for the TM00 mode at various waveguide widths. The blue background represents the TE continuum. (c) The electric field (|Ey|) profiles for TM00 and TM01 modes. (d) The electric field (|Ez|) profiles for TE00 and TE01 modes.

    To reveal the light propagation mechanism within the waveguide, an analysis of optical modes with electric field profiles was performed. Figure 1(c) displays the electric field profiles of |Ey| for both TM00 and TM01 modes, revealing energy concentrated in the upper and lower cladding layers. Correspondingly, Fig. 1(d) illustrates electric field profiles of |Ez| for both TE00 and TE01 modes, confirming the predominant localization within the LN layer, which facilitates the effective utilization of the outstanding material properties. Compared to the TM modes, the TE modes exhibit relatively weaker confinement in the z-direction, potentially resulting in larger losses in designs involving curved waveguides. Nevertheless, the transmission characteristics of the TE modes are instrumental in avoiding the disruption of BIC condition caused by the anisotropy of LN. This feature is very important for the design of high-Q PCNBC.

    Based on the discussion of waveguide modes and optical losses above, we further investigate the losses inside the nanocavity. As illustrated in Fig. 2(a), the proposed PCNBC is constructed by a series of dielectric blocks in two regions, including taper and mirror, which are symmetrical with the red dashed line. The width of the polymer waveguide is 2 μm, and the fixed lattice constant of a = 0.43 μm enables phase matching for each unit cell. In the taper region, pulling the confined mode with a Gaussian-shaped field profile away from the light line effectively minimizes radiation loss33. It is realized by establishing a parabolic distribution of the filling factor34, which is utilized to define the dimension of the dielectric block. Here, the filling factor f is defined as the ratio of the air area to that of the unit cell. The relationship of the filling factor from the center of PCNBC (fc) to the end of the taper region (fe) is

    (a) Schematic diagram of the polymer-loaded PCNBC. (b) The band diagram of the TE00 modes for different filling factors: f = 0.3 (blue line) and f = 0.42 (red line). The inset shows the enlarged boxed region and the resonant frequency of the fundamental mode is marked with a red dot. (c) The mirror strength vs. filling factor. (d) The top views of the electric field (|Ez|) profile for the fundamental mode and second-order mode. The orientation of the PCNBC is along the x direction of the LN crystal. (e) Electric field (Ez) distribution profile of the magnified region in (d). The inset shows the electric profile at the y-z plane.

    Figure 2.(a) Schematic diagram of the polymer-loaded PCNBC. (b) The band diagram of the TE00 modes for different filling factors: f = 0.3 (blue line) and f = 0.42 (red line). The inset shows the enlarged boxed region and the resonant frequency of the fundamental mode is marked with a red dot. (c) The mirror strength vs. filling factor. (d) The top views of the electric field (|Ez|) profile for the fundamental mode and second-order mode. The orientation of the PCNBC is along the x direction of the LN crystal. (e) Electric field (Ez) distribution profile of the magnified region in (d). The inset shows the electric profile at the y-z plane.

    fi=fc(fcfe)i2/Nt2,

    where Nt represents the number of dielectric blocks in the taper region, and i is an integer increasing from 0 to Nt. fc and fe are determined by mirror strength γ, which is determined by34

    γ=(ω0ω1)2/(ω0+ω1)2(ωresω2)2/ω22,

    where ωres is the target resonance frequency of the fundamental mode, and ω0, ω1, ω2 are the air band edge, dielectric band edge, and midgap frequency of each segment. Figure 2(b) shows the band diagram of the TE00 mode. The filling factors of 0.3 and 0.42 are chosen, which correspond to the maximum mirror strength and the minimum mirror strength (see Fig. 2(c)). As shown in Fig. 2(b), a photonic band gap (PBG) is obtained at f = 0.3 (blue curves). When f is 0.42 (red curves), the dielectric band is pulled into the PBG. It means that the fundamental mode becomes a discrete mode. As a result, fc is set to 0.42 and fe to 0.3. The filling factor is gradually changing from f = 0.3 to f = 0.42 according to Eq. (1). At the mirror region, the filling factor remains the same (i.e., fe = 0.3).

    Next, we investigate the optical mode field profile of the PCNBC based on the above parameters. To better confine optical mode, the transition from fe to fc should be smoother. Thus, the numbers of Nt and Nm are set to Nt = 120 and Nm = 100, respectively. Figure 2(d) illustrates the simulation results for the profile of Gaussian-shaped electric field energy for the fundamental and second-order modes. It indicates that the PCNBC we designed has the capability to support other high-order resonant modes. Furthermore, as depicted in Fig. 2(e), the electric field distribution of the fundamental mode is parallel to the z-axis of the LN crystal. Thus, it confirms the optical mode of the PCNBC is based on TE00 mode. The relationship between w, Nt, Nm, and Q will be discussed in detail in the next section.

    Device fabrication

    Devices were fabricated on a custom-made y-cut LNOI substrate with a 0.3 μm LN layer (NanoLN Corp.). The substrate is cleaned sequentially in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (90 °C), isopropyl alcohol (ultrasonic), deionized water (ultrasonic), and piranha solution (90 °C) for 10 minutes, respectively. Then a 0.4 μm polymer (ARP-6200.13) was spin-coated on the substrate and prebaked on a hot plate at 180 °C for 10 minutes. The pattern was transferred to the polymer by e-beam lithography (NanoBeam, nB5). Finally, the residual polymer was removed with the developer. Figure 3(a) shows the scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of the sample. The polymer waveguide is well-defined, which guarantees its process stability.

    (a) SEM image of the fabricated PCNBC. The bottom insets show the grating coupler (left) and the central region of the cavity (right), respectively. (b) Measured transmission spectrum of a cavity with fc = 0.42, fe = 0.3, Nt = 120, Nm = 100, and w = 2 μm. Inset: the detailed transmission spectrum of the fundamental mode is fitted with a Lorentzian line shape at around 1528.320 nm. (c) Measured Q factors of the fundamental mode vs. waveguide width w. (d) Measured transmission spectra of the fundamental mode for different Nt at Nm = 100. (e) Measured transmission spectra of the fundamental mode for different Nm at Nt = 120. The inset shows the Lorentzian fitting of the transmission spectrum at Nm = 200.

    Figure 3.(a) SEM image of the fabricated PCNBC. The bottom insets show the grating coupler (left) and the central region of the cavity (right), respectively. (b) Measured transmission spectrum of a cavity with fc = 0.42, fe = 0.3, Nt = 120, Nm = 100, and w = 2 μm. Inset: the detailed transmission spectrum of the fundamental mode is fitted with a Lorentzian line shape at around 1528.320 nm. (c) Measured Q factors of the fundamental mode vs. waveguide width w. (d) Measured transmission spectra of the fundamental mode for different Nt at Nm = 100. (e) Measured transmission spectra of the fundamental mode for different Nm at Nt = 120. The inset shows the Lorentzian fitting of the transmission spectrum at Nm = 200.

    Device characterization

    To characterize the proposed device, the light from the tunable semiconductor laser (Santec, TSL-550) is pumped into the grating coupler through a polarization controller, which is used to adjust the polarization of the pump light. The transmitted light of PCNBC is collected by the optical power meter (Thorlabs, PM100D) from the other grating coupler. Throughout the testing process, the chip is placed on a high-accuracy thermoelectric cooler (TEC) with a stabilized temperature of 21.5 °C. As shown in Fig. 3(b), there exist several peaks. The fundamental mode is located at 1528.320 nm, which is close to the simulated result of 1530.612 nm (the fundamental mode resonance wavelength in Fig. 2(d)). The slight deviation can be attributed to the influence of the fabrication. Other high-order modes appear at larger wavelengths. Compared with the high-order modes, the fundamental mode has a higher Q factor of 0.47×105 (see the inset in Fig. 3(b)) and a lower transmission of 52.4%. Since only the fundamental mode is optimized, the high-order modes suffer a larger radiation loss. Moreover, the coupling loss quality factor (Qc) from the PCNBC to the bus waveguide and the radiation loss quality factor (Qr) can be used to determine transmission (T)35

    T=Qr2/(Qc+Qr)2.

    For radiation-Q-limited PCNBC, Qc is much larger than Qr. According to Eq. (3), the high-order modes exhibit larger transmissions due to their smaller values of Qc. Figure. 3(c) describes the relationship between the Q factor of the fundamental mode and w (Nt = 120, Nm = 100, fc = 0.42, and fe = 0.3). The Q factor becomes larger along with w because a larger w results in a smaller propagation loss (see Fig. 1(b)).

    Here, we discuss the influence of the dielectric block on the Q factor. Figure 3(d) presents the transmission spectrum at different Nt, revealing that as Nt increases, the Q factor correspondingly rises, while the transmission gradually diminishes. A similar behavior is observed in Fig. 3(e) for varying values of Nm. These results can be attributed to three mechanisms. First, an increased number of dielectric blocks in the taper region leads to a more gradual parabolic distribution of the filling factor, ranging from 0.3 to 0.42. This design facilitates a more uniform confinement of the optical Gaussian-shaped field profile along the x-direction, thereby minimizing the scattering of optical energy into radiation modes. Second, a higher value of Nm enhances the mirror reflectivity, which significantly strengthens the confinement of the Gaussian-shaped field profile within the PCNBC. Third, an increase in both Nt and Nm can reduce the coupling losses, which result in reduced transmission, as illustrated in Eq. (3). Combining these mechanisms, the increasing Q factors with the number of dielectric blocks can be attributed to a tighter Gaussian-shaped field profile, resulting in reduced cavity losses and coupling losses. Thereby, the properly optimal Nm and Nt parameters are crucial for achieving high-Q and high-transmission PCNBCs that are much more desirable for high-efficient optical modulators. Despite a decrease in transmission, the Q increases to above 1.87×105 when Nm is set to 200, as shown in the inset of Fig. 3(e). Table 1 presents a comparison of the reported LN-based PCNBCs. Noted that, our PCNBCs exceed the most similar cavities on LN substrate, featuring a much simpler fabrication process36.

    • Table 1. Comparison of various PCNBCs on LN substrate.

      Table 1. Comparison of various PCNBCs on LN substrate.

      Device structurePolarization modesQ (×105)Transmission (%)Extinction ratio (dB)Footprint (μm2)
      Dimensions of A: w = 2 μm, Nt = 120, Nm = 140, fc =0.42, and fe = 0.3. Dimensions of B: w = 2 μm, Nt = 120, Nm = 200, fc =0.42, and fe = 0.3.
      Si3N4 PCNBC/LNOI37TE0.09-321.6×140
      LN PCNBC/Suspend38TE1.0924-0.75×37
      Si PCNBC/LN39TE1.21.6-1.8×35.5
      LN PCNBC/LNOI36TE1.34-11.51.2×30
      Polymer PCNBC/LNOI32TM0.0738-1.8×118
      Polymer PCNBC/LNOI26TM0.1215-2.1×122
      Polymer PCNBC/LNOIthis work, ATE1.0416.6252×189
      Polymer PCNBC/LNOIthis work, BTE1.872222×223

    Discussion on Q-induced optical phenomena

    The high Q factor of PCNBCs enhance the light-matter interactions, enabling the exploration of intriguing novel optical phenomena. In this section, the potential functions of the Q-induced phenomen based on our LN PCNBCs are examined and studied.

    Thermo-optic tuning

    TO tuning is one of the most efficient methods to manipulate photons, providing a significant refractive index change almost without optical loss40,41. This mechanism plays a crucial role in photonic integrated circuits (PICs), where TO switches and modulators are indispensable components42,43. For example, optical devices like microring resonators and PCNBCs, are highly sensitive to fabrication errors leading to resonance wavelength shifts. This problem can be solved by integrating a heater near the waveguide. The optical material with a large TO coefficient is critical for achieving highly energy-efficient TO tuning. Nevertheless, in the proposed LNOI platform, the maximum TO coefficient of the LN is dne/dT3.3×105K1, which is smaller than that of the polymer material as reported44. For our PCNBCs, polymer serves not only as the structural element but also facilitates TO tuning compared to monolithic LN, since part of the optical mode is distributed within the polymer layer. The TO tuning capability of polymers has been demonstrated in various types of PCNBCs45,46. Generally, to evaluate the modulation efficiency of the TO modulator, the π-phase shift temperature ΔTπ is calculated by47

    ΔTπ=πδλ0(Δλ/ΔT)1,

    where δλ0 is the linewidth, corresponding to the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the transmission spectrum, and ΔλT is the sensitivity of temperature, which is determined by the material properties. To improve modulation efficiency, it often involves complex structures and fabrication processes, such as suspended device structures and p-n junction waveguides48,49. High modulation efficiency and a simple fabrication process are desirable for TO tuning, especially in LN photonics with a weak TO coefficient.

    To study the thermal tuning characteristics of our PCNBCs, the chip is heated from 20 °C to 30 °C at a step of 2 °C. The transmission spectra for a PCNBC operating in the fundamental mode are presented in Fig. 4(a). The resonance peak redshifts obviously as the temperature rises and ΔTπ of 2.36 °C is obtained. Therefore, the device possesses TO tuning capability. In general, an increase in the Q tends to reduce the ΔTπ of the TO modulator, as shown in Eq. (4), indicating a lower power consumption. For this purpose, devices with different Q factors are measured under the same condition. The corresponding ΔTπ and ΔλT are shown in Fig. 4(b). With the increase in the Q factor, the ΔTπ reduces. It is due to a larger optical energy density that enhances light-matter interactions. A device with a larger Q is suitable for temperature-sensitivity applications. The sensitivity of temperature remains around 26 pm/°C as the Q increases, which reveals the ΔλT of this platform. ΔTπ reaches its minimum value of 1.05 °C when the Q reaches 1.87×105, surpassing the performance of a device employing TO tuning with an integrated metal heater7,45. Through the measured data and the results from FEM calculations, the TO coefficient of the polymer is extracted as 0.8×10−4 K−1. Most importantly, the demonstration of thermal tuning indicates that the proposed high-Q PCNBCs provide a novel solution to the TO tuning issues experienced by LN photonics while also allowing for easy fabrication processes.

    (a) Measured transmission spectra of the PCNBC at different temperatures. The Q factor of the PCNBC is 0.8×105. (b) Measured ΔTπ and the sensitivity of temperature for various devices with different Q factors.

    Figure 4.(a) Measured transmission spectra of the PCNBC at different temperatures. The Q factor of the PCNBC is 0.8×105. (b) Measured ΔTπ and the sensitivity of temperature for various devices with different Q factors.

    Optical bistability

    Optical bistability is a phenomenon observed in high-Q silicon photonics, predominantly attributed to complex nonlinear effects such as two-photon absorption (TPA), the TO effect, FCD, and the Kerr effect50. This bistability is critical for the development of next-generation all-optical applications, including high-speed modulation and optical logic circuits51,52. LN, despite its widespread use in photonic applications, has a poor TO coefficient and lacks a mechanism for TPA at 1550 nm due to its wide bandgap of 3.78 eV53. Therefore, it is nontrivial to excite optical bistability even in microcavities, limiting its potential for all-optical modulation. In contrast, the polymer introduces inherent defect absorption and has a large TO coefficient as previously discussed in TO tuning. Moreover, the high-Q PCNBC may facilitate this process due to the small mode volume and strong confinement of the Gaussian-shaped field profile. Taking into account the above-mentioned analysis, it is a feasible solution to facilitate the application of LN photonics in all-optical information processing. Consequently, we investigate optically-induced bistability in the proposed high-Q PCNBCs.

    First, we set the tunable semiconductor laser with wavelength increment steps of 1 pm, and the required sample time is 0.37 seconds for each point. Second, we measure the transmission spectrum for the fundamental mode at different input power levels. At this state, the power-dependent transmission spectra for one of the PCNBCs are shown in Fig. 5(a). As the power injected into the cavity increases from 72.4 μW to 738.9 μW, there are two significant changes are observed. The resonance peak exhibits a pronounced redshift, which is induced by the positive TO coefficient of LN and polymer. Additionally, the measured line shapes gradually change from a Lorentzian type to a bistability feature induced by the TO effect. The optical bistability comes into being when the shift (Δλ) of the transmission spectrum satisfies the Eq. (5)54. Meanwhile, Eq. (5) indicates that a PCNBC with a large Q factor (small linewidth) will benefit under the identical condition, which requires lower optical power to induce bistability. The corresponding injected power is defined as the threshold power Pt. For this device, Pt is 160 μW.

    (a) The measured transmission spectra of a PCNBC (Q is 1.04×105) at different input powers. The threshold power is 160 μW. (b) The measured threshold power for the devices with different transmissions and Q factors.

    Figure 5.(a) The measured transmission spectra of a PCNBC (Q is 1.04×105) at different input powers. The threshold power is 160 μW. (b) The measured threshold power for the devices with different transmissions and Q factors.

    Δλ3δλ0/2.

    Figure 5(b) illustrates the threshold power of optical bistability for different devices with varying Q factors and transmissions. Initially, the threshold power gradually decreases as the Q increases, which agrees with our prediction. The underlying mechanism is mainly due to the dramatically enhanced optical energy density in PCNBC. When the Q exceeds 1.63×105, the threshold power begins to increase. It is caused by the decline in transmission intensity with increasing Q. Therefore, achieving high-efficient optical bistability depends on the careful design of PCNBCs with both high Q factors and optimal transmission characteristics. This experiment validates the feasibility of LN photonics devices with optical response, potentially paving the way for the development of LN all-optical logic chips.

    Fano resonance

    Fano resonance, characterized by its sharp and asymmetric line shape, opens up extensive prospects for the advancement of the field of photonics, especially proving immensely attractive in the realms of switching and sensing55,56. Numerous efforts have been put to demonstrate high-performance Fano resonance57,58. However, these devices often suffer from a larger footprint and complex tunability. Recently, the tunable Fano line shapes have been demonstrated in the silicon-based 1D PCNBC by adjusting the position of the input and output fibers59. This efficient Fano tunability benefits from two aspects. First, the high-index-contrast silicon waveguide ensures strong confinement of light within the waveguide. Second, the rectangular photonic crystal grating couplers provide heightened light sensitivity. All these factors enhance the dependency of the grating on the position of the fiber. However, achieving highly efficient Fano tunability on this etchless LNOI platform remains challenging due to the wake interaction between discrete state (cavity resonance mode) and continuum state (waveguide propagating mode). Therefore, the high-Q PCNBCs provide a good platform for studying the high-efficiency generation of Fano resonance.

    When the pump laser is near the resonance wavelength of the PCNBC, part of the energy is converted into the high-order leak TE mode, which serves as a continuous state and can propagate through the PCNBC59,60. Then, it interferes with the discrete fundamental mode. The transmission spectrum produced by the interaction is described as follows61

    |T(ω)|2=T0+k[q+2(ωw0)/Γ]21+[2(ωw0)/Γ]2,

    q=cotφ,

    where T0 and k are the constant factors of offset and scaling factor. And q, φ, w0, and Γ are the Fano asymmetry factor, the phase difference between the continuum state and discrete state, the resonance frequency of the cavity mode, and the resonance linewidth, respectively.

    To introduce the interference, the positions of the input fiber (left red dot) and output fiber (right red dot), located at the top of the grating couplers, are gradually altered, as illustrated in Fig. 6(a). When two fibers perfectly coincide with the center of the grating couplers, the phase difference φ between the continuum state and the discrete fundamental mode is zero, and the measured transmission spectrum has a Lorentzian line shape. However, the phase difference φ is not zero when the fibers are off-center from the grating couplers, the two modes start to interfere with each other, and the measured transmission spectrum has an asymmetric Fano line shape. In this approach, the transmission spectrum will experience a π phase shift change in theory. That is, the transmission spectrum will go through Lorentzian, Fano, quasi-Lorentzian, inverted Fano, and Lorentzian line shapes62.

    (a) Optical micrograph of the tested PCNBC. The locations of the fibers are indicated by red dots. (b) The measured transmission spectra at different input fiber displacements. The device has a Q of 1.04×105. (c) Devices with different Q factors are measured for Δφ.

    Figure 6.(a) Optical micrograph of the tested PCNBC. The locations of the fibers are indicated by red dots. (b) The measured transmission spectra at different input fiber displacements. The device has a Q of 1.04×105. (c) Devices with different Q factors are measured for Δφ.

    The measured transmission spectra are displayed in Fig. 6(b). For simplification and effective monitoring of the interference, the output fiber is fixed at yo = 3 μm. To change the phase, the input fiber is moved from yi = 2 μm to yi = 6 μm in the direction of yi at a step of 2 μm. During this process, the measured transmission spectra show a significant change. With the increase in yi, the extinction ratio (ER) reaches 15.14 dB, 19.03 dB, and 25.43 dB for the φ values of 0.24 rad, 0.43 rad, and 0.58 rad. When the input fiber goes along −yi with the same displacement, the inverted Fano line shapes are obtained. The corresponding ER is 25.83 dB, 16.38 dB, and 12.89 dB, with φ being −0.09 rad, −0.19 rad, and −0.22 rad. In sharp Fano line shapes, a large ER enables low-power operation. The effect of the Q factor on Δφ is also investigated in Fig. 6(c). Here, Δφ is defined as the sum of the absolute phase difference between two antisymmetric Fano line shapes (yi = |−yi|), corresponding to the variation degree of the line shape. The Δφ tends to increase with Q at yi/|−yi| = 4 μm. A larger Q factor means less displacement shift of the input fiber to attain the same Δφ. Although there is much room for improvement in Fano tuning, the impact of the Q factor on the phase tunability of the Fano line shapes is demonstrated for the first time on the LNOI platform. This discovery introduces a new avenue of research for ultra-compact Fano resonance tunability photonic devices.

    Conclusion

    In this paper, we theoretically proposed and experimentally demonstrated a method for achieving high-Q PCNBCs based on LNOI platform. The design principle of a radiation-limited cavity enabled the successful fabrication of nanocavities with Q factors exceeding 105 and high transmittance. To the best of our knowledge, the achieved Q is over one order of magnitude higher than the previous reports on etchless LN PCNBCs. Moreover, we explore the application potential of high Q microcavities in the interaction between light and external fields, demonstrating efficient modulation effects in TO tuning, optically-induced bistability, and Fano line shapes generation. These results hold tremendous promise for providing a versatile platform technique to develop high performance EO or AO modulator, optical logic devices, and quantum photonics, demonstrating significant potential in the field of photonic integration.

    [1] BEA Saleh, MC Teich. Fundamentals of Photonics(2019).

    [2] KJ Vahala. Optical microcavities. Nature, 424, 839-846(2003).

    [3] G Cocorullo, Corte FG Della, I Rendina et al. Thermo-optic effect exploitation in silicon microstructures. Sens Actuators A Phys, 71, 19-26(1998).

    [4] RA Soref, BR Bennett. Electrooptical effects in silicon. IEEE J Quantum Electron, 23, 123-129(1987).

    [5] A Shakoor, K Nozaki, E Kuramochi et al. Compact 1D-silicon photonic crystal electro-optic modulator operating with ultra-low switching voltage and energy. Opt Express, 22, 28623-28634(2014).

    [6] Shiramin L Abdollahi, WQ Xie, B Snyder et al. High extinction ratio hybrid graphene-silicon photonic crystal switch. IEEE Photonics Technol Lett, 30, 157-160(2018).

    [7] Y Zhang, Y He, QM Zhu et al. Single-resonance silicon nanobeam filter with an ultra-high thermo-optic tuning efficiency over a wide continuous tuning range. Opt Lett, 43, 4518-4521(2018).

    [8] M Soljačić, JD Joannopoulos. Enhancement of nonlinear effects using photonic crystals. Nat Mater, 3, 211-219(2004).

    [9] MZ Chowdhury, M Shahjalal, S Ahmed et al. 6G wireless communication systems: applications, requirements, technologies, challenges, and research directions. IEEE Open J Commun Soc, 1, 957-975(2020).

    [10] D Zhu, LB Shao, MJ Yu et al. Integrated photonics on thin-film lithium niobate. Adv Opt Photonics, 13, 242-352(2021).

    [11] EL Wooten, KM Kissa, A Yi-Yan et al. A review of lithium niobate modulators for fiber-optic communications systems. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron, 6, 69-82(2000).

    [13] H Suzuki, M Fujiwara, K Iwatsuki. Application of super-DWDM technologies to terrestrial terabit transmission systems. J Lightwave Technol, 24, 1998-2005(2006).

    [14] C Wang, M Zhang, X Chen et al. Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators operating at CMOS-compatible voltages. Nature, 562, 101-104(2018).

    [15] MX Li, HX Liang, R Luo et al. Photon-level tuning of photonic nanocavities. Optica, 6, 860-863(2019).

    [16] LT Cai, A Mahmoud, M Khan et al. Acousto-optical modulation of thin film lithium niobate waveguide devices. Photonics Res, 7, 1003-1013(2019).

    [17] S Benchabane, L Robert, JY Rauch et al. Highly selective electroplated nickel mask for lithium niobate dry etching. J Appl Phys, 105, 094109(2009).

    [18] R Geiss, S Diziain, M Steinert et al. Photonic crystals in lithium niobate by combining focussed ion beam writing and ion-beam enhanced etching. Phys Status Solidi A, 211, 2421-2425(2014).

    [19] RB Wu, JH Zhang, N Yao et al. Lithium niobate micro-disk resonators of quality factors above 107. Opt Lett, 43, 4116-4119(2018).

    [20] RH Gao, HS Zhang, F Bo et al. Broadband highly efficient nonlinear optical processes in on-chip integrated lithium niobate microdisk resonators of Q-factor above 108. New J Phys, 23, 123027(2021).

    [21] RH Gao, N Yao, JL Guan et al. Lithium niobate microring with ultra-high Q factor above 108. Chin Opt Lett, 20, 011902(2022).

    [22] ZJ Yu, X Xi, JW Ma et al. Photonic integrated circuits with bound states in the continuum. Optica, 6, 1342-1348(2019).

    [23] CL Zou, JM Cui, FW Sun et al. Guiding light through optical bound states in the continuum for ultrahigh-Q microresonators. Laser Photonics Rev, 9, 114-119(2015).

    [24] ZJ Yu, YY Tong, HK Tsang et al. High-dimensional communication on etchless lithium niobate platform with photonic bound states in the continuum. Nat Commun, 11, 2602(2020).

    [25] F Ye, Y Yu, X Xi et al. Second-harmonic generation in etchless lithium niobate nanophotonic waveguides with bound states in the continuum. Laser Photonics Rev, 16, 2100429(2022).

    [26] JX Zhang, BC Pan, WX Liu et al. Ultra-compact electro-optic modulator based on etchless lithium niobate photonic crystal nanobeam cavity. Opt Express, 30, 20839-20846(2022).

    [27] ZJ Yu, XK Sun. Acousto-optic modulation of photonic bound state in the continuum. Light Sci Appl, 9, 1(2020).

    [28] Y Yu, ZJ Yu, ZY Zhang et al. Wavelength-division multiplexing on an etchless lithium niobate integrated platform. ACS Photonics, 9, 3253-3259(2022).

    [29] JH Zhang, JY Ma, M Parry et al. Spatially entangled photon pairs from lithium niobate nonlocal metasurfaces. Sci Adv, 8, eabq4240(2022).

    [30] Molina L Valencia, Morales R Camacho, JH Zhang et al. Enhanced infrared vision by nonlinear up-conversion in nonlocal metasurfaces. Adv Mater, 36, 2402777(2024).

    [31] J Čtyroký, J Petráček, V Kuzmiak et al. Bound modes in the continuum in integrated photonic LiNbO3 waveguides: are they always beneficial. Opt Express, 31, 44-55(2023).

    [33] QM Quan, M Loncar. Deterministic design of wavelength scale, ultra-high Q photonic crystal nanobeam cavities. Opt Express, 19, 18529-18542(2011).

    [34] QM Quan, PB Deotare, M Loncar. Photonic crystal nanobeam cavity strongly coupled to the feeding waveguide. Appl Phys Lett, 96, 203102(2010).

    [35] JD Joannopoulos, SG Johnson, JN Winn et al. Photonic Crystals: Molding the Flow of Light(2008).

    [36] MX Li, JW Ling, Y He et al. Lithium niobate photonic-crystal electro-optic modulator. Nat Commun, 11, 4123(2020).

    [38] HX Liang, R Luo, Y He et al. High-quality lithium niobate photonic crystal nanocavities. Optica, 4, 1251-1258(2017).

    [39] JD Witmer, JA Valery, P Arrangoiz-Arriola et al. High-Q photonic resonators and electro-optic coupling using silicon-on-lithium-niobate. Sci Rep, 7, 46313(2017).

    [40] J Wang, H Shen, L Fan et al. Reconfigurable radio-frequency arbitrary waveforms synthesized in a silicon photonic chip. Nat Commun, 6, 5957(2015).

    [41] B Stern, XL Zhu, CP Chen et al. On-chip mode-division multiplexing switch. Optica, 2, 530-535(2015).

    [42] HY Zhou, CY Qiu, XH Jiang et al. Compact, submilliwatt, 2 × 2 silicon thermo-optic switch based on photonic crystal nanobeam cavities. Photonics Res, 5, 108-112(2017).

    [43] HY Yu, F Qiu. Compact thermo-optic modulator based on a titanium dioxide micro-ring resonator. Opt Lett, 47, 2093-2096(2022).

    [44] L Moretti, M Iodice, Corte FG Della et al. Temperature dependence of the thermo-optic coefficient of lithium niobate, from 300 to 515 K in the visible and infrared regions. J Appl Phys, 98, 036101(2005).

    [45] YY Chen, J Whitehead, A Ryou et al. Large thermal tuning of a polymer-embedded silicon nitride nanobeam cavity. Opt Lett, 44, 3058-3061(2019).

    [46] QM Quan, IB Burgess, SKY Tang et al. High-Q, low index-contrast polymeric photonic crystal nanobeam cavities. Opt Express, 19, 22191-22197(2011).

    [47] DY Yao, Z Jiang, Y Zhang et al. Ultrahigh thermal-efficient all-optical silicon photonic crystal nanobeam cavity modulator with TPA-induced thermo-optic effect. Opt Lett, 48, 2325-2328(2023).

    [48] XY Liu, P Ying, XM Zhong et al. Highly efficient thermo-optic tunable micro-ring resonator based on an LNOI platform. Opt Lett, 45, 6318-6321(2020).

    [49] GL Li, XZ Zheng, J Yao et al. 25Gb/s 1V-driving CMOS ring modulator with integrated thermal tuning. Opt Express, 19, 20435-20443(2011).

    [50] Y Gao, W Zhou, XK Sun et al. Cavity-enhanced thermo-optic bistability and hysteresis in a graphene-on-Si3N4 ring resonator. Opt Lett, 42, 1950-1953(2017).

    [51] VR Almeida, M Lipson. Optical bistability on a silicon chip. Opt Lett, 29, 2387-2389(2004).

    [52] PY Wen, M Sanchez, M Gross et al. Vertical-cavity optical AND gate. Opt Commun, 219, 383-387(2003).

    [53] C Thierfelder, S Sanna, A Schindlmayr et al. Do we know the band gap of lithium niobate. Phys Status Solidi C, 7, 362-365(2010).

    [54] PE Barclay, K Srinivasan, O Painter. Nonlinear response of silicon photonic crystal microresonators excited via an integrated waveguide and fiber taper. Opt Express, 13, 801-820(2005).

    [55] K Nozaki, A Shinya, S Matsuo et al. Ultralow-energy and high-contrast all-optical switch involving Fano resonance based on coupled photonic crystal nanocavities. Opt Express, 21, 11877-11888(2013).

    [56] JY Su, XQ Huang, HL Xu et al. Ultrafast all-optical switching in a silicon-polymer compound slotted photonic crystal nanobeam cavity. Opt Rev, 30, 33-40(2023).

    [57] S Zheng, ZS Ruan, SQ Gao et al. Compact tunable electromagnetically induced transparency and Fano resonance on silicon platform. Opt Express, 25, 25655-25662(2017).

    [58] XQ Guo, TG Dai, B Chen et al. Twin-Fano resonator with widely tunable slope for ultra-high-resolution wavelength monitor. Opt Lett, 44, 4527-4530(2019).

    [59] KK Mehta, JS Orcutt, RJ Ram. Fano line shapes in transmission spectra of silicon photonic crystal resonators. Appl Phys Lett, 102, 081109(2013).

    [60] LP Gu, BB Wang, QC Yuan et al. Fano resonance from a one-dimensional topological photonic crystal. APL Photonics, 6, 086105(2021).

    [61] M Galli, SL Portalupi, M Belotti et al. Light scattering and Fano resonances in high-Q photonic crystal nanocavities. Appl Phys Lett, 94, 071101(2009).

    [62] MF Limonov, MV Rybin, AN Poddubny et al. Fano resonances in photonics. Nat Photonics, 11, 543-554(2017).

    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Zhi Jiang, Cizhe Fang, Xu Ran, Yu Gao, Ruiqing Wang, Jianguo Wang, Danyang Yao, Xuetao Gan, Yan Liu, Yue Hao, Genquan Han. Ultra-high-Q photonic crystal nanobeam cavity for etchless lithium niobate on insulator (LNOI) platform[J]. Opto-Electronic Advances, 2025, 8(1): 240114-1

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Research Articles

    Received: May. 16, 2024

    Accepted: Aug. 19, 2024

    Published Online: Mar. 24, 2025

    The Author Email: Yao Danyang (DYYao), Gan Xuetao (XTGan)

    DOI:10.29026/oea.2025.240114

    Topics