[1] Aharonov Y, Vaidman L. Properties of a quantum system during the time interval between two measurements[J]. Physical Review A, Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 41, 11-20(1990).

[2] Aharonov Y, Bergmann P G, Lebowitz J L. Time symmetry in the quantum process of measurement[J]. Physical Review, 134, B1410-B1416(1964).

[3] Xu X Y, Pan W W, Wang Q Q et al. Measurements of nonlocal variables and demonstration of the failure of the product rule for a pre- and postselected pair of photons[J]. Physical Review Letters, 122, 100405(2019).

[4] Aharonov Y, Vaidman L. On the two-state vector reformulation of quantum mechanics[J]. Physica Scripta, T76, 85(1998).

[5] Aharonov Y, Vaidman L. The two-state vector formalism: an updated review[M]. //Muga J G, Mayato R S, Egusquiza Í L. Time in quantum mechanics. Lecture notes in physics. Heidelberg: Springer, 734, 399-477(2008).

[6] Aharonov Y, Popescu S, Tollaksen J. A time-symmetric formulation of quantum mechanics[J]. Physics Today, 63, 27-32(2010).

[7] Aharonov Y, Albert D Z, Vaidman L. How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin- 1/2 particle can turn out to be 100[J]. Physical Review Letters, 60, 1351-1354(1988).

[8] Kofman A G, Ashhab S, Nori F. Nonperturbative theory of weak pre- and post-selected measurements[J]. Physics Reports, 520, 43-133(2012).

[9] Dressel J, Jordan A N. Weak-values are universal in von Neumann measurements[J]. Physical Review Letters, 109, 230402(2012).

[10] Tamir B, Cohen E. Introduction to weak measurements and weak-values[J]. Quanta, 2, 7-17(2013).

[11] Dressel J, Malik M, Miatto F M et al. Colloquium: understanding quantum weak-values: basics and applications[J]. Reviews of Modern Physics, 86, 307-316(2014).

[12] Knee G C, Combes J, Ferrie C et al. Weak-value amplification: state of play[J]. Quantum Measurements and Quantum Metrology, 3, 32-37(2016).

[13] Steinberg A M. A light touch[J]. Nature, 463, 890-891(2010).

[14] Aharonov Y, Botero A. Quantum averages of weak-values[J]. Physical Review A, 72, 052111(2005).

[15] Aharonov Y, Botero A, Popescu S et al. Revisiting Hardy’s paradox: counterfactual statements, real measurements, entanglement and weak-values[J]. Physics Letters A, 301, 130-138(2002). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375960102009866

[16] Resch K J, Steinberg A M. Extracting joint weak-values with local, single-particle measurements[J]. Physical Review Letters, 92, 130402(2004). http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=PRLTAO000092000013130402000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=Yes

[17] Lundeen J S, Steinberg A M. Experimental joint weak measurement on a photon pair as a probe of Hardy’s paradox[J]. Physical Review Letters, 102, 020404(2009).

[18] Resch K J, Lundeen J S, Steinberg A M. Experimental realization of the quantum box problem[J]. Physics Letters A, 324, 125-131(2004).

[19] Williams N S, Jordan A N. Weak-values and the Leggett-Garg inequality in solid-state qubits[J]. Physical Review Letters, 100, 026804(2008). http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/18232905

[20] Dressel J, Broadbent C J, Howell J C et al. Experimental violation of two-party Leggett-Garg inequalities with semiweak measurements[J]. Physical Review Letters, 106, 040402(2011).

[21] Pusey M F. Anomalous weak-values are proofs of contextuality[J]. Physical Review Letters, 113, 200401(2014). http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/25432026

[22] Wiseman H M. Weak-values, quantum trajectories, and the cavity-QED experiment on wave-particle correlation[J]. Physical Review A, 65, 032111(2002). http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002PhRvA..65c2111W

[23] Mir R, Lundeen J S, Mitchell M W et al. A double-slit ‘which-way’ experiment on the complementarity-uncertainty debate[J]. New Journal of Physics, 9, 287(2007). http://arxiv.org/abs/0706.3966

[24] Dressel J. Weak-values as interference phenomena[J]. Physical Review A, 91, 032116(2015). http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.0943v3

[25] Dressel J, Jordan A N. Significance of the imaginary part of the weak-value[J]. Physical Review A, 85, 012107(2012).

[26] Brunner N, Acín A, Collins D et al. Optical telecom networks as weak quantum measurements with postselection[J]. Physical Review Letters, 91, 180402(2003).

[27] Brunner N, Scarani V, Wegmüller M et al. Direct measurement of superluminal group velocity and signal velocity in an optical fiber[J]. Physical Review Letters, 93, 203902(2004).

[28] Solli D R, McCormick C F, Chiao R Y et al. Fast light, slow light, and phase singularities: a connection to generalized weak-values[J]. Physical Review Letters, 92, 043601(2004).

[29] Camacho R M, Dixon P B, Glasser R T et al. Realization of anall-optical zero to pi cross-phase modulation jump[J]. Physical Review Letters, 102, 013902(2009).

[30] Cho Y W, Kim Y, Choi Y H et al. Emergence of the geometric phase from quantum measurement back-action[J]. Nature Physics, 15, 665-670(2019).

[31] Kocsis S, Braverman B, Ravets S et al. Observing the average trajectories of single photons in a two-slit interferometer[J]. Science, 332, 1170-1173(2011).

[32] von Neumann J. Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics: new edition[M](2018).

[33] Jozsa R. Complex weak-values in quantum measurement[J]. Physical Review A, 76, 044103(2007). http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=VIRT04000007000010000130000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=Yes

[34] Parks A D, Gray J E. Variance control in weak-value measurement pointers[J]. Physical Review A, 84, 012116(2011).

[35] Knee G C, Briggs G A D. Seeing opportunity in every difficulty: protecting information with weak-value techniques[J]. Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foundations, 5, 505-517(2018). http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40509-018-0164-z

[36] Pan Y M, Zhang J, Cohen E et al. Weak-to-strong transition of quantum measurement in a trapped-ion system[J]. Nature Physics, 16, 1206-1210(2020). http://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-020-0973-y

[37] Johansen L M. Weak measurements with arbitrary probe states[J]. Physical Review Letters, 93, 120402(2004). http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=PRLTAO000093000012120402000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=Yes

[38] Pryde G J, O’Brien J L, White A G et al. Measurement of quantum weak-values of photon polarization[J]. Physical Review Letters, 94, 220405(2005).

[39] Romito A, Gefen Y, Blanter Y M. Weak-values of electron spin in a double quantum dot[J]. Physical Review Letters, 100, 056801(2008).

[40] Shpitalnik V, Gefen Y, Romito A. Tomography of many-body weak-values: Mach-Zehnder interferometry[J]. Physical Review Letters, 101, 226802(2008).

[41] Cho Y W, Lim H T, Ra Y S et al. Weak-value measurement with an incoherent measuring device[C]. //CLEO/QELS: 2010 Laser Science to Photonic Applications, May 16-21, 2010, San Jose, CA, USA, 1-2(2010).

[42] Shikano Y, Hosoya A. Weak-values with decoherence[J]. Journal of Physics A, 43, 025304(2010).

[43] Iinuma M, Suzuki Y, Taguchi G et al. Weak measurement of photon polarization by back-action-induced path interference[J]. New Journal of Physics, 13, 033041(2011).

[44] Dressel J, Jordan A N. Sufficient conditions for uniqueness of the weak-value[J]. Journal of Physics A, 45, 015304(2012). http://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=2871392

[45] Puentes G, Hermosa N, Torres J P. Weak measurements with orbital-angular-momentum pointer states[J]. Physical Review Letters, 109, 040401(2012). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23006067

[46] Susa Y, Shikano Y, Hosoya A. Optimal probe wave function of weak-value amplification[J]. Physical Review A, 85, 052110(2012).

[47] Turek Y, Kobayashi H, Akutsu T et al. Post-selected von Neumann measurement with Hermite-Gaussian and Laguerre-Gaussian pointer states[J]. New Journal of Physics, 17, 083029(2015).

[48] Turek Y, Maimaiti W, Shikano Y et al. Advantages of nonclassical pointer states in postselected weak measurements[J]. Physical Review A, 92, 022109(2015). http://arxiv.org/abs/1507.07322

[49] Qin L P, Feng W, Li X Q. Simple understanding of quantum weak-values[J]. Scientific Reports, 6, 20286(2016).

[50] Flack R, Monachello V, Hiley B et al. A method for measuring the weak-value of spin for metastable atoms[J]. Entropy, 20, 566(2018). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/326705746_A_Method_for_Measuring_the_Weak_Value_of_Spin_for_Metastable_Atoms

[51] Ogawa K, Kobayashi H, Tomita A. Operational formulation of weak-values without probe systems[J]. Physical Review A, 101, 042117(2020).

[52] Wu S J, Li Y. Weak measurements beyond the Aharonov-Albert-Vaidman formalism[J]. Physical Review A, 83, 052106(2011).

[53] Geszti T. Postselected weak measurement beyond the weak-value[J]. Physical Review A, 81, 044102(2010). http://arxiv.org/abs/0909.2206v4

[54] Koike T, Tanaka S. Limits on amplification by Aharonov-Albert-Vaidman weak measurement[J]. Physical Review A, 84, 062106(2011). http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=VIRT04000011000012000123000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=Yes

[55] Zhu X M, Zhang Y X, Pang S S et al. Quantum measurements with preselection and postselection[J]. Physical Review A, 84, 052111(2011).

[56] di Lorenzo A. Full counting statistics of weak-value measurement[J]. Physical Review A, 85, 032106(2012).

[57] Nakamura K, Nishizawa A, Fujimoto M K. Evaluation of weak measurements to all orders[J]. Physical Review A, 85, 012113(2012).

[58] Nishizawa A, Nakamura K, Fujimoto M K. Weak-value amplification in a shot-noise-limited interferometer[J]. Physical Review A, 85, 062108(2012).

[59] Chen S Z, Zhou X X, Mi C Q et al. Modified weak measurements for the detection of the photonic spin Hall effect[J]. Physical Review A, 91, 062105(2015).

[60] Qiu J D, Ren C L, Li Z X et al. Extended validity of weak measurement[J]. Chinese Physics B, 29, 064214(2020).

[61] Ren J H, Qin L P, Feng W et al. Weak-value-amplification analysis beyond the Aharonov-Albert-Vaidman limit[J]. Physical Review A, 102, 042601(2020). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/344493734_Weak-value-amplification_analysis_beyond_the_Aharonov-Albert-Vaidman_limit

[62] Pang S S, Wu S J, Chen Z B. Weak measurement with orthogonal preselection and postselection[J]. Physical Review A, 86, 022112(2012).

[63] Ritchie N W M, Story J G, Hulet R G. Realization of a measurement of a“weak-value”[J]. Physical Review Letters, 66, 1107-1110(1991).

[64] Hosten O, Kwiat P. Observation of the spin Hall effect of light via weak measurements[J]. Science, 319, 787-790(2008).

[65] Dixon P B, Starling D J, Jordan A N et al. Ultrasensitive beam deflection measurement via interferometric weak-value amplification[J]. Physical Review Letters, 102, 173601(2009). http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/19518781

[66] Howell J C, Starling D J, Dixon P B et al. Interferometric weak-value deflections: quantum and classical treatments[J]. Physical Review A, 81, 033813(2010).

[67] Qin Y, Li Y, He H et al. Measurement of spin Hall effect of reflected light[J]. Optics Letters, 34, 2551-2553(2009). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19724486/

[68] Brunner N, Simon C. Measuring small longitudinal phase shifts: weak measurements or standard interferometry?[J]. Physical Review Letters, 105, 010405(2010). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20867428

[69] Starling D J, Dixon P B, Williams N S et al. Continuous phase amplification with a Sagnac interferometer[J]. Physical Review A, 82, 011802(2010).

[70] Starling D J, Dixon P B, Jordan A N et al. Precision frequency measurements with interferometric weak-values[J]. Physical Review A, 82, 063822(2010).

[71] Feizpour A, Xing X X, Steinberg A M. Amplifying single-photon nonlinearity using weak measurements[J]. Physical Review Letters, 107, 133603(2011). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22026853

[72] Zilberberg O, Romito A, Gefen Y. Charge sensing amplification via weak-values measurement[J]. Physical Review Letters, 106, 080405(2011).

[73] Turner M D, Hagedorn C A, Schlamminger S et al. Picoradian deflection measurement with an interferometric quasi-autocollimator using weak-value amplification[J]. Optics Letters, 36, 1479-1481(2011). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21499396

[74] Hogan J M, Hammer J, Chiow S W et al. Precision angle sensor using an optical lever inside a Sagnac interferometer[J]. Optics Letters, 36, 1698-1700(2011).

[75] Pfeifer M, Fischer P. Weak-value amplified optical activity measurements[J]. Optics Express, 19, 16508-16517(2011).

[76] Zhou X X, Xiao Z C, Luo H L et al. Experimental observation of the spin Hall effect of light on a nanometal film via weak measurements[J]. Physical Review A, 85, 043809(2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.85.043809

[77] Gorodetski Y, Bliokh K Y, Stein B et al. Weak measurements of light chirality with a plasmonic slit[J]. Physical Review Letters, 109, 013901(2012). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23031106

[78] Egan P, Stone J A. Weak-value thermostat with 0.2 mK precision[J]. Optics Letters, 37, 4991-4993(2012).

[79] Viza G I, Martínez-Rincón J, Howland G A et al. Weak-values technique for velocity measurements[J]. Optics Letters, 38, 2949-2952(2013). http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/24104618

[80] Jayaswal G, Mistura G, Merano M. Weak measurement of the Goos-Hänchen shift[J]. Optics Letters, 38, 1232-1234(2013). http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ol/abstract.cfm?uri=ol-38-8-1232

[81] Li C F, Xu X Y, Tang J S et al. Ultrasensitive phase estimation with white light[J]. Physical Review A, 83, 044102(2011).

[82] Xu X Y, Kedem Y, Sun K et al. Phase estimation with weak measurement using a white light source[J]. Physical Review Letters, 111, 033604(2013). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23909319

[83] Jayaswal G, Mistura G, Merano M. Observation of the Imbert-Fedorov effect via weak-value amplification[J]. Optics Letters, 39, 2266-2269(2014).

[84] Magaña-Loaiza O S, Mirhosseini M, Rodenburg B et al. Amplification of angular rotations using weak measurements[C]. //Frontiers in Optics 2014, October 19-23, 2014, Tucson, Arizona United States. Washington, D.C.: OSA, FTh4A.4(2014).

[85] Hallaji M, Feizpour A, Dmochowski G et al. Weak-value amplification of the nonlinear effect of a single photon[J]. Nature Physics, 13, 540-544(2017).

[86] Ling X H, Zhou X X, Huang K et al. Recent advances in the spin Hall effect of light[J]. Reports on Progress in Physics, 80, 066401(2017). http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28357995

[87] Chen S Z, Mi C Q, Cai L et al. Observation of the Goos-Hänchen shift in graphene via weak measurements[J]. Applied Physics Letters, 110, 031105(2017). http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/proceeding/aipcp/10.1063/1.4974212

[88] Chen S Z, Mi C Q, Wu W J et al. Weak-value amplification for Weyl-point separation in momentum space[J]. New Journal of Physics, 20, 103050(2018).

[89] Steinmetz J, Lyons K, Song M et al. Enhanced on-chip frequency measurement using weak-value amplification[EB/OL]. (2021-03-29)[2021-04-01]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.15752

[90] Braunstein S L, Caves C M. Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states[J]. Physical Review Letters, 72, 3439-3443(1994). http://www.europepmc.org/abstract/MED/10056200

[91] Giovannetti V, Lloyd S, Maccone L. Advances in quantum metrology[J]. Nature Photonics, 5, 222-229(2011).

[92] Braunstein S L. Quantum limits on precision measurements of phase[J]. Physical Review Letters, 69, 3598-3601(1992).

[93] Giovannetti V, Lloyd S, Maccone L. Quantum-enhanced measurements: beating the standard quantum limit[J]. Science, 306, 1330-1336(2004). http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=15211871&site=ehost-live

[94] Giovannetti V, Lloyd S, Maccone L. Quantum metrology[J]. Physical Review Letters, 96, 010401(2006).

[95] Resch K J, Pregnell K L, Prevedel R et al. Time-reversal and super-resolving phase measurements[J]. Physical Review Letters, 98, 223601(2007).

[96] Polino E, Valeri M, Spagnolo N et al. Photonic quantum metrology[J]. AVS Quantum Science, 2, 024703(2020).

[97] Barnett S M, Fabre C, Maıtre A. Ultimate quantum limits for resolution of beam displacements[J]. The European Physical Journal D, 22, 513-519(2003). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=907772

[98] Combes J, Ferrie C, Jiang Z et al. Quantum limits on postselected, probabilistic quantum metrology[J]. Physical Review A, 89, 052117(2014). http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/e746061c3ab7f9cef3b45a488f2c7c18

[99] Lee J, Tsutsui I. Merit of amplification by weak measurement in view of measurement uncertainty[J]. Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foundations, 1, 65-78(2014).

[100] Combes J, Ferrie C. Cost of postselection in decision theory[J]. Physical Review A, 92, 022117(2015).

[101] Susa Y, Tanaka S. Statistical hypothesis testing by weak-value amplification: proposal and evaluation[J]. Physical Review A, 92, 012112(2015).

[102] Arvidsson-Shukur D R M, Yunger Halpern N, Lepage H V et al. Quantum advantage in postselected metrology[J]. Nature Communications, 11, 3775(2020). http://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-17559-w

[103] Zhang L J, Datta A, Walmsley I A. Precision metrology using weak measurements[J]. Physical Review Letters, 114, 210801(2015).

[104] Hofmann H F, Goggin M E, Almeida M P et al. Estimation of a quantum interaction parameter using weak measurements: theory and experiment[J]. Physical Review A, 86, 040102(2012).

[105] Tanaka S, Yamamoto N. Information amplification viapostselection: a parameter-estimation perspective[J]. Physical Review A, 88, 042116(2013). http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.2409

[106] Alves G B, Escher B M, de Matos Filho R L et al. Weak-value amplification as an optimal metrological protocol[J]. Physical Review A, 91, 062107(2015).

[107] Li F, Huang J Z, Zeng G H. Adaptive weak-value amplification with adjustable postselection[J]. Physical Review A, 96, 032112(2017). http://journals.aps.org/pra/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.032112

[108] Xu L, Liu Z X, Datta A et al. Approaching quantum-limited metrology with imperfect detectors by using weak-value amplification[J]. Physical Review Letters, 125, 080501(2020).

[109] Pang S S, Dressel J, Brun T A. Entanglement-assisted weak-value amplification[J]. Physical Review Letters, 113, 030401(2014).

[110] Chen J S, Liu B H, Hu M J et al. Realization of entanglement-assisted weak-value amplification in a photonic system[J]. Physical Review A, 99, 032120(2019). http://journals.aps.org/pra/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevA.99.032120

[111] Stárek R, Mičuda M, Hošák R et al. Experimental entanglement-assisted weak measurement of phase shift[J]. Optics Express, 28, 34639-34655(2020).

[112] Pang S S, Brun T A. Suppressing technical noise in weak measurements by entanglement[J]. Physical Review A, 92, 012120(2015).

[113] Pang S S, Brun T A. Improving the precision of weak measurements by postselection measurement[J]. Physical Review Letters, 115, 120401(2015). http://www.zhangqiaokeyan.com/academic-journal-foreign_other_thesis/0204111873327.html

[114] Jordan A N, Tollaksen J, Troupe J E et al. Heisenberg scaling with weak measurement:a quantum state discrimination point of view[J]. Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foundations, 2, 5-15(2015).

[115] Chen G, Zhang L J, Zhang W H et al. Achieving Heisenberg-scaling precision with projective measurement on single photons[J]. Physical Review Letters, 121, 060506(2018).

[116] Chen G, Aharon N, Sun Y N et al. Heisenberg-scaling measurement of the single-photon Kerr non-linearity using mixed states[J]. Nature Communications, 9, 93(2018).

[117] Torres J P, Salazar-Serrano L J. Weak-value amplification: a view from quantum estimation theory that highlights what it is and what isn’t[J]. Scientific Reports, 6, 19702(2016).

[118] Knee G C, Briggs G A D, Benjamin S C et al. Quantum sensors based on weak-value amplification cannot overcome decoherence[J]. Physical Review A, 87, 012115(2013).

[119] Pang S S, Alonso J R G, Brun T A et al. Protecting weak measurements against systematic errors[J]. Physical Review A, 94, 012329(2016).

[120] Ferrie C, Combes J. Weakvalue amplification is suboptimal for estimation and detection[J]. Physical Review Letters, 112, 040406(2014). http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.0199v1

[121] Jordan A N, Martínez-Rincón J, Howell J C. Technical advantages for weak-value amplification: when less is more[J]. Physical Review X, 4, 011031(2014).

[122] Sinclair J, Hallaji M, Steinberg A M et al. Weak-value amplification and optimal parameter estimation in the presence of correlated noise[J]. Physical Review A, 96, 052128(2017).

[123] Starling D J, Dixon P B, Jordan A N et al. Optimizing the signal-to-noise ratio of a beam-deflection measurement with interferometric weak-values[J]. Physical Review A, 80, 041803(2009).

[124] Kedem Y. Using technical noise to increase the signal-to-noise ratio of measurements via imaginary weak-values[J]. Physical Review A, 85, 060102(2012). http://www.oalib.com/paper/3385537

[125] Knee G C, Gauger E M. When amplification with weak-values fails to suppress technical noise[J]. Physical Review X, 4, 011032(2014).

[126] Viza G I, Martínez-Rincón J, Alves G B et al. Experimentally quantifying the advantages of weak-values-based metrology[C]. //CLEO: QELS_Fundamental Science 2015, May 10-15, 2015, San Jose, California United States. Washington, D.C.: OSA, FM1A.2(2015).

[127] Harris J, Boyd R W, Lundeen J S. Weak-value amplification can outperform conventional measurement in the presence of detector saturation[J]. Physical Review Letters, 118, 070802(2017).

[128] Dressel J, Lyons K, Jordan A N et al. Strengthening weak-value amplification with recycled photons[J]. Physical Review A, 88, 023821(2013). http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.4520

[129] Lyons K, Dressel J, Jordan A N et al. Power-recycled weak-value-based metrology[J]. Physical Review Letters, 114, 170801(2015).

[130] Wang Y T, Tang J S, Hu G et al. Experimental demonstration of higher precision weak-value-based metrology using power recycling[J]. Physical Review Letters, 117, 230801(2016).

[131] Strübi G, Bruder C. Measuring ultrasmall time delays of light by joint weak measurements[J]. Physical Review Letters, 110, 083605(2013).

[132] Fang C, Huang J Z, Yu Y et al. Ultra-small time-delay estimation via a weak measurement technique with post-selection[J]. Journal of Physics B, 49, 175501(2016).

[133] Martínez-Rincón J, Liu W T, Viza G I et al. Can anomalous amplification be attained without postselection?[J]. Physical Review Letters, 116, 100803(2016).

[134] Liu W T, Martínez-Rincón J, Viza G I et al. Anomalous amplification of a homodyne signal via almost-balanced weak-values[J]. Optics Letters, 42, 903-906(2017). http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28248327

[135] Martínez-Rincón J, Mullarkey C A, Viza G I et al. Ultrasensitive inverse weak-value tilt meter[J]. Optics Letters, 42, 2479-2482(2017).

[136] Lyons K, Howell J C, Jordan A N. Noise suppression in inverse weak-value-based phase detection[J]. Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foundations, 5, 579-588(2018).

[137] Yin P, Zhang W H, Xu L et al. Improving the precision of optical metrology by detecting fewer photons[EB/OL]. (2021-03-23)[2021-04-01]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.12373

[138] Zhang Z H, Chen G, Xu X Y et al. Ultrasensitive biased weak measurement for longitudinal phase estimation[J]. Physical Review A, 94, 053843(2016).

[139] Li D M, Guan T, He Y H et al. A chiral sensor based on weak measurement for the determination of Proline enantiomers in diverse measuring circumstances[J]. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 110, 103-109(2018).

[140] Li D M, Guan T, Liu F et al. Optical rotation based chirality detection of enantiomers via weak measurement in frequency domain[J]. Applied Physics Letters, 112, 213701(2018). http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/proceeding/aipcp/10.1063/1.5019816

[141] Thew R T, Nemoto K, White A G et al. Qudit quantum-state tomography[J]. Physical Review A, 66, 012303(2002).

[142] James D F V, Kwiat P G, Munro W J et al. Measurement of qubits[J]. Physical Review A, 64, 052312(2001).

[143] Horodecki R, Horodecki P, Horodecki M et al. Quantum entanglement[J]. Reviews of Modern Physics, 81, 865-942(2009).

[144] Xu H C, Xu F X, Theurer T et al. Experimental quantification of coherence of a tunable quantum detector[J]. Physical Review Letters, 125, 060404(2020). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/343504258_Experimental_Quantification_of_Coherence_of_a_Tunable_Quantum_Detector

[145] Pallister S, Linden N, Montanaro A. Optimal verification of entangled states with local measurements[J]. Physical Review Letters, 120, 170502(2018).

[146] Lundeen J S, Sutherland B, Patel A et al. Direct measurement of the quantum wavefunction[J]. Nature, 474, 188-191(2011). http://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/arXiv:1112.3575

[147] Fischbach J, Freyberger M. Quantum optical reconstruction scheme using weak values[J]. Physical Review A, 86, 052110(2012).

[148] Salvail J Z, Agnew M, Johnson A S et al. Full characterization of polarization states of light via direct measurement[J]. Nature Photonics, 7, 316-321(2013).

[149] Malik M, Mirhosseini M, Lavery M P J et al. Direct measurement of a 27-dimensional orbital-angular-momentum state vector[J]. Nature Communications, 5, 3115(2014).

[150] Chaturvedi S, Ercolessi E, Marmo G et al. Wigner-Weyl correspondence in quantum mechanics for continuous and discrete systems: a Dirac-inspired view[J]. Journal of Physics A, 39, 1405-1423(2006). http://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=2202811

[151] Bamber C, Lundeen J S. Observing Dirac’s classical phase space analog to the quantum state[J]. Physical Review Letters, 112, 070405(2014). http://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.070405

[152] Lundeen J S, Bamber C. Procedure for direct measurement of general quantum states using weak measurement[J]. Physical Review Letters, 108, 070402(2012). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22401180

[153] Mao Y L, Ma Z H, Jin R B et al. Error-disturbance trade-off in sequential quantum measurements[J]. Physical Review Letters, 122, 090404(2019).

[154] di Lorenzo A. Quantum state tomography from a sequential measurement of two variables in a single setup[J]. Physical Review A, 88, 042114(2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.88.042114

[155] di Lorenzo A. Sequential measurement of conjugate variables as an alternative quantum state tomography[J]. Physical Review Letters, 110, 010404(2013).

[156] Diósi L. Structural features of sequential weak measurements[J]. Physical Review A, 94, 010103(2016).

[157] Shojaee E, Jackson C S, Riofrío C A et al. Optimal pure-state qubit tomography via sequential weak measurements[J]. Physical Review Letters, 121, 130404(2018). http://arxiv.org/abs/1805.01012v1

[158] Chen J S, Hu M J, Hu X M et al. Experimental realization of sequential weak measurements of non-commuting Pauli observables[J]. Optics Express, 27, 6089-6097(2019).

[159] Thekkadath G S, Giner L, Chalich Y et al. Direct measurement of the density matrix of a quantum system[J]. Physical Review Letters, 117, 120401(2016). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27689255

[160] Wu S J. State tomography via weak measurements[J]. Scientific Reports, 3, 1193(2013). http://www.nature.com/articles/srep01193

[161] Ren C L, Wang Y, Du J F. Efficient direct measurement of arbitrary quantum systems via weak measurement[J]. Physical Review Applied, 12, 014045(2019). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/334755640_Efficient_Direct_Measurement_of_Arbitrary_Quantum_Systems_via_Weak_Measurement

[162] Lundeen J S, Resch K J. Practical measurement of joint weak-values and their connection to the annihilation operator[J]. Physics Letters A, 334, 337-344(2005). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375960104016342

[163] Brodutch A, Vaidman L. Measurements of non local weak-values[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 174, 012004(2009).

[164] Kedem Y, Vaidman L. Modularvalues and weak-values of quantum observables[J]. Physical Review Letters, 105, 230401(2010). http://www.zhangqiaokeyan.com/academic-journal-foreign_other_thesis/0204111957275.html

[165] Pan W W, Xu X Y, Kedem Y et al. Direct measurement of a nonlocal entangled quantum state[J]. Physical Review Letters, 123, 150402(2019). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31702297

[166] Kim Y, Kim Y S, Lee S Y et al. Direct quantum process tomography via measuring sequential weak-values of incompatible observables[J]. Nature Communications, 9, 192(2018).

[167] Xu L, Xu H C, Xu F X et al. Direct characterization of quantum measurement using weak-values[EB/OL]. (2020-05-21)[2021-04-01]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.10423

[168] Brida G, Ciavarella L, Degiovanni I P et al. Ancilla-assisted calibration of a measuring apparatus[J]. Physical Review Letters, 108, 253601(2012). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23004600

[169] Zhang L J, Coldenstrodt-Ronge H B, Datta A et al. Mapping coherence in measurement via full quantum tomography of a hybrid optical detector[J]. Nature Photonics, 6, 364-368(2012).

[170] Zhang L J, Datta A, Coldenstrodt-Ronge H B et al. Recursive quantum detector tomography[J]. New Journal of Physics, 14, 115005(2012).

[171] Lundeen J S, Feito A, Coldenstrodt-Ronge H et al. Tomography of quantum detectors[J]. Nature Physics, 5, 27-30(2009).

[172] Barnett S M, Pegg D T, Jeffers J. Bayes’ theorem and quantum retrodiction[J]. Journal of Modern Optics, 47, 1779-1789(2000).

[173] Pegg D T, Barnett S M, Jeffers J. Quantum retrodiction in open systems[J]. Physical Review A, 66, 022106(2002). http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=VIRT04000002000008000059000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=Yes

[174] Pregnell K L, Pegg D T. Retrodictive quantum optical state engineering[J]. Journal of Modern Optics, 51, 1613-1626(2004). http://www120.secure.griffith.edu.au/rch/items/c330b6a3-16fb-3fe2-8c10-6352a3ba9636/1/

[175] Amri T. Quantum behavior of measurement apparatus[EB/OL]. (2010-01-18)[2021-04-01]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1001.3032

[176] Amri T, Laurat J, Fabre C. Characterizing quantum properties of a measurement apparatus: insights from the retrodictive approach[J]. Physical Review Letters, 106, 020502(2011). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21405212

[177] Maccone L, Rusconi C C. State estimation: a comparison between direct state measurement and tomography[J]. Physical Review A, 89, 022122(2014).

[178] Zou P, Zhang Z M, Song W. Direct measurement of general quantum states using strong measurement[J]. Physical Review A, 91, 052109(2015). http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PhRvA..91e2109Z

[179] Vallone G, Dequal D. Strong measurements give a better direct measurement of the quantum wave function[J]. Physical Review Letters, 116, 040502(2016).

[180] Zhang Y X, Wu S J, Chen Z B. Coupling-deformed pointer observables and weak-values[J]. Physical Review A, 93, 032128(2016).

[181] Zhu X M, Zhang Y X, Wu S J. Direct state reconstruction with coupling-deformed pointer observables[J]. Physical Review A, 93, 062304(2016).

[182] Denkmayr T, Geppert H, Lemmel H et al. Experimental demonstration of direct path state characterization by strongly measuring weak-values in a matter-wave interferometer[J]. Physical Review Letters, 118, 010402(2017).

[183] Calderaro L, Foletto G, Dequal D et al. Direct reconstruction of the quantum density matrix by strong measurements[J]. Physical Review Letters, 121, 230501(2018). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30576212

[184] Zhu X M, Wei Q, Liu L X et al. Hybrid direct state tomography by weak-value[EB/OL]. (2019-09-05)[2021-04-01]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.02461

[185] Zhang C R, Hu M J, Hou Z B et al. Direct measurement of the two-dimensional spatial quantum wave function via strong measurements[J]. Physical Review A, 101, 012119(2020).

[186] Howland G A, Lum D J, Howell J C. Compressive wavefront sensing with weak-values[J]. Optics Express, 22, 18870-18880(2014).

[187] Mirhosseini M, Magaña-Loaiza O S, Hashemi Rafsanjani S M et al. Compressive direct measurement of the quantum wave function[J]. Physical Review Letters, 113, 090402(2014).

[188] Knarr S H, Lum D J, Schneeloch J et al. Compressive direct imaging of a billion-dimensional optical phase space[J]. Physical Review A, 98, 023854(2018).

[189] Shi Z M, Mirhosseini M, Margiewicz J et al. Scan-free direct measurement of an extremely high-dimensional photonic state[J]. Optica, 2, 388-392(2015).

[190] Ogawa K, Yasuhiko O, Kobayashi H et al. A framework for measuring weak-values without weak interactions and its diagrammatic representation[J]. New Journal of Physics, 21, 043013(2019).

[191] Ogawa K, Okazaki T, Kobayashi H et al. Direct measurement of ultrafast temporal wavefunctions[EB/OL]. (2021-03-01)[2021-04-01]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.01020

[192] Zhou Y Y, Zhao J P, Hay D et al. Direct tomography of high-dimensional density matrices for general quantum states[EB/OL]. (2021-02-02)[2021-04-01]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.01271

[193] Yang M, Xiao Y, Liao Y W et al. Zonal reconstruction of photonic wavefunction via momentum weak measurement[J]. Laser & Photonics Reviews, 14, 1900251(2020).