Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 55, Issue 1, 11101(2018)
Characterization of Electrical Tapes by Optical Coherence Tomography
Figures & Tables(15)
Fig. 4. (a) 2D OCT cross-sectional image and (b) A-scan signal of an electrical tape
Fig. 5. (a) 2D OCT cross-sectional image of A1; (b) 2D OCT cross-sectional image of A2; (c) A-scan signal of A1; (d) A-scan signal of A2
Fig. 6. (a) 2D OCT cross-sectional image of A3; (b) 2D OCT cross-sectional image of A4; (c) A-scan signal of A3; (d) A-scan signal of A4
Fig. 7. (a) 2D OCT cross-sectional image of A5; (b) 2D OCT cross-sectional image of A6; (c) A-scan signal of A5; (d) A-scan signal of A6
Fig. 8. Fitted exponential curves of peak 1 and the following 10 points for samples (a) A7 and (b) A8
Fig. 9. (a) 3D reconstruction image of A9; (b) transverse sectional image of A9 at the depth of 100 μm; (c) 3D reconstruction image of A10; (d)transverse sectional image of A10 at the depth of 100 μm
Table 1. Information of electrical tape samples
View tableTable 1. Information of electrical tape samples
No. Brand Manufacturer A1 TESA TESA, Germany A2 COBRA Huaxia Industry Co., Ltd., Hebei, China A3 YOUXIN Youxin Packaging Materials Co., Ltd., Dongguan, China A4 DELI Sino-American DELI Tools Co., Ltd., Yuyao, China A5 SHUWANG Shushi Industrial Co., Ltd., Hubei, China A6 WANDE Yahua Adhesive Product Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China A7 VINI Denka Co., Ltd., Japan A8 TIANTAN Tiantan Adhesive Product Co., Ltd., Beijing, China A9 HUWANG Huaxia Industry Co., Ltd., Hebei, China A10 SINCERE Sincere Adhesive Product Co., Ltd., Ningbo, China
Table 2. Optical path of different electrical tape samples
View tableTable 2. Optical path of different electrical tape samples
No. Average optical path and error /μm A1 162.96±1.68 A2 288.96±1.68 A3 297.36±1.68 A4 286.44±1.68 A5 288.12±2.06 A6 A7 201.6±0 A8 177.24±3.14 A9 298.2±0 A10 274.68±2.06
Table 3. Comparison of the scattering intensity ratio of different electrical tape samples
View tableTable 3. Comparison of the scattering intensity ratio of different electrical tape samples
No. Average scattering intensity ratio and error A1 6.06±0.67 A2 57.82±4.26 A3 41.88±8.89 A4 24.06±2.25 A5 14.68±1.41 A6 A7 1.62±0.41 A8 8.7±1.65 A9 48.32±5.21 A10 16.18±1.86
Table 4. Number of signal peaks of different electrical tape samples
View tableTable 4. Number of signal peaks of different electrical tape samples
No. Number of signal peaks A1 2 A2 2 A3 2 A4 2 A5 2 A6 1 A7 2 A8 2 A9 2 A10 2
Table 5. Attenuation coefficients of different electrical tape samples
View tableTable 5. Attenuation coefficients of different electrical tape samples
No. Average attenuation coefficient and error A1 11.04±1.15 A2 77.5±2.42 A3 57.86±2.05 A4 89.4±2.89 A5 67.18±2.79 A6 64.3±2.29 A7 82.86±5.79 A8 67.02±2.67 A9 64.86±5.15 A10 58.38±2.08
Table 6. Comparison of the significant difference (p<0.05) in the characteristic parameters of different samples
View tableTable 6. Comparison of the significant difference (p<0.05) in the characteristic parameters of different samples
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A1 A2 a, b, d A3 a, b, d a, b, d A4 a, b, d a, b, d a, b, d A5 a, b, d b, d a, b, d b, d A6 c, d c, d c, d c, d c A7 a, b, d a, b a, b, d a, b a, b, d c, d A8 a, b, d a, b, d a, b, d a, b, d a, b c a, b, d A9 a, b, d a, b, d d a, b, d a, b c a, b, d a, b A10 a, b, d a, b, d a, b a, b, d a, d c, d a, b, d a, b, d a, b, d
Tools
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Liu Kangkang, Meng Li, Zhang Ning, Sun Zhenwen, Xie Bin, Liu Xingxing, Xu Xiaojing. Characterization of Electrical Tapes by Optical Coherence Tomography[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2018, 55(1): 11101
Paper Information
Category: Imaging Systems
Received: Jun. 29, 2017
Accepted: --
Published Online: Sep. 10, 2018
The Author Email: Ning Zhang (zhangning@cifs.gov.cn)
© Copyright 2018-2021 | Chinese Laser Press.
All Rights Reserved 沪ICP备15018463号-20