Large laser facilities, such as the National Ignition Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, are often at the forefront of laser-driven laboratory astrophysics[
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, Volume. 6, Issue 2, 02000e17(2018)
A platform for high-repetition-rate laser experiments on the Large Plasma Device
We present a new experimental platform for studying laboratory astrophysics that combines a high-intensity, high-repetition-rate laser with the Large Plasma Device at the University of California, Los Angeles. To demonstrate the utility of this platform, we show the first results of volumetric, highly repeatable magnetic field and electrostatic potential measurements, along with derived quantities of electric field, charge density and current density, of the interaction between a super-Alfvénic laser-produced plasma and an ambient, magnetized plasma.
1 Introduction
Large laser facilities, such as the National Ignition Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, are often at the forefront of laser-driven laboratory astrophysics[
The Large Plasma Device (LAPD) at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) addresses some of these shortcomings by providing a high-repetition-rate, highly repeatable, long-lived and well-diagnosed ambient plasma. Previous experiments on the LAPD have utilized commercially available, high-repetition-rate lasers to study the magnetic[) and too low energy (
) to drive the highly energetic plasmas necessary for laboratory astrophysics.
In this paper, we overview a new experimental platform at UCLA that combines the LAPD with a high-power, high-repetition-rate laser that is capable of on-target intensities in excess of . This platform allows new 3D volumetric data collection of the interaction between laser-driven plasma plumes and a magnetized ambient plasma. We present the first experimental results using this platform, and discuss its potential application to topics in laboratory astrophysics, including the study of both perpendicular and parallel low-Mach number magnetized shocks, the formation of magnetic instabilities and kinetic-scale magnetospheres.
Sign up for High Power Laser Science and Engineering TOC Get the latest issue of High Power Laser Science and Engineering delivered right to you!Sign up now
2 Experimental platform and setup
The experiments were carried out at UCLA utilizing a high-repetition-rate laser in the Phoenix Laser Laboratory[), current-free magnetized ambient plasma at repetition rates up to 1 Hz. Multiple current-carrying coils along the machine provide uniform axial magnetic fields up to 2 kG. A BaO-coated Ni cathode at one end of the machine provides the main 60-cm-diameter ambient plasma, which can be composed of various gases (H, D, He). A second
cathode at the other end of the machine provides a higher-density 20-cm-diameter core plasma centered on the main plasma. Consequently, the ambient plasma electron density varies from
at the edge to
at the center, with an electron temperature of
and ion temperature of
.
The high-repetition-rate laser was originally designed[, and repetition rates up to 4 Hz. The output laser energy is stable to within 5%, and the pulse shape, diffraction-limited focus, and beam pointing are stable to within 1%. Additional details on the performance of the laser can be found in Ref. [
In the experiments, a high-density polyethylene () plastic target, 30.5 cm long and 38 mm in diameter, was positioned 30 cm from the LAPD center axis. The target was mounted on a 2D stepper motor drive synchronized with the laser, which translated and rotated the target in a helical pattern. Each target position was repeated three times and then moved to provide a fresh surface. A single target could thus be used for up to
laser shots. The laser was configured with a 14 ns pulse width (FWHM) and directed through an
lens at an angle of
relative to the target normal, which ablated the target with intensities up to
. Due to the low ambient density, the laser had a negligible effect on the ambient plasma over the regions of interest. The target and laser were oriented so that the laser-ablated plasma was directed across the background field. The laser and target were synchronized to the LAPD, and they all operated at a repetition rate of 0.23 Hz to allow time for the diagnostics to position themselves between shots.
The position of the laser spot on the target defines as , with the background magnetic field directed along
, the target surface normal directed along
, and the vertical motion of the target directed along
. The center of the LAPD is then at
. Diagnostics was positioned in the planes defined by
(
–
plane) or
(
–
plane). The firing of the laser defines as
.
The magnetic field was characterized using 1 mm diameter, three-axis magnetic flux (‘bdot’) probes[–
or
–
plane. Each position was repeated three times to generate statistics, and a 2D plane of data was assembled by moving the probe in 5 mm increments in a grid pattern over successive laser shots. The bdot signals were passed through a 150 MHz differential amplifier and coupled to fast (1.25 GHz) 10-bit digitizers, and then integrated to yield magnetic field.
The electrostatic plasma potential was measured using a resistively heated emissive probe[
Images of the interaction of the laser plasma and ambient plasma were acquired with a fast-gate (10 ns) intensified charge-coupled device (ICCD) camera. The camera was positioned either above the target or at the end of the machine to image the –
and
–
planes, respectively. Data was acquired in 10 ns increments simultaneously with the measurements of the magnetic field or plasma potential. The camera collected light from broadband plasma self-emission and could be additionally filtered to isolate specific ion charge states. Results from the fast-gate imaging can be found in Ref. [
Additionally, swept Langmuir probes were employed to measure similar –
and
–
planes of plasma electron density and temperature. These measurements were carried out in the absence of the laser plasma, and so provided the initial state of the ambient plasma at
.
|
3 Results
Magnetic field and electrostatic potential measurements were acquired in both the –
and
–
planes. In the
–
plane, the magnetic probe scanned from
to
and
to
over a total of 1875 shots (where each position was repeated three times), while the emissive probe scanned from
to
and
to
using 945 shots. In the
–
plane, in order to avoid hitting the probes with the laser, the probes scanned several smaller regions that were stitched together into a final, roughly triangular region from
to
and
to
over approximately 7000 shots. For all measurements, the background magnetic field was
and directed along
, and the ambient plasma was composed of
with an initial electron density of
, electron temperature
, and ion temperature
(see Figure
The probe measurements were highly repeatable. Each location in a plane was repeated three times. The resulting time-dependent value (magnetic field or electrostatic potential) was found to be within 5% of the mean value at that time, i.e.,
. This held for each location that was measured.
Figure –
and
–
planes into a composite plot at time
for the
-component of the relative magnetic field
and the electrostatic potential
. Features from each plane are well-aligned, again indicating that the individual measurements are very repeatable over thousands of laser shots. The formation of a fully expelled diamagnetic cavity and leading magnetic compression is clearly visible in
. The cavity has an oblong shape, extending
in both
and
with a maximum extend at this time of
in
. At the same time, there is a positive potential of
ahead of the magnetic compression that quickly goes to
at the edge of the magnetic cavity.
Figure in the
–
plane. A fully expelled magnetic cavity is led by a magnetic compression that reaches its peak value
at
, at which point it is moving at
. This corresponds to an Alfvénic Mach number of
, where the Alfvén speed
is calculated for the ambient plasma. The cavity itself reaches its maximum size of 17 cm in
shortly thereafter, and then stagnates at this distance while the compression continues to propagate at
. Over the next
, the magnetic field diffuses back into the cavity, starting with the cavity edges nearest to the target. This diffusion process results in a long-lived cavity elongated along the background magnetic field, so that the last segment of the cavity to collapse is a narrow strip extending along
at the leading edge. Simultaneously, measurements in the
–
plane indicate that the magnetic compression propagates out to the edge of the LAPD (
) while gyrating upwards (
), consistent with the compression being carried by ions.
We note that the cavity still collapses approximately an order of magnitude faster than the classical (Spitzer) or Bohm magnetic diffusion time , where
is the gradient magnetic scale length on the order of a few cm and
is the diffusivity. At the time of collapse, the laser plasma is mostly confined within the magnetic cavity and has a density
, temperature
, and average ionization
[
. The classical diffusivity parallel to the background field
, while the perpendicular diffusivity
, where
is the Spitzer resistivity,
is the collision frequency, and
is the gyrofrequency. Thus, the fastest (Bohm) diffusion time considered is
, which is much larger than observed (
).
Transverse components of were also measured. Figure
component of the magnetic field in the
–
plane. Large-amplitude magnetosonic waves (
) can be seen propagating away from the target. The waves are associated with the magnetic cavity and dissipate as the cavity collapses at late time.
From our 2D planes of vector magnetic field and electrostatic potential
, we can calculate the current density
and electrostatic electric field
, where we take
(the electric fields are slowly changing relative to the rate at which signals are sampled). We can also estimate the charge density
. The results are shown in Figures
–
plane) and
–
plane), both at time
. Like Figure
. Outside of the cavity, the magnetic compression is dominantly directed along
, which is the direction of the background field
. At the same time, Figure
in the cavity to
outside the cavity is associated with a large, negative (into-the-plane) current density
. A smaller amplitude current density (
) is associated with the leading edge of the magnetic compression. The compression is also associated with an outward radially directed electric field of magnitude
, which reverses sign near the peak of the compression and grows to
near the cavity edge, as shown in Figure
is shown in Figure
from each of these quantities are shown in Figure
These features are also reproduced in the –
plane (Figure
drifts of the electrons, which establishes a clockwise azimuthal diamagnetic current. The current is also supported by electron pressure gradient drifts (
) inherent to the laser-plasma profile. Concurrently, the pile-up of ions (relative to the ambient plasma) at the leading edge creates an outwardly directed electric field, which drives an oppositely directed azimuthal current that acts to increase (compress) the magnetic field.
4 Discussion and conclusions
The results of Section
This high-repetition platform thus provides a rich testbed for exploring the interaction between super-Alfvénic laser plasmas and magnetized ambient plasmas relevant to laboratory astrophysics. Indeed, the experiments presented here were modeled after previous low-repetition experiments on the LAPD that explored perpendicular magnetized collisionless shocks[
Other applications of this platform are currently being pursued. Fast-gate imaging of the laser plasma shows the formation and evolution of flute-like, Rayleigh–Taylor or large-Larmor-radius magnetic instabilities[) magnetic dipole field[
[7] I. F. Shaikhislamov, Y. P. Zakharov, V. G. Posukh, A. V. Melekhov, V. M. Antonov, E. L. Boyarintsev, A. G. Ponomarenko. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion, 56(2014).
[25] D. B. Schaeffer, D. Winske, D. J. Larson, M. M. Cowee, C. G. Constantin, A. S. Bondarenko, S. E. Clark, C. Niemann. Phys. Plasmas, 24(2017).
[30] P. V. Heuer, M. S. Weidl, R. Dorst, D. B. Schaeffer, A. S. Bondarenko, S. Tripathi, B. Van Compernolle, S. Vincena, C. G. Constantin, C. Niemann.
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
D. B. Schaeffer, L. R. Hofer, E. N. Knall, P. V. Heuer, C. G. Constantin, C. Niemann. A platform for high-repetition-rate laser experiments on the Large Plasma Device[J]. High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 02000e17
Received: Dec. 1, 2017
Accepted: Feb. 6, 2018
Published Online: Jul. 4, 2018
The Author Email: D. B. Schaeffer (dschaeffer@physics.ucla.edu)