Photonics Research, Volume. 13, Issue 8, 2409(2025)

On-chip ultra-high-Q optical microresonators approaching the material absorption limit Spotlight on Optics

Qi Shi1、†, Jianxiong Tian1、†, Shulin Ding1, Yunan Wang1, Shujian Lei1, Menghua Zhang1, Wenjie Wan2, Xingchen Ji3, Bing He4, Min Xiao1, and Xiaoshun Jiang1、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures, College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Advanced Optical Communication Systems and Networks, University of Michigan-Shanghai Jiao Tong University Joint Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
  • 3John Hopcroft Center for Computer Science, School of Electronic Information and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
  • 4Center for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information, Universidad Mayor, Huechuraba, RM, Chile
  • show less

    Chip-based optical microresonators with ultra-high Q-factors are becoming increasingly important to a variety of applications. However, the losses of on-chip microresonators with the highest Q-factor reported in the past are still far from their material absorption limits. Here, we demonstrate an on-chip silica microresonator that has approached the absorption limit of the state-of-the-art material on chip, realizing, to our knowledge, record intrinsic Q-factors exceeding 3 billion at both 1560 nm and 1064 nm. This fact is corroborated by photo-thermal spectroscopy measurements. Especially, compared with the standard optical fibers, its corresponding optical losses are only 38.4 times and 7.7 times higher at the wavelengths of 1560 nm and 1064 nm, respectively. To exhibit the performance of such fabricated microresonator, we achieve a record-low optical parametric oscillation threshold (31.9 μW) for millimeter-sized microresonators and generate a single-soliton microcomb with a record-low pump power of 220.2 μW for all soliton microcombs realized thus far.

    1. INTRODUCTION

    On-chip high-Q optical microresonators constitute a pivotal type of photonic device and have been widely used for quantum optics, nonlinear optics, as well as sensing [13]. So far, chip-based optical microresonators have been demonstrated in many material platforms and structures [420]. Among them, chip-based silica [5,6] and thin-core Si3N4 optical microresonators [911] exhibit the highest optical Q-factors, because most of the optical modes in these structures are confined in the silica materials so that the absorption loss can be significantly reduced [21]. To date, such ultra-high-Q optical microresontors have become essential for applications in ultra-narrow linewidth lasers [5,2225], Kerr soliton microcombs [26,27], and gyroscopes [28,29], whose performances heavily rely on the Q-factor. For example, the fundamental laser linewidth of the Brillouin lasing or optical parametric oscillation threshold is found to be inversely proportional to Q2.

    Recently, with the development of the fabrication techniques of the integrated photonics, several microresonator platforms with relatively higher material absorption loss, such as aluminum gallium arsenide (AlGaAs) [18,21] and tantalum pentoxide (Ta2O5) [20,21] at 1550 nm, as well as Si3N4 [30] at visible wavelength, have achieved the optical Q-factors that approach their absorption limits. However, the optical Q-factors of the on-chip microresonators with ultra-low material absorption [5,6,911,21] are still limited by the scattering loss introduced during the fabrication process. On the other hand, compared with the standard optical fibers, the optical losses of the on-chip optical resonators or waveguides are still much higher. How to reduce them to the level of optical fibers is an open issue to the community of integrated photonics.

    In this work, we report the chip-based silica microtoroid resonators with their record-high optical Q-factors of 3.3 billion and 3.2 billion at the wavelengths of 1560 nm and 1064 nm, respectively. Compared with the highest Q-factor reported in the past [5,6,31], we have achieved an improvement by three times and five times at the wavelengths of 1560 nm and 1064 nm, respectively. By employing cavity-enhanced photothermal spectroscopy measurement [21], we see that these optical Q-factors are near the material-limited Q-factors, i.e., 80.5% at 1560 nm and 60.8% at 1064 nm. If compared with the standard optical fiber [3234], their associated optical losses are only 38.4 times at 1560 nm and 7.7 times at 1064 nm. To prove the good performance of such microresonators of ultra-high Q-factors but with the relatively large size of millimeter, we implement optical parametric oscillation at a record-low threshold (31.9 μW). Moreover, we realize a single-soliton microcomb with a record-low operation power of 220.2 μW for the known soliton microcombs thus far.

    2. FABRICATION PROCESS

    The fabrication process of the microtoroid resonators is based on the optimization of the method in earlier works [4,35]. Figure 1(a) shows the fabrication process of the optical microtoroid resonators. A stepper is used to pattern the photoresist on a thermally grown silicon oxide film with a thickness of 12 μm. The silica microdisk is formed through over-etching in buffered hydrofluoric solution. After a cleaning step using organic solvents to remove the photoresist, the silica microdisk is undercut using xenon difluoride dry etching to ensure a circular silicon pedestal. It is noteworthy that multiple cleaning processes are required to avoid potential contamination of the silica microdisk. A CO2 laser with a Gaussian beam is applied to heat and reflow the silica microdisk. Since the diameter of the silica microdisk is much larger than the beam waist (1  mm) of the CO2 laser, the position of the microdisk is continuously adjusted by using a three-dimensional linear translation stage to circulate the laser around the periphery of the sample. This circulating step is iterated as the laser power increases. The typical optical power of the CO2 laser at the conclusion of the reflow process is around 40–45 W. Following the reflow process, a 40-h annealing in an oxygen ambience at 1000°C is performed to drive down the water and release the stress induced by the reflow process. It should be noted that, compared to the annealing in a nitrogen ambience, the oxygen ambience is more appropriate to improve the stress stability for silica-based devices on the chip [36]. In our experiment, the maximum Q-factors of the microtoroid resonator at the wavelength of 1560 nm, after the annealing in an oxygen or in a nitrogen ambience, are measured to be 3.3 billion and 1.9 billion, respectively. Figure 1(c) shows a scanning electron microscopy image of the fabricated microtoroid resonator with a diameter of 2.8 mm. In addition, an atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurement is performed to evaluate the surface roughness. As shown in Fig. 1(b), the measured root-mean-squared (RMS) roughness on the surfaces of resonators is found to be 0.3  nm.

    Fabrication process and microscope characterization of the toroid resonators. (a) Fabrication process flow of large diameter toroid resonators. (b) 3D atomic force microscopy (AFM) scan on the surface of toroid. The RMS roughness and the correlation length are determined to be 0.3 nm and 30 nm, respectively. (c) Typical scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of a toroid resonator with 2.8 mm diameter.

    Figure 1.Fabrication process and microscope characterization of the toroid resonators. (a) Fabrication process flow of large diameter toroid resonators. (b) 3D atomic force microscopy (AFM) scan on the surface of toroid. The RMS roughness and the correlation length are determined to be 0.3 nm and 30 nm, respectively. (c) Typical scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of a toroid resonator with 2.8 mm diameter.

    3. CHARACTERIZATION OF QUALITY FACTORS

    Experimentally, we first measure the optical Q-factors of the microtoroid resonators by characterizing the linewidths of the cavity modes at the wavelength of 1560 nm band. During the linewidth measurement, a tunable narrow linewidth laser is coupled to the microresonator via a tapered fiber [37] to sweep across the resonance of the cavity mode. Meanwhile, a fiber Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI) calibrated by an electro-optic modulator is employed for the characterization of resonance linewidth. The left panel of Fig. 2(a) shows the measured transmission spectra of the singlet and doublet cavity modes at the wavelength of 1560  nm. Then, through the transmission measurement, the corresponding intrinsic Q-factors are thus inferred to be 2.45 billion and 3.37 billion, respectively. A noteworthy phenomenon is that a backscattering-induced mode splitting [38] can be easily observed in our millimeter-sized microtoroid resonators with ultra-high Q-factors. In contrast, this mode splitting is not observable in the wet-etched microdisk resonators of similar size [5,31] due to the relatively lower optical Q-factor. Specifically, optical mode with the splitting rate smaller than 100 kHz is observed in the linewidth measurements. We also count the distribution of splitting rate and further investigate the origin of mode splitting. By comparing the measured and calculated results, we can conclude that the mode splitting is induced by the bulk inhomogeneities rather than by the surface roughness. More details can be found in Appendix A.

    Characterization of intrinsic quality factors (Q0). (a) Left column: linewidth measurement of a 23-GHz free spectral range (FSR) toroid resonator at 1560 nm. The upper (lower) panel presents a resonance transmission with its Lorentzian line shape fitting for the singlet (doublet) mode. The sinusoidal trace in each panel is a frequency calibration from a Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI) with a 201.21-kHz FSR. Right column: corresponding ringing measurement of the modes in left column. (b) Corresponding linewidth and ringing measurements of the same device in (a) at 1064 nm.

    Figure 2.Characterization of intrinsic quality factors (Q0). (a) Left column: linewidth measurement of a 23-GHz free spectral range (FSR) toroid resonator at 1560 nm. The upper (lower) panel presents a resonance transmission with its Lorentzian line shape fitting for the singlet (doublet) mode. The sinusoidal trace in each panel is a frequency calibration from a Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI) with a 201.21-kHz FSR. Right column: corresponding ringing measurement of the modes in left column. (b) Corresponding linewidth and ringing measurements of the same device in (a) at 1064 nm.

    The above-mentioned results of Q-factors characterization can be confirmed further by the ringing measurements [3941]. In the right panel of Fig. 2(a), we show the ringing spectrum that is obtained by sweeping the laser frequency across the resonance at a relatively fast speed. According to the theoretical fitting of the measured ringing spectra [41], the intrinsic optical Q-factors are found to be 2.44 billion for the singlet mode and 3.33 billion for the doublet mode. These values are consistent with the results obtained from the linewidth measurements. To investigate the dependence of the scattering loss on the wavelength, we also perform the measurements at the wavelength of 1064  nm, and the corresponding results are presented in Fig. 2(b). The inferred intrinsic Q-factors for the singlet and doublet cavity modes in the linewidth measurement are 2.55 billion and 3.25 billion, respectively. Similarly, the ringing measurements yield the intrinsic Q-factors of 2.59 billion and 3.23 billion for the singlet and doublet cavity modes, respectively, which are in good agreement with the linewidth measurements.

    To the best of our knowledge, these results present the record values for the on-chip optical microresonators at both the 1560 nm and 1064 nm wavelength bands, which are three times and five times higher than the previous works [5,6,31] at the wavelengths of 1560 nm and 1064 nm, respectively. The enhancement of the optical Q-factor is attributed to the reduced surface roughness of our microtoroid resonators. In fact, their equivalent propagation losses reach 7.7 dB/km at 1560 nm and 11.5 dB/km at 1064 nm, being only 38.4 times and 7.7 times larger than those of the standard optical fibers [3234], respectively, at these bands of wavelength.

    4. MEASUREMENT OF MATERIAL ABSORPTION LOSS

    The unexpectedly high similarity of the measured intrinsic Q-factors at 1560 nm and 1064 nm as well as the ultra-smooth surface of the microtoroid resonators indicates that optical Q-factors of the microresonators are not determined by the scattering loss. To further explore the loss mechanisms of the microresonators, we employ the cavity-enhanced photothermal spectroscopy (CEPS) [21,42,43] to find the material absorption-limited Q-factor defined as Qabs=ω0κa,where κa is the energy loss rate for the material. This method quantifies the correlation between the intracavity energy density (ρ) and resonance shift (δω0) induced by the photothermal effect (α) and Kerr effect (g) through the linear relation δω0(α+g)ρ. Since the Kerr nonlinear effect is much smaller than the photothermal effect (gα) for the suspended silica resonators, it is reasonable to neglect the resonance shift caused by the Kerr effect [21] (α+gα). Then, the energy loss rate (κa) can be calculated with the following equation: κa=α(δT/Pabs)(δω0/δT)Veff.Here, δT is the change of the temperature in the mircoresonator, Pabs denotes the absorbed optical power, and Veff represents the mode volume of the optical mode. These involved parameters are determined as follows. The value of Veff can be calculated by a finite-element method (FEM) modeling of the optical mode in the resonator. δT/Pabs is determined by incorporating the simulated optical mode field as a heat source in the finite-element simulation and the resonance tuning coefficient δω0/δT is measured by using a thermoelectric cooler (TEC) with a proportional-integral-differential (PID) temperature controller to precisely adjust the temperature of the microresonator. More details of the parameters used for the simulations can be found in a previous work [21].

    Figure 3(a) shows the typical transmission spectra with thermal broadening [44] at the wavelength of 1560 nm. By fitting the thermal triangle line shape [43], the normalized resonance shift δω0/ω0 versus the intracavity energy density ρ is determined and presented in Fig. 3(c), so that the photothermal coefficient α can be inferred from the previously mentioned linear dependence of these two variables. We need to point out that, during the measurement, only singlet cavity modes are employed to simplify the calculation of the intracavity energy and make our measurement more accurate. Figure 3(b) shows the results of the measured δf0/δT at both 1560 nm and 1064 nm bands, which indicates the corresponding thermo-optic coefficients of 1.097×105  K1 and 1.141×105  K1, respectively. These results align well with the previously reported first order thermo-optic coefficient [45].

    The material absorption loss measurement. (a) Typical normalized transmission spectra of thermal triangle under different input powers. The spectra are obtained under a sufficiently slow laser frequency scanning speed of 20 MHz/s to prevent the distortion of the line shape. (b) Measured resonance frequency shift versus microresonator temperature offset at 1560 nm and 1064 nm with linear fittings. (c) Measured resonance frequency shift versus intracavity energy density for four modes at 1560 nm and 1064 nm. The identical slope of the linear fittings is expressed as δω0∼(α+g)ρ. (d) Material absorption-limited Q-factors (Qabs) of the four modes in (c) at 1560 nm (red) and 1064 nm (royal).

    Figure 3.The material absorption loss measurement. (a) Typical normalized transmission spectra of thermal triangle under different input powers. The spectra are obtained under a sufficiently slow laser frequency scanning speed of 20 MHz/s to prevent the distortion of the line shape. (b) Measured resonance frequency shift versus microresonator temperature offset at 1560 nm and 1064 nm with linear fittings. (c) Measured resonance frequency shift versus intracavity energy density for four modes at 1560 nm and 1064 nm. The identical slope of the linear fittings is expressed as δω0(α+g)ρ. (d) Material absorption-limited Q-factors (Qabs) of the four modes in (c) at 1560 nm (red) and 1064 nm (royal).

    With all parameters we have determined, the obtained absorption-limited Q-factors (Qabs) at both 1560 nm and 1064 nm are presented in Fig. 3(d). The measurements conducted on several cavity modes with varying intrinsic Q0 demonstrate a consistent Qabs ranging from 3.5 billion to 4.2 billion at 1560 nm, and from 5.1 billion to 5.5 billion at 1064 nm.

    These measured absorption-limited Q-factors at the communication wavelength agree with the previously measured result of the state-of-the-art material on chip [21], while it is the first experimental measurement for the absorption-limited Q-factor at the wavelength of 1064 nm. By comparing these results to the measured intrinsic Q-factors, we can conclude that the achieved intrinsic Q-factors of the microtoroid resonators are mainly limited by the material absorption loss.

    5. LOSS CONTRIBUTION ANALYSIS

    To determine the contribution of different loss mechanisms, we have measured the intrinsic Q-factors of five samples in multiple wavelength bands, as shown in Fig. 4(a). The corresponding values of the intrinsic loss γ0 (dB/km) are also plotted in Fig. 4(b). To analyze these measurement results, we also model the surface scattering loss of the microtoroid resonators based on the three-dimensional volume current method [5,31,4648], considering the measured surface roughness of 0.3 nm and the correlation length of 30 nm. Due to the small roughness and the relatively large mode volume of the microtoroid resonator, the calculated scattering losses are much lower than the measured material absorption losses at both 1560 nm and 1064 nm, which further confirms that the intrinsic Q-factors of the microtoroid resonators are mainly limited by the absorption loss.

    Q factor and corresponding optical loss versus wavelength. (a) Scatter plot of Q-factors measured in five samples from 1480 nm to 1570 nm and from 1020 nm to 1070 nm. (b) Corresponding intrinsic loss (dB/km) in (a) and loss curves originating from different sources. The red and blue dashed lines represent the measured material absorption and simulated scattering loss, respectively, while the green dashed line represents the simulated water absorption loss, and the purple solid line represents a combination of these three losses.

    Figure 4.Q factor and corresponding optical loss versus wavelength. (a) Scatter plot of Q-factors measured in five samples from 1480 nm to 1570 nm and from 1020 nm to 1070 nm. (b) Corresponding intrinsic loss (dB/km) in (a) and loss curves originating from different sources. The red and blue dashed lines represent the measured material absorption and simulated scattering loss, respectively, while the green dashed line represents the simulated water absorption loss, and the purple solid line represents a combination of these three losses.

    Interestingly, there is a decreasing trend of the intrinsic optical loss with the wavelength increasing from 1480 nm to 1570 nm [Fig. 4(b)], while no significant variation is observed with the wavelength of 1020 nm to 1070 nm. Since the scattering loss is negligible at these wavelengths, it suggests that there is an additional loss mechanism beyond the scattering and material absorption losses of the microtoroid resonator. We attribute this extra loss to the surface water absorption [49], which can be simulated by FEM modeling. More details are provided in Appendix B. At the wavelength of the 1064 nm band, the simulated intrinsic losses are slightly lower than the measured values, and it could be due to the contamination induced scattering loss during the fabrication or measurement of the samples. Also, the scattering induced optical loss is more sensitive at 1064 nm than that of 1560 nm. The comparison between the modeled and measured results is summarized in Table 1. It is seen that the absorption loss contributes to 80.5% of the intrinsic loss at 1560 nm and 60.8% at 1064 nm, as the dominant factor for the intrinsic Q-factors.

    Summary of Loss at 1064 nm and 1560 nm

    Loss1064 nm (dB/km)1560 nm (dB/km)
    Material absorption loss7.026.18
    Surface water absorption lossa<0.011.20
    Surface scattering loss0.120.03
    Sum of above lossesb7.137.41
    Measured intrinsic lossc11.547.68
    Optical loss in fiberd<1.5<0.2

    The average water layer thickness used in the simulation is 0.1 nm.

    The sum of losses is a combination of material absorption, surface water absorption, and scattering losses.

    The data is obtained from sample 5. The material absorption loss contributes to 80.5% of the intrinsic loss at 1560 nm and 60.8% at 1064 nm.

    The optical losses in fiber at 1064 nm and 1560 nm are taken from Refs. [32,33], respectively.

    6. OPTICAL PARAMETRIC OSCILLATION THRESHOLD AND SOLITON GENERATION

    For a demonstration of how well the fabricated ultra-high-Q microtoroid resonators can perform, we employ the aforementioned 2.8-mm-diameter microtoroid resonator with an intrinsic Q-factor of 3.3 billion for an optical parametric oscillation threshold measurement. By monitoring the power of the generated sidebands at the varying pump power levels, we infer a threshold of 31.9 μW as depicted in Fig. 5(a). This threshold is 30 times lower than the value obtained from a silica microdisk resonator [6,50] due to a significant enhancement in the Q-factor, making a new record for the millimeter-sized optical microresonators. Previously, the thresholds in similar orders were only obtained with the microresonators of much smaller sizes [18,51]. During the threshold measurement, the coupling condition is carefully optimized to achieve an under-coupled state [52,53], thereby minimizing the threshold.

    Measurement of parametric oscillation threshold and soliton generation. (a) Plot of parametric oscillation power versus input power (1560 nm). The oscillation threshold is seen at 31.9 μW. The inset presents a parametric oscillation spectrum at the input power of 74.3 μW. (b) Optical spectrum of a single soliton state with sech2 fitting (green solid line) at different pump power levels. The inset shows the transmission of the pump laser with a power of 220 μW.

    Figure 5.Measurement of parametric oscillation threshold and soliton generation. (a) Plot of parametric oscillation power versus input power (1560 nm). The oscillation threshold is seen at 31.9 μW. The inset presents a parametric oscillation spectrum at the input power of 74.3 μW. (b) Optical spectrum of a single soliton state with sech2 fitting (green solid line) at different pump power levels. The inset shows the transmission of the pump laser with a power of 220 μW.

    On the other hand, the ultra-high Q-factor significantly diminishes the power required for soliton formation. By employing the auxiliary-laser-heating method [54,55], we successfully obtain a single soliton microcomb using the fabricated microtoroid resonator. As shown in the inset of Fig. 5(b), a soliton step is observed in the transmission spectrum of the pump light. Figure 5(b) displays the optical spectrum of a single soliton excited with a pump power of only 220.2 μW. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of a soliton at such a low power level, even lower than those for the generations of dark pulses; see the comparison in Table 2. Among the available platforms listed in Table 2, the creation of solitons in our ultra-high-Q silica microtoroid demonstrates the advantages of low pump power and low repetition rate.

    Comparison of Coherent Microcomb Generation with Various Devices

    DeviceIntrinsic Q-Factor (106)Repetition Rate (GHz)Pump Power (mW)Comb Type
    Si3N4 [56]15996.2Bright soliton
    Si3N4 [57]5.7104.82.5Dark pulse
    SiC [58]5.63502.3Bright soliton
    AlGaAs [59]0.910000.5Bright soliton
    AlGaAs [60]2.36900.93Dark pulse
    Silica microrod [54]3702830.78Bright soliton
    Silica wedge [61]>2001525Bright soliton
    Silica microtoroid (this work)3300240.22Bright soliton

    7. CONCLUSION

    In summary, we have realized significantly enhanced Q-factors for the on-chip optical resonators operating at both 1064-nm and 1560-nm wavelength bands. The record-breaking Q-factor is achieved with 3.3 billion at 1560 nm and 3.2 billion at 1064 nm. Owing to the extremely high Q-factors, mode splitting smaller than 100 kHz is observed in a millimeter-sized microtoroid resonator. By employing the cavity-enhanced photothermal spectroscopy, we determine that the absorption loss of the currently available material of silica contributes to 80.5% and 60.8% of the total loss at 1560 nm and 1064 nm, respectively, thus proving that the optical Q-factors of our fabricated microresonators are mainly limited by the material absorption. Further analysis has been performed by measuring the Q-factor across a wide range of wavelengths and modeling the scattering and surface water absorption losses. Notably, the surface water absorption is found to contribute to an increase of Q-factors with the wavelength increasing from 1480 nm to 1570 nm, but has no discernible impact at 1064 nm. To demonstrate the good performance of the fabricated millimeter-sized microtoroid resonators, we break the record for the threshold of parametric oscillation to 31.9 μW and observe a single-soliton microcomb formation with a record-low pump power of 220.2 μW. Our results significantly elevate the upper limit of Q-factors for on-chip optical resonators, providing valuable insights into the optical loss mechanisms in thermally grown silica. Furthermore, this chip-based silica microresonator with an ultra-high-Q factor and a relatively large mode volume offers a unified platform for realizing an ultra-narrow linewidth Brillouin laser and a high-performance Kerr soliton microcomb, as well as facilitates the exploration of the interplay between nonlinear optical mechanisms. By integrating a waveguide and the silica microtoroid resonator on the same chip [62], it will be possible to achieve a fully integrated ultra-high-Q microtoroid resonator for practical application. Since the material absorption limit has been nearly reached in the current research, we expect that a further improvement on the Q-factor of the chip-based optical microresonators will be made possible only by optimizing the quality of the silica material.

    Acknowledgment

    Acknowledgment. We thank Professor Limin Tong for helpful discussions.

    APPENDIX A: QUALITATIVE ESTIMATES OF RESONANCE SPLITTING

    As shown in Fig. 6, we plotted the distribution of the splitting rate at both 1560 nm and 1064 nm. However, no linear correlation between the splitting rate and intrinsic linewidth [9,63] is observed in Fig. 6(a), which prompted us to investigate the origin of mode splitting. According to the general approach in microspheres and the first order perturbation theory, the mode coupling induced by the bulk inhomogeneities can be expressed as follows [64]: β=ω02n2δϵ(r)EjEk*dv|Ej|2dv,δω=2β=ω03λ4αbulk8π3n4Veff,where δϵ describes the random bulk defects leading to the coupling between CW (Ej) and CCW (Ek) modes, n is the refractive index, δω is the mode splitting rate, λ is the wavelength, Veff denotes the effective mode volume and can be determined by the finite-element modeling, and αbulk indicates the scattering rate in the bulk. According to the analysis of scattering loss in fiber materials, this coefficient αbulk can be estimated as follows [65]: αbulk=8π33λ4n8p2κTηT,where κ is the Boltzmann constant, T is the effective temperature of glassification (1500  K for fused silica), ηT is the isothermic compressibility (7×1011/Pa for silica at 1500 K), and p is the Pockels coefficient of photoelasticity. Notably, the parameter p represents the density fluctuation at the temperature T, which is quite small in fused silica. Due to the challenges in determining p at such high temperatures, the value [66] measured at room temperature (0.2–0.22) is used in our tentative calculations. Using Eqs. (A1)–(A3), we estimate the splitting rates (δω/2π) for the fundamental transverse electric field mode as 0.14 MHz at 1560 nm and 0.28 MHz at 1064 nm. These results agree with the distribution of splitting observed in our measurements, as shown in Fig. 6(b). Similarly, surface roughness can also give rise to the mode splitting [64]. However, this splitting rate (0.001  MHz) is substantially lower than the aforementioned values due to the small roughness (0.3 nm), and therefore can be neglected in our estimations.

    Resonance splitting. (a) Scatter plot of the splitting rate versus the measured intrinsic linewidth for two wavelength bands. Red dot and gray dot represent the wavelength bands of 1560 nm and 1064 nm, respectively. (b) Distribution of resonance splitting at two wavelength bands.

    Figure 6.Resonance splitting. (a) Scatter plot of the splitting rate versus the measured intrinsic linewidth for two wavelength bands. Red dot and gray dot represent the wavelength bands of 1560 nm and 1064 nm, respectively. (b) Distribution of resonance splitting at two wavelength bands.

    APPENDIX B: SIMULATION OF SURFACE WATER ABSORPTION LOSS

    When a silica microresonator is exposed to air, water vapor in the atmosphere can adsorb onto its surface, forming a hydration layer [49]. This adsorption occurs due to active sites or surface defects on the silicon and oxygen atoms of the resonator, enabling interaction via hydrogen bonding with water molecules. The thickness of this adsorbed water layer typically increases with relative humidity (RH). Even at RH levels below 20%, approximately one to two monolayers of water molecules can exist [67,68].

    The presence of adsorbed water molecules on the microresonator’s surface can introduce additional optical losses, primarily through the light absorption and scattering by the water layer. To quantitatively assess these effects, a finite-element modeling is conducted using COMSOL Multiphysics. Specifically, a very thin water layer is modeled on the silica surface to evaluate its impact on the optical Q-factor (Qwater), as depicted in Fig. 7(a). The refractive index and extinction coefficient of water [69] varying with the wavelength are used in our simulations. Figure 7(b) illustrates the decrease in Qwater with decreasing wavelength, due to a significant absorption around 1450 nm resulting from the first overtone stretch vibration of water molecules. Notably, the optical absorption of water around the 1064 nm band is approximately 100 times lower compared to the 1560 nm band, leading to the higher Qwater values, as shown in Fig. 7(c). It should be noted that our devices operate within a nitrogen-filled environment with a controlled RH level below 10%. According to the previous work [67,68], this RH level corresponds to a water molecule coverage of less than a monolayer (0.28 nm) on silicon oxide surfaces. Hence, in our simulations, the thickness of the water layer was set from 0.05 nm to 0.2 nm. According to the simulation, the surface water absorption loss only slightly influences the intrinsic Q-factors at the communication wavelength, while it is negligible at the 1064 nm band.

    The simulation of surface water absorption. (a) Mode profiles of the toroid resonator with a water layer. The diameters of the resonator and the ring core are 2.8 mm and 55 μm, respectively. (b) The simulated quality factor (Qwater) of toroid resonators with different water layer thicknesses versus wavelength. (c) Qwater of different mode families versus water layer thickness at 1560 nm and 1064 nm.

    Figure 7.The simulation of surface water absorption. (a) Mode profiles of the toroid resonator with a water layer. The diameters of the resonator and the ring core are 2.8 mm and 55 μm, respectively. (b) The simulated quality factor (Qwater) of toroid resonators with different water layer thicknesses versus wavelength. (c) Qwater of different mode families versus water layer thickness at 1560 nm and 1064 nm.

    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Qi Shi, Jianxiong Tian, Shulin Ding, Yunan Wang, Shujian Lei, Menghua Zhang, Wenjie Wan, Xingchen Ji, Bing He, Min Xiao, Xiaoshun Jiang, "On-chip ultra-high-Q optical microresonators approaching the material absorption limit," Photonics Res. 13, 2409 (2025)

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Nanophotonics and Photonic Crystals

    Received: Mar. 5, 2025

    Accepted: May. 13, 2025

    Published Online: Jul. 31, 2025

    The Author Email: Xiaoshun Jiang (jxs@nju.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.1364/PRJ.560978

    CSTR:32188.14.PRJ.560978

    Topics