Dirac materials[
Chinese Physics B, Volume. 29, Issue 8, (2020)
Two-dimensional hexagonal Zn3Si2 monolayer: Dirac cone material and Dirac half-metallic manipulation
The fascinating Dirac cone in honeycomb graphene, which underlies many unique electronic properties, has inspired the vast endeavors on pursuing new two-dimensional (2D) Dirac materials. Based on the density functional theory method, a 2D material Zn3Si2 of honeycomb transition-metal silicide with intrinsic Dirac cones has been predicted. The Zn3Si2 monolayer is dynamically and thermodynamically stable under ambient conditions. Importantly, the Zn3Si2 monolayer is a room-temperature 2D Dirac material with a spin–orbit coupling energy gap of 1.2 meV, which has an intrinsic Dirac cone arising from the special hexagonal lattice structure. Hole doping leads to the spin polarization of the electron, which results in a Dirac half-metal feature with single-spin Dirac fermion. This novel stable 2D transition-metal-silicon-framework material holds promises for electronic device applications in spintronics.
1. Introduction
Dirac materials[
Recently, a family of 2D Dirac materials called Dirac half metals (DHM) has emerged which has potential applications in high-speed and low-power-consumption spintronic devices. Combining the two fascinating properties of massless Dirac fermions and 100% spin polarization, the DHM[
In this work, based on the density functional theory, a novel 2D crystal in transition metal silicide Zn3Si2 with a hexagonal lattice has been predicted. It not only shows good stability but also exhibits interesting orbital configurations and unique electron properties. In particular, the Zn3Si2 monolayer demonstrates zero-gap Dirac semiconductive feature and possesses a distinct Dirac cone in the absence of SOC. When SOC is considered, the monolayer shows a gap of about 1.2 meV. Carrier doping arouses the spin-polariztion of the structure and leads to the spin splitting of the Dirac band in the case of no external magnetic field. As a result, a Dirac half-metal with single-spin Dirac fermion (SDF) can be obtained via one-hole doping. These findings render the Zn3Si2 monolayer a promising platform for applications in spintronic devices.
2. Method
The first principles computation is implemented in the Vienna ab initio simulation software package (VASP).[
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Geometric structure and stability
Figure 1(a) presents the top and side views of the geometric structure of the Zn3Si2 monolayer, containing three zinc (Zn) atoms and two silicon (Si) atoms in a unit cell. Obviously, the Zn3Si2 monolayer has a planar honeycomb lattice structure with P6/mmm (No. 16) symmetry. The black dotted line indicates the minimum repeating unit of Zn3Si2 with a = b = 8.05 Å. As shown in Fig. 1(a), there are one unique Zn atom (site symmetry 3g) and one independent Si atom (site symmetry 2d) in the primitive unit of the 2D Zn3Si2 monolayer which is structurally similar to the graphene-like honeycomb Be3Si2[
Figure 1.(a) Optimized geometry of Zn3Si2 monolayer, with a unit cell labeled by the black dotted line. (b) A zoom-in figure of (a).
To examined the stability of the Zn3Si2 lattice, the cohesive energy[
The dynamical properties of the 2D Zn3Si2 monolayer have been studied by phonon dispersion calculations, as shown in Fig. 2(a). It clearly shows that the 2D Zn3Si2 monolayer has no imaginary frequency, indicating that the 2D Zn3Si2 monolayer is kinetically stable. Additionally, we also perform AIMD simulations using a supercell of 3 × 3 unit cells (see Fig. 2(b)). Note that the structure still maintains the 2D lattice shape throughout a 3 ps MD simulation at 300 K, indicating that the Zn3Si2 monolayer is dynamically and thermally stable at room temperature. Considering that many 2D materials such as graphene, MoS2, BN, and stanene have been experimentally synthesized, it is expected that a similar method can be used to synthesize a Zn3Si2 monolayer.
Figure 2.(a) Phonon dispersion of Zn3Si2 monolayer, where no soft mode is found. (b) The total energy for the Zn3Si2 lattice as a function of simulation time at 300 K. The inset illustrates the snapshots of the optimized crystal structures of the Zn3Si2 lattice at 1 ps, 2 ps, and 3 ps.
3.2. Electronic properties and Dirac states
The chemical bonding in the monolayer can be explained by the electron localization function (ELF),[
Figure 3.(a) The charge density difference with an isovalue of 0.02
To evaluate the electronic properties of the predicted monolayer Zn3Si2, the projected band structure and the corresponding partial density of states (PDOS) are investigated in the absence of SOC, as shown in Figs. 4(a) and 4(b). The Zn3Si2 monolayer is a zero-band-gap semi-metal with the VB and CB touching each other at the K point (Fig. 4(a)). The yellow, gray, blue, and green dots represent the total pz, py, px, and d orbitals, respectively. It can be clearly seen that the Dirac point near the Fermi level is mainly contributed by the pz orbitals. The other two crossing bands are mainly composed of the py orbital, which are about 0.5–3.5 eV below the Fermi level. Considering the D6h point group symmetry of the Zn3Si2 monolayer, the Zn-d orbital can be divided into three categories: dxy,x2 – y2, dxz, yz, and dz2. In Fig. 4(b) we plot the PDOS of the Si and Zn atoms, respectively. Near the Fermi levels, the VB and CB are mainly from the Si pz orbital and the Zn px,y, dxz, yz orbitals, respectively. Meanwhile, the VB-1 is primarily derived from the Si px,y and Zn px,y, dxy, x2 – y2 orbitals. So, it is considered that the Dirac cone is derived from the special hexagonal lattice structure. As the Zn3Si2 monolayer has a planar structure, it is considered that px,y and dxy, x2 – y2 are hybridized to form an σ bond, while pz and dxz, yz are hybridized to form a π bond. The three-dimensional (3D) valence and conduction bands are also presented in Fig. 4(c), which clearly shows the features of the Dirac cone at its high symmetry K point. The Dirac cone-like electronic states generally mean excellent electronic transport properties. We have calculated the Fermi velocity (VF) of the Zn3Si2 monolayer near the Dirac point by using the equation VF = ∂E/(ℏ ∂ k). The calculated VF values along the directions Γ → K and K → M are 2.85 × 105 m⋅s−1 and 1.65 × 105 m⋅ s−1 (without SOC calculation), respectively, which are in the same order of those of graphene (9.5 × 105 m⋅s−1 and 8.2 × 105 m⋅s−1). The corresponding VF values with SOC are 2.79 × 105 m⋅s−1 and 1.49 × 105 m⋅s−1, respectively, which are similar to the results without SOC.
Figure 4.The electronic properties of Zn3Si2 without SOC. (a) The orbital-resolved band structures for Zn3Si2 monolayer (yellow: total p
The SOC results in “frivolous” splitting of orbital energy levels caused by the interaction of particles’ spin and orbital momentum. The band structure calculated with SOC is shown in Fig. 5(a) It can be seen that the Dirac cone remains. In Fig. 5(b), the zoom-in around Fermi energy shows that a tiny band gap of 1.2 meV appears after considering SOC. Although the crystal lattice of silicene is smaller than that of Zn3Si2, the bandgap of silicene (1.55 meV) with SOC is slightly larger than that of Zn3Si2 due to 2D silicene materials being undulating and the in-plane px and py orbitals enhancing the SOC effect.
Figure 5.(a) The calculated band structures of Zn3Si2 monolayer with SOC. The Fermi level is set to zero. (b) The zoom-in around the Fermi level corresponding to the red dotted box in (a), where the inset indicates the first Brillouin zone.
4. Manipulation of the Dirac half-metal
According to the previous studies,[
Figure 6.(a) The Δ
5. Conclusion
In summary, our first-principles calculations predict the Zn3Si2 monolayers to be a new 2D material with intrinsic Dirac states in a hexagonal lattice. The AIMD simulations and phonon spectra reveal that the monolayer is dynamically and thermodynamically stable under ambient conditions. The Dirac cones at a point of high symmetry in the Zn3Si2 monolayer are sorely derived from the Si pz and Zn pz, dxz, yz orbitals, which are robust against SOC. It has a 1.2 meV SOC energy gap. Carrier doping of the monolayer leads to structural magnetism, which also induces spin-polarized Dirac electrons without an external magnetic field. In particular, the Dirac half-metallic structures are obtained when 0.2 hole/atom is doped, resulting in a single-spin Dirac fermion state with 100% spin-polarized currents. By the prediction of this novel stable 2D transition-metal-silicon-framework material, we provide a feasible strategy for the design of Dirac materials, which holds promise applications in spintronics.
[1] T Wehling, A M Black-Schaffer, A V Balatsky. Adv. Phys, 63, 1(2014).
[2] A H Castro Neto, N M R Peres, K S Novoselov, A K Geim. Rev. Mod. Phys, 81, 109(2009).
[3] C C Liu, W X Feng, Y G Yao. Phys. Rev. Lett, 107(2011).
[4] S Cahangirov, M Topsakal, E Aktürk, H Şahin, S Ciraci. Phys. Rev. Lett, 102(2009).
[5] F F Zhu, W J Chen, Y Xu, C L Gao, D D Guan, C H Liu, D Qian, S C Zhang, J F Jia. Nat. Mater, 14, 1020(2015).
[6] K Novoselov. Nat. Mater, 6, 720(2007).
[7] K S Novoselov, A K Geim, S Morozov, D Jiang, M I Katsnelson, I Grigorieva, S Dubonos, A A Firsov. Nature, 438, 197(2005).
[8] Y Zhang, Y W Tan, H L Stormer, P Kim. Nature, 438, 201(2005).
[9] K I Bolotin, F Ghahari, M D Shulman, H L Stormer, P Kim. Nature, 462, 196(2009).
[10] X Du, I Skachko, F Duerr, A Luican, E Y Andrei. Nature, 462, 192(2009).
[11] C R Dean, L Wang, P Maher, C Forsythe, F Ghahari, Y Gao, J Katoch, M Ishigami, P Moon, M Koshino. Nature, 497, 598(2013).
[12] L Ponomarenko, R Gorbachev, G Yu, D Elias, R Jalil, A Patel, A Mishchenko, A Mayorov, C Woods, J Wallbank. Nature, 497, 594(2013).
[13] B Hunt, J Sanchez-Yamagishi, A Young, M Yankowitz, B J LeRoy, K Watanabe, T Taniguchi, P Moon, M Koshino, P Jarillo Herrero. Science, 340, 1427(2013).
[14] K I Bolotin, K J Sikes, Z Jiang, M Klima, G Fudenberg, J Hone, P Kim, H Stormer. Solid State Commun, 146, 351(2008).
[15] J Hellerstedt, I Yudhistira, M T Edmonds, L Chang, M S Fuhrer. Phys. Rev. Mater, 1(2017).
[16] J H Dil, E Al, J Osterwalder, L Patthey, F Meier. Phys. Rev. Lett, 103(2009).
[17] T Sato, K Segawa, H Guo, K Sugawara, Y Ando. Phys. Rev. Lett, 105(2010).
[18] X Li, F Zhang, Q Niu, J Feng. Sci. Rep, 4, 6397(2014).
[19] L L Chen Xue Jiao, Shen Dezhen. Chin. Phys. B, 28(2019).
[20] P F Liu, L J Zhou, S Tretiak, L M Wu. J. Mater. Chem. C, 5, 9181(2017).
[21] Z F Wang, Z Liu, F Liu. Nat. Commun, 4, 1471(2013).
[22] Y Ma, Y Dai, X Li, Q Sun, B Huang. Carbon, 73, 382(2014).
[23] Y Ma, Y Dai, W Wei, B B Huang, M H Whangbo. Sci. Rep, 4, 7297(2014).
[24] H Ishizuka, Y Motome. Phys. Rev. Lett, 109(2012).
[25] T Y Cai, X Li, F Wang, S Ju, J Feng, C D Gong. Nano Lett, 15, 6434(2015).
[26] L Wei, X M Zhang, M W Zhao. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys, 18, 8059(2016).
[27] W X Ji, B M Zhang, S F Zhang, C W Zhang, M Ding, P Li, P J Wang. J. Mater. Chem. C, 5, 8504(2017).
[28] M H Wu, Z J Wang, J W Liu, W B Li, H H Fu, L Sun, X Liu, M H Pan, H M Weng, M Dincă. 2D Mater, 4(2017).
[29] S J Zhang, C W Zhang, S F Zhang, W X Ji, P Li, P J Wang, S S Li, S S Yan. Phys. Rev. B, 96(2017).
[30] J He, S Ma, P Lyu, P Nachtigall. J. Mater. Chem. C, 4, 2518(2016).
[31] Z F Liu, J Y Liu, J J Zhao. Nano Res, 10, 1972(2017).
[32] W X Ji, B M Zhang, S F Zhang, C W Zhang, M Ding, P J Wang, R Q Zhang. Nanoscale, 10(2018).
[33] Q L Sun, N Kioussis. Phys. Rev. B, 97(2018).
[34] G Kresse, J Hafner. Phys. Rev. B, 47, 558(1993).
[35] G Kresse, D Joubert. Phys. Rev. B, 59, 1758(1999).
[36] J P Perdew, K Burke, M Ernzerhof. Phys. Rev. Lett, 80, 891(1998).
[37] K Parlinski, Z Li, Y Kawazoe. Phys. Rev. Lett, 78, 4063(1997).
[38] S Nosé. J. Chem. Phys, 81, 511(1984).
[39] L L Song, L Z Zhang, Y R Guan, J C Lu, C X Yan, J M Cai. Chin. Phys. B, 28(2019).
[40] P F Liu, L Zhou, T Frauenheim, L M Wu. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys, 18(2016).
[41] S L Zhang, M Q Xie, F Y Li, Z Yan, Y F Li, E J Kan, W Liu, Z F Chen, H B Zeng. Angew. Chem, 55, 1666(2016).
[42] M Pumera, Z Sofer. Adv. Mater, 29(2017).
[43] Z R Liu, J H Chen, S B Wang, D W Yuan, M J Yin, C L Wu. Acta Mater, 59, 7396(2011).
[44] C Wolverton, V Ozoliņš. Phys. Rev. B, 73(2006).
[45] A Savin, R Nesper, S Wengert, T F Fässler. Angew. Chem, 36, 1808(1997).
[46] C Wang, X Zhou, Y Pan, J Qiao, X Kong, C C Kaun, W Ji. Phys. Rev. B, 97(2018).
[47] A Javey, J Guo, D B Farmer, Q Wang, D Wang, R G Gordon, M Lundstrom, H Dai. Nano Lett, 4, 447(2004).
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Yurou Guan, Lingling Song, Hui Zhao, Renjun Du, Liming Liu, Cuixia Yan, Jinming Cai. Two-dimensional hexagonal Zn3Si2 monolayer: Dirac cone material and Dirac half-metallic manipulation[J]. Chinese Physics B, 2020, 29(8):
Received: Mar. 13, 2020
Accepted: --
Published Online: Apr. 29, 2021
The Author Email: Cuixia Yan (j.cai@kmsut.edu.cn)