Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 45, Issue 4, 0430002(2025)

Phase-Sensitive Dispersion Spectroscopy Atmospheric Water Vapor Detection Based on High Modulation Frequency Current Dithering

Xi Xiao1,2, Chenwen Ye1,2, Tao Wu1,2、*, Ming Zhu3, and Xingdao He1,2
Author Affiliations
  • 11Key Laboratory of Nondestructive Test, Ministry of Education, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang 330063, Jiangxi , China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Opto-Electronic Information Science and Technology of Jiangxi Province, Nanchang 330063, Jiangxi , China
  • 3Jiangxi Etcho Industry Co., Ltd., Nanchang 330063, Jiangxi , China
  • show less

    Objective

    Water vapor (H2O) is the main greenhouse gas in the atmosphere, which causes a global greenhouse effect and has severely affected human life and health. Thus, accurate monitoring of water vapor concentration is crucial for both environmental monitoring and human health. The heterodyne phase-sensitive dispersion spectroscopy (HPSDS) technique is a dispersion spectroscopy detection technique. It is widely utilized in atmospheric monitoring, medical diagnostics, combustion diagnostics, and other research fields due to its advantages such as high linear dynamic range, zero baseline, effective common-mode noise suppression, and independence from the fluctuation of laser power. In our research, we directly modulate the injection current of a distributed feedback laser with a high modulation frequency to construct a near-infrared HPSDS sensing system for atmospheric H2O monitoring.

    Methods

    In our study, the gas sensing response of HPSDS is investigated by modulating the injection current of a semiconductor laser. Experiments are conducted using different frequencies to modulate the injection current of distributed feedback lasers. We study the influence on the near-infrared water vapor HPSDS system and select the optimal modulation frequency for the system.

    Results and Discussions

    As shown in Fig. 3(a), there is a linear relationship between the peak-to-peak values of the signals and the gas concentration of the NIR HPSDS system at the three modulation frequencies of 1.0, 1.1, 1.2 GHz, and the linear R2 values of the three groups reach 0.99, indicating the good linear response of the HPSDS system. Fig. 4 shows the HPSDS system at three different frequencies for a 2 h measurement of H2O. In terms of long-term stability, the standard deviation is 165.39×10-6 at a modulation frequency of 1.0 GHz with a relative uncertainty of 0.9%, the standard deviation is 177.71×10-6 at a modulation frequency of 1.1 GHz with a relative uncertainty of 1.0%, and the standard deviation at a modulation frequency of 1.2 GHz is 126.85×10-6 with a relative uncertainty of 0.7%. Fig. 5 compares Allen’s variance of the three frequencies and the detection limit when the integration time is all at 156 s. The detection limit is 43.63×10-6 for 1.0 GHz, 30.87×10-6 for 1.1 GHz, and 12.77×10-6 for 1.2 GHz. By comparing the long-term stability and the detection limit, the experiments select 1.2 GHz as the optimal frequency of the system. As shown in Fig. 6, the WMS signal has a good linear response only in the concentration range of 0.74%?1.96% and is clearly nonlinear in 1.96%?2.59%, whereas the HPSDS signal has a good linear response in all concentration ranges of 0.74%?2.59%. As illustrated in Fig. 7, the detection limit can be up to 4.19×10-6 at an average time of 79 s for the WMS system and 8.82×10-6 at an average time of 61 s for the HPSDS system. As depicted in Fig. 8, the water vapor concentration obtained from the inversion of the HPSDS sensing system is compared with the water vapor concentration calculated from the temperature and humidity logger, which fits the water vapor profile of the temperature and humidity logger very well.

    Conclusions

    In our study, the performance of NIR HPSDS sensors at high modulation frequencies is demonstrated by using a low-frequency modulation of the injection current of distributed feedback lasers based on the modulation frequency up to the GHz level, and the performance of NIR HPSDS sensors used for water vapor concentration monitoring is presented, with the optimal modulation frequency of 1.2 GHz and the detection limit of 8.82×10-6. Experiments comparing the HPSDS system and the WMS system show that the dynamic range of the HPSDS system is better than that of the WMS system, and the precision of the lowest detection limit of the HPSDS system is slightly lower than that of the WMS system. It is verified that injecting a high modulation frequency compared to a low modulation frequency in the direct current modulation distributed feedback laser mode leads to a significant improvement in sensor performance, with an order of magnitude improvement in the minimum detection limit (MDL). Using the NIR HPSDS sensor to monitor water vapor in the atmosphere, by comparing the measurement data from the temperature and humidity loggers, it is obtained that the NIR HPSDS sensor can invert the concentration of water vapor in the atmosphere in real time, which provides a feasible basis for the HPSDS technology in an open-circuit sensor.

    Keywords
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Xi Xiao, Chenwen Ye, Tao Wu, Ming Zhu, Xingdao He. Phase-Sensitive Dispersion Spectroscopy Atmospheric Water Vapor Detection Based on High Modulation Frequency Current Dithering[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2025, 45(4): 0430002

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Spectroscopy

    Received: Oct. 20, 2024

    Accepted: Dec. 16, 2024

    Published Online: Feb. 20, 2025

    The Author Email: Wu Tao (wutccnu@nchu.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/AOS241661

    Topics