Ultrafast pump and probe has been a powerful and popularly used optical technique in the investigation into, e.g., dynamical properties of electronic and optoelectronic materials and devices.[
Chinese Physics B, Volume. 29, Issue 8, (2020)
Picosecond terahertz pump–probe realized from Chinese terahertz free-electron laser
Electron energy relaxation time τ is one of the key physical parameters for electronic materials. In this study, we develop a new technique to measure τ in a semiconductor via monochrome picosecond (ps) terahertz (THz) pump and probe experiment. The special THz pulse structure of Chinese THz free-electron laser (CTFEL) is utilized to realize such a technique, which can be applied to the investigation into THz dynamics of electronic and optoelectronic materials and devices. We measure the THz dynamical electronic properties of high-mobility n-GaSb wafer at 1.2 THz, 1.6 THz, and 2.4 THz at room temperature and in free space. The obtained electron energy relaxation time for n-GaSb is in line with that measured via, e.g., four-wave mixing techniques. The major advantages of monochrome ps THz pump–probe in the study of electronic and optoelectronic materials are discussed in comparison with other ultrafast optoelectronic techniques. This work is relevant to the application of pulsed THz free-electron lasers and also to the development of advanced ultrafast measurement technique for the investigation of dynamical properties of electronic and optoelectronic materials.
1. Introduction
Ultrafast pump and probe has been a powerful and popularly used optical technique in the investigation into, e.g., dynamical properties of electronic and optoelectronic materials and devices.[
As is well known, in the conventional metals, semiconductors, oxides, superconductors, etc., the electronic kinetic energy, the Fermi energy, the shallow impurity binding energy, the phonon energy, the plasmon energy, etc. are normally on an meV/THz energy/frequency scale. The electrons in these materials can therefore interact strongly with THz radiation field via photo-assistant electronic momentum and energy excitation and relaxation due to electron coupling with scattering centers and to elementary electronic excitations.[
2. Facility parameters of the CTFEL
As is well known, the THz free-electron laser (FEL) can provide high-power, high-linear-polarization, high-degreeof-monochrome, and frequency-tunable THz laser radiation.[
Figure 1.Schematic diagram of THz macro- and micro-pulse structure of CTFEL.
Figure 2.Autocorrelation measurement of THz pulses of the CTFEL at three different frequencies. Together with Fourier transformation of these data, we can determine the width of THz pulses in both time- and frequency-domains.
3. Sensitive detection of ps THz pulses
One of the key technical issues to realize the ps THz pump–probe system using pulsed THz source for the study of a material is the detection of THz beams transmitted through or reflected from a sample in transmission or reflection experiment. In this study, we employ a highly sensitive THz detector realized from GaN heterojunction[
4. Experimental setup
The principle and optical path for the ps THz pump–probe realized from the CTFEL is illustrated in Fig. 3. In the present study, the facility is established for THz transmission measurement. (i) The CTFEL beam is split into two beams by using an Si wafer or a mylar film as a beam splitter. One beam with stronger intensity is for THz pumping and another with weaker intensity is for probing. (ii) The pump THz beam is focused on the surface of the sample. The intensity of the pump radiation can be changed via varying the CTFEL output power and/or, more conveniently, adding Si wafer or mylar films in the optical path to reduce the radiation intensity. (iii) The probe THz beam is first delayed via time delay stage then is focused at the same spot as the pump beam on the sample surface. The focusing spot of the probe beam on the sample should not shift as delay stage moves. Because the ps probe is required, the lengths of the optical paths for the pump THz beam and probe THz beam should be roughly the same and the difference between them should be within the range of the movement of the time delay stage (Thorlab, USA). (iv) The probe beam transmitted through the sample is focused on the sensitive THz detector for the probe measurement and the signals are recorded by an oscilloscope with 300 MHz band width (Tektronix MSO 3034). (v) The pump THz beam and the probe THz beam are focused on the same spot of the sample surface but in a small angle included between them. Thus, the pump beam can be blocked so that it cannot enter into the THz detector, in order to protect the THz detector from being optically damaged. (vi) In this experimental setup, we can measure the transmissions of the THz beam through the sample as a function of delay time at different THz pump intensities and frequencies. It should be noted the above scheme of the ps THz pump–probe system is similar optically to the nanosecond (ns) THz pump–ns THz probe system proposed and realized by NovoFEL (Russia).[
Figure 3.Schematic diagram of ps THz pump–probe system based on CTFEL.
5. Results from measurement of GaSb
Using the ps THz pump–probe measurement facility realized from the CTFEL, in the present study we measure and examine the electronic dynamical properties of high mobility n-type GaSb. The GaSb possesses a single crystal structure of sphalerite, its lattice constant is 0.61 nm, and the effective electron mass is about m* = 0.04m0 with m0 being the electron rest mass. Due to relatively small electron mass, GaSb normally has a high electron mobility.[
In this study, we measure the intensity of THz transmission through the n-GaSb wafer as a function of delay time, respectively, for 1.2 THz, 1.6 THz, and 2.4 THz, at room-temperature and in free space. The width of the THz macro-pulse and micro-pulse are fixed respectively at about 0.9 ms and at about 20 ps. The transmission signals of the macro-pulses are recorded, where each delay time measured with a time spacing of about 30 fs by delay stage corresponds to the result from summing and averaging over 1000 points collected by the oscilloscope. We find that the excitation and decay signals cannot be markedly detected at 1.2 THz. This is because the incident surface of the sample is highly polished and, as a result, the reflection of THz probe beam from sample surface is very strong due to surface plasmonic effect.[
Figure 4.Plots of transmission intensity
Now we generalize the commonly used analytical approach for ultrafast pump and probe[
It should be noted that under THz pumping, the electronic excitation and relaxation in n-GaSb are achieved mainly through intra-band and intra-valley electronic transition channels or namely, through free-electron transition events. Thus, we can model the excitation-decay in pump–probe experiment by using a single exponential decay with a decay constant τ (or electronic relaxation time) via
We assume that the time resolution of the THz detection system (including detector, optical path, time delay stage, etc.) can be modelled by a Gaussian function with a full width half maximum as σ (or time resolution of the measurement system), which reads
As a result, the response function or the time-resolved transmission intensity in pump–probe measurement can be regarded as the conjugation between the instrumental response R(t) and the response from the sample S(t) via[
From Fig. 4, we see that the experimental data obtained from the ps THz pump–probe system for n-GaSb fit fairly well to Eq. (3). Through fitting the experimental results to the theoretical formula, we are able to determine the sample and measurement parameters. We find that I0 = 0.94, A = 3.8, τ = 2.92 ps, and σ = 60.0 ps at 1.6 THz and that I0 = 1.3, A = 19.2, τ = 2.32 ps, and σ = 60.8 ps at 2.4 THz.
It should be noted that like other THz FELs running at present, the CTFEL has output power varying with radiation frequency. In our measurements, the output power is about 10 W at 1.2 THz and 1.6 THz and about 25 W at 2.4 THz. The relaxation time τ = 2.92 ps at 1.6 THz is slightly longer than τ = 2.32 ps at 2.4 THz. This implies that under the intense THz FEL radiation, hot-electron effect or nonlinear electronic response can be achieved so that a shorter relaxation time can be measured at a stronger radiation intensity. In the presence of intense THz radiation and at room-temperature, the hot-electron effect can be induced by electron–phonon scattering.[
In the present study, we measure the transmission intensity of the sample. The electronic relaxation time determined experimentally should correspond to the energy relaxation time which measures the electronic energy loss rate induced by electron coupling with scattering centers such as impurities, phonons, surface roughness, etc.[
We note that the full width half maximum σ measures the time resolution of the THz detection system in a Gaussian function like time response. It therefore depends not only on the detector itself but also on the intensity and frequency of the radiation field. We find that σ = 60.0 ps at 1.6-THz frequency and 10-W power is slightly smaller than σ = 60.8 ps at 2.4-THz frequency and 25-W power. It implies that the better time resolution of our THz detection system can be reached with relatively lower radiation intensity. When σ does not depend on the radiation frequency nor intensity, the linear response of the detection system is achieved.
6. Further discussion
From Fig. 4, we note that the time decay signal obtained from transmission measurement via the ps THz pump–ps probe system is weaker than those via the fs pump–probe system[
Because the width of the THz micro-pulses for the CTFEL is in a range of about 10 ps–20 ps, the essential condition under which the obvious excitation and decay phenomena can be observed in the ps THz pump–probe experiment is that the electronic energy relaxation time τE should be large, namely, high electron mobility sample is required. It has been demonstrated experimentally[
It should be noted that although the width of the THz pulse from CTFEL ranges from about 10 ps to 20 ps, they still can be applied to the measurement of the sample with several ps energy relaxation time in the pump–probe experiment. This is due to the fact that during the measurement of the transmission with the time delay of the probe THz beam, the pump pulse is absent. From Eq. (3), we see that the relaxation time in the response function is multiplied by the delay time. When the delay time is long enough, the decay signals can be measured.
The raw data shown in Fig. 4 look quite coarse. The major error items to the recorded transmission signals come from: i) the absorption of the THz pulse waves by the moisture in air because the measurement is conducted in free space, ii) the turbulence of the THz pulses during the measurement, and iii) the instability of the circuits in THz detector under intense THz irradiation. We find that the InSb THz detector and the GaN heterojunction detector used in the present study become saturated quickly with THz radiation power increasing and, as a result, the response of the detector to the radiation field becomes nonlinear. In this work, we try to measure the dependence of the transmission on THz radiation power by using high-resistance Si wafer (half transmission and half reflection) to attenuate the radiation intensity. However, when the THz radiation intensity is relatively low, we cannot obtain the reliable results because the signals are too noisy. The main reason behind this is that the THz detector used in this study responds nonlinearly to the THz radiation intensity. Furthermore, for fitting Eq. (3), we need to assum an exponential decay of the electronic relaxation process and a Gaussian-function-like time resolution of the THz detection system. These assumptions may not be fully true for the case of intense THz radiation, especially when the response of the THz detector becomes nonlinear and saturated.
7. Conclusions
In this work, we establish a monochrome picosecond THz pump–probe measurement facility by utilizing the special THz pulse structures of the Chinese THz free-electron laser (CTFEL). This technique can be applied to the investigation of free-electron dynamics of electronic and optoelectronic materials and devices. Compared with the fs pump–probe and OPTP using 780-nm laser pumping, this facility can measure the pure consequence of the momentum and energy excitation and relaxation of free-electrons, where almost no effects of photon-induced carriers and associated excitons are involved. Compared with the THz TDS and TPTP, this technique can provide monochrome THz pump and probe so that there is no need to perform the Fourier transformation of the measured data for analyzing the experimental results. Together with frequency tunability of the FEL, this facility can achieve selective radiation frequency for THz pump and probe. Therefore, this facility can be expected to possess wide applications.
We investigate the THz dynamical properties of high mobility n-GaSb and develop an analytical model for analyzing the experimental data. Through fitting the experimental data to the theoretical formula, we can obtain the electronic energy relaxation time τE for the sample. The obtained τE from this study is in line with that measured via e.g., four-wave mixing technique. Finally, it is noticed that at present, the CTFEL is at its preliminary stage for user applications. We hope that the results shown and discussed in this article can provide some inspiration for the application of the pulsed THz FELs and also for the development of advanced ultrafast measurement technique applied to the investigation of electronic and optoelectronic materials and devices.
Acknowledgment
Acknowledgment. We thank Dr. Xiancun Cao (Luoyang, China) for providing GaSb samples for the measurement in this study, and also Prof. Dr. Manfred Helm (HZDR, Germany) for helpful discussion.
[1] Y S Lee. Principles of Terahertz Science and Technology, 58(2009).
[2] C Rullière. Femtosecond laser pulses, 325(2005).
[3] T Morimoto, T Miyamoto, H Okamoto. Crystals, 7, 132(2017).
[4] M Nakajima, N Takubo, Z Hiroi, Y Ueda, T Suemoto. Appl. Phys. Lett, 92(2008).
[5] J Zielbauer, M Wegener. Appl. Phys. Lett, 68, 1223(1996).
[6] W J Lee, D H Cho, J H Wi, W S Han, Y D Chung, J Park, J M Bae, M H Cho. J. Phys. Chem. C, 119(2015).
[7] M Tsubouchi, M Nagai, Y Ohshima. Opt. Lett, 37, 3528(2012).
[8] W Xu, C Zhang. Phys. Rev. B, 55, 5259(1997).
[9] J H Zhou, Y Z Hu, T Jiang, H Ouyang, H Li, Y H Sui, H Hao, J You, X Zheng, Z J Xu, X A Cheng. Photon. Res, 7, 994(2019).
[10] J Lloyd-Hughes, T I Jeon. J. Infrared Millim. Terahertz Waves, 33, 871(2012).
[11] M K Liu, H Y Hwang, H Tao, A C Strikwerda, K Fan, G R Keiser, A J Sternbach, K G West, S Kittiwatanakul, J W Lu, S A Wolf, F G Omenetto, X Zhang, K A Nelson, R D Averitt. Nature, 487, 345(2012).
[12] J Hebling, M C Hoffmann, H Y Hwang, K L Yeh, K A Nelson. Phys. Rev. B, 81(2010).
[13] H A Hafez, X Chai, A Ibrahim, S Mondal, D Férachou, X Ropagnol, T Ozaki. J. Opt, 18(2016).
[14] B A Knyazev, G N Kulipanov, N A Vinokurov. Meas. Sci. Technol, 21(2010).
[15] X J Shu, Y H Dou, X F Yang, M Li, Y Xu, Z Xu, 3228(2018).
[16] Y Hao, L A Yang, J C Zhang. Terahertz Sci. Technol, 1, 51(2008).
[17] Y Y Choporova, V V Gerasimov, B A Knyazev, S M Sergeev, O A Shevchenko, R K Zhukavin, N V Abrosimov, K A Kovalevsky, V K Ovchar, H W Hübers, G N Kulipanov, V N Shastin, H Schneider, N A Vinokurov. Phys. Procedia, 84, 152(2016).
[18] R B M Schasfoort, A J Tudos. Handbook of surface plasmon resonance, 15-29(2008).
[19] P T Dong, J X Cheng. Spectroscopy, 32, 24(2017).
[20] T Fang, A Konar, H L Xing, D Jena. Phys. Rev. B, 78(2008).
[21] K Kash, P A Wolff, W A Bonner. Appl. Phys. Lett, 42, 173(1983).
[22] H P Li, C H Kam, Y L Lam, Y X Jie, W Ji, A T S Wee, C H A Huan. Appl. Phys. B, 72, 611(2001).
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Chao Wang, Wen Xu, Hong-Ying Mei, Hua Qin, Xin-Nian Zhao, Hua Wen, Chao Zhang, Lan Ding, Yong Xu, Peng Li, Dai Wu, Ming Li. Picosecond terahertz pump–probe realized from Chinese terahertz free-electron laser[J]. Chinese Physics B, 2020, 29(8):
Received: Mar. 10, 2020
Accepted: --
Published Online: Apr. 29, 2021
The Author Email: Wen Xu (wenxu_issp@aliyun.com)