Photonics Research, Volume. 12, Issue 9, 1918(2024)

In situ tracking anisotropic photocarrier dynamics in two-dimensional ternary Ta2NiSe5 via digital micromirror device-based pump-probe microscopy

Bingxu Chen1、†, Jie Qiao2、†, Fei Han1, Fu Feng2,3, and Shih-Chi Chen1、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Mechanical and Automation Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  • 2Zhejiang Lab, Research Center for Humanoid Sensing, Hangzhou 311100, China
  • 3e-mail: fufeng@zhejianglab.com
  • show less

    In two-dimensional (2D) material studies, tracking the anisotropic ultrafast carrier dynamics is essential for the development of optoelectronic nano-devices. Conventionally, the anisotropic optical and electronic properties are investigated via either polarization-dependent Raman spectroscopy or field-effect transistors measurements. However, study of the anisotropic transient carrier behaviors is still challenging, due largely to the lack of picosecond-resolved acquisition or programmable scanning capabilities in the current characterization systems. In this work, we select Ta2NiSe5 as a model system to investigate the ultrafast anisotropic transportation properties of photo-excited carriers and transient polarized responses via a digital micromirror device (DMD)-based pump-probe microscope, where the probe beam scans along the armchair and zigzag directions of a crystal structure via binary holography to obtain distinct carrier diffusion coefficients, respectively. The results reveal the nonlinear diffusion behaviors of Ta2NiSe5 in tens of picoseconds, which are attributed to the interplay between excited electrons and phonons. The trend of the measured local polarization-dependent transient reflectivity is consistent with the polarized Raman spectra results. These results show that the DMD-based pump-probe microscope is an effective and versatile tool to study the optoelectronic properties of 2D materials.

    1. INTRODUCTION

    Low in-plane symmetry two-dimensional (2D) materials have attracted great interests in recent years due to their unique optoelectronic properties, such as valley-selective optical coupling and strong nonlinear optical responses [13]. This class of material has recently been verified to exhibit anisotropic electronic transport properties and remarkable light–matter interactions, making them a promising candidate for a wide range of applications, such as 2D field-effect transistors (2D-FETs) and photodetectors [2,46]. As a member of low-symmetry semimetallic 2D materials, Ta2NiSe5 has a direct band structure with a narrow band gap of 0.36 eV, thereby facilitating the transport of electrons within the band structure [710]. Besides, Ta2NiSe5 has a monoclinic structure stacked by weak van der Waals interactions, where the underlying one-dimensional [TaSe6]2 chains exhibit a significant in-plane anisotropy ratio [11,12]. These characteristics show Ta2NiSe5 can enhance the performance of different nano-devices owing to their better carrier transport capability and photoelectric conversion efficiency. However, some important optoelectronic properties, such as anisotropic photo-excited carrier behaviors, of Ta2NiSe5 have yet to be totally investigated, which is critical for developing new electronic devices with higher efficiency and improved performance.

    Previously, Ta2NiSe5-based FETs have been reported to show a field-effective mobility of 161  cm2V1s1 along the armchair direction. A polarization-dependent Raman spectroscopy study showed the anisotropic optical responses [13]. However, these methods can only study the steady state optoelectronic properties rather than revealing the evolution of carrier transportation with high spatial resolution (<1  μm) and temporal resolution (<1  ns). Besides, macroscopical sample defects and impurities may result in a significant discrepancy between the device mobility and the true value of the material [1416]. Pump-probe microscopy is a powerful tool to monitor ultrafast processes with temporal resolution down to tens of femtoseconds. It also has a diffraction-limited spatial resolution of several hundred nanometers, which makes it possible to characterize the transient carrier behaviors of Ta2NiSe5.

    Regarding carrier dynamics, Zhao et al. conducted studies using pump-probe microscopy and confirmed the carrier lifetime of black phosphorus is 100  ps after 20 ps, while it can reach 180  ps for MoS2 [17,18]. Yue et al. experimentally studied the semiconducting cubic boron arsenide and determined an ambipolar diffusion coefficient of 39  cm2  s1 [19]. These studies show that pump-probe microscopy is an effective tool for monitoring carrier diffusion processes for 2D materials and semiconductors with a fixed scanning trajectory. However, it is still challenging to acquire in situ anisotropic carrier diffusion coefficients via a conventional pump-probe microscope that uses a scanning mirror to steer the laser, since the probe beam needs to precisely follow designed scanning paths (e.g., armchair and zigzag directions). Although rotating the specimen to specific angles or inducing a pair of scanning mirrors may partially address the issue, the method is time-consuming, and motion errors may be introduced during repeated operations. To address this issue, we developed a spatially resolved pump-probe microscope based on a random-access digital micromirror device (DMD) scanner, where the 3D position of the laser focus can be changed by directly switching holograms on the DMD chip, and the trajectories of the probe beam can be arbitrarily programmed based on binary holography, making it possible to perform in situ anisotropic carrier diffusion characterization more flexibly [20].

    In this work, we study the dynamics of photocarriers in multi-layer Ta2NiSe5 using a DMD-based pump-probe microscope. To track the anisotropic photocarrier diffusion process, we designed two sets of holograms to command the DMD for scanning the specimen along the armchair and zigzag directions, respectively. By analyzing the evolution of photocarriers, we experimentally measured the transport performance and in-plane anisotropy of Ta2NiSe5, which showed rapid carrier diffusion behaviors in the first 5 ps and an abrupt decline after that. These results confirm the superior capability of DMD-based pump-probe microscopy to investigate ultrafast dynamic phenomena of optoelectronic materials and devices.

    2. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    Ta2NiSe5 has a monoclinic crystal structure stacked by van der Waals interaction along the b axis [Fig. 1(a)], where the Ta double chain and Ni single chain are parallelly aligned with the a axis (armchair direction) and are alternately arrayed along the c axis (zigzag direction). The in-plane anisotropic structures are formed via the periodic connection of TaSe6 octahedral chains and NiSe4 chains along the zigzag direction [13]. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and selected area electron diffraction pattern measurements showed that the prepared specimen has well-defined monoclinic crystal structures, confirming the specimen is suitable for the planned ultrafast experiments [Fig. 1(d)].

    (a) Schematic of the interactions among the pump, probe laser pulses, and Ta2NiSe5 specimen, where the green, gray, and orange spheres represent the Ta, Ni, and Se atoms, respectively. (b) Schematic illustration of the DMD-based pump-probe microscopy. A spatial filter selects the −1st order of the probe beam to perform scanning. A half-wave plate (HWP) adjusts the probe beam’s polarization. DM, dichroic mirror; OBJ, objective lens. (c) Wide-field optical image of the Ta2NiSe5 flake, where the armchair (a) and zigzag (c) directions are labeled. θ indicates the angle between the probe beam’s polarization and the long edge of the Ta2NiSe5 specimen. Scale bar: 2 μm. (d) High-resolution transmission electron microscopy and selected area electron diffraction pattern measurement of Ta2NiSe5. (e) Enlarged view of the objective lens and the Ta2NiSe5 specimen on the quartz substrate from (b), where the probe beam scans along the armchair and zigzag directions to acquire the anisotropic carrier diffusion coefficients.

    Figure 1.(a) Schematic of the interactions among the pump, probe laser pulses, and Ta2NiSe5 specimen, where the green, gray, and orange spheres represent the Ta, Ni, and Se atoms, respectively. (b) Schematic illustration of the DMD-based pump-probe microscopy. A spatial filter selects the 1st order of the probe beam to perform scanning. A half-wave plate (HWP) adjusts the probe beam’s polarization. DM, dichroic mirror; OBJ, objective lens. (c) Wide-field optical image of the Ta2NiSe5 flake, where the armchair (a) and zigzag (c) directions are labeled. θ indicates the angle between the probe beam’s polarization and the long edge of the Ta2NiSe5 specimen. Scale bar: 2 μm. (d) High-resolution transmission electron microscopy and selected area electron diffraction pattern measurement of Ta2NiSe5. (e) Enlarged view of the objective lens and the Ta2NiSe5 specimen on the quartz substrate from (b), where the probe beam scans along the armchair and zigzag directions to acquire the anisotropic carrier diffusion coefficients.

    In the transient absorption measurements, the multi-layer Ta2NiSe5 specimen was attached to a quartz substrate via Scotch tape. A 400-nm (3.10 eV) pump laser with a pulse duration of 200 fs was focused on the specimen, and the photon energy is high enough to generate free carriers [21,22]. The probe beam, which was controlled by the DMD, was an 800-nm (1.55 eV) laser with a pulse duration of 200 fs, and the polarization is determined by the rotation angle of the half-wave plate, as shown in Figs. 1(b) and 1(c). Both the pump and probe beams were directed to the specimen, where the probe beam (1.6  μm) was set to be slightly larger than the pump beam (0.8  μm). Detailed DMD-based pump-probe microscopy optical configuration is presented in Appendix A.

    To study the dynamics of the induced photocarriers at the picosecond time scale, we measured the differential reflection signals by probing the sample with a designed time delay, Δt, after the pump beam excited the sample [23]. The differential reflection signals, i.e., ΔR/R, are defined as the relative intensity changes between the initial and reflected probe beams. The results are presented in Fig. 2(a), which show that the differential reflection signals peak at around 0 ps and then decay in two distinctive ways, reflecting the different carrier diffusion behaviors. First, from 0 to 5 ps, the signals exponentially decay with a time constant of 1  ps; after that the signals enter a slow decaying stage with a time constant of 150  ps. (See Appendix C for more details.) To validate that the measured time constants are intrinsic to the material, the experiments were repeated six times using different pump laser powers (50–300 μW), and the probe power was 100 μW (pulse fluence, 4  μJcm2). The results are plotted in Fig. 2(b), where the red dots, which represent the peaks of |ΔR/R|, are proportional to the pump power, and the cyan dots, which represent the time constant, are independent of the pump power at 1  ps in the first 5 ps. This result provides an experimental basis for the anisotropic carrier dynamics studies in the following sections as it indicates that the dynamic processes of carriers are intrinsic physical properties of Ta2NiSe5 and will not be influenced by the densities of the induced electrons or carriers. To ensure a high signal-to-noise ratio and avoid sample damage, the power of the pump beam was set at 200 μW in the following experiments (pulse fluence, 80  μJcm2).

    (a) Absolute value of signals (|ΔR/R|) as a function of the delay time of the probe beam in Ta2NiSe5 excited by the pump beam from 50 to 300 μW (probe power, 100 μW). The solid lines are fitted curves based on the exponential decay model. (b) Exponential decay time constants (cyan dots, right axis) and the peak |ΔR/R| signals (red dots, left axis) as a function of the pump power. The red solid line indicates the linear relation between the peak signal and pump power.

    Figure 2.(a) Absolute value of signals (|ΔR/R|) as a function of the delay time of the probe beam in Ta2NiSe5 excited by the pump beam from 50 to 300 μW (probe power, 100 μW). The solid lines are fitted curves based on the exponential decay model. (b) Exponential decay time constants (cyan dots, right axis) and the peak |ΔR/R| signals (red dots, left axis) as a function of the pump power. The red solid line indicates the linear relation between the peak signal and pump power.

    Conventionally, the anisotropic optical response of Ta2NiSe5 has been studied by polarization-dependent Raman spectroscopy [13]. Here, we further applied our DMD-based pump-probe microscope to monitor ΔR/R variations using the probe beam of different polarizations. Figure 3(a) presents the contour color map of the polarization-resolved (θ=0°180°) differential reflection as a function of the probe beam time delay. We selected four polarization angles, i.e., 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90°, from Fig. 3(a) and found that the curves of different polarizations share the same decaying trend [Fig. 3(b)]. The 0° polarization corresponds to the armchair direction of Ta2NiSe5, which shows the capability of this method to identify the crystalline direction of the flake [13,24]. Figure 3(c) shows that for the same time delay (i.e., 0 or 10 ps), |ΔR/R| intensities exhibit periodic variations with a period of 180° and display a symmetrical trend along the zigzag (90°, 270°) direction. The measured angle-dependent data are in good agreement with previous studies, which are fitted by the red solid and dashed lines [13,25,26]. Considering the polarization-resolved carrier lifetime [Fig. 3(d)], we can confirm that the carrier lifetime is 1  ps and is independent of the probe beam’s polarization. This can be attributed to the fact that the polarization of the probe beam mainly affects the probing efficiency, rather than the evolution of carrier dynamics [17,24].

    (a) Polarization-resolved |ΔR/R| transient mapping of Ta2NiSe5 from −3 to 30 ps. (b) |ΔR/R| at four selected (probe) polarization angles: 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90°. The solid lines show the fitted decay curves. (c) |ΔR/R| plotted as a function of the polarization angle with delays of 0 and 10 ps. (d) Exponential decay time constants as a function of polarization angles.

    Figure 3.(a) Polarization-resolved |ΔR/R| transient mapping of Ta2NiSe5 from 3 to 30 ps. (b) |ΔR/R| at four selected (probe) polarization angles: 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90°. The solid lines show the fitted decay curves. (c) |ΔR/R| plotted as a function of the polarization angle with delays of 0 and 10 ps. (d) Exponential decay time constants as a function of polarization angles.

    The above analyses present initial results of the photocarrier dynamics with fixed pump and probe beams. In this section, we present the characterization of the anisotropic carrier coefficient of Ta2NiSe5. In the spatiotemporal dynamic measurements, the 400-nm pump beam was first focused on the specimen to generate photocarriers with high density. After that, the photocarriers rapidly diffused within the flake. The diffusion process was monitored by reflectivity variations over time across the sample via the probe beam. The fast sample scanning was realized by the DMD-scanner. By uploading designed holograms, the DMD can control the probe beam to scan over the pump beam along the armchair and zigzag directions, respectively, as shown in Fig. 1(e) [2729]. Figure 4(a) presents the measured spatiotemporal differential reflectivity along the armchair direction, and the probe beam polarization was θ=0°. By selecting four different time delays (i.e., 0, 1, 10, and 20 ps), we can obtain |ΔR/R| as a function of the probe position [Fig. 4(b)], where the solid lines show curves fitted by a Gaussian function (R20.98).

    Photocarrier diffusion along the armchair direction of Ta2NiSe5. (a) Contour color map of |ΔR/R| as a function of the probe delay time (horizontal axis) and probe position (vertical axis). (b) |ΔR/R| as a function of probe position at four selected time delays from (a). (c) |ΔR/R| as a function of the probe position at 0, 2, 3, and 5 μm from (a), where the inset shows corresponding decay time constants. The solid lines show the fitted decay curves. (d) FWHM2 as a function of the probe time delay in the armchair (red dots) and zigzag (blue dots) directions. The FWHMs are obtained from fitting the data in (a) with a Gaussian function. The red solid and dashed lines are fitted by a linear function with diffusion coefficients of 500±30 cm2 s−1 and 56±8 cm2 s−1, respectively. The blue solid and dashed lines are fitted by a linear function with diffusion coefficients of 100±10 cm2 s−1 and 35±5 cm2 s−1, respectively. The inset plots the carrier diffusion coefficient at pump powers from 100 to 300 μW along the armchair direction in the first 5 ps.

    Figure 4.Photocarrier diffusion along the armchair direction of Ta2NiSe5. (a) Contour color map of |ΔR/R| as a function of the probe delay time (horizontal axis) and probe position (vertical axis). (b) |ΔR/R| as a function of probe position at four selected time delays from (a). (c) |ΔR/R| as a function of the probe position at 0, 2, 3, and 5 μm from (a), where the inset shows corresponding decay time constants. The solid lines show the fitted decay curves. (d) FWHM2 as a function of the probe time delay in the armchair (red dots) and zigzag (blue dots) directions. The FWHMs are obtained from fitting the data in (a) with a Gaussian function. The red solid and dashed lines are fitted by a linear function with diffusion coefficients of 500±30  cm2s1 and 56±8  cm2s1, respectively. The blue solid and dashed lines are fitted by a linear function with diffusion coefficients of 100±10  cm2s1 and 35±5  cm2s1, respectively. The inset plots the carrier diffusion coefficient at pump powers from 100 to 300 μW along the armchair direction in the first 5 ps.

    A prerequisite for determining carrier diffusion coefficients is to confirm that the obtained reflectivity profiles broadening at different time delays are indeed caused by carrier diffusion, rather than other factors (e.g., photocarrier recombination). Figure 4(c) presents the differential reflectivity at four selected probe positions (i.e., 0, 2, 3, and 5 μm) as a function of the probe beam time delay. From the results, one may observe that all dynamics of photocarriers at different distances from the pump beam center decayed exponentially with a time constant of 1  ps regardless of the detection position. This demonstrates that the broadening of the reflectivity profiles is solely attributed to carrier diffusion instead of photocarrier recombination, in which case the time constant will vary with the detection position [17]. Figure 4(d) presents the FWHM2 as a function of the time delay, where the FWHM2 values are obtained from fitting the data in Fig. 4(a) with a Gaussian function. From the results, one may observe that the time delay curves increased bi-linearly, where the transition occurred at approximately 5 ps. Specifically, the FWHM2 value increases rapidly in the first 5 ps, followed by a slower increase.

    Based on the FWHM2 values in Fig. 4(d), we next calculate the carrier diffusion coefficient via the carrier diffusion model, expressed in Eqs. (1) and (2) [30]: FWHM2(t)=FWHM2(t0)+16ln(2)D(tt0),dFWHM2(t)dt=16ln(2)D,where D is the carrier diffusion coefficient. From the red line in Fig. 4(d), we can extract two slopes of 0.55  μm2ps1 and 0.06  μm2ps1, which correspond to the fast and slow diffusion coefficients of 500±30  cm2s1 (Δt=05  ps) and 56±8  cm2s1 (Δt>5  ps) calculated by Eq. (2), respectively. Similarly, from the carrier diffusion measurement along the zigzag direction [blue lines in Fig. 4(d)], we can calculate the fast and slow diffusion coefficients as 100±10  cm2s1 (Δt=05  ps) and 35±5  cm2s1 (Δt>5  ps), respectively. It is worth noting that during the first 5 ps period, the carrier diffusion coefficient in the armchair direction is about five times higher than that in the zigzag direction, which confirms the strong anisotropic carrier mobility characteristic of Ta2NiSe5. The corresponding photocarrier diffusion map along the zigzag direction is presented in Appendix E.

    From the experiments in Figs. 2(a) and 3(b), two distinctively different dynamic behaviors of the photocarriers have been observed; i.e., when Δt<5  ps, the measured |ΔR/R| decayed rapidly, and when Δt>5  ps, the measured |ΔR/R| decayed much slower. Similarly, in the transition stage at 5  ps, an abrupt slope decrease of FWHM2(t) in Fig. 4(d) was observed. These behaviors are attributed to the interplay between the hot electron relaxation and phonon scattering effects. In other words, the high-energy carriers initially achieved a much higher transportation speed upon the laser excitation, gradually replaced by the vibration of phonons due to the dissipation of energy [31]. (See Appendix C, Fig. 8, for frequency analyses of in situ transient absorption measurements that confirm the presence of the phonon scattering effect [32].) Experiments and simulations also show that the nickel films in the 0–10 ps have similar transient dynamics compared to Ta2NiSe5 [33]. Based on these results, we can deduce that the metal atoms in Ta2NiSe5 play a crucial role in the rapid relaxation of hot carriers, which results in a small transition time. The alternating crystal structure among Ta, Ni, and Se atoms contributes to the pronounced anisotropy, as shown in the transient polarization-resolved experiments and carrier diffusion measurements along the armchair and zigzag directions.

    From the inset in Fig. 4(d), one may observe that the hot electron diffusion coefficient is independent of the pump power (as it increases from 100 to 300 μW). This is because the initial coefficient is mainly influenced by the ratio of the electron thermal conductivity (ke) and heat capacity (Ce) instead of the pump fluence or carrier density [19,21,34]. As ke of Ta2NiSe5 was reported to have values of 20.5  W  m1  K1 and 4.5  W  m1  K1 along the armchair and zigzag directions, respectively, and Ce remains constant [35], the diffusion coefficient ratio between the armchair and zigzag directions is calculated to be 4.6, which agrees with our experimental result (i.e., diffusion ratio=5 in 0–5 ps).

    Lastly, we studied the 2D photocarrier diffusion evolution. The results are presented in Fig. 5. In the experiments, the DMD commanded the probe beam to perform random-access scanning (to avoid damage on the sample) over an area of 16  μm×16  μm with a step size of 400 nm, while the pump beam remained stationary, and Figs. 5(a)–5(c) plot the measured |ΔR/R| as a function of the probe time delay (i.e., 0, 5, and 10 ps). (Note that the intensity gradient is plotted logarithmically for better displaying the low-intensity components in the image.) The ovality (O) of the intensity profiles in Figs. 5(a)–5(c) was calculated based on the gray dashed lines plotted by connecting the data points with an intensity value of 1.8×105. From the results, one may observe that for a given polarization (i.e., 0°), the peaked intensity decreases rapidly from 0 ps to 5 ps and decreases slowly from 5 ps to 10 ps. This is consistent with the results presented in Fig. 2(a). Note that the ovality in Figs. 5(a)–5(c) increases from 0.6% to 4%, where the major axis of the ellipse is aligned with the armchair direction. This is because the excited photocarriers travel faster in the armchair direction than in the zigzag direction, which well shows the in-plane anisotropic characteristics of Ta2NiSe5. Figure 5(d) presents a Gaussian function-fitted profile of the intensity data in Fig. 5(a) (R20.98).

    2D transient differential reflection images of Ta2NiSe5 at time delays of (a) 0 ps, (b) 5 ps, and (c) 10 ps with a probe beam polarization angle θ=0°. The color bar shows the logarithmic intensity distribution; the dotted lines show the ovality (O) curves with an intensity value of 1.8×10−5. (d) Gaussian fitted profile of (a) at 0 ps time delay. Scale bar: 2 μm.

    Figure 5.2D transient differential reflection images of Ta2NiSe5 at time delays of (a) 0 ps, (b) 5 ps, and (c) 10 ps with a probe beam polarization angle θ=0°. The color bar shows the logarithmic intensity distribution; the dotted lines show the ovality (O) curves with an intensity value of 1.8×105. (d) Gaussian fitted profile of (a) at 0 ps time delay. Scale bar: 2 μm.

    3. CONCLUSION

    In this work, we investigated the ultrafast dynamics of photo-excited carriers in a multi-layer Ta2NiSe5 specimen via a DMD-based pump-probe microscope. Specifically, the evolution of the carrier diffusion was studied, which shows two distinctive dynamic processes, i.e., a rapid diffusion process dominated by the hot electrons relaxation and a slow diffusion process dominated by the phonon scattering. The polarization-dependent transient absorption measurements are consistent with the trends of polarized Raman spectra. The associated carrier diffusion coefficients along the armchair and zigzag crystalline directions were measured to be 500  cm2  s1 and 100  cm2  s1 in the first 5 ps, respectively. The obtained diffusion coefficient variations demonstrate semimetallic properties of Ta2NiSe5, which supports the development of Ta2NiSe5-based optoelectrical devices. Compared with the conventional Raman spectroscopy and FET-based techniques, the DMD-based system offers a sub-picosecond resolution for studying different ultrafast dynamics. Additionally, the DMD platform can be readily applied to study other ultrafast phenomena in the micro- and nano-scale optoelectronic devices, e.g., photonic chips and solar cells, enhancing the fundamental understanding of different 2D materials, perovskites, nanocrystals, and so on.

    APPENDIX A: DMD-BASED PUMP-PROBE MICROSCOPY OPTICAL CONFIGURATION

    Figure 6(a) presents the optical configuration of the DMD-based pump-probe microscope. The light source is a Ti:sapphire oscillator (Chameleon Ultra II, Coherent) with a central wavelength of 800 nm, a repetition rate of 80 MHz, and a pulse duration of 200 fs. The laser beam diameter is first expanded to 10 mm via a beam expander (BE) and split into two beams via a polarizing beam splitter (PBS). The beam reflected by the PBS is relayed to a retroreflector (i.e., M3 and M4) mounted on a linear stage via M2 to adjust optical path difference (i.e., time delay). The beam is then focused to a beta barium borate (BBO) crystal to generate a 400-nm beam (i.e., pump beam) via second-harmonic generation. The pump beam then enters an optical chopper (CP) to modulate the beam at 3 kHz. Lastly, the pump beam is relayed and focused to the specimen via a long-pass dichroic mirror (DM) and an objective lens.

    (a) Optical configuration of the DMD-based pump-probe microscope system. L1−L9, lenses; M1−M4, high-reflectivity mirrors; ISO, isolator (central wavelength=800 nm); BE, beam expander; HWP1 and HWP2, half-wave plates; PBS, polarizing beam splitter; ND1 and ND2, neutral density filters; TG, transmission grating; DM, long-pass dichroic mirror; BS, beam splitter (50:50); CP, chopper; PD, photodiode; SP, short-pass filter; LP, long-pass filter; OBJ, objective lens. (b) Front view of the spatial filter that illustrates how redundant diffraction orders are blocked and the −1st-order beam is collected.

    Figure 6.(a) Optical configuration of the DMD-based pump-probe microscope system. L1L9, lenses; M1M4, high-reflectivity mirrors; ISO, isolator (central wavelength=800  nm); BE, beam expander; HWP1 and HWP2, half-wave plates; PBS, polarizing beam splitter; ND1 and ND2, neutral density filters; TG, transmission grating; DM, long-pass dichroic mirror; BS, beam splitter (50:50); CP, chopper; PD, photodiode; SP, short-pass filter; LP, long-pass filter; OBJ, objective lens. (b) Front view of the spatial filter that illustrates how redundant diffraction orders are blocked and the 1st-order beam is collected.

    For the probe beam, after the PBS, the laser beam is relayed to the DMD via a 4-f system (i.e., L5 and L6; fL5=100  mm, fL6=250  mm). To pre-compensate for the angular dispersion introduced by the DMD, a blazed transmission grating (TG, 1200 lines/mm) is included in the light path [27,29]. To scan the probe beam, binary holograms are synthesized and loaded to the DMD memory.

    When the probe beam is incident on the DMD, the designed scanning wavefronts are reconstructed in the 1st-order diffraction beam. As such, a spatial filter is installed after the DMD to block the redundant diffraction orders, as illustrated in Fig. 6(b). After the filter, the probe beam passes through a tube lens (L8), DM, and BS and is lastly focused to the specimen via the objective lens. The power of the pump and probe beams is controlled by the HWP1 and neutral density filters (i.e., ND1 and ND2).

    The reflectance of the probe beam from the specimen, which contains the information of ultrafast carrier dynamics, is collected by the objective lens again and relayed to the photodiode (PD). Note that to prevent the pump light from entering the PD, a long-pass filter (LP) is installed before the PD. The reflectance signals collected by the PD are first pre-amplified and subsequently sent to a lock-in amplifier for generating the differential reflection signals.

    APPENDIX B: LASER BEAM SCANNING VIA BINARY HOLOGRAPHY AND DMD

    The laser focus can be directed to any point in a three-dimensional (3D) space via binary holograms displayed on a DMD. By rapidly switching the displayed holograms on the DMD, fast beam scanning can be achieved. Binary holograms used in our experiments are synthesized via Lee holography [36], as expressed in the following equation: h(i,j)={1,q2R(x,y)T+ϕ(x,y)2π+kq20,otherwise,where h(i,j){0,1} (1im; 1jn; i,jN) represents the states of the pixels on the DMD. “1” and “0” represent the “on” and “off” states, respectively. m and n refer to the number of DMD rows and columns, respectively. For our DMD (i.e., DLP 7000), m=1024 and n=768. R(x,y)/T represents the tilted phase for lateral scanning, where R(x,y)=x·sin(α)+y·cos(α) and T is the grating period of the DMD chip. α is the tilt angle of the fringe holograms. ϕ(x,y)=π(x2+y2)/λf represents the spherical wavefront for axial scanning. k is an integer. q  (0q1/2) is a constant determining the widths of the fringes. Figure 7 illustrates how laser focus (i.e., 1st-order diffraction beam) can be controlled by different hologram patterns.

    Binary holograms and the corresponding focus positions. (a)–(d) Holograms with (a) blank pattern, (b) vertical stripe pattern, (c) 45° sloped stripe pattern, and (d) concentric circle pattern. (e)–(h) Location of the −1st, 0th, and 1st order beams. (e) Only 0th order, (f) −1st order beam moved laterally, (g) −1st order beam moved along a 45° line, and (h) −1st order beam moved axially (in the z direction, out of the focal plane).

    Figure 7.Binary holograms and the corresponding focus positions. (a)–(d) Holograms with (a) blank pattern, (b) vertical stripe pattern, (c) 45° sloped stripe pattern, and (d) concentric circle pattern. (e)–(h) Location of the 1st, 0th, and 1st order beams. (e) Only 0th order, (f) 1st order beam moved laterally, (g) 1st order beam moved along a 45° line, and (h) 1st order beam moved axially (in the z direction, out of the focal plane).

    APPENDIX C: MEASURED DYNAMICS OF ΔR/R OVER 120 ps

    Figure 8 presents the measured dynamics of ΔR/R over 120 ps with a pump power of 200 μW. The fitted biexponential decay curve shows a two-step decaying process with time constants of 1 ps and 145 ps, respectively. Figure 8(b) presents the data in a logarithmic scale, where the inset presents the corresponding fast Fourier transform (FFT) result from 5 to 120 ps. The 1  THz (A1g) peak indicates strong phonon scattering effects during the carrier relaxation process [32].

    Measured dynamics of |ΔR/R| over 120 ps with the pump power of 200 μW. (a) Raw data (blue line) and the corresponding biexponential decay fit (red line) for showing the two-step photocarrier relaxation dynamics. (b) Raw data plotted in the logarithmic scale. The dashed lines show the biexponential decay trends extracted from (a). The inset shows the corresponding frequency analysis.

    Figure 8.Measured dynamics of |ΔR/R| over 120 ps with the pump power of 200 μW. (a) Raw data (blue line) and the corresponding biexponential decay fit (red line) for showing the two-step photocarrier relaxation dynamics. (b) Raw data plotted in the logarithmic scale. The dashed lines show the biexponential decay trends extracted from (a). The inset shows the corresponding frequency analysis.

    APPENDIX D: 2D TRANSIENT ABSORPTION IMAGE OF Ta2NiSe5 FLAKE

    Figures 9(a) and 9(b) present the wide-field optical image of Ta2NiSe5 flake and correspondingly acquired transient absorption mapping at 0 ps time delay via the DMD-based pump-probe microscope. We selected three points in Fig. 9(b) for dynamics verification (positions 1, 2, 3). These three selected areas have different transient absorption peak intensities, as shown in Fig. 9(c). Likewise, the time-resolved differential reflection signals present the same decay regimes. Further analysis of the carrier lifetimes [Fig. 9(d)] proved that it is independent of the selected area, indicating that the formerly discussed carrier dynamic evolutions are inherent properties of the 2D Ta2NiSe5, regardless of material thickness, reflectivity, and so on.

    (a) Wide-field optical microscopy image of the Ta2NiSe5 flake. (b) Transient absorption mapping of the Ta2NiSe5 flake on the quartz substrate at the time delay of 0 ps. The intensity scale selects a logarithmic distribution. (c) |ΔR/R| as a function of the probe delay at positions 1, 2, and 3 in (a). (d) Corresponding time constants extracted by the exponential decays. The error bars show the 80% confidence intervals of the exponential decay fitting.

    Figure 9.(a) Wide-field optical microscopy image of the Ta2NiSe5 flake. (b) Transient absorption mapping of the Ta2NiSe5 flake on the quartz substrate at the time delay of 0 ps. The intensity scale selects a logarithmic distribution. (c) |ΔR/R| as a function of the probe delay at positions 1, 2, and 3 in (a). (d) Corresponding time constants extracted by the exponential decays. The error bars show the 80% confidence intervals of the exponential decay fitting.

    APPENDIX E: PHOTOCARRIER DIFFUSION ALONG THE ZIGZAG DIRECTION OF Ta2NiSe5

    Figure 10 presents the photocarrier diffusion along the zigzag direction of Ta2NiSe5. The scanning trajectory of the probe beam and polarization are parallel to the zigzag direction, and the pump fluence is the same as the experiments in the armchair direction.

    Photocarrier diffusion along the zigzag direction of Ta2NiSe5. (a) Contour color map of the absolute differential reflection as a function of the probe delay time (horizontal axis) and probe position (vertical axis). (b) Intensity profiles of the four selected delay times (i.e., Δt=0, 1, 10, and 20 ps) extracted from (a).

    Figure 10.Photocarrier diffusion along the zigzag direction of Ta2NiSe5. (a) Contour color map of the absolute differential reflection as a function of the probe delay time (horizontal axis) and probe position (vertical axis). (b) Intensity profiles of the four selected delay times (i.e., Δt=0, 1, 10, and 20 ps) extracted from (a).

    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Bingxu Chen, Jie Qiao, Fei Han, Fu Feng, Shih-Chi Chen, "In situ tracking anisotropic photocarrier dynamics in two-dimensional ternary Ta2NiSe5 via digital micromirror device-based pump-probe microscopy," Photonics Res. 12, 1918 (2024)

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Instrumentation and Measurements

    Received: Apr. 24, 2024

    Accepted: Jun. 17, 2024

    Published Online: Aug. 23, 2024

    The Author Email: Shih-Chi Chen (scchen@mae.cuhk.edu.hk)

    DOI:10.1364/PRJ.528229

    Topics