Photonics Research, Volume. 13, Issue 1, 87(2025)

Realization of edge states along a synthetic orbital angular momentum dimension Spotlight on Optics

Yu-Wei Liao1,2,3, Mu Yang1,2,3,5, Hao-Qing Zhang1,2,3, Zhi-He Hao1,2,3, Jun Hu1,2,3, Tian-Xiang Zhu1,2,3,4, Zong-Quan Zhou1,2,3,4, Xi-Wang Luo1,2,3, Jin-Shi Xu1,2,3,4、*, Chuan-Feng Li1,2,3,4,6, and Guang-Can Guo1,2,3,4
Author Affiliations
  • 1CAS Key Laboratory of Quantum Information, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
  • 2Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Quantum Network, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
  • 3CAS Center for Excellence in Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
  • 4Hefei National Laboratory, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230088, China
  • 5e-mail: myang@ustc.edu.cn
  • 6e-mail: cfli@ustc.edu.cn
  • show less

    Synthetic dimensions have emerged as promising methodologies for studying topological physics, offering great advantages in controllability and flexibility. Photonic orbital angular momentum (OAM), characterized by discrete yet unbounded properties, serves as a potent carrier for constructing synthetic dimensions. Despite the widespread utilization of synthetic OAM dimensions in the investigation of topological physics, the demonstration of an edge along such dimensions has remained challenging, significantly constraining the exploration of important topological edge effects. In this study, we establish an edge within a Floquet Su–Schrieffer–Heeger OAM lattice, creating approximate semi-infinite lattices by introducing a pinhole in the optical elements within a cavity. Leveraging the spectral detection capabilities of the cavity, we directly measure the phase transitions of zero (±π) energy edge states, elucidating the principle of bulk-edge correspondence. Furthermore, we dynamically observe the migration of edge modes from the gap to the bulk by varying the edge phase, and we reveal that interference near the surface results in the discretization of the spectrum. We offer, to our knowledge, a novel perspective for investigating edge effects and provide an important photonic toolbox in topological photonics.

    1. INTRODUCTION

    Synthetic dimensions are newly developed tools to study topological materials in recent years. The central idea of the synthetic dimension is to exploit a set of physical states based on particles’ internal degrees of freedom to simulate the motion along an extra lattice. Synthetic dimensions have been formed based on degrees of freedom such as spin [1,2], energy levels [3,4] of atoms, frequency [510], orbital angular momentum (OAM) [11,12], arrival time [1316], and transverse spatial supermodes [17] of photons. The synthetic dimensions are independent of accurate geometric dimensions, which enables the study of higher-dimensional physics in a lower-dimensional system. Moreover, from flexible modulation and abundant detection methods, plenty of unique topological phenomena have been obtained along synthetic dimensions in atomic and photonic systems [1820].

    OAM states, which are found functional in high-dimensional quantum information processing [21,22], represent a prominent avenue for realizing photonic synthetic dimensions. Numerous theoretical frameworks have been proposed to investigate topological physics or develop functional devices within the synthetic OAM dimension, including synthetic gauge fields [23], Weyl semimetal phases [24], all-optical devices [25], and OAM optical switches [26]. Moreover, experimental studies have extensively utilized synthetic OAM dimensions to explore diverse phenomena such as Zak phases [27], wavepacket dynamics [28], statistical moments [29], band structures [11], and non-Hermitian exceptional points [12]. Additionally, coupling the synthetic OAM system with another physical dimension enables the investigation of two-dimensional Chern topological insulators [30]. Furthermore, by incorporating atomic-mediated interactions, the synthetic OAM dimension has been used in studying interaction physics [31] and investigating Laughlin states in fractional quantum Hall effects [32].

    While significant strides have been made in exploring various bulk topological features within the synthetic OAM dimension, the establishment of edges along such synthetic dimensions to explore the topologically protected edge states presents ongoing challenges. In the context of topological materials [33], the non-trivial bulk topology is typically delineated by topological invariants, such as the Chern number [34] or Z2 index [35]. Edge states manifest at the interfaces between materials possessing distinct topological invariants, a phenomenon known as the bulk-edge correspondence [36]. These edge states are topologically protected and can be used to realize optoelectronic devices with distinct characteristics such as immunity to local defects and high transmission efficiency [3739]. Consequently, the creation of an edge holds paramount significance in studying topological phenomena.

    In this study, we experimentally realize a Su–Schrieffer–Heeger (SSH)-like model based on synthetic OAM dimensions in a cavity. To establish an edge, we drill a circular hole in the waveplate (WP) and terminate the polarization coupling at the zero OAM mode, effectively dividing the OAM lattice into two semi-infinite chains. This methodological approach draws inspiration from theoretical frameworks advocating for boundary establishment through the use of hollow beam splitters [40]. We calculate the system’s topological invariants and delineate its phase diagram. Leveraging resonant spectrum detection, we directly observe the spectra of edge states, offering novel insights into the phase transition dynamics of their energies and illustrating the bulk-edge correspondence. Moreover, we uncover additional characteristics of topological edges that have not been directly observed in previous experimental studies. Specifically, we investigate the dynamic behaviors of edge states as they transition into the bulk by modulating the phase of the surface. Furthermore, we observe that interference near a surface results in the discretization of the detected energy spectrum.

    2. RESULTS

    A. Creating Boundaries in a Synthetic OAM Lattice

    We start our experiment in a degenerate optical cavity [Fig. 1(a)] [4143], which can support a set of modes with different OAM (m) to resonate at the same frequency (see Appendix G for details). To form a one-dimensional (1-D) chain in OAM synthetic space, we introduce a WP made of birefringent materials and a q-plate consisting of anisotropic liquid crystal molecules into the cavity, as shown in Fig. 1(a). Compared with the platform based on a stack of q-plates and waveplates [27], the introduction of the cavity enables the reuse of optical elements, which greatly saves experimental resources. The optical modes with different spin angular momentum (SAM) [left-circular polarization (s=1) or right-circular polarization (s=1)] are coupled with each other by the WP with coupling strength sin(η/2), where η is the phase delay between the ordinary and extraordinary light. On the other hand, for the spin-orbital interaction of the q-plate, modes with adjacent even OAM m and (m+2) are coupled with coupling strength sin(δ/2) and SAM is partially changed by 2 simultaneously, where δ is an electrically controlled parameter. The coupled OAM and SAM modes form a 1-D SSH-like lattice, as shown in Fig. 1(c).

    Degenerate cavity designed to form the OAM synthetic lattice and the topology of the bulk. (a) The degenerate cavity contains diverse OAM modes. A q-plate (q=1) and a waveplate are settled for coupling polarized OAM modes. WP, waveplate. (b) The WP with a centered hole in the cavity, where only optical modes with topological charge |m|≥2 pass through the WP and their polarization can be coupled. (c) The schematic of the synthetic lattice formed by OAM modes with different spins [red for left circularly polarized modes (↺), and blue for right circularly polarized modes (↻)]; η and δ are coupling strengths of the waveplate and q-plate, respectively. The 1-D chain in synthetic space is cut off between the different polarized fundamental Gaussian modes (m=0). The unit cells labeled by index l are indicated with dashed boxes. (d) The diagram of the topological phase (ν0,νπ) of our cavity system. The dashed line corresponds to η=π/2.

    Figure 1.Degenerate cavity designed to form the OAM synthetic lattice and the topology of the bulk. (a) The degenerate cavity contains diverse OAM modes. A q-plate (q=1) and a waveplate are settled for coupling polarized OAM modes. WP, waveplate. (b) The WP with a centered hole in the cavity, where only optical modes with topological charge |m|2 pass through the WP and their polarization can be coupled. (c) The schematic of the synthetic lattice formed by OAM modes with different spins [red for left circularly polarized modes (), and blue for right circularly polarized modes ()]; η and δ are coupling strengths of the waveplate and q-plate, respectively. The 1-D chain in synthetic space is cut off between the different polarized fundamental Gaussian modes (m=0). The unit cells labeled by index l are indicated with dashed boxes. (d) The diagram of the topological phase (ν0,νπ) of our cavity system. The dashed line corresponds to η=π/2.

    The OAM modes with m=0 are fundamental Gaussian modes with the intensity peaks distributed in the center. In contrast, the OAM modes with m0 have doughnut-shaped intensity distributions, where the intensity peaks are located on a ring with the radius scaled as m (see Appendix H for the intensity profiles of the different cavity transverse OAM modes). Given the spatial distinguishability of the intensity distributions between the m=0 and m0 modes, we can implement an m-dependent operation within the cavity to truncate the OAM chain.

    To establish an edge in the synthetic OAM lattice, we make a hole at the center of the WP, as shown in Fig. 1(b), to cut off the connection between two specific adjacent modes. The diameter of the hole is specially designed so that the WP will only modulate the polarization of photons with |m|2. In contrast, photons with m=0 can directly go through the hole and remain unchanged. With a suitable pinhole with radius r=0.75ω0=125  μm, where ω0 is the radius of the fundamental Gaussian mode, the undesired modal cross-coupling caused by the overlap between the cavity transverse OAM modes and the spatial aperture can be almost ignored. It is worth noting that as the sharpness of the edge is decided by the relative size of the pinhole and the beam waist, we can simply adjust the boundary from sharp to soft by tuning the position along the axis of the WP in the cavity (see Appendix H for details). As illustrated in Fig. 1(c), the polarization coupling of m=0 is destroyed, and a sharp edge is created. On the other hand, the largest OAM index mmax (corresponding to radius rmax=ω0mmax/2) is limited by the effective diameter R=6.35  mm of the q-plate, and the second edge appears on the sites of mmax>5000. Thus, the OAM lattice can be viewed as two approximate semi-infinite lattices, where the interface between the non-trivial topological bulk and “vacuum” can support edge states.

    To better characterize the lattice, we define the unit cell order l=(ms1)/2. The Hamiltonian for this system in tight binding approximation (δ,η1) can be written as (see Appendix B for more details) H^=l1η(a,la,l+1+h.c.)+lδ(a,la,l+h.c.),where the a(),l and a(),l represent the creation and annihilation operators of the l-th site with specific polarization ( and ).

    B. Topological Phases in Synthetic OAM Lattice

    The Hamiltonian of the system, owing to the spatial translational symmetry of the bulk, can be expressed as H^=kakH(k)ak, where k is the quasi-momentum and ak=(a,k,a,k) is the Fourier transform of the creation operator, satisfying a(),l=ka(),keikl. The Hamiltonian H(k) in momentum space exhibits chiral symmetry, characterized by the presence of a unitary operator Γ=σz satisfying ΓH(k)Γ=H(k), where σz is the Pauli operator. Consequently, the eigenstates of the bulk crystal are constrained to rotate in a plane orthogonal to a fixed axis, hosting a topological feature in the Brillouin zone manifold. The winding number quantifies the number of rotations as k traverses the entire Brillouin zone, expressed as [44] w=14πiππdkTr[ΓH(k)1kH(k)],which serves as a topological invariant taking strictly integer values within the Hermitian framework.

    As the parameters δ and η increase, the tight-binding approximation is no longer satisfied, and we have to go back to the Floquet description (see Appendix A for details). The bulk-edge correspondence in this periodically driven system relies on two invariants (ν0, νπ), which determine the number of 0 and ±π energy edge states [44]. These invariants are expressed as simple functions of winding numbers w1 and w2 in two equivalent timeframes, where the effective Hamiltonians satisfy H1(k)=iln[JQ(δ/2)JW(η)JQ(δ/2)] and H2(k)=iln[JW(η/2)JQ(δ)JW(η/2)], respectively. JQ (JW) are the operators of the q-plate (WP) in the momentum space (see Appendix C for the matrix forms of the operators). As a result, the complete topological classification of such an OAM lattice can be quantified as ν0=w1+w22,νπ=w1w22.The complete topological phases for different configurations (η,δ) are illustrated in Fig. 1(d) through the calculation of the invariants of our lattice model. Moreover, we can directly detect the topological numbers in our synthetic platform, which is a unique advantage of our system (see Appendix I for experimental results).

    According to the phase diagram (indicated by dashed lines), when η=π/2, the system exhibits three phases as δ varies from π to π. Here, we compute the theoretical eigen-energy spectrum E of the effective Hamiltonians H1(k) and H2(k) for δ(π,π], with η=π/2, as depicted in Fig. 2(a) (refer to Appendix A for details). The 0 and ±π energy edge states emerge within the gap at positions I and II, respectively. The energies of these edge states transition from ±π to 0 and back to ±π at the gap closing points (δ=±π/2), consistent with the predictions of the phase diagram, thus demonstrating the bulk-edge correspondence.

    Experimental observation of the energy band structures of the edge states. (a) The theoretical energy spectrum with edge states (I and II). (b) Distributions of the edge states with 0 (I) or ±π (II) energy when δ=0 or ±π. (c), (e) The schemes of the OAM lattice model when exciting different sites. Red for left circularly polarized modes (↺), and blue for right circularly polarized modes (↻). (d), (f) The normalized transmission intensity spectra with edge state I or II when pumping the cavity with a left circularly polarized fundamental Gaussian mode (d) or right circularly polarized m=2 OAM mode (f). ω−ω0 is the frequency detuning, and Ω=375 MHz represents the free spectral range (FSR).

    Figure 2.Experimental observation of the energy band structures of the edge states. (a) The theoretical energy spectrum with edge states (I and II). (b) Distributions of the edge states with 0 (I) or ±π (II) energy when δ=0 or ±π. (c), (e) The schemes of the OAM lattice model when exciting different sites. Red for left circularly polarized modes (), and blue for right circularly polarized modes (). (d), (f) The normalized transmission intensity spectra with edge state I or II when pumping the cavity with a left circularly polarized fundamental Gaussian mode (d) or right circularly polarized m=2 OAM mode (f). ωω0 is the frequency detuning, and Ω=375  MHz represents the free spectral range (FSR).

    C. Probing the Synthetic Lattice with Boundaries

    Benefiting from the resonant spectrum detection of cavity output photons, such edge state energy structures can be visualized with a direct experimental perspective. The input and output relations satisfy Langevin equations [45], tan(t)=i[an,H^]γ2an(t)γbin,n(t),bout,n(t)=γan(t),where n=s,l and s{,}. an represents the light field of polarized OAM modes in the cavity and bin(out),n is the input (output) light field. γ is the decay rate of each mode in the cavity. Transferring to the frequency domain, the input-output relation can be written as bout,n(ω)=nTnnbin,n(ω), where Tnn=in|γ/(ωH^+iγ/2)|n represents the transmission coefficient (see Appendix D for more details). We can pre-select the input state |n and reveal the edge state distribution features according to the corresponding transmission spectrum, where the edge state self-energy appears only when the corresponding edge mode is excited.

    As shown in Fig. 2(b), the edge states of zero energy (I, δ=0) are located at the edge sites, while the edge states of ±π energy (II, δ=±π) are located at the second nearest neighbor sites to the edge. In the experiment, we pump the cavity with a sweeping continuous-wave laser. The pre-selected input state is chosen as left circularly polarized Gaussian modes (m=0). The site n=,0 on the edge along the OAM lattice is excited as shown in Fig. 2(c). The corresponding transmitted intensity spectrum I(ω)=n|Tnn|2 varying with parameter δ is shown in Fig. 2(d). The system energy corresponds to E=2π(ωω0)/Ω, where ωω0 is the frequency detuning, and Ω=375  MHz represents the free spectral range (FSR) of the cavity. It is worth noting that the energy period (π,π] of the Floquet system corresponds to the frequency detuning range (Ω/2,Ω/2].

    The energy spectrum of bulk states agrees well with theoretical predictions in Fig. 2(a). Moreover, only the zero energy edge when δ(π/2,π/2) can be obtained with site n=,0 excited, which demonstrates the zero energy edge state mainly distributed on the edge, as predicted in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b) (I). Then, we change the input modes to the right circularly polarized OAM modes with m=2, and the corresponding site n=,0 is excited [Fig. 2(e)]. Only the ±π energy edge modes when δ(π,π/2) or δ(π/2,π) appear [Fig. 2(f)], which demonstrates energy edges with ±π energy mainly distributed on the second-nearest edge, as predicted in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b) (II). Also, we can reveal the distribution of edge states equivalently by post-selecting the output state |n on the OAM basis, denoted as projective measurements.

    D. Edge State Behaviors with Edge Perturbations

    The edge state is the topological feature in the SSH model and is protected by chiral symmetry (see Appendix E for details). Therefore, the edge state will be significantly affected when the symmetry changes. To investigate the robustness of the edge state energy, we probe the band structure with perturbations on the edge.

    One advantage of photonic synthetic dimensions is that we can dynamically change the lattice structures by flexibly adjusting the optical parameters. By tilting the angle of the WP with a central hole, the thickness of the birefringent crystal changes continuously. The light of high-order OAM modes (m0) passing through the crystal accumulates a roundtrip phase eiϕ compared with the fundamental Gaussian mode passing through the hole, which introduces an effective phase shift for the edge sites, as illustrated in Fig. 3(a).

    Experimentally measured edge state behaviors with edge perturbations and the spectrum discretization. (a) The schemes of the OAM lattice model when modulating the phase ϕ of the states on the edge. Red for left circularly polarized modes (↺), and blue for right circularly polarized modes (↻). (b) The detected transmission spectra with different ϕ when δ=−π/3. The edge state (indicated by the arrow) moves from ω=ω0 into bulk states as ϕ varies from 0 to 0.2π. ω−ω0 is the frequency detuning, and Ω=375 MHz represents the FSR.

    Figure 3.Experimentally measured edge state behaviors with edge perturbations and the spectrum discretization. (a) The schemes of the OAM lattice model when modulating the phase ϕ of the states on the edge. Red for left circularly polarized modes (), and blue for right circularly polarized modes (). (b) The detected transmission spectra with different ϕ when δ=π/3. The edge state (indicated by the arrow) moves from ω=ω0 into bulk states as ϕ varies from 0 to 0.2π. ωω0 is the frequency detuning, and Ω=375  MHz represents the FSR.

    The experimentally transmitted intensity spectra I(ω) with δ=π/3 of different ϕ are shown in Fig. 3(b). As ϕ=0, a small transmitted peak corresponding to the zero energy edge state (marked by the black arrow) is located in the center of the topological band gap. As the parameter ϕ changes from 0 to 0.2π, we observe the zero energy edge state move to the bulk states (green regions) and the topological protection is effectively destroyed. Here, the semi-infinite chain has an open boundary. The roundtrip phase applied by WP causes a shift of the quasi-energies for the edge site compared with the bulk modes, which breaks the chiral symmetry of the model.

    E. Spectrum Discretization for the Interference

    As an analog of our single boundary model, we consider an emitter close to a surface. The density of states of emitted light will be modified because of the interference between the forward propagating and the reflected wave [46]. According to Bloch’s theorem, the mode propagating on a periodic lattice is a modified plane wave uk(x)eikx, where k is the momentum, uk(x) is the periodic amplitude, and x is the axis. Here we consider a light source that will release two Bloch waves traveling in opposite directions e±ik(xL), where L represents the distance to the surface [Fig. 4(a), left panel]. Waves traveling to the left will be reflected and result in the state Ψ(x)=eik(xL)+eik(xL)+reikLeikx,where r1 is the reflection coefficient. The interference between the leftward and the reflected waves causes an oscillation of the intensity distribution |Ψ(x)|2. For example, the wave intensity at the position of emitter |Ψ(L)|2=54cos2kL along with momentum k is shown in Fig. 4(a) (right panel), where the oscillating period is determined by π/L.

    Detected spectrum discretization. (a) Left panel: an emitter near the surface. Right panel: oscillation of energy distribution |Ψ(L)|2 caused by the interference. (b) Schematic of the lattice dynamics when exciting the left circularly polarized OAM mode with topological charge m=6. Photons travel along the purple arrow, and the black cross indicates that the edge causes the reflection of the left-traveling photons. Red for left circularly polarized modes (↺), and blue for right circularly polarized modes (↻). (c), (e) The experimental (c) and numerically simulated (e) transmission intensity spectra. (d), (f) The experimental (d) and numerically simulated (f) transmission intensity spectra when δ=0.35π, corresponding to the dotted lines in (c) and (e). ω−ω0 is the frequency detuning, and Ω=375 MHz represents the FSR.

    Figure 4.Detected spectrum discretization. (a) Left panel: an emitter near the surface. Right panel: oscillation of energy distribution |Ψ(L)|2 caused by the interference. (b) Schematic of the lattice dynamics when exciting the left circularly polarized OAM mode with topological charge m=6. Photons travel along the purple arrow, and the black cross indicates that the edge causes the reflection of the left-traveling photons. Red for left circularly polarized modes (), and blue for right circularly polarized modes (). (c), (e) The experimental (c) and numerically simulated (e) transmission intensity spectra. (d), (f) The experimental (d) and numerically simulated (f) transmission intensity spectra when δ=0.35π, corresponding to the dotted lines in (c) and (e). ωω0 is the frequency detuning, and Ω=375  MHz represents the FSR.

    This effect will cause spectrum discretization in our OAM lattice system. We pump the cavity with a high-order OAM mode (m=6) and excite the right semi-infinite lattice site n=,2 as shown Fig. 4(b). The experimental and simulated transmitted intensity spectra I(ω) with different δ are shown in Figs. 4(c) and 4(e), respectively. Since the left-traveling photons and reflected photons interfere in three unit cells (corresponding to L=3) between the edge (n=,0) and the exciting sites (n=,2), six discrete bands of the bulk are obtained in the transmitted spectra (see Appendix F for more simulation results). To clarify the distinct peaks for the transmitted spectra, we illustrate the contour of the transmitted intensity I(ω) with δ=0.35π as shown in Fig. 4(d) (experiment) and Fig. 4(f) (simulation), which show six discrete peaks in the bulk clearly. Notably, the experimental transmitted peak has a wider peak width than the simulation results, which is more indistinguishable due to the loss of the cavity.

    3. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION

    In conclusion, we have experimentally demonstrated the edge along a synthetic OAM lattice in a single optical cavity and explored the bulk-edge correspondence of our system by measuring the topological invariants. We further investigate the behavior of the edge state under perturbations, and we find that the spectrum discretization observed in our OAM lattice system aligns well with the theory of emitters near the surface.

    Compared with schemes of topological edge states in other synthetic dimensions based on atoms [1,3,4], photonic frequency [8,47,48], and spatial supermodes [17], we form a unique approximate semi-infinite lattice and explore corresponding spectrum properties, which provides a new perspective to attain topological edge effects in the SSH model. Notably, the properties of finite lattice and semi-finite lattice exhibit significant differences in non-Hermitian systems [4952]. It is convenient to explore the non-Hermitian topology of edge states in our cavity system by inserting a partially polarized beam splitter. Moreover, the degenerate-cavity-based scheme makes it easier to support the couplings of multiple synthetic dimensions [53] and cavities [23], which provides opportunities to construct high-dimensional topological insulators for exploring nontrivial topological edge phenomena, such as the chiral edge states along the OAM lattice. The long-range couplings along the OAM lattice can also be introduced via a J-plate [54], which can perform arbitrary spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion. Drilling a hole in optical elements to distinguish different OAM modes can also build all-optical devices, such as all-optical memory [25]. Furthermore, the degenerate cavity offers the possibility of coupling atoms [32], allowing for the exploration of effective many-particle systems by introducing photon-photon interactions via atomic mediums [55,56]. Our work provides a new topological photonic structure that may benefit topological devices such as topological lasers.

    APPENDIX A: FORMING A FLOQUET SSH OAM LATTICE IN A CAVITY

    The q-plate, as a crucial element in constructing the OAM synthetic dimension, performs spin-orbital angular momentum coupling in the experiment. It is composed of liquid crystal molecules with different optical axes, each of which is equivalent to a half-waveplate [57]. The optical axis of cylindrical coordinates satisfies α(r,ϕ)=qϕ+α0,where q and α0 are constants. The Jones formalism of q-plate MQ at each point can be written as MQ=cos(δ/2)I+isin(δ/2)(cos2αsin2αsin2αcos2α),where δ is a parameter controlled by the applied electric field. Within the paraxial approximation, a left (right)-circularly polarized plane wave E=E0eimϕ(1,±i)T, denoted as |(),m, passing through the q-plate, would be transformed to EE0=cos(δ/2)(1±i)+isin(δ/2)ei(±2q+m)ϕ(1i).The phase factor e±i2qϕ (topological charge is 2q) is introduced during the spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion.

    In the experimental setup, we use a q-plate with q=1, α0=0. The coupling of different modes introduced by the q-plate can be described as JQ=mcos(δ/2)(a,ma,m+a,ma,m)+isin(δ/2)(a,m+2qa,m+h.c.),where δ is the electrically controlled parameter, and sin(δ/2) is the coupling strength between adjacent OAM modes. a(),m and a(),m are creation and annihilation operators of left (right) circular polarization. To better define the topological phase, we define the unit cell as l=(ms1)/2, where s=1  (1) for left (right) circular polarization. The q-plate operator can be JQ=lcos(δ/2)(a,la,l+a,la,l)+isin(δ/2)(a,la,l+h.c.).Similarly, the operator of the WP introducing hopping between two polarized states with the same OAM is JW=lcos(η/2)(a,la,l+a,la,l)+isin(η/2)(eiξa,la,l+1+eiξa,l+1a,l),where η denotes the phase delay between ordinary and extraordinary photons and is determined by the thickness of the quartz plate. ξ is the angle of the WP optical axis. As we drill a pinhole on the WP where only the OAM mode with m=0 can pass through, the operator JWhole of the WP is expressed as JWhole=l1cos(η/2)(a,l+1a,l+1+a,la,l)+isin(η/2)(eiξa,la,l+1+eiξa,l+1a,l)+a,0a,0+a,1a,1.

    In a roundtrip in the cavity, the light field double passes through the q-plate and the WP, and the evolution of the polarized OAM states can be written as U=JQJWholeJWholeJQ. For the periodic-driven nature of the system, we can define an effective Hamiltonian satisfying H^eff=ilnU.

    By solving the stationary Schrödinger equation U|ψ=eiHeff|ψ=eiE|ψ, we can get the eigen-energy E and eigenstates |ψ. As an example, the solved eigen-energy (E) along δ (δ(π,π]) with η=π/2 is shown in Fig. 5(a). We can clearly find the zero energy edge modes when |δ|<π/2 and ±π energy edge modes when |δ|>π/2. The solved eigenstates |ψ as δ=9π/40 and 3π/4 [corresponding to the eigen-energy of pink points in Fig. 5(a)] are shown in Figs. 5(b) and 5(c). The bulk states are evenly distributed (blue bars) along the OAM lattice while the zero (π) energy edge modes (colored by orange bars) are mostly localized at the n=,1 and n=,0 (n=,1 and n=,0) sites. By a similar method, we also calculate the edge state distributions [Fig. 2(b)] in the main text with δ=0 and δ=π.

    Calculated eigen-energies and eigenstates when η=π/2. (a) The eigen-energies at different δ. (b) The eigenstates distribution as δ=9π/40, corresponding to the pink points in (a). The orange bars correspond to the zero energy edge states, while the blue bars correspond to bulk states. (c) The eigenstates distribution as δ=3π/4. The orange bars correspond to the π energy edge states, while the blue bars correspond to bulk states.

    Figure 5.Calculated eigen-energies and eigenstates when η=π/2. (a) The eigen-energies at different δ. (b) The eigenstates distribution as δ=9π/40, corresponding to the pink points in (a). The orange bars correspond to the zero energy edge states, while the blue bars correspond to bulk states. (c) The eigenstates distribution as δ=3π/4. The orange bars correspond to the π energy edge states, while the blue bars correspond to bulk states.

    APPENDIX B: TIGHTLY BINDING APPROXIMATION OF THE HAMILTONIAN

    On the other hand, as the coupling strength is small, we can write the analytic expression of the system Hamiltonian directly. As δ1, the operator of the q-plate can be approximated to JQ1+ilδ2(a,la,l+h.c.)=eilδ2(a,la,l+h.c.).Similarly, as η1, the operator of the WP can be approximated to JWhole1+il1η2(a,la,l+1+h.c.)=eil1η2(a,la,l+1+h.c.).Thus, the evolution U of the light field in a roundtrip can be written as U=JQJWholeJWholeJQ=eilδ(a,la,l+h.c.)+il1η(a,la,l+1+h.c.).The system Hamiltonian is H^=ilnU=lδ(a,la,l+h.c.)+l1η(a,la,l+1+h.c.).

    APPENDIX C: TOPOLOGICAL PHASES IN THE SYNTHETIC LATTICE

    According to the Bloch theory, we can define a Bloch mode, given by |k=leikl|l, in the quasi-momentum space. Applying the Fourier transform, we have JQ=kcos(δ2)(a,ka,k+a,ka,k)+isin(δ2)(a,ka,k+h.c.)=k(a,ka,k)(cos(δ2)isin(δ2)isin(δ2)cos(δ2))    (a,ka,k),and JW=kcos(η/2)(a,ka,k+a,ka,k)+isin(η/2)  [ei(ξk)a,ka,k+ei(ξk)a,ka,k]=k(a,ka,k)(cos(η2)isin(η2)ei(ξk)isin(η2)ei(kξ)cos(η2))(a,ka,k).Then, we get the operator in the momentum space: JQ(k)=(cos(δ2)isin(δ2)isin(δ2)cos(δ2)),and JW(k)=(cos(η2)isin(η2)ei(ξk)isin(η2)ei(kξ)cos(η2)).

    The total operators of two different timeframes are U1(k)=JQ(δ/2)JW(η)JQ(δ/2) and U2(k)=JW(η/2)    JQ(δ)JW(η/2). The effective Hamilton satisfies Hα(k)=ilnUα(k). The defined winding numbers of the system are ωα=02πdk4πiTr[σzH^α1(k)kH^α(k)]=12(12πiBZdlnUα2,1Uα1,2),where Uα1,2 and Uα2,1 represent the antiangular matrix elements of Uα (α=1,  2). So we obtain ω1=14πiBZdlnU12,1U11,2=14πiBZdln(cosηsinδ+cosδsinηcosk+isinηsinkcosηsinδ+cosδsinηcoskisinηsink),and ω2=14πiBZdlnU22,1U21,2=1+14πiBZdln(cosηsinδcosk+cosδsinηisinδsinkcosηsinδcosk+cosδsinη+isinδsink).The calculated diagram of the topological phase with different (δ, η) settings is illustrated in the main text Fig. 1(d).

    APPENDIX D: INPUT AND OUTPUT RELATIONS OF THE CAVITY

    In the experiment of edge states in the main text, we measure the system by detecting the output signal of the degenerate cavity, which is pumped by a continuous-wave laser. To study the characteristics of the transmission process, we consider the interaction between the cavity modes and the outside optical modes. The total Hamiltonian has the form H^=H^sys+H^b+H^int,where H^sys is the Hamiltonian of the cavity system. H^b is the heat bath Hamiltonian, which describes the outside field as H^b=ndωωbn(ω)bn(ω),where bn(ω) are boson annihilation operators for the bath; label n=s,l denotes the polarization of the photon and order of the unit cell. bn(ω) obey the commutation relation [bn(ω),bn(ω)]=δ(ωω)δnn.H^int in Eq. (D1) describes the coupling of the system to the bath. With rotating wave approximation and assuming the coupling constant κ(ω)=γ/2π is independent of the frequency, H^int has the form H^int=indωγ2π[anbn(ω)bn(ω)an],where an is the annihilation operator of the photon mode in the system.

    Defining in field operators, bin,n(t)=12πdωeiωtbn,0(ω),with bn,0(ω) the value of bn(ω) at t=0, which also satisfies [bin,n(t),bin,n(t)]=δnnδ(tt). We can write down the Langevin equation dan(t)dt=i[an,H^sys]γ2an(t)γbin,n(t).We also have the input-output relation [58] bout,n(t)bin,n(t)=γan(t),where bout,n(t)=12πdωeiω(tt1)bn,1(ω) is defined as the output field operators, and bn,1(ω) is the boson annihilation operator at time t1>t.

    Combine Eq. (D6) and Eq. (D7), transfer them to the frequency domain using Fourier transformation, and we get the solution bout,n(ω)=n(δnnin|γωH^sys+iγ2|n)bin,n(ω).|n=an in Eq. (D8) is a single photon mode. The first term on the right side represents the reflection and the second term is the transmission part. With a single mode input field bin(ω)=bin,n(ω), the transmission coefficient takes the form Tn=in|γωH^sys+iγ2|n.

    APPENDIX E: TOPOLOGICAL PROTECTION OF THE EDGE STATE

    The disorder is inherent in our system because of air disturbances, which deform the transmitted spectrum of bulk states. Nevertheless, the observed transmission spectrum of edge states is kept unmoved due to the topological protection against disorders. To demonstrate the property of the edge state’s immunity against disorders in our experiment clearly, we simulate the behavior of the edge state when there are perturbations of air in the cavity system. Here, we assume the air disturbance in the experiment will cause random additional phases ϕm on different OAM modes |m, and the simulated transmission spectrum is illustrated in Fig. 6. It shows that energies of bulk states are shifted due to disorders while the energy of the edge state remains at zero, which demonstrates the topological protection of the edge state.

    Simulation of transmission spectra with (red)/without (blue) disorders when δ=π/4.

    Figure 6.Simulation of transmission spectra with (red)/without (blue) disorders when δ=π/4.

    APPENDIX F: SIMULATIONS OF THE BANDS WITH INTERFERENCE

    To show the influence on the transmission spectra of the interference in the OAM lattice, we numerically simulate the evolution of OAM modes in the cavity. As we input the OAM modes |ϕin with topological charge m0=6 into the cavity [where the sites between the excited point and the boundary form three unit cells corresponding to L=3, as shown in Fig. 4(b)], the OAM states start to evolve according to U^n|ϕin, where n represents the number of times light circulates in the cavity. The OAM distribution at each cycle is shown in Fig. 7(a), and we can find that leftward waves along the OAM lattice meet the boundary (m=0) and are reflected after three cycles. The output of the cavity is a coherent superposition of each cyclic state, which can be written as |ϕout=κntn1ei2nπ(ωω0)/ΩU^n|ϕin, where κ and t are the coupling coefficient and reflection coefficient of the cavity mirror satisfying |κ|2+|t|2=1. ωω0 is the detuning of the input frequency and Ω is the FSR. As we project the output states on the Bloch wave vector |k=meikm|m, we can get the normalized transmission intensity spectra I(ω,k)=ϕout|kk|ϕout along momentum k [Fig. 7(b)]. We can find the spectrum for the leftward modes (vg=ω/k<0) split into three peaks for the interference between the leftward propagating and the reflected modes. Thus the total normalized transmission intensity ωI(ω,k) along momentum k has six peaks [Fig. 7(b), top], which is consistent with the prediction of the formula |Ψ(L=3)|2 in Fig. 4(a). In our experiment, we detect the total normalized transmission intensity spectra [kI(ω,k)] containing all k and we can also obtain the six peaks [Fig. 7(b), right].

    (a) OAM distributions of the light circulating in the cavity. (b) Normalized transmission intensity spectra versus momentum k. Top and right panels: total normalized transmission intensity spectra.

    Figure 7.(a) OAM distributions of the light circulating in the cavity. (b) Normalized transmission intensity spectra versus momentum k. Top and right panels: total normalized transmission intensity spectra.

    APPENDIX G: DETAILS OF THE EXPERIMENTAL SETUP TO CREATE AND MEASURE THE EDGE STATES

    The experimental setup for edge state detecting is shown in Fig. 8. We use a degenerate cavity to form the synthetic OAM dimension. The cavity transverse modes are Laguerre-Gaussian (LG) modes satisfying E(r,ϕ,z)=CmpLGw(z)[r2w(z)]|m|er2w2(z)Lp|m|[2r2w2(z)]eikr22R(z)ei(2p+|l|+1)ζ(z)eimϕ,where p and m are radial and angular indices. w(z)=w01+(z/zR)2 represents beam size, where w0 is waist size. zR is Rayleigh distance and ζ(z)=arctan(z/zR) is Gouy phase shift. Lp|m| represents the Laguerre polynomial, and R(z) represents the radius of curvature of the wavefront. The resonant frequency of the LG modes in the cavity is 2πωΩ(2p+l+1)arccos(A+D2)=2nπ,where ω is the light frequency and Ω is the FSR of the cavity. A and D are diagonal elements of the transmission matrix of the cavity. A cavity that satisfies (A+D)/2=1 is defined as a degenerate cavity, where all spatial modes of the degenerate cavity share the same resonant frequency. The cavity consists of two plane mirrors, two lenses, a q-plate, and a WP. For the coupled-in mirror, the ratio between transmittance and reflectance is 5/95, and for the coupled-out mirror, it is 1/99. Two lenses in the cavity have the same focal length f=10  cm and form a 4f telescope [corresponding to (A+D)/2=1], which holds the cavity degeneracy to all the OAM modes. The q-plate introduces the hopping between adjacent OAM modes, and the parameter δ is controlled by a square wave signal applied by an arbitrary function generator (AFG). The WP has a hole in the center with a radius r=125  μm. To pump the system, we use a laser, which has a central wavelength of 880 nm, combined with a spatial light modulator (SLM) to generate light of different OAM modes. Holograms of vortex beams with different topological charges m are loaded on the SLM. The incident light to the SLM is polarized to the horizontal polarization by the polarizing beam splitter (PBS). After modulating, the light passes through a 4f system (not illustrated in the figure). And in the middle of the two lenses, we place a pinhole to filter out unmodulated light. To measure the transmission spectrum of the cavity, we sweep the frequency of the laser from 0 to 500 MHz by a triangle wave signal, which is also used to trigger the oscilloscope. A photon detector (PD) connected to the oscilloscope detects the transmitted photons.

    Experimental setup. SLM: spatial light modulator; PBS: polarizing beam splitter; AFG: arbitrary function generator; PD: photon detector; QWP: quarter-waveplate; WP: waveplate.

    Figure 8.Experimental setup. SLM: spatial light modulator; PBS: polarizing beam splitter; AFG: arbitrary function generator; PD: photon detector; QWP: quarter-waveplate; WP: waveplate.

    APPENDIX H: FABRICATION OF THE PINHOLE ON THE WAVEPLATE

    The size of the pinhole on the WP in the experiment is determined carefully. The intensity profiles of different cavity transverse OAM modes near the waist are shown in Fig. 9(a), which quantifies the overlap integral between the different cavity transverse OAM modes and the spatial aperture in the WP. The radius of the pinhole is designed to only operate on the m=0 mode. By preparing the pinhole with a specific radius rh=0.75w0=125  μm using femtosecond laser processing technology in experiments, where w0 is the waist of the incident LG beam, we can minimize the scattering of the small residual portion of light for m0 modes. Here we simulate the diffraction of OAM modes with m=0 [Fig. 9(b)] and m=2 [Fig. 9(c)]. Though the residual portion of modes that interacts with the aperture results in a small +1st order diffraction ring (marked by black arrows), the relative intensity is small (I+1/Iall<2%). Thus, the extra losses or spurious modal cross-coupling terms can be almost ignored.

    (a) The intensity distributions of different cavity OAM modes. The dotted lines show the size of the pinhole. (b), (c) Inserts: the diffraction patterns of the OAM modes with different topological charges m=0 (b) and m=2 (c). Curves: normalized intensity profiles along the white dotted line.

    Figure 9.(a) The intensity distributions of different cavity OAM modes. The dotted lines show the size of the pinhole. (b), (c) Inserts: the diffraction patterns of the OAM modes with different topological charges m=0 (b) and m=2 (c). Curves: normalized intensity profiles along the white dotted line.

    APPENDIX I: DETECTING THE WINDING NUMBER

    For a periodically driven system, the Hamiltonian can be written as H^F(k)=E(k)n(k)·σ, where n(k)=[nx(k),ny(k),nz(k)] is the real and imaginary parts of the Bloch vector. E(k) represents the quasi-energy; σ=[σx,σy,σz] is the Pauli matrix. In the experiment, the topological property of the bulk can be directly measured from the winding of the unit vector n(k) along the k-space.

    In Ref. [11], we have illustrated the direct detection method for the topological winding of n(k). The detected topological winding numbers are based on the unit cell index m. Noting the topological phase in this work is based on unit cell order l, we can simply map the system with unit cell index l to the system with index m by switching parameters δ and η, denoted as δη and ηδ. And the two timeframes become U1=JW(η/2)JQ(δ)JW(η/2) and U2=JQ(δ/2)JW(η)JQ(δ/2), respectively.

    At the topological phase corresponding to η=π/2 and δ=0, denoted by the red dot in Fig. 10(a), parameters of the experimental setup are δ=π/2 and η=0. With JW(0)=I, U1=U2=JQ(π/2), resulting in identical setups across the two timeframes with only a q-plate within the cavity. The detected winding number w1=w2=1 as shown in Fig. 10(b), which derives (ν0,νπ)=(1,0). The invariants indicate an edge state at E=0, aligning well with the result in Fig. 2(d) in the main text.

    (a) The diagram of the topological phase. (b) The detected winding of the unit vector n(k) when only a q-plate is placed in the degenerate cavity. (c) The detected winding number when the q-plate is deposited after a half-waveplate in the cavity.

    Figure 10.(a) The diagram of the topological phase. (b) The detected winding of the unit vector n(k) when only a q-plate is placed in the degenerate cavity. (c) The detected winding number when the q-plate is deposited after a half-waveplate in the cavity.

    Then we set δ=π/2 and η=π to obtain the topological invariant when η=π/2 and δ=π, denoted by the blue dot in Fig. 10(a). For the first timeframe, U1(k)=JW(π/2)    JQ(π/2)JW(π/2), where a half-waveplate and a q-plate are set in the cavity. The detected winding number is illustrated in Fig. 10(c), where the winding number w1=1. In the second timeframe, for JW(π)=I, we have U1(k)=JQ(π/2). Thus, w2=1 remains the same as the situation in Fig. 10(b). The calculated (ν0,νπ) is (0,1), which is consistent with the detected edge states at E=±π in the main text Fig. 2(f).

    [45] D. Walls, G. J. Milburn. Input–output formulation of optical cavities. Quantum Optics, 127-141(2008).

    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Yu-Wei Liao, Mu Yang, Hao-Qing Zhang, Zhi-He Hao, Jun Hu, Tian-Xiang Zhu, Zong-Quan Zhou, Xi-Wang Luo, Jin-Shi Xu, Chuan-Feng Li, Guang-Can Guo, "Realization of edge states along a synthetic orbital angular momentum dimension," Photonics Res. 13, 87 (2025)

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Quantum Optics

    Received: Jul. 2, 2024

    Accepted: Sep. 17, 2024

    Published Online: Dec. 20, 2024

    The Author Email: Jin-Shi Xu (jsxu@ustc.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.1364/PRJ.533602

    CSTR:32188.14.PRJ.533602

    Topics