In this decade, active research has been carried out on the laser plasma acceleration concept[
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, Volume. 3, Issue 1, 01000e10(2015)
Scaling and design of high-energy laser plasma electron acceleration
Recently there has been great progress in laser-driven plasma-based accelerators by exploiting high-power lasers, where electron beams can be accelerated to multi-GeV energy in a centimeter-scale plasma due to the laser wakefield acceleration mechanism. While, to date, worldwide research on laser plasma accelerators has been focused on the creation of compact particle and radiation sources for basic sciences, medical and industrial applications, there is great interest in applications for high-energy physics and astrophysics, exploring unprecedented high-energy frontier phenomena. In this context, we present an overview of experimental achievements in laser plasma acceleration from the perspective of the production of GeV-level electron beams, and deduce the scaling formulas capable of predicting experimental results self-consistently, taking into account the propagation of a relativistic laser pulse through plasma and the accelerating field reduction due to beam loading. Finally, we present design examples for 10-GeV-level laser plasma acceleration, which is expected in near-term experiments by means of petawatt-class lasers.
1. Introduction
In this decade, active research has been carried out on the laser plasma acceleration concept[
We organize the remainder of this paper as follows. Section
2. Overview of laser plasma electron acceleration
Laser-driven plasma-based accelerators have evolved from a groundbreaking concept by Tajima and Dawson[
Sign up for High Power Laser Science and Engineering TOC Get the latest issue of High Power Laser Science and Engineering delivered right to you!Sign up now
In fact, there has been significant experimental progress in laser wakefield acceleration of electron beams since the incipient experiments on laser wakefield accelerators successfully demonstrated ultrahigh gradient acceleration of the order of , using chirped pulse amplification lasers with 10-TW class peak power and 1 ps pulse duration[
For many practical applications of electron beams, quality, stability and controllability of the beam performance such as energy, energy spread, emittance and charge are indispensable in addition to compact and robust features of accelerators. In this context, breakthrough experiments[
Although self-injection is a robust method relying on self-focusing, self-compression of the laser pulse and expansion of the bubble[
For laser plasma acceleration reaching GeV-level energies, it is essential to propagate intense laser pulses over a centimeter-scale distance in underdense plasma. For this purpose, a preformed plasma density channel with a parabolic radial distribution[
3. Energy scaling of laser wakefield acceleration in the relativistic regime
3.1. Propagation of relativistic laser pulses in plasma
The wave equation for the normalized vector potential describing the evolution of a laser pulse with laser wavelength and duration
(full width at half maximum, FWHM) in a plasma channel can be written as[
Under the matched condition that no phase shift of the laser pulse occurs, the group velocity is written as , where a correction factor for the group velocity is defined as[
3.2. Laser plasma acceleration in the quasi-linear regime
In the linear laser wakefield with the accelerating field , the equations of the longitudinal motion of an electron with the normalized velocity
and electron energy
are given by[
Setting the initial electron phase at
, the maximum energy gain is given by
3.3. Laser plasma acceleration in the bubble regime
Previous laser plasma acceleration experiments that successfully demonstrated the production of quasi-monoenergetic electron beams with narrow energy spread have been elucidated in terms of self-injection and an acceleration mechanism in the bubble regime[ in the bubble frame moving in the plasma with velocity
, i.e.,
. In the bubble (blowout) regime for
, since the electron-evacuated cavity shape is determined by balancing the Lorentz force of the ion sphere exerted on the electron sheath with the ponderomotive force of the laser pulse, the bubble radius
is approximately given as
(Ref. [
, where
represents a factor that takes into account the difference between the simulation and theoretical estimation, and more significantly the accelerating field reduction due to the beam loading effects.
In self-guided laser wakefield acceleration, where a driving laser pulse propagates by means of self-channeling, the equations of longitudinal motion of an electron are approximately written as[
|
For a driving laser pulse propagating in a plasma channel, the equations of electron motion are given by setting in Equations (
. Hence, the maximum energy gain is
The matched power corresponding to the matched spot size
is calculated as
3.4. Beam loading effects
In laser wakefield acceleration, an accelerated electron beam induces its own wakefield and cancels the laser-driven wakefield. Assuming the beam loading efficiency defined by the fraction of the plasma wave energy absorbed by particles of the bunch with the rms radius
, the beam-loaded field is given by
, where
is the accelerating field without beam loading, given by
for the bubble regime
. Thus, the loaded charge is calculated as[
3.5. Comparison with experimental results on GeV-class electron beams
Table (Refs. [
(Refs. [
for a given
, most previous experiments have employed chirped pulse amplification lasers with wavelength
and pulse duration
, except for the case of Ref. [
and
was employed. The validity of the energy scaling formulas (Equations (
or
.
For self-guided laser wakefield acceleration, the multi-GeV acceleration results reported in Refs. [ is focused onto a
spot radius of
, producing
at the entrance of a 7-cm long gas cell with
. The accelerated electron beam has a quasi-monoenergetic peak at 2.0 GeV with a relative energy spread of 10% (FWHM), containing a total charge of 540 pC in a bunch. In this case, from Equations (
and the correction factor of the group velocity
are
and
, respectively, at
. Thus, since the matched spot radius is
, the laser pulse undergoes self-focusing after propagating through the gas cell. Using Equations (
, the field reduction factor
is calculated as
(
). From Equation (
, while from Equation (
. From Equation (
is estimated as
In Ref. [ spot radius of
, producing
at the entrance of a gas jet for three cases consisting of a 4-mm long single stage with
, a 10-mm long single stage with
, and two stages comprising a 4-mm long injector with
and a 10-mm long accelerator with
. As shown in Figure
and the correction factor of the group velocity
are
and
, respectively, at
. Since the matched spot radius is
for the 4-mm single-stage case,
for the 10-mm single-stage case and
in the injector jet and
in the accelerator jet for the two-stage case, respectively, it is inferred that a laser pulse with a focused spot radius of
is initially self-focused down to the matched spot radius. Using Equations (
, the field reduction factor
is calculated as
for the 4-mm single-stage case,
for the 10-mm single-stage case and
in the injector/
in the accelerator for the two-stage case. From Equation (
for the 4-mm single-stage case,
for the 10-mm single-stage case and
in the injector/
in the accelerator for the two-stage case. The pump depletion length due to pulse-front erosion is
for the 4-mm single-stage case,
for the 10-mm single-stage case and
in the injector/
in the accelerator for the two-stage case. From Equation (
with an effective acceleration length of
for the 4-mm single-stage case and
with
for the 10-mm single-stage case. For the two-stage case, the output energy of the injector is
with
and the output energy of the accelerator stage reaches
with
, assuming that the injection energy is
and the focused spot size at the entrance of the accelerator stage is decreased to
due to self-focusing in the injector stage, increasing the normalized vector potential up to
. In this experiment, most of the charge produced in the injector is injected into the accelerator stage, while the large energy spread is attributed to the fact that the accelerator length is shorter than the dephasing length at which the energy compression takes place in the phase space as well as the maximum energy.
4. Design of 10-GeV-level laser plasma accelerators
At present, the most near-term prospects for 10-GeV-level laser plasma acceleration are confidently given by the scaling and methods described in the previous section. Here, we consider design examples of laser plasma accelerators capable of delivering 10-GeV electron beams with bunch charges of 160 pC ( electrons per bunch) for three cases: a self-guided laser plasma accelerator in the bubble regime with
, a channel-guided laser plasma accelerator in the bubble regime with
and a channel-guided laser plasma accelerator in the quasi-linear regime with
. For all three cases, we present design parameters for the laser and plasma for a driving laser wavelength of 800 nm. Table
and a beam loading charge of 300 pC by comparison with the results of 3D PIC simulation from the Lorentz-boosted frame OSIRIS code[
|
4.1. Self-guided laser plasma accelerator in the bubble regime
For a given energy gain , the operating plasma density is determined from Equation (
4.2. Channel-guided laser plasma accelerator in the bubble regime
The operating plasma density is determined by
The matched spot radius becomes
4.3. Channel-guided laser plasma accelerator in the quasi-linear regime
For a given , the pulse duration is given by
5. Conclusion
We have provided an overview of recent progress in laser plasma accelerators from the perspective of experiments on the production of GeV-level electron beams, and scaling formulas to describe energy gain for a self-guided laser plasma accelerator in the bubble regime (), a channel-guided laser plasma accelerator in the bubble regime (
) and a channel-guided laser plasma accelerator in the quasi-linear regime (
). Although most previous experiments have been focused on electron injection into the plasma bubble and the production of high-quality electron beams with small energy spread and emittance, employing a millimeter-scale gas jet, recent experimental results beyond 1-GeV acceleration allow us to test the scaling formulas in depth, which are necessary for the design of the operating parameters of laser plasma accelerators to satisfy requirements such as energy gain and beam charge. Taking account of the group velocity correction factor
in the propagation of laser pulses with relativistic intensity, characterized by
, through plasma channels, including initially uniform plasma with
and a preformed plasma channel with
, provides the correct accelerator length equal to the dephasing length as well as the proper operating plasma density. Meanwhile, we found that the accelerating field reduction factor
due to beam loading can be properly evaluated by applying the resultant scaling formulas to recent experimental results for multi-GeV laser plasma accelerators[
can be obtained from the simple analytic formulas Equations (
[4] H. Lu, M. Liu, W. Wang, C. Wang, J. Liu, A. Deng, J. Xu, C. Xia, W. Li, H. Zhang, X. Lu, C. Wang, J. Wang, X. Liang, Y. Leng, B. Shen, K. Nakajima, R. Li, Z. Xu. Appl. Phys. Lett., 99(2011).
[5] X. Wang, R. Zgadzaj, N. Fazel, Z. Li, S. A. Yi, X. Zhang, W. Henderson, Y. Y. Chang, R. Korzekwa, H. E. Tsai, C. H. Pai, H. Quevedo, G. Dyer, E. Gaul, M. Martinez, A.C. Bernstein, T. Borger, M. Spinks, M. Donovan, V. Khudik, G. Shvets, T. Ditmire, M. C. Downer. Nature Commun., 4, 1988(2013).
[6] H. T. Kim, K. H. Pae, H. J. Cha, I. J. Kim, T. J. Yu, J. H. Sung, S. K. Lee, T. M. Jeong, J. Lee. Phys. Rev. Lett., 111(2013).
[11] J. S. Liu, C. Q. Xia, W. T. Wang, H. Y. Lu, C. Wang, A. H. Deng, W. T. Li, H. Zhang, X. Y. Liang, Y. X. Leng, X. M. Lu, C. Wang, J. Z. Wang, K. Nakajima, R. X. Li, Z. Z. Xu. Phys. Rev. Lett., 107(2011).
[15] C. Xia, J. Liu, W. Wang, H. Lu, W. Cheng, A. Deng, W. Li, H. Zhang, X. Liang, Y. Leng, X. Lu, C. Wang, J. Wang, K. Nakajima, R. Li, Z. Xu. Phys. Plasmas, 18(2011).
[17] J.-L. Vay, C. G. R. Geddes, E. Esarey, C. B. Schroeder, W. P. Leemans, E. Cormier-Miche, D. P. Grote. Phys. Plasmas, 18(2011).
[21] K. Nakajima, H. Lu, X. Zhao, B. Shen, R. Li, Z. Xu. Chin. Opt. Lett., 11(2013).
[28] K. Nakajima, A. H. Deng, H. Yoshitama, Nasr A. M. Hafz, H. Y. Lu, B. F. Shen, J. S. Liu, R. X. Li, Z. Z. XuFree Electron Laser.
[31] N. E. Andreev, L. M. Gorbunov, V. I. Kirsanov, A. A. Pogosova, R. R. Ramazashvili. Sov. Phys. JETP, 55, 571(1992).
[46] L. M. Chen, H. Kotaki, K. Nakajima, J. Koga, S. V. Bulanov, T. Tajima, Y. Q. Gu, H. S. Peng, X. X. Wang, T. S. Wen, H. J. Liu, C. Y. Jiao, C. G. Zhang, X. J. Huang, Y. Guo, K. N. Zhou, J. F. Hua, W. M. An, C. X. Tang, Y. Z. Lin. Phys. Plasmas, 14(2007).
[51] S. Kneip, S. R. Nagel, S. F. Martins, S. P. D. Mangles, C. Bellei, O. Chekhlov, R. J. Clarke, N. Delerue, E. J. Divall, G. Doucas, K. Ertel, F. Fiuza, R. Fonseca, P. Foster, S. J. Hawkes, C. J. Hooker, K. Krushelnick, W. B. Mori, C. A. J. Palmer, K. Ta Phuoc, P. P. Rajeev, J. Schreiber, M. J. V. Streeter, D. Urner, J. Vieira, L. O. Silva, Z. Najmudin. Phys. Rev. Lett., 103(2009).
[52] D. H. Froula, C. E. Clayton, T. Döppner, K. A. Marsh, C. P. J. Barty, L. Divol, R. A. Fonseca, S. H. Glenzer, C. Joshi, W. Lu, S. F. Martins, P. Michel, W. B. Mori, J. P. Palastro, B. B. Pollock, A. Pak, J. E. Ralph, J. S. Ross, C.W. Siders, L. O. Silva, T. Wang. Phys. Rev. Lett., 103(2009).
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Kazuhisa Nakajima, Hyung Taek Kim, Tae Moon Jeong, and Chang Hee Nam. Scaling and design of high-energy laser plasma electron acceleration[J]. High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2015, 3(1): 01000e10
Category: regular articles
Received: Feb. 19, 2014
Accepted: Aug. 25, 2014
Published Online: Apr. 14, 2015
The Author Email: