Nonlinear terahertz (THz) science started about two decades ago, when high-field THz pulses with frequencies of several tens of THz were generated in a GaSe semiconductor and were used as a pump pulse in pump-probe measurements[
Chinese Optics Letters, Volume. 19, Issue 11, 111902(2021)
Performance comparison of lithium-niobate-based extremely high-field single-cycle terahertz sources [Invited] Editors' Pick
Tilted-pulse-front-pumping (TPFP) lithium-niobate terahertz (THz) pulse sources are widely used in pump-probe and control experiments since they can generate broadband THz pulses with tens of microjoules of energy. However, the conventional TPFP setup suffers from limitations, hindering the generation of THz pulses with peak electric field strength over 1 MV/cm. Recently, a few setups were suggested to mitigate or even eliminate these limitations. In this paper, we shortly review the setups that are suitable for the generation of single-cycle THz pulses with up to a few tens of megavolts/centimeter focused electric field strength. The THz pulses available with the new layouts pave the way for previously unattainable applications that require extremely high electric field strength and pulse energy in the multi-millijoule range.
1. Introduction
Nonlinear terahertz (THz) science started about two decades ago, when high-field THz pulses with frequencies of several tens of THz were generated in a GaSe semiconductor and were used as a pump pulse in pump-probe measurements[
Figure 1.Schematic depiction of the analyzed setups: (a) conventional TPFP (using optical grating) or TPFP setup with reflective echelon grating, (b) hybrid-contact-grating (with optical grating on NM) and NLES-I and echelon grating on NM, (c) NLES-woI setup, and (d) RNLS setup. See text for details.
Many possible applications of THz pulses have been proposed[
In recent years, disadvantageous properties of the conventional TPFP setup have been identified[
Sign up for Chinese Optics Letters TOC Get the latest issue of Advanced Photonics delivered right to you!Sign up now
In Sections 2 and 3, we shortly describe the most critical limiting properties of the conventional TPFP setup and describe the five newly proposed setups for mitigating/eliminating these limitations. In Section 4, we compare the main properties and best application possibilities of these setups.
2. Limitations of the Conventional TPFP Setup
The conventional TPFP THz source is shown schematically in Fig. 1(a). It contains three main optical elements: (1) an optical grating to introduce a pulse front tilt, (2) a lens or optical telescope to image the tilted pulse into the LN NM, and (3) a prism-shaped LN crystal with a wedge angle of . Please note that the tilt angle inside the LN crystal is set in three steps. First, the grating introduces a tilt angle . Its tangent will be changed by the imaging system [e.g., the lens in the case of Fig. 1(a)] having magnification. With the pump beam entering from the air () into the LN prism having group index, the tangent of the tilt angle will be decreased by times. So, the tangent of is given as
Since for LN is more than two times larger than , according to Eq. (1), has to be larger than 60°. The necessarily large tilt angle and the correspondingly large angular dispersion of the pump beam [see Eq. (3), where is the phase index of refraction of the LN at the pump wavelength, and is the angular dispersion of the pump beam[
These limitations are the following:
We notice that the negative effect of the limitation (iii) is less severe for longer FL pump pulses[
3. Setups with Reduced/Eliminated Limitations
The following setups for TPFP LN THz sources with reduced or eliminated limitations have been proposed and numerically simulated.
3.1. Hybrid-contact-grating setup
In principle, limitations (i) and (ii) can be entirely eliminated with the application of the contact-grating setup[
A new version of the contact-grating setup, the so-called hybrid-contact-grating setup, eliminates these difficulties. Here, the tilt angle needed for velocity matching is introduced in two steps[
3.2. Setup with reflective echelon grating
In order to eliminate limitation (iii), a THz setup that replaces the optical grating with an echelon grating in the conventional TPFP setup [see Fig. 1(a)] has been proposed and investigated[
Since this setup contains a prism-shaped LN with the same wedge angle as the conventional TPFP setup, limitation (ii) is similarly effective in hindering using large pump spots and achieving extremely high THz energy.
3.3. Nonlinear echelon slab with imaging
This setup is depicted schematically in Fig. 1(b)[
3.4. Nonlinear echelon slab without imaging
This setup, depicted schematically in Fig. 1(c)[
3.5. Reflective nonlinear slab
This setup, depicted schematically in Fig. 1(d)[
Here, we mention that the type of the diffraction on the back surface depends on the relation between the period of the structure and the pump pulse duration. If the grating constant is large compared to the product of the pulse duration and the speed of light in LN, the individual parts of the beam cannot interfere with each other. In this case, the structure works as an echelon, and the tilted pulse front will be segmented. For this case, the reflective nonlinear slab (RNLS) works as a reflective nonlinear echelon slab (RNLES). In the opposite case, the structured back surface behaves like a special blazed reflection grating.
4. Comparison of the New Setups
THz generation is examined in detail from two aspects. On the one hand, the generation efficiency of the different setups is investigated at the typical pump wavelengths and pulse duration. On the other hand, the opportunity of the single-cycle THz pulse generation is analyzed. After that, the different setups are evaluated by several aspects.
4.1. High-efficiency generation of THz pulses
In the calculations, Yb-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Yb:YAG) and Ti:sapphire lasers were assumed as pump lasers, as these types of ultrashort pulse lasers are available with high energy and high efficiency. For THz generation, the most critical differences between these lasers are the FL pulse duration and the wavelength. The shorter FL pulse duration changes faster during THz generation due to the large bandwidth in the presence of angular dispersion, and thereby the average pump intensity and generation efficiency will be significantly reduced. In the case of the shorter pumping wavelength (800 nm), three-photon absorption in LN becomes effective[
One-dimensional models were used to describe THz generation for the different setups[
In NLES and RNLES setups, the pump beam becomes segmented in the LN crystal due to the rough structured input and reflection surfaces of the LN slab, respectively. According to this fact, two significant effects were taken into account in the models. On the one hand, the “decoherence” effect was taken into consideration. By “decoherence,” the following is meant: the THz wavelets generated at the different transversal points of the beamlets arrive with different phase delays at a distant point in the direction of propagation of the generated THz radiation. These phase differences can result in less constructive interference between the wavelets, causing a drop in the THz generation efficiency. On the other hand, the segmented parts of the beam can be considered in the model as independent beamlets[
The dependencies of the efficiencies on the crystal length are presented in Fig. 2 in the case of the two different pump pulse sources for two different temperatures. The velocity matching frequency was supposed to be 0.5 THz in all cases. In order to avoid the damage of the LN crystal and the unwanted nonlinear effects, the intensity was kept at and in the case of 200 fs and 50 fs pump pulse duration, respectively, similarly to Ref. [33].
Figure 2.Dependence of the efficiency on the crystal length using conventional, NLES-I, NLES-woI, and RNLS setups in case of two different pump pulse sources. In the case of an ultrashort pulse source, the RNLES setup was also investigated. The phase matching frequency was 0.5 THz.
According to the calculations, the conventional setup could achieve one of the highest efficiencies in the case of 200 fs FL pump pulses and room temperature operation [see Fig. 2(a)]. However, in this case, the usable beam size is very limited (approximately 1 mm) because of both the decreasing generation efficiency and transversal inhomogeneity of the THz pulse shape with increasing pump beam size[
In the case of the conventional and RNLS setups, for significantly shorter than 100 fs pump pulse duration, the optimal crystal length is shorter than 2 mm [see Fig. 2(b)]. This is the result of limitation (iii), as is explained in Section 2. The negative effect of the shorter crystal length on the THz generation efficiency can be partly compensated by using cryogenic operation temperature. Since the angular dispersion is two times smaller in the NLES setups than in the conventional and RNLS setups, the reduction of the effective THz generation length with decreasing pump pulse duration is less significant. According to Fig. 2(b), the optimal crystal thickness is 4–5 mm, and the THz generation efficiency is 1.3 and 2.0 times larger than for the conventional and RNLS setups. The advantage of RNLES (in the absence of angular dispersion, only the smaller effect of the material dispersion of the LN crystal influences the variation of the pump pulse duration inside the crystal) becomes effective in the case of ultrashort (less than 50 fs FL pulse duration) pump pulses.
4.2. Single-cycle THz pulse generation
For many applications, a strict single-cycle temporal shape of the THz pulses has outstanding importance. Therefore, the condition of single-cycle THz pulse generation was investigated for the different setups. Figures 3(a)–3(c) show the amplitude ratio of the side peak [see Fig. 4(a)] of the THz pulse to its mean peak as a function of the pump pulse duration and the crystal thickness. The corresponding THz generation efficiencies are shown in Figs. 3(d)–3(f). The shapes of the generated THz pulses and their spectra are shown in Fig. 4 for .
Figure 3.(a)–(c) Ratio of the side peak to the main peak of the THz pulse and (d)–(f) the efficiency of the THz generation as a function of the pump pulse duration and the crystal thickness, for (a), (d) NLES-I, (b), (e) NLES-woI, and (c), (f) RNLS cases.
Figure 4.Shapes and spectra (insets) of the generated THz pulses by NLES-I (red), NLES-woI (blue), and RNLS (green) setups for crystal lengths of (a) 2 mm and (b) 4 mm. The pump pulse duration was appropriately chosen in order to satisfy the Eside/Emax = 10% ratio. The corresponding pump pulse durations were (a)/(b) 465 fs/475 fs, 340 fs/390 fs, and 605 fs/700 fs in the cases of NLES–I, NLES–woI, and RNLS, respectively.
According to Figs. 3(a)–3(c), the longer the pump pulse lengths are, the more single-pulse character the generated THz pulse has. The dispersion can explain this behavior in the THz spectral range. Really, it is expected that in the normal dispersion range the GDD results in such chirping of a traveling ultrashort pulse that the lower frequency appears on the leading part and the higher frequency on the trailing part, in agreement with Fig. 4. Using longer pump pulses, the generated THz frequencies are lower, and the effect of GDD is less significant. Of course, in the case of THz pulse generation in the LN crystal, other effects are also significant, and the dependence of the single-cycle character on the crystal length becomes more complex. For example, according to Fig. 3(a), in the case of NLES, the single-cycle character is almost independent of the crystal length.
So, for shorter than 500-fs-long pump pulses, the NLES setup is recommended for the generation of high-energy THz pulses with excellent beam quality. In the case of longer pump pulse durations, each presented setup is applicable for generating single-cycle THz pulses, but the simplest and most scalable is the RNLS[
4.3. Recommendation
Based on the discussion above and on our experience, we compared the most important properties of the different reviewed setups in Table 1. “Efficiency” means the pumped to THz conversion efficiency. “Scalability” means the energy scalability, which primarily depends on the useable pump beam size. “Beam quality” means the electric field homogeneity of the THz beam along the transversal dimension. “Shape stability” means how independent the waveform of the generated THz pulse is from the pump pulse length or the crystal length. “Feasibility” shows how easy (or difficult) it is to implement a given setup at the current state of the art.
|
It is important to note that every setup can work in echelon and optical-grating modes. In the case of echelon mode, the pulse front is discretely tilted, and it is segmented; in the case of conventional-grating mode, the pulse front tilt is continuous. The reflective echelon setups are the same as the conventional setup in the echelon mode. NLES-I is a special hybrid-contact-grating setup in the echelon mode. The mode depends on the size of the grating groove relative to the spatial length of the pulse. If the grooves are not near enough to each other to interfere with the transmitted/reflected parts of the beam, the grating will work as an echelon grating, and the pulse front will be segmented. In the above discussion, including Table 1, it was assumed that the conventional, the hybrid contact grating, and the RNLS setups work in the optical-grating mode, while, the reflection echelon and both NLES setups work in the echelon mode. More sophisticated code[
5. Conclusion
The fundamental and practical limitations of recently proposed high-energy LN sources were analyzed. We have shown that the NLES-I, NLES-woI, and RNLS pumping schemes can significantly reduce the limitations of the conventional TPFP LN THz source. Performances of the different setups were compared, showing that a very significant enhancement of the available THz pulse energy and excellent beam quality can be expected by using the new setups compared to the conventional one. The only limiting factors are the available pump energy and crystal size in the case of RNLS. The RNLS setup will pave the way to new applications requiring multi-mJ THz pulses. Such critical applications are particle acceleration and manipulation, generation of attosecond pulses by high harmonic generation and other methods, orientation, and alignment of molecules, which all will gain from the availability of THz sources producing focused field strength in the few 10 MV/cm regime.
[1] P. Gaal, W. Kuehn, K. Reimann, M. Woerner, T. Elsaesser, R. Hey. Internal motions of a quasiparticle governing its ultrafast nonlinear response. Nature, 450, 1210(2007).
[2] J. Hebling, M. C. Hoffmann, H. Y. Hwang, K.-L. Yeh, K. A. Nelson. Observation of nonequilibrium carrier distribution in Ge, Si, and GaAs by terahertz pump–terahertz probe measurements. Phys. Rev. B, 81, 035201(2010).
[3] J. Hebling, G. Almasi, I. Kozma, J. Kuhl. Velocity matching by pulse front tilting for large area THz-pulse generation. Opt. Express, 10, 1161(2010).
[4] T. Kampfrath, A. Sell, G. Klatt, A. Pashkin, S. Mährlein, T. Dekorsy, M. Wolf, M. Fiebig, A. Leitenstorfer, R. Huber. Coherent terahertz control of antiferromagnetic spin waves. Nat. Photon., 5, 31(2010).
[5] E. Balogh, K. Kovacs, P. Dombi, J. A. Fulop, G. Farkas, J. Hebling, V. Tosa, K. Varju. Single attosecond pulse from terahertz-assisted high-order harmonic generation. Phys. Rev. A, 84, 023806(2011).
[6] K. Kovacs, E. Balogh, J. Hebling, V. Tosa, K. Varju. Quasi-phase-matching high-harmonic radiation using chirped THz pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett., 108, 193903(2012).
[7] J. Hebling, J. A. Fulop, M. I. Mechler, L. Palfalvi, C. Toke, G. Almasi. Optical manipulation of relativistic electron beams using THz pulses(2011).
[8] L. Palfalvi, J. A. Fulop, G. Toth, J. Hebling. Evanescent-wave proton postaccelerator driven by intense THz pulse. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams, 17, 031301(2014).
[9] Z. Tibai, M. Unferdorben, S. Turnar, A. Sharma, J. A. Fulop, G. Almasi, J. Hebling. Relativistic electron acceleration by focused THz pulses. J. Phys. B, 51, 134004(2018).
[10] S. Turnár, J. Hebling, J. A. Fulop, G. Toth, G. Almasi, Z. Tibai. Design of a THz-driven compact relativistic electron source. J. Phys. B, 127, 38(2021).
[11] G. Toth, Z. Tibai, A. Sharma, J. A. Fulop, J. Hebling. Single-cycle attosecond pulses by Thomson backscattering of terahertz pulses. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 35, A103(2018).
[12] S. Fleischer, Y. Zhou, R. W. Field, K. A. Nelson. Molecular orientation and alignment by intense single-cycle THz pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett., 107, 163603(2011).
[13] K. N. Egodapitiya, S. Li, R. R. Jones. Terahertz-induced field-free orientation of rotationally excited molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett., 112, 103002(2014).
[14] W. R. Huang, E. A. Nanni, K. Ravi, K. H. Hong, A. Fallahi, L. J. Wong, P. D. Keathley, L. E. Zapata, F. X. Kartner. Toward a terahertz-driven electron gun. Sci. Rep., 5, 14899(2015).
[15] W. R. Huang, A. Fallahi, X. Wu, H. Cankaya, A.-L. Calendron, K. Ravi, D. Zhang, E. A. Nanni, K.-H. Hong, F. X. Kartner. Terahertz-driven, all-optical electron gun. Optica, 3, 1209(2016).
[16] E. A. Nanni, W. R. Huang, K.-H. Hong, K. Ravi, A. Fallahi, G. Moriena, R. J. D. Miller, F. X. Kartner. Terahertz-driven linear electron acceleration. Nat. Commun., 6, 8486(2015).
[17] D. Zhang, A. Fallahi, M. Hemmer, X. Wu, M. Fakhari, Y. Hua, H. Cankaya, A.-L. Calendron, L. E. Zapata, N. H. Matlis, F. X. Kartner. Segmented terahertz electron accelerator and manipulator (STEAM). Nat. Photon., 12, 336(2018).
[18] E. Curry, S. Fabbri, J. Maxson, P. Musumeci, A. Gover. Meter-scale terahertz-driven acceleration of a relativistic beam. Phys. Rev. Lett., 120, 094801(2018).
[19] D. Zhang, A. Fallahi, M. Hemmer, H. Ye, M. Fakhari, Y. Hua, H. Cankaya, A.-L. Calendron, L. E. Zapata, N. H. Matlis, F. X. Kartner. Femtosecond phase control in high-field terahertz-driven ultrafast electron sources. Optica, 6, 872(2019).
[20] L. Xu, I. Tutunnikov, E. Gershnabel, Y. Prior, I. S. Averbukh. Long-lasting molecular orientation induced by a single terahertz pulse. Phys. Rev. Lett., 125, 013201(2020).
[21] P. Salen, M. Basini, S. Bonetti, J. Hebling, M. Krasilnikov, A. Y. Nikitin, G. Shamuilov, Z. Tibai, V. Zhaunerchyk, V. Goryashko. Matter manipulation with extreme terahertz light: progress in the enabling THz technology. Phys. Rep., 836–837, 1(2019).
[22] J. A. Fulop, L. Palfalvi, G. Almasi, J. Hebling. Design of high-energy terahertz sources based on optical rectification. Opt. Express, 18, 12311(2010).
[23] M. Kunitski, M. Richter, M. D. Thomson, A. Vredenborg, J. Wu, T. Jahnke, M. Schoffler, H. S. Bocking, H. G. Roskos, R. Dorne. Optimization of single-cycle terahertz generation in LiNbO3 for sub-50 femtosecond pump pulses. Opt. Express, 21, 6826(2013).
[24] K. Ravi, W. R. Huang, S. Carbajo, X. Wu, F. X. Kartner. Limitations to THz generation by optical rectification using tilted pulse fronts. Opt. Express, 22, 20239(2014).
[25] S. B. Bodrov, A. A. Murzanev, Y. A. Sergeev, Y. A. Malkov, A. N. Stepanov. Terahertz generation by tilted-front laser pulses in weakly and strongly nonlinear regimes. Appl. Phys. Lett., 103, 251103(2013).
[26] L. Palfalvi, Z. Ollmann, L. Tokodi, J. Hebling. Hybrid tilted-pulse-front excitation scheme for efficient generation of high-energy terahertz pulses. Opt. Express, 24, 8156(2016).
[27] L. Palfalvi, J. A. Fulop, G. Almasi, J. Hebling. Novel setups for extremely high power single-cycle terahertz pulse generation by optical rectification. Appl. Phys. Lett., 92, 171107(2008).
[28] Z. Ollmann, J. Hebling, G. Almasi. Design of a contact grating setup for mJ-energy THz pulse generation by optical rectification. Appl. Phys. B, 108, 821(2012).
[29] M. Tsubouchi, K. Nagashima, F. Yoshida, Y. Ochi, M. Maruyama. Contact grating device with Fabry–Perot resonator for effective terahertz light generation. Opt. Lett., 39, 5439(2014).
[30] B. K. Ofori-Okai, P. Sivarajah, W. R. Huang, K. A. Nelson. THz generation using a reflective stair-step echelon. Opt. Express, 24, 5057(2016).
[31] L. Palfalvi, G. Toth, L. Tokodi, Z. Marton, J. A. Fulop, G. Almasi, J. Hebling. Numerical investigation of a scalable setup for efficient terahertz generation using a segmented tilted-pulse-front excitation. Opt. Express, 25, 29560(2017).
[32] P. S. Nugraha, G. Krizsan, C. Lombosi, L. Palfalvi, G. Toth, G. Almasi, J. A. Fulop, J. Hebling. Demonstration of a tilted-pulse-front pumped plane-parallel slab terahertz source. Opt. Lett., 44, 1023(2019).
[33] G. Toth, L. Palfalvi, J. A. Fulop, G. Krizsan, N. H. Matlis, G. Almasi, J. Hebling. Numerical investigation of imaging-free terahertz generation setup using segmented tilted-pulse-front excitation. Opt. Express, 27, 7762(2019).
[34] G. Toth, L. Palfalvi, Z. Tibai, L. Tokodi, J. A. Fulop, Z. Marton, G. Almasi, J. Hebling. Single-cycle scalable terahertz pulse source in reflection geometry. Opt. Express, 27, 30681(2019).
[35] J. Hebling. Derivation of the pulse front tilt caused by angular dispersion. Opt. Quantum Electron., 28, 1759(1996).
[36] J. A. Fulop, L. Palfalvi, S. Klingebiel, G. Almasi, F. Krausz, S. Karsch, J. Hebling. Generation of sub-mJ terahertz pulses by optical rectification. Opt. Lett., 37, 557(2012).
[37] J. A. Fülöp, Z. Ollmann, C. Lombosi, C. Skrobol, S. Klingebiel, L. Pálfalvi, F. Krausz, S. Karsch, J. Hebling. Efficient generation of THz pulses with 0.4 mJ energy. Opt. Express, 22, 20155(2014).
[38] S.-W. Huang, E. Granados, W. R. Huang, K.-H. Hong, L. E. Zapata, F. X. Kartner. High conversion efficiency, high energy terahertz pulses by optical rectification in cryogenically cooled lithium niobate. Opt. Lett., 38, 796(2013).
[39] M. I. Bakunov, S. B. Bodrov. Terahertz generation with tilted-front laser pulses in a contact-grating scheme. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 31, 2549(2014).
[40] J. A. Fulop, G. Polonyi, B. Monoszlai, G. Andriukaitis, T. Balciunas, A. Pugzlys, G. Arthur, A. Baltuska, J. Hebling. Highly efficient scalable monolithic semiconductor terahertz pulse source. Optica, 3, 1075(2016).
[41] J. Hebling, Z. Marton. Theory of spectroscopic devices. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 23, 966(2006).
[42] X. Wu, S. Carbajo, K. Ravi, F. Ahr, G. Cirmi, Y. Zhou, O. D. Mücke, F. X. Kartner. Terahertz generation in lithium niobate driven by Ti:sapphire laser pulses and its limitations. Opt. Lett., 39, 5403(2014).
[43] S.-C. Zhong, Z.-H. Zhai, J. Li, L.-G. Zhu, J. Li, K. Meng, Q. Liu, L.-H. Du, J.-H. Zhao, Z.-R. Li. Optimization of terahertz generation from LiNbO3 under intense laser excitation with the effect of three-photon absorption. Opt. Express, 23, 31313(2015).
[44] K. Ravi, B. K. Ofori-Okai, K. A. Nelson, F. X. Kartner. Analysis of terahertz generation by beamlet superposition. Opt. Express, 27, 26547(2019).
[45] L. Wang, T. Kroh, N. H. Matlis, F. Kaertner. Full 3D+1 modeling of the tilted-pulse-front setups for single-cycle terahertz generation. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 37, 1000(2020).
[46] Z. Chen, X. Zhou, C. A. Werley, K. A. Nelson. Generation of high power tunable multicycle teraherz pulses. Appl. Phys. Lett., 99, 071102(2011).
[47] F. Ahr, S. W. Jolly, N. H. Matlis, S. Carbajo, T. Kroh, K. Ravi, D. N. Schimpf, J. Schulte, H. Ishizuki, T. Taira, A. R. Maier, F. X. Kartner. Narrowband terahertz generation with chirped-and-delayed laser pulses in periodically poled lithium niobate. Opt. Lett., 42, 2118(2017).
[48] S. W. Jolly, N. H. Matlis, F. Ahr, V. Leroux, T. Eichner, A.-L. Calendron, H. Ishizuki, T. Taira, F. X. Kartner, A. R. Maier. Spectral phase control of interfering chirped pulses for high-energy narrowband terahertz generation. Nat. Commun., 10, 2591(2019).
[49] G. Toth, J. A. Fulop, J. Hebling. Periodically intensity-modulated pulses by optical parametric amplification for multicycle tunable terahertz pulse generation. Opt. Express, 25, 28258(2017).
[50] V. Stummer, T. Flory, G. Krizsan, G. Polonyi, E. Kaksis, A. Pugzlys, J. Hebling, J. A. Fulop, A. Baltuska. Programmable generation of terahertz bursts in chirped-pulse laser amplification. Optica, 7, 1758(2020).
[51] L. Wang, G. Toth, J. Hebling, F. Kartner. Tilted-pulse-front schemes for terahertz generation. Laser Photon. Rev., 14, 2000021(2020).
[52] G. Illes, Z. Tibai, L. Palfalvi, G. Almasi, J. Hebling, G. Toth. General characteristics of imaging-free nonlinear echelon slab to generate high energy THz pulses.
[53] J. A. Fulop, G. Polonyi, G. Krizsan, N. M. Mbithi, P. S. Nugraha, G. Almasi, L. Palfalvi, Z. Tibai, G. Toth, J. Hebling. Novel intense single- and multicycle THz sources. 45th International Conference on Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves(2020).
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
György Tóth, László Pálfalvi, Szabolcs Turnár, Zoltán Tibai, Gábor Almási, János Hebling, "Performance comparison of lithium-niobate-based extremely high-field single-cycle terahertz sources [Invited]," Chin. Opt. Lett. 19, 111902 (2021)
Category: Nonlinear Optics
Received: May. 11, 2021
Accepted: Jul. 9, 2021
Published Online: Sep. 2, 2021
The Author Email: János Hebling (hebling@fizika.ttk.pte.hu)