Particle tracking analysis is a versatile technique capable of multiparameter measurement for in-depth understanding of the processes of synthesis, reaction kinetics, or specificity studies of various particles, including protein aggregates [
Photonics Research, Volume. 8, Issue 8, 1316(2020)
Graphene metalens for particle nanotracking
Particle nanotracking (PNT) is highly desirable in lab-on-a-chip systems for flexible and convenient multiparameter measurement. An ultrathin flat lens is the preferred imaging device in such a system, with the advantage of high focusing performance and compactness. However, PNT using ultrathin flat lenses has not been demonstrated so far because PNT requires the clear knowledge of the relationship between the object and image in the imaging system. Such a relationship still remains elusive in ultrathin flat lens-based imaging systems because they operate based on diffraction rather than refraction. In this paper, we experimentally reveal the imaging relationship of a graphene metalens using nanohole arrays with micrometer spacing. The distance relationship between the object and image as well as the magnification ratio is acquired with nanometer accuracy. The measured imaging relationship agrees well with the theoretical prediction and is expected to be applicable to other ultrathin flat lenses based on the diffraction principle. By analyzing the high-resolution images from the graphene metalens using the imaging relationship, 3D trajectories of particles with high position accuracy in PNT have been achieved. The revealed imaging relationship for metalenses is essential in designing different types of integrated optical systems, including digital cameras, microfluidic devices, virtual reality devices, telescopes, and eyeglasses, and thus will find broad applications.
1. INTRODUCTION
Particle tracking analysis is a versatile technique capable of multiparameter measurement for in-depth understanding of the processes of synthesis, reaction kinetics, or specificity studies of various particles, including protein aggregates [
The principle of particle nanotracking (PNT) is to visualize and measure nanoparticles in suspension in the size range from tens of nanometers to a few micrometers based on the analysis of Brownian motion. The actual motion of a particle () is deduced from the motion of the particle in the image () following the relationship of , where is the magnification ratio of the imaging system. is defined by the imaging relationship of the system as , where and are the distances from the object and the image to the lens, respectively. Thus, it is of great importance to have preknowledge of the exact imaging relationship of an optical system for the PNT application. Currently, PNT systems based on bulky commercial optical microscopes are equipped with conventional refractive lenses with well-established imaging relationship , where is the focal distance of the lens. However, bulky commercial optical microscopic systems take significant space and have limited mobility with high costs, thus greatly limiting their applications.
The recent development of material science and nanofabrication technology has enabled various ultrathin flat lenses [
Sign up for Photonics Research TOC Get the latest issue of Advanced Photonics delivered right to you!Sign up now
To enable broad applications of ultrathin flat lenses, including PNT, in this study, we experimentally measured the imaging relationship for a graphene metalens by using a spots array with nanoholes and micrometer spacing as the object, with which the object distance (), image distance (), as well as the magnification ratio (), have been well decided. The demonstrated microscopic system allows for measuring these distances with nanometer accuracy. The experimental measurements match well with the theoretical derivation based on the Rayleigh–Sommerfeld (RS) diffraction theory, thus confirming that the imaging relationship of diffractive metalenses can be generally applied to other ultrathin flat lenses [
2. MEASURING THE IMAGING RELATIONSHIP OF A METALENS
An imaging relationship describes the relation between the object distance (), image distance (), and the focal length () of a lens. The current imaging relationship for conventional lenses based on the refraction principle is expressed as , which is derived using geometric optics that assumes the wavelength of light is infinitely small. For ultrathin flat lenses based on diffraction instead of refraction [
The imaging relationship is further evaluated by using the rigorous RS diffraction theory to calculate the imaging process of a graphene metalens. In the simulation, we designed a graphene metalens model [
In order to experimentally verify the theoretical predictions, we designed a miniaturized lab-on-a-chip device with a graphene metalens for PNT, as shown in Fig.
Figure 1.Design of the particle tracking system with a graphene metalens. (a) Schematic of the lab-on-a-chip particle tracking system with an integrated graphene metalens; inset, structure of graphene metamaterial; (b) reflective optical microscopic image of a fabricated graphene metalens; (c) atomic force microscope (AFM) image of a region of the fabricated graphene metalens; (d) SEM image of the full view and a region of the fabricated graphene metalens; (e) measured cross-sectional thickness distributions along the white dashed line in (c). Scale bars in (b) and (c) are 40 μm. Scale bar in (c) is 2.5 μm. Scale bar in the inset of (d) is 4 μm.
The imaging and focusing performances are characterized by a homemade imaging setup (see Appendix E, Fig.
In order to validate the imaging relationship of the graphene metalens, it is necessary to accurately measure the object distance () and the image distance () from the lens, which requires a well-defined object. Moreover, to measure the magnification ratio of the imaging system, the object should have known distances between different parts. To simultaneously meet all the requirements, we fabricated a scale-regulated spot array gauge with different interspot distances of 3, 5, and 7 μm on a gold thin film (200 nm thick) coated on a glass substrate using laser ablation. The diameter of the spots (nanoholes) is around 400 nm, as shown in the SEM image [Fig.
Figure 2.Imaging performance of the graphene metalens. (a) Schematic of imaging experiment of the spot array object imaged by the graphene metalens. (b) SEM image of the spot array object; (c) optical image of the object and image from the graphene metalens; cross-sectional intensity distribution along the (d) horizontal lines and (e) vertical lines of the spots array from the sample and image. Scale bars in (b) and (c) are 5 μm. Scale bar in the inset of (b) is 0.4 μm.
In addition, the same setup is used to measure the object and image distances from the lens to reveal the exact imaging relationship. Here we pick up one of the spots in the array shown in Fig.
Figure 3.Imaging an object moving along the axial direction of the graphene metalens. (a) Schematic for measuring the object and image distances from the lens on the
3. PARTICLE-TRACKING ANALYSIS USING A METALENS
The imaging relationship of graphene metalenses allows its application in PNT to monitor the exact 3D motions of particles with displacement along the three axes as , , . By using the imaging relationship, we can obtain the following equation to accurately calculate by knowing the displacement of the image along the axis as : Then the magnification ratio from the motion can be worked out as . Thus, by measuring the motion of the particles in the imaging plane along the and axes as , , the exact motion of the particles in the object plane can be calculated as In this way, the 3D motion of the particles can be tracked with high accuracy, which can only be achieved by knowing the exact imaging relationship of the lens.
In order to demonstrate that different particles can be distinguished and tracked with high accuracy, an object of the Centre for Translational Atomaterials (CTAM) logo is fabricated by laser ablation, the SEM image of which is shown in Fig.
Figure 4.Particle tracking analysis using the graphene metalens. (a) SEM image of the fabricated object for PNT demonstration; (b) optical microscopic image of the object; (c) image of the object from the graphene metalens (see
The object is driven by a 3D nanometer scanning stage to control the motion of the particles, which is compared to the deduced motions from the image of the graphene metalens to evaluate the position accuracy of the tracking. A movie with 15 fps (frames per second) frame rate was taken to record the process (
The position accuracy depends on a few factors. 1) The positioning accuracy of the scanning stage for holding the object. Here we used a piezo nanometer scanning stage with position accuracy down to 1 nm (Physik Instrumente), which can move the object with a well-controlled fine step. 2) Since we measured the motion of the particles by using the central position of the particle, the resolution of the graphene metalens is important to clearly resolve the particles to resolve the central position. Here, the graphene metalens has a subwavelength resolution (), which is able to resolve the particles (P1, P2, and P3), and even the doughnut-shaped ones [Fig.
4. CONCLUSION
We have experimentally revealed the imaging relationship of metalenses. Outstanding agreements between the theoretical predictions based on geometric optics, RS diffraction theory, and the experimental results are achieved. In addition, we further demonstrate the first application of graphene metalenses in PNT, which shows the trajectories of particles can be tracked with nanometer accuracy (10 nm). Our work not only opens up the possibility of using metalenses for PNT in ultracompact systems, but also reveals the fundamental imaging relationship, which can be generally applied to any ultrathin flat lenses based on the diffraction principle. Therefore, the research findings can enable broad applications in advanced imaging systems, including digital cameras, eyeglasses, microfluidic devices for in situ optical imaging, nanophotonic chips, and aerospace.
Acknowledgment
Acknowledgment. B. J. and H. L. conceived the idea and developed the strategy of the project. X. L. and H. L. developed the theoretical model and designed the experiments. X. L. conducted the simulations and the experiments. S. W. contributed to the experimental design. G. C. contributed to the theoretical model development and programming. B. J. and Y. Z. supervised the project. All authors contributed to data analysis and paper writing.
APPENDIX A: THEORETICAL STUDY OF THE IMAGING RELATIONSHIP
Here we calculate the imaging positions of objects at different axial positions by using the RS diffraction theory. The object is an point light source on the optical axis with different distances from the graphene metalens. The image position is the focusing position of the point source. The result is shown in Fig.?
Figure 5.(a) Intensity distribution of theoretical results of the graphene metalens with different object distances from 160 to 480 μm; (b) image distance as a function of object distance with RS simulation model and analytical formula.
APPENDIX B: DESIGN OF THE GRAPHENE METALENS
We have measured the complex refractive index (including the refractive index and extinction coefficient) of the graphene multilayer material in our previous work [
APPENDIX C: RS DIFFRACTION THEORY
The field distribution in focal region of the metalens can be calculated using the RS diffraction theory:
APPENDIX D: FOCUSING CHARACTERIZATION OF THE GRAPHENE METALENS (Fig.?6)
The focusing performance of the graphene metalens is characterized by focusing the light from a point light source which is located at one of the focal point of the lens. The corresponding focal spot is at the other focal point [Fig.?
Figure 6.(a) Schematic of the focusing characterization of the graphene flat lens; (b) simulated focal intensity distribution along the optical axis; (c) intensity distribution of the 3D focal spot of the graphene flat lens; experimentally measured intensity distributions in the (d) lateral and (e) axial planes; cross-sectional intensity distributions along the white dashed lines in the (f) lateral and (g) axial planes.
APPENDIX E: EXPERIMENTAL SETUP FOR IMAGING CHARACTERIZATION (Fig.?7)
The optical setup for imaging the sample is shown in Fig.?
Figure 7.Schematic diagram of the experimental setup used for imaging with the graphene metalens. The laser beam is a supercontinuum laser filtered by a narrowband filter (600 nm with bandwidth of 40 nm). The target was placed at the focal plane of the graphene metalens with the laser illumination. The Mitutoyo objective (
APPENDIX F: APPLICATION OF GRAPHENE METALENS IN PNT (Fig.?8)
The imaging frames from the recorded video, indicated by the numbers, are shown in Fig.?
Figure 8.PNT movie frames. The images of the object and image from the graphene lens of the CTAM logo are recorded by the CCD with the number of frames marked in the figure. The pictures of image from the graphene metalens are flipped by 180° for easy comparison (see
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Xueyan Li, Shibiao Wei, Guiyuan Cao, Han Lin, Yuejin Zhao, Baohua Jia, "Graphene metalens for particle nanotracking," Photonics Res. 8, 1316 (2020)
Category: Instrumentation and Measurements
Received: May. 11, 2020
Accepted: Jun. 15, 2020
Published Online: Jul. 14, 2020
The Author Email: Han Lin (hanlin@swin.edu.au), Yuejin Zhao (yjzhao@bit.edu.cn), Baohua Jia (bjia@swin.edu.au)