Rich dynamical behavior in periodically-driven systems has attracted extensive attention in recent years.[
Chinese Physics B, Volume. 29, Issue 8, (2020)
Quantum to classical transition induced by a classically small influence
We investigate the quantum to classical transition induced by two-particle interaction via a system of periodically kicked particles. The classical dynamics of particle 1 is almost unaffected in condition that its mass is much larger than that of particle 2. Interestingly, such classically weak influence leads to the quantum to classical transition of the dynamical behavior of particle 1. Namely, the quantum diffusion of this particle undergoes the transition from dynamical localization to the classically chaotic diffusion with the decrease of the effective Planck constant ?eff. The behind physics is due to the growth of entanglement in the system. The classically very weak interaction leads to the exponential decay of purity in condition that the classical dynamics of external degrees freedom is strongly chaotic.
1. Introduction
Rich dynamical behavior in periodically-driven systems has attracted extensive attention in recent years.[
Theoretical investigations have stimulated experimental studies on the transport phenomenon in periodically-driven quantum systems. Recently, the DL was observed in the atom-optics experiments on the periodically-driven ultracold atoms[
It is known that the unavoidable coupling between system and environment destroys quantum coherence,[
Motivated by these studies, we investigate the quantum diffusion in a system involving two-coupled particles. The system is periodically driven by impulsive fields. We concentrate on both the classical and quantum dynamics of one particle (say particle 1) under the interaction with the other one (say particle 2). Interestingly, the effects of particle 2 with mass m on the classical diffusion of particle 1 with unity mass decrease as m decreases, and it is negligibly small when m ≪ 1. The reason is that particle 2 of very small mass possesses little energy to affect the classical motion of particle 1. More importantly, the classically vanishing small influence is able to destroy the DL of particle 1. It even leads to the appearance of classically chaotic diffusion in quantum dynamics when the effective Planck constant ℏeff is small enough. To characterize the quantum entanglement, we numerically investigate the purity of the quantum state. The issue we address here is the sensitivity of entanglement to the classical chaoticity of the external degrees of freedom. We find that the time dependence of purity exhibits the power law decay for the regular motion of the classical dynamics of particle 2, and the exponential decay for the chaotic motion.
The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we describe the system and show the QCC of particle 1 subjected to the influence from a very small particle. In Section 3, we give a purity description of quantum entanglement. Summary is present in Section 4.
2. The quantum and classical diffusions
We consider two interacting particles which are trapped in an infinitely square well and periodically kicked by optical lattices. The Hamiltonian reads
It is useful to introduce a set of scaled dimensionless units. Time is scaled by T, i.e., t′ = t/T, which means that t′ denotes the number of kicks. The canonical coordinate and momentum variables are redefined as
We concentrate on both the classical and quantum dynamics of particle 1. Numerically, we use the split-operator method to simulate the time evolution of the quantum dynamics. The initial state is a product state of the ground state of each particle, i.e., ψ(0) = ϕ1(0)ϕ2(0) with
The typical character of classically chaotic diffusion is the linear growth of the mean energy with time, i.e., 〈 p2(t) 〉c = Dct, where 〈 ⋅ 〉c stands for the ensemble average over many trajectories and Dc is usually termed as the classical diffusion coefficient (CDC).[
Figure 1.Classical diffusion coefficient
We numerically investigate the quantum diffusion of particle 1 when its classical counterpart is almost unaffected which is ensured by the condition m ≪ 1. The quantum mean energy
Figure 2.(a) Time dependence of the classical (red line) mean energy and quantum mean energy (black lines) of particle 1. From top to bottom, black solid lines correspond to
In chaotic situation, the motion of particle 2 of very small mass behaves like random noise. It is known that external noises can destroy quantum interference and thus leads to the classically chaotic diffusion.[
Figure 3.(a), (b) Time dependence of the mean energy. In (a),
We quantify the difference between quantum and diffusion coefficients of particle 1 by using the ratio ℛ = Dq/Dc, where the quantum diffusion coefficient is defined as
Figure 4.(a) The ratio
Furthermore, we define the criteria of the appearance of the classically chaotic diffusion and DL as ℛ = 0.9 and 0.1, respectively. We numerically obtain the threshold values of ℏeff corresponding to ℛ = 0.9 and 0.1, which are separately termed as
3. A purity description of entanglement
A commonly used measure of quantum entanglement is purity
Figure 5.Purity
4. Summary
We numerically investigate the entanglement involving a few degrees of freedom via two coupled particles. We show that, the effect of particle 2 on the classical behavior of particle 1 decreases as its mass (m) decreases. Under the classically weak perturbation (m ≪ 1), the quantum diffusion behavior of particle 1 undergoes a transition from DL to chaotic diffusion with the decrease of ℏeff. We numerically investigate the difference between quantum and classical diffusions for a wide regime of ℏeff and m, and find the exponential decay of ℛ with ℏeff. By using this quantity, we define the boundary for the appearance of DL and classically-chaotic diffusion. Numerically, we obtain a “phase” diagram of the quantum diffusion in the parameters space (ℏeff, m). The quantum to classical transition is accompanied by the growth of entanglement. For the vanishingly small interaction ε ∝ ℏ with ℏeff ≪ 1, the time decay of purity is exponentially fast in condition that the classical dynamics of particle 2 is strongly chaotic. Such exponentially-fast entanglement is stable in the sense that the time dependence of purity is almost unchanged as K2 varies. Our investigation has important implication for the fundamental problem of the quantum to classical transition.
[1] I Dana. Phys. Rev. B, 89(2014).
[2] M Ben-Harush, I Dana. Phys. Rev. E, 93(2016).
[3] J Wang, J B Gong. Phys. Rev. Lett, 102(2009).
[4] D Y H Ho, J B Gong. Phys. Rev. Lett, 109(2012).
[5] W L Zhao, J Z Wang, X H Wang, P Q Tong. Phys. Rev. E, 99(2019).
[6] L W Zhou, C Chen, J B Gong. Phys. Rev. B, 94(2016).
[7] Z Li, H Q Wang, D W Zhang, S L Zhu, D Y Xing. Phys. Rev. A, 94(2016).
[8] L W Zhou, J B Gong. Phys. Rev. A, 97(2018).
[9] F Borgonovi, F M Izrailev, L F Santos, V G Zelevinsky. Phys. Rep, 626, 1(2016).
[10] C Neill, P Roushan, M Fang et al. Nat. Phys, 12, 1037(2016).
[11] G Casati, B V Chirikov, F M Izraelev, J Ford. Stochastic Behavior in Classical and Quantum Hamiltonian Systems, 334(1979).
[12] F M Izrailev. Phys. Rep, 196, 299(1990).
[13] I Dana. Can. J. Chem, 92, 77(2014).
[14] P W Anderson. Phys. Rev, 109, 1492(1958).
[15] S Fishman, D R Grempel, R E Prange. Phys. Rev. Lett, 49, 509(1982).
[16] S Dadras, A Gresch, C Groiseau, S Wimberger, G S Summy. Phys. Rev. Lett, 121(2018).
[17] J Wang, I Guarneri, G Casati, J B Gong. Phys. Rev. Lett, 107(2011).
[18] B Mieck, G Graham. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen, 38, L139(2005).
[19] W L Zhao, J B Gong, W G Wang, G Casati, J Liu, L B Fu. Phys. Rev. A, 94(2016).
[20] W L Zhao, J Z Wang, W G Wang. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor, 52(2019).
[21] I Guarneri. Phys. Rev. E, 95(2017).
[22] M Lopez, J F Clement, P Szriftgiser, J C Garreau, D Delande. Phys. Rev. Lett, 108(2012).
[23] M Bitter, V Milner. Phys. Rev. Lett, 118(2017).
[24] J Chabé, G Lemarie, B Gremaud, D Delande, P Szriftgiser, J C Garreau. Phys. Rev. Lett, 101(2008).
[25] G Lemarié, J Chabé, P Szriftgiser, J C Garreau, B Grémaud, D Delande. Phys. Rev. A, 80(2009).
[26] J C Garreau. C. R. Phys, 18, 31(2017).
[27] S Sarkar, S Paul, C Vishwakarma, S Kumar, G Verma, S Sainath, U D Rapol, M S Santhanam. Phys. Rev. Lett, 118(2017).
[28] C Hainaut, I Manai, R Chicireanu, J Clément, S Zemmouri, J C Garreau. Phys. Rev. Lett, 118(2017).
[29] J T Tan, Y R Luo, Z Zhou, W H Hai. Chin. Phys. Lett. bf, 33(2016).
[30] Z Li, J Z Wang, L B Fu. Chin. Phys. Lett, 30(2013).
[31] Y B Yang, W G Wang. Chin. Phys. Lett, 32(2015).
[32] E Joos, H D Zeh, C Kiefer, D Giulini, J Kupsch, I O Stamatescu. Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory, 41(2003).
[33] W H Zurek. Rev. Mod. Phys, 75, 715(2003).
[34] M Schlosshauer. Rev. Mod. Phys, 76, 1267(2004).
[35] M Schlosshauer. Found. Phys, 38, 796(2008).
[36] A Z Chaudhry, J B Gong. Phys. Rev. A, 89(2014).
[37] W G Wang, L W He, J B Gong. Phys. Rev. Lett, 108(2012).
[38] R P Feynman, F L Vernon. Ann. Phys. (Leipzig), 24, 118(1963).
[39] A O Caldeira, A J Leggett. Physica (Amsterdam), 121A, 587(1983).
[40] D Wisniacki, F Toscano. Phys. Rev. E, 79(2009).
[41] C Petitjean, P Jacquod. Phys. Rev. Lett, 97(2006).
[42] D Rossini, G Benenti, G Casati. Phys. Rev. E, 74(2006).
[43] J N Bandyopadhyay. Europhys. Lett, 85(2009).
[44] S Adachi, M Toda, K Ikeda. Phys. Rev. Lett, 61, 659(1988).
[45] R Graham, A R Kolovsky. Phys. Rev. A, 222, 47(1996).
[46] H K Park, S W Kim. Phys. Rev. A, 67(2003).
[47] K Takahashi. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl, 98, 109(1989).
[48] W L Zhao, Q L Jie. Commun. Theor. Phys, 51, 465(2009).
[49] W L Zhao, Q L Jie, B Zhou. Commun. Theor. Phys, 54, 247(2010).
[50] W L Zhao, J Z Wang, F Q Dou. Acta Phys. Sin, 61(2012).
[51] B Gadway, J Reeves, L Krinner, D Schneble. Phys. Rev. Lett, 110(2013).
[52] D L Shepelyansky. Phys. Rev. Lett, 73, 2607(1994).
[53] F Borgonovi, D L Shepelyansky. Nonlinearity, 8, 877(1995).
[54] P Q Qin, A Andreanov, H C Park, S Flach. Sci. Rep, 7(2017).
[55] D L Shepelyansky. Phys. Rev. Lett, 70, 1787(1993).
[56] I García-Mata, D L Shepelyansky. Phys. Rev. E, 79(2009).
[57] S Flach, D O Krimer, C Skokos. Phys. Rev. E, 79(2009).
[58] H Veksler, Y Krivolapov, S Fishman. Phys. Rev. E, 80(2009).
[59] A Pikovsky, S Fishman. Phys. Rev. E, 83(2011).
[60] E Michaely, S Fishman. Phys. Rev. E, 85(2012).
[61] S Fishman, Y Krivolapov, A Soffer. Nonlinearity, 25, 53(2012).
[62] E B Rozenbaum, V Galitski. Phys. Rev. B, 95(2017).
[63] S Notarnicola, F Iemini, D Rossini, R Fazio, A Silva, A Russomanno. Phys. Rev. E, 97(2018).
[64] A C Keser, S Ganeshan, G Refael, V Galitski. Phys. Rev. B, 94(2016).
[65] T Čadež, R Mondaini, P D Sacramento. Phys. Rev. B, 96(2017).
[66] B Gadway. Phys. Rev. A, 92(2015).
[67] F Alex An, E J Meier, J Ang’ong’a, B Gadway. Phys. Rev. Lett, 120(2018).
[68] F Alex An, E J Meier, B Gadway. Nat. Comm, 8, 325(2017).
[69] E J Meier, F Alex An, B Gadway. Phys. Rev. A, 93(2016).
[70] D A Abanin, W D Roeck, F Huveneers. Phys. Rev. Lett, 115(2015).
[71] B Hu, B W Li, J Liu, Y Gu. Phys. Rev. Lett, 82, 4224(1999).
[72] J Liu, W T Cheng, C G Cheng. Commun. Theor. Phys, 33, 15(2000).
[73] H S Chen, J Wang, Y Gu. Chin. Phys. Lett, 17, 85(2000).
[74] S Paul, H Pal, M S Santhanam. Phys. Rev. A, 93(2016).
[75] V Milner, D A Steck, W H Oskay, M G Raizen. Phys. Rev. E, 61, 7223(2000).
[76] C F F Karney, A B Rechester, R B White. Physica D, 3, 425(1982).
[77] E Ott, T M Antonsen, J D Hanson. Phys. Rev. Lett, 53, 2187(1984).
[78] A Lakshminarayan. Phys. Rev. E, 64(2001).
[79] J N Bandyopadhyay, A Lakshminarayan. Phys. Rev. A, 89(2002).
[80] D Cohen, E J Heller. Phys. Rev. Lett, 84, 2841(2000).
[81] D A Wisniacki, D Cohen. Phys. Rev. E, 66(2002).
[82] D A Wisniacki, N Ares, E G Vergini. Phys. Rev. Lett, 104(2010).
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Wen-Lei Zhao, Quanlin Jie. Quantum to classical transition induced by a classically small influence[J]. Chinese Physics B, 2020, 29(8):
Received: Mar. 3, 2020
Accepted: --
Published Online: Apr. 29, 2021
The Author Email: Wen-Lei Zhao (wlzhao@jxust.edu.cn)