Photonics Research, Volume. 12, Issue 8, 1802(2024)

Photonic crystal-connected bidirectional micro-ring resonator array for duplex mode and wavelength channel (de)multiplexing

Zhiwei Guan1, Chaofeng Wang2, Chuangxin Xie1, Haisheng Wu1, Junmin Liu3, Huapeng Ye4,6, Dianyuan Fan1, Jiangnan Xiao5,7, and Shuqing Chen1、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1International Collaborative Laboratory of 2D Materials for Optoelectronics Science and Technology, Institute of Microscale Optoelectronics, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
  • 2College of Physics and Engineering Technology, Minzu Normal University of Xingyi, Xingyi 562400, China
  • 3College of New Materials and New Energies, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen 518118, China
  • 4Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Optical Information Materials and Technology and Institute of Electronic Paper Displays, South China Academy of Advanced Optoelectronics, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China
  • 5Terahertz Technology Innovation Research Institute, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Modern Optical System, Terahertz Science Cooperative Innovation Center, School of Optical-Electrical Computer Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
  • 6e-mail: yehp@m.scnu.edu.cn
  • 7e-mail: jiangnanxiao@usst.edu.cn
  • show less

    The progress of on-chip optical communication relies on integrated multi-dimensional mode (de)multiplexers to enhance communication capacity and establish comprehensive networks. However, existing multi-dimensional (de)multiplexers, involving modes and wavelengths, face limitations due to their reliance on single-directional total internal reflection and multi-level mode conversion based on directional coupling principles. These constraints restrict their potential for full-duplex functionality and highly integrated communication. We solve these problems by introducing a photonic-like crystal-connected bidirectional micro-ring resonator array (PBMRA) and apply it to duplex mode-wavelength multiplexing communication. The directional independence of total internal reflection and the cumulative effect of the subwavelength-scale pillar within the single-level photonic crystal enable bidirectional mode and wavelength multiplexed signals to transmit among multi-pair nodes without interference, improving on-chip integration in single-level mode conversion. As a proof of concept, we fabricated a nine-channel bidirectional multi-dimensional (de)multiplexer, featuring three wavelengths and three TE modes, compactly housed within a footprint of 80 μm×80 μm, which efficiently transmits QPSK-OFDM signals at a rate of 216 Gbit/s, achieving a bit error rate lower than 10-4. Leveraging the co-ring transmission characteristic and the orthogonality of the mode-wavelength channel, this (de)multiplexer also enables a doubling of communication capacity using two physical transmission channels.

    1. INTRODUCTION

    The progress of integrated optical communication requires mode division multiplexing (MDM) technologies to bolster communication capacity and establish comprehensive networks [16]. With wavelength and mode demonstrating physical independence, MDM, when coupled with wavelength division multiplexing [79], holds promise in reshaping multi-dimensional multiplexing, optimizing the utilization of limited spectrum resources [10]. Conventional multi-dimensional multiplexers often employ separate devices for mode (e.g., liquid crystals [11,12]) and wavelength (e.g., gratings [1315]) channels, resulting in bulky system footprints. To meet the space-saving needs of integrated communication systems, an optical wavelength-mode (de)multiplexing chip emerged for multi-dimensional information processing. On-chip wavelength-mode demultiplexers typically manipulate light using cascade total internal reflection structures, such as tapered adiabatic micro-ring resonators [1619] and directional coupler connected array waveguide gratings [20,21]. However, their inherent complexity, stemming from multi-level mode conversion based on phase matching conditions within the cascaded structure [22,23], restricts their compactness. Moreover, interference among nodes arises from coherent intervention in the shared time slots, hindering duplex communication [2426] when time is divided into slots for data transmission among communicating parties. While the utilization of identical communication paths for both transmission and reception, employing the same frequency and mode, is attainable, achieving compatibility with full-duplex capabilities and high integration poses considerable challenges.

    We overcome these challenges by employing a photonic-like crystal-connected bidirectional micro-ring resonator array (PBMRA), supporting duplex mode and wavelength (de)multiplexing. The micro-ring resonator array [2729] utilizes an energy feedback principle to facilitate resonant wavelength multiplexing. Additionally, the subwavelength-scale photonic crystal structure significantly enhances the interaction between the mode field and material based on Bragg’s law of diffraction, reducing the energy conversion length [30,31], owing to its effective control over the mode field phase. In our duplex multi-dimensional multiplexing system based on a PBMRA, the directional independence of total internal reflection [32,33] of the micro-rings allows simultaneous coupling and separation of wavelength channels. Utilizing the inverse design algorithm, the photonic crystal structure only retains crucial units [3436], enabling multiple mode conversion processes within the operational bandwidth through scattering accumulation effect. Consequently, this approach enables simultaneous co-frequency, co-mode full-duplex communication for a single-pair node and bidirectional wavelength-mode signal transmission among multiple pairs without interference. Moreover, the pixelated area of the PBMRA streamlines the cascaded mode conversion structure through precise phase compensation. This single-level mode conversion strategy reduces the device footprint and complexity, culminating in a highly integrated multi-dimensional full-duplex communication system.

    This work leverages the principle of total internal reflection directional independence of the micro-rings and the robust mode field phase modulation capacity of the photonic crystals to engineer a bidirectional nine-channel multi-dimensional (de)multiplexer. Operating within an 80  μm×80  μm footprint, it effectively multiplexes and demultiplexes QPSK-OFDM signals at a bidirectional transmission rate of 216 Gbit/s. With a bit error rate below 104 and crosstalk lower than 15.5  dB, this confirms the orthogonal separation of duplex multi-dimensional signals, meeting the requirements for practical full-duplex communication multiplexing. The photonic crystal’s mode conversion length, approximately 5 μm, facilitates simultaneous conversion of three modes, reducing the beat length and enabling single-level mode conversions, thereby enhancing device integration. This integration successfully combines high integration and full-duplex characteristics in on-chip multi-dimensional multiplexing communication. Moreover, our proposed micro-ring resonator acts as a versatile component, functioning not only just as a transceiver port and filter but also as a transmitter or receiver for dual-channel operation due to its co-ring transmission attributes. When combined with the orthogonal features of the wavelength and mode channels, it facilitates interference-free simplex communication via dual physical transmission paths, effectively doubling the transmission rate and capacity density among multi-pair nodes in optical networks.

    2. PRINCIPLES AND METHODS

    The schematic of the on-chip duplex multi-dimensional mode (de)multiplexer using a PBMRA is depicted in Fig. 1. It comprises two integral components: an inverse-designed photonic crystal (IPC) and bidirectional micro-ring resonator array (BMRA). These components facilitate bidirectional mode conversion and wavelength selection, enabling effective full-duplex communication. During unidirectional signal transmission or reception, the system maintains orthogonal wavelengths and modes. However, during simultaneous transmission and reception, bidirectional signals remain distinct without interference.

    Schematic of the on-chip bidirectional multi-dimensional (de)multiplexer employing PBMRA. Illustrations depict the operation principles of (a) the bidirectional micro-ring resonator array and (b) the single-level mode conversion facilitated by the photonic crystal.

    Figure 1.Schematic of the on-chip bidirectional multi-dimensional (de)multiplexer employing PBMRA. Illustrations depict the operation principles of (a) the bidirectional micro-ring resonator array and (b) the single-level mode conversion facilitated by the photonic crystal.

    Utilizing bidirectional micro-ring resonators as user transceiver ports and wavelength filters, our system enables simultaneous transmission and separation of wavelengths. The operation principle of the BMRA is illustrated in Fig. 1(a), supporting a broader range of wavelength channels. The unit bidirectional micro-ring resonator integrates two straight coupling waveguides, two add ports, two drop ports, and a micro-ring [3739]. The resonant wavelength adheres to the following resonance condition: neff(λ)×2πλ×(2πR+2L)=2mπ,where m, L, neff, and λ represent the positive integer, the coupling length, the effective refractive index, and wavelength, respectively. R is the radius of the micro-ring. The straight waveguide with optimized length L connecting the micro-ring expands the arcuate coupling area, thus boosting energy conversion efficiency. The coupling coefficient is 60.33  mm1 and the calculation process is shown in Appendix A. Precise adjustment of the gap (G) between the straight waveguide and micro-ring ensures critical coupling, balancing coupling loss with the micro-ring’s inherent loss, thereby maximizing optical energy containment and amplification. When light waves propagate within a waveguide and encounter a boundary, total internal reflection will occur due to the difference in refractive index, and it will be effectively confined within the waveguide. Within the micro-ring, resonance is achieved when the frequency of the incident light is aligned with the characteristic frequency of the micro-ring. The resonance is maintained by constructive interference of light on the loop, and this process is independent of the chosen input port. This independence ensures the generation of resonant states from any coupling point along the ring against interference. Consequently, the frequency selection is attained by fine-tuning the micro-ring’s size to meet the resonance condition.

    To incorporate the mode dimension for full-duplex communication and ensure optimal optical energy conversion within a confined space, we utilize photonic crystal structures optimized through inverse design strategy, illustrated in Fig. 1(b). Here, we select the TE mode as the multiplexing mode. The predominantly planar electric field distribution of the TE mode contributes to improved field confinement and elevated Q factor within the micro-ring resonator. Moreover, the TE mode exhibits reduced mode dispersion in photonic crystals, facilitating enhanced stability and uniformity in the control of multi-wavelength signals [40]. Appendix B delineates the inverse design methodology of the photonic crystal structure. The well-structured arrangement of air pillars collectively modulates all input light waves exhibiting the TE0 fundamental mode through scattering accumulation effect, denoted as i=1,j=1x,yPi,j. Based on the Bragg’s law of diffraction, adapting to subwavelength sizes in photonic crystals matches the dimensions closely with the C-band wavelength, thereby increasing the efficiency of light–matter interaction within the crystal. This enhancement allows for more precise control over optical wave modes, facilitating more effective phase compensation required for mode conversion. Subsequently, the intermodal coupling effects within the same single-level mode conversion region are suppressed, ensuring different mode conversions with multi-modal orthogonal phase distribution. Therefore, the orthogonal modes (TE0, TE1, and TE2) can be demultiplexed and separated. Operating across the broad bandwidth, the mode multiplexer IPC seamlessly integrates with the BMRA’s trunk waveguide via bending and crossing waveguides, ensuring compatibility with numerous closely spaced resonant wavelengths.

    In our design of the multi-dimensional mode multiplexer encompassing three modes (TE0TE2) and three wavelengths (1545.5 nm, 1550.0 nm, and 1554.5 nm) with bidirectional physical transmission paths, we employed an optimization approach using finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) methods. Details outlining the relationship between effective refractive indices and waveguide widths for TE0TE2 in the 1540.0 nm to 1570.0 nm range are provided in Appendix C. The optimized widths, ensuring effective performance, were determined for both single-mode (ws=0.50  μm) and tri-mode (wm=1.75  μm) waveguides. The waveguide parameters for the air medium pillars include a diameter (d) of 120 nm, with a 180 nm spacing between adjacent air columns, encompassing a pixelated structural region measuring 5.4  μm×5.4  μm. The bidirectional micro-ring resonator array comprises three units. Leveraging FDTD simulations, we fine-tuned the cavity perimeter to regulate wavelength, ensuring uniform spacing. The coupling lengths for the three micro-ring resonator arrays corresponding to the resonant wavelengths are 6.17 μm, 6.13 μm, and 6.08 μm, respectively. In the simulation, the gap (G) between the single-mode waveguides and the radius (R) of the MMR are defined as 0.18 μm and 2.8 μm, respectively. The simulation utilized a value of m as 48. This setup facilitates concurrent multiplexing and demultiplexing across three wavelengths and three TE mode channels.

    3. RESULTS AND ANALYSIS

    We fabricated the on-chip bidirectional multi-dimensional (de)multiplexer utilizing SOI with a 220 nm Si layer. For details about the fabrication process, please refer to Appendix D. Figure 2 illustrates the top-view structure of the PBMRAs, showcasing its ability for bidirectional wavelength and mode (de)multiplexing. The scanning electron microscopy images in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b) depict the BMRR and IPC, respectively, highlighting integration areas of approximately 50  μm×11  μm and 5.4  μm×5.4  μm, respectively. The entire demultiplexer footprint is approximately 80  μm×80  μm. Compared with the ordinary ADC multiplexing structure (around 100 μm) [32,33,41], the footprint of the proposed IPC multiplexing structure is reduced by 1 to 2 orders of magnitude. The connection between the BMRA trunk waveguide and the IPC is based on a crossing waveguide (with a footprint of 10  μm×10  μm), as shown in Appendix E, and bent waveguides (with radii of 1.4 μm and 2.9 μm), as shown in Appendix F. By integrating bidirectional micro-ring resonators as user transceiver ports and wavelength filters, our system achieves simultaneous transmission and separation of wavelengths. It facilitates the transmission and reception of multi-dimensional multiplexing signals through the left and right ports simultaneously.

    Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images showcasing the fabricated multi-dimensional (de)multiplexer utilizing the PBMRAs. (a) Top view of the bidirectional micro-ring resonator (BMRR). (b) Top view of the inverse photonic-like crystal (IPC). (In the “l th” and “rth,” “l” denotes light waves received from the left drop port and “r” indicates transmission from the right drop port.)

    Figure 2.Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images showcasing the fabricated multi-dimensional (de)multiplexer utilizing the PBMRAs. (a) Top view of the bidirectional micro-ring resonator (BMRR). (b) Top view of the inverse photonic-like crystal (IPC). (In the “l th” and “rth,” “l” denotes light waves received from the left drop port and “r” indicates transmission from the right drop port.)

    In Fig. 3(a), the simulated intensity distribution illustrates the BMRA’s response at wavelengths 1545.5 nm, 1550.0 nm, and 1554.5 nm, respectively. Irrespective of the incident light’s direction (from the left or right end), resonance occurs within the micro-ring, resulting in distinct exits through various drop ports. This capability allows for the simultaneous transmission of dual-wavelength signals through co-ring resonance. Meanwhile, Fig. 3(b) shows the simulated intensity distribution concerning TE0, TE1, and TE2, respectively. The maps demonstrate that the various order modes are almost entirely converted back to the TE0 mode, owing to the phase matching condition in the coupling region. However, there is a slight mode leakage beyond the pixelated region, which can be further mitigated by introducing optimization objectives aimed at minimizing this leaked power. The simulated transmittance curves of the BMRR and IPC are shown in Appendix G. Furthermore, bent waveguides with radii of 1.4 μm and 2.9 μm were used in this integrated device, and their insertion losses are 0.12 dB and 0.03 dB, respectively, indicating high efficiency and minimal loss in optical signal transmission.

    (a) Simulated intensity maps showing wavelengths of 1545.5 nm, 1550.0 nm, and 1554.5 nm decoupled from the left and right output ports of the BMRA, respectively. (b) Intensity distributions illustrating the mode conversion for TE0, TE1, and TE2 in the IPC TE mode (de)multiplexer.

    Figure 3.(a) Simulated intensity maps showing wavelengths of 1545.5 nm, 1550.0 nm, and 1554.5 nm decoupled from the left and right output ports of the BMRA, respectively. (b) Intensity distributions illustrating the mode conversion for TE0, TE1, and TE2 in the IPC TE mode (de)multiplexer.

    In Fig. 4(a), the experimentally measured transmission spectrum (with a sampling interval of 0.5 nm) of the six wavelength channels within the BMRA exhibits nearly identical spectral shapes for different channels within the same bidirectional micro-ring resonator. The insertion losses for the resonant wavelengths are measured as 1.3 dB, 1.0 dB, 1.8 dB, 1.9 dB, 1.5 dB, and 1.2 dB, respectively. The resonance peak jitters compared to the simulation results, and this nonuniformity in excess loss may partially result from fabrication errors. Crosstalk among wavelength channels operating in the same transmission direction remains below 20  dB. Crosstalk level denotes the power difference between the desired channel (detected at port P0) and all unwanted channels (N0), calculated as Crosstalk=10lg(P0/N0). Widening the spacing between resonant wavelengths could further decrease overall crosstalk. Figure 4(b) illustrates the experimentally measured transmission spectrum of the three mode channels (TE0, TE1, and TE2) in the IPC. Multiplexing and demultiplexing through the pixelated structure result in losses of 6.9 dB, 7.4 dB, and 7.9 dB, respectively, with corresponding crosstalk levels at 15.9  dB, 15.3  dB, and 13.9  dB at the 1550.0 nm wavelength. The insertion losses are about 5 dB higher than the simulation results, while the crosstalk is improved by 2 dB compared with the simulation results. The broad working bandwidth accommodates BMRA wavelengths. By adjusting channel spacing and bandwidth through micro-manufacturing technology, signal transmission through TE0, TE1, and TE2 mode channels on the chip becomes viable within the wide 1540 nm to 1560 nm waveband. Furthermore, the increased losses and crosstalk observed in the TE2 mode can be attributed to two primary factors: the complexity of modal field distribution and increased sensitivity to phase mismatches during mode conversion. The complexity arises as higher-order TE modes exhibit more intricate spatial field configurations, characterized by numerous nodes and antinodes. This expanded modal volume heightens the likelihood of scattering and other loss-inducing interactions with material imperfections and waveguide boundaries. Moreover, efficient mode conversion for higher-order modes necessitates stringent phase matching conditions. More precise control over the waveguide’s geometric and material attributes is necessary to ensure effective phase compensation. Manufacturing errors such as air column distortion and varying column radius particularly affect higher modes, as shown in Appendix H. In silicon-based waveguide device research using photonic crystal structures, deliberate introduction of device errors, multiple simulations, and fabrication tests are common practices to adjust device parameters and mitigate loss of functionality resulting from fabrication errors.

    (a) Experiment transmittance measurements of wavelengths 1545.5 nm, 1550.0 nm, and 1554.5 nm decoupled from the left and right drop ports of the BMRA, respectively. (b) Experiment transmittance measurements of TE0, TE1, and TE2 modes in the IPC TE mode (de)multiplexer.

    Figure 4.(a) Experiment transmittance measurements of wavelengths 1545.5 nm, 1550.0 nm, and 1554.5 nm decoupled from the left and right drop ports of the BMRA, respectively. (b) Experiment transmittance measurements of TE0, TE1, and TE2 modes in the IPC TE mode (de)multiplexer.

    Experiment measurements of the coupling efficiency within the PBMRA. (l/r: input or output the light from the left/right drop port of the bidirectional micro-ring resonator.)

    Figure 5.Experiment measurements of the coupling efficiency within the PBMRA. (l/r: input or output the light from the left/right drop port of the bidirectional micro-ring resonator.)

    To evaluate the performance of PBMRA devices and prepare for subsequent assessments of signal transmission quality, we conducted measurements of transmission efficiency and crosstalk in the PBMRA. Figure 5 illustrates the transmission characteristics of the nine duplex transmission channels, comprising three TE modes (TE0, TE1, and TE2) combined with three wavelengths (1545.5 nm, 1550.0 nm, and 1554.5 nm) within the BMRA. The optical energy loss measures range from 7.4 dB to 8.9 dB (the system loss after removing the fiber-to-chip loss), while the channel crosstalk ranges from 15.4  dB to 13.3  dB.

    Furthermore, we conducted an evaluation of its bidirectional communication performance using QPSK-OFDM multi-dimensional multiplexing signals. The experiment setup is shown in Appendix G. Employing QPSK-OFDM signals with a single channel transmission rate of 24 Gbit/s, we present the communication results in Fig. 6. Figure 6(a) demonstrates the BER performance of signals transmitted from the left end to the right end, while Fig. 6(b) illustrates the BER performance of signals transmitted from the right end to the left end. Our designed device, showcasing a communication capacity of 216 Gbit/s, sustains a BER lower than 104 at a received power of 16.5  dBm. Accounting for variances in design and fabrication across diverse mode-crossing devices, the maximum sensitivity difference among the nine mode channels approximates 2 dB, meeting the requisite criteria for practical full-duplex communication multiplexing. For clearer insights, Fig. 6(c) displays the constellations of bidirectional multi-dimensional multiplexing signals transmitted across the nine multi-dimensional channels at a received power of 16.5  dBm. A constellation diagram graphically represents the mapping and quality of digital modulated signals, using I/Q components to depict the amplitude and phase of each symbol. These diagrams calculate the error vector magnitude (EVM), crucial in gauging signal quality where smaller values signify better quality by showcasing the difference between the actual signal and the ideal signal. Notably, all the channel constellation diagrams exhibit strong convergence, with EVMs below 20%. These results underscore the compatibility of wavelength and mode dimensions, affirming their utility in multi-dimensional full-duplex communication.

    (a) BER curves of the signal transmitted across nine multi-dimensional channels from the left end to the right end. (b) BER curves of the signal transmitted across nine multi-dimensional channels from the right end to the left end. (λ1,1545.5 nm; λ2,1550.0 nm; λ3,1554.5 nm). (c) Constellation of the signal transmitted across the multi-dimensional channels. (L/R: input or output the light from the left/right drop port of the bidirectional micro-ring resonator.)

    Figure 6.(a) BER curves of the signal transmitted across nine multi-dimensional channels from the left end to the right end. (b) BER curves of the signal transmitted across nine multi-dimensional channels from the right end to the left end. (λ1,1545.5  nm; λ2,1550.0  nm; λ3,1554.5  nm). (c) Constellation of the signal transmitted across the multi-dimensional channels. (L/R: input or output the light from the left/right drop port of the bidirectional micro-ring resonator.)

    4. DISCUSSION

    In the realm of on-chip multi-dimensional optical networks, balancing system compactness with achieving full-duplex functionality emerges as a pivotal strategy, enhancing both signal transmission efficiency and communication capacity density within multi-dimensional multiplexing systems. Our study introduces a novel approach, the PBMRA, meticulously crafted to enable full-duplex transmission of wavelength-mode multiplexing signals. By optimizing a photonic crystal region using a binary search algorithm, this system adeptly manages multi-mode conversion within the operational bandwidth. Harnessing the bidirectional signal circulation inherent in the bidirectional micro-ring resonators, our PBMRA showcases remarkable bidirectional filtering prowess for spatial mode light, allowing seamless full-duplex transmission among node pairs, free from interference. Noteworthy is its significant reduction in space required for mode conversion compared to conventional cascaded tapered adiabatic micro-ring resonators and directional coupler connected array waveguide gratings, courtesy of the subwavelength-size photonic crystal with robust mode field modulation capacity. Furthermore, its ability to achieve single-level mode conversions through precise phase compensation significantly reduces system redundancy, propelling the integration of multi-dimensional full-duplex multiplexing systems.

    Our achievement of a communication capacity of 216 Gbit/s in single-directional multi-dimensional multiplexing signal transmission makes a significance in optical communication. Leveraging the principle of directional independence within total reflection, the bidirectional micro-ring resonator transforms from an optical signal transceiver into a dual-space channel sender or receiver, allowing simultaneous dual-wavelength transmission via co-ring resonance [42]. When coupled with the orthogonal attributes of the wavelength-mode joint channel, it enables simplex communication at identical frequencies and modes across dual physical transmission paths, regardless of their entry direction (left or right port), as shown in Fig. 7(a). Figure 7(b) illustrates the measured BERs across 18 channels in multi-dimensional multiplexing signal transmission as a function of received optical power. The achieved communication transmission rate of 432 Gbit/s maintains a BER below the FEC threshold (3.8×103). These findings underscore the potential for doubling the communication capacity density within on-chip optical networks using the co-ring transmission characteristic. Furthermore, the system’s maximum sensitivity difference, nearing 2 dB, enables the capture of weaker signals, ensuring stable connections and enhancing transmission distance.

    (a) Schematic of the simplex mode and wavelength channel (de)multiplexing communication system. (b) BER curves of the signal transmitted for 18 multi-dimensional channels supporting (b1) TE0, (b2) TE1, and (b3) TE2 modes, respectively. (λ1,1545.5 nm; λ2,1550.0 nm; λ3,1554.5 nm; L/R, decouple the signal from the left/right ports.)

    Figure 7.(a) Schematic of the simplex mode and wavelength channel (de)multiplexing communication system. (b) BER curves of the signal transmitted for 18 multi-dimensional channels supporting (b1) TE0, (b2) TE1, and (b3) TE2 modes, respectively. (λ1,1545.5  nm; λ2,1550.0  nm; λ3,1554.5  nm; L/R, decouple the signal from the left/right ports.)

    This study serves as a proof of concept for high-density multi-dimensional full-duplex communication. The refinement level within the PBMRA pixel region and the obtained refractive index distribution, manipulated via the inverse design algorithm and variations in calculated depth, dictate the number of supported mode conversions. Furthermore, the size of the dielectric column plays a critical role in determining the precision of phase compensation. However, achieving a delicate balance between these factors becomes imperative during the design process, especially considering the influence of fabrication tolerance limits.

    5. CONCLUSION

    This study introduces a compact solution for bidirectional multi-dimensional mode (de)multiplexing using a PBMRA on SOI. It allows bidirectional transmission and reception of wavelength multiplexing signals through the total internal reflection directional independence of the micro-rings. Moreover, the robust mode phase modulation of subwavelength-scale photonic-like crystals introduces the mode dimension, streamlining the mode conversion region. Our development includes a successful bidirectional nine-channel multi-dimensional (de)multiplexer, accommodating three wavelengths and three TE modes, within a compact footprint of approximately 80  μm×80  μm and a mode conversion length of 5.4 μm. With (de)multiplexed crosstalk below 15.5  dB, achieving a transmission rate of 216 Gbit/s and bit error rates lower than 104, this underscores the system’s compatibility with full-duplex capability and high integration in muti-dimensional communication systems. Leveraging the co-ring transmission attributes and capitalizing on the orthogonal features of the wavelength-mode channels, this system holds the potential to double the communication capacity density in simplex communication within on-chip optical networks.

    APPENDIX A: CALCULATION OF MODE COUPLING COEFFICIENT

    The refractive indices of the core waveguide and cladding are defined as n1 and n0, respectively. Under weakly conducive conditions, the relative refractive index difference can be represented as Δ=n12n022n12.

    Furthermore, normalized frequency is defined as ν=kn1a2Δ, where a represents half of the waveguide width. Under the condition of paraxial approximations and ignoring slight disturbance, the mode coupling coefficient is then given by [43] κ=2Δa(kxa)2(γxa)2(1+γxa)ν3exp[γx(D2a)],where D represents the spacing between two adjacent straight waveguides, kx represents the component of the wave vector k along the waveguide width direction (transverse direction), and γx is a measure of the asymmetry of the cladding refractive indices. Parameters kx and γx are obtained by solving the eigenvalue equation: {kxa=(p1)π2+arctan(n12γxn02kx)γx2=k2(n12n02)kx2,where p represents the number of local electric field peaks along the transverse direction. In this work, within the silicon-based device n1 and n0 are 3.47 and 1, respectively. Additionally, a and D are 0.25 μm and 0.18 μm, respectively. The number of local electric field peaks of TE0 along the waveguide width direction is 1. Combining the above equations, the coupling coefficient is solved as 60.33  mm1.

    APPENDIX B: METHOD OF INVERSE DESIGN OF THE IPC

    The arrangement of air columns within the IPC undergoes optimization through a direct binary search (DBS) algorithm [44], facilitated by FDTD simulations, as shown in Fig. 8. Figure 8(a) showcases the pixelated structure of the photonic crystal region, where the nonetched region’s pixel points hold a value of 0, while those corresponding to the air column region are assigned with a value of 1, organized in an x×y matrix (where x=30 and y=30). The optimization process of the inverse-designed photonic crystal is outlined in the flowchart displayed in Fig. 8(b). Upon scanning the target pixel point, the pixel value undergoes modification, transitioning between 0 and 1. Subsequently, the IPC with the altered pixel value is subjected to simulation and measurement to refine the device parameters. If the device’s performance improves, the changes are retained and recorded. Conversely, if the modification leads to performance deterioration, the alteration is reverted, and the subsequent pixel point is evaluated. The objective function driving this search process is as follows: Fobject=(TiiTij),where Tii is the transmittance of the corresponding mode of the ith port, while Tij is the transmittance of the corresponding mode of the other ports.

    Direct binary search (DBS) algorithm for the inverse-designed photonic crystal. (a) Pixelated representation of the photonic crystal region. (b) Optimization flow chart for the inverse-designed photonic crystal.

    Figure 8.Direct binary search (DBS) algorithm for the inverse-designed photonic crystal. (a) Pixelated representation of the photonic crystal region. (b) Optimization flow chart for the inverse-designed photonic crystal.

    APPENDIX C: EFFECTIVE REFRACTIVE INDICES FOR TE MODES

    To determine appropriate widths for both single-mode and multi-mode waveguides, we conducted simulations spanning the effective refractive index of three distinct TE modes (TE0 to TE2) across the wavelength range of 1540 nm to 1570 nm as shown in Fig. 9, corresponding to various waveguide widths. When different TE modes exhibit identical effective refractive indices at specific waveguide widths, they fulfill the phase matching criterion, enabling mode conversion through evanescent wave coupling between closely spaced waveguides. Upon analyzing simulation outcomes and conducting additional studies on the tri-mode multiplexer, this paper selects an approximate width of 0.50 μm for the single-mode waveguide and 1.75 μm for the tri-mode waveguide.

    Effective refractive index of three distinct TE modes (TE0 to TE2) across the wavelength range of 1540 nm to 1570 nm, corresponding to various waveguide widths.

    Figure 9.Effective refractive index of three distinct TE modes (TE0 to TE2) across the wavelength range of 1540 nm to 1570 nm, corresponding to various waveguide widths.

    APPENDIX D: FABRICATION METHOD OF THE DEVICE

    The fabrication process of the silicon-based waveguide device, as depicted in Fig. 10, involves the following steps. System.Xml.XmlElementSystem.Xml.XmlElementSystem.Xml.XmlElementSystem.Xml.XmlElementSystem.Xml.XmlElement

    Flow chart for the fabrication of the silicon-based waveguide device.

    Figure 10.Flow chart for the fabrication of the silicon-based waveguide device.

    APPENDIX E: SCHEMATIC OF THE CROSSING WAVEGUIDE

    An on-chip cross waveguide represents a photonic integrated chip device enabling the intersection of two waveguides in distinct directions, facilitating optical signal transmission and exchange within the chip. Various types of this device include taper-type crossing waveguides, multi-mode interferometer crossing waveguides, subwavelength grating-type crossing waveguides, and multi-layer SiN structure crossing waveguides. In this instance, we utilize a taper-type crossing waveguide that connects a single-mode waveguide to the crossing region. This design gradually alters the effective refractive index of the waveguide toward the center region, effectively reducing light wave scattering and reflection at the crossing region. Consequently, this approach ensures high efficiency and minimal loss in optical signal transmission. Compared to other crossing waveguide types, it offers superior characteristics such as high degeneracy and low loss. Figure 11(a) presents transverse and longitudinal optical field transmission diagrams of our designed crossing waveguide, while Fig. 11(b) showcases SEM characterization of the fabricated device, measuring approximately 10  μm×10  μm in size.

    Illustration of the crossing waveguide. (a) Simulated intensity maps representing the horizontal and vertical transmission directions. (b) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image displaying the fabricated crossing waveguide.

    Figure 11.Illustration of the crossing waveguide. (a) Simulated intensity maps representing the horizontal and vertical transmission directions. (b) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image displaying the fabricated crossing waveguide.

    APPENDIX F: SCHEMATIC OF THE BENT WAVEGUIDE

    For photonic circuits at the microscale, the design of bent waveguides is crucial to precisely control the propagation direction of light. The radius of the bent waveguide plays a key role in maintaining phase continuity and minimizing radiation losses. Its selection involves a precise balance between the device integration and low loss. By optimizing the radius as well as the waveguide width and refractive index contrast, maintaining constructive interference and continuity of optical modes around the bend, we can keep bend losses to acceptable levels. Silicon-based bent waveguides, with their higher refractive index contrast compared to traditional SiN waveguides, more effectively confine optical fields, reduce scattering losses into the substrate, and enable a smaller bending radius. In the duplex multi-dimensional multiplexing system, we utilize bent waveguides with radii of 1.4 μm and 2.9 μm, respectively, as shown in Figs. 12(a) and 12(b). The simulated insertion loss is 0.12 dB and 0.03 dB, respectively. Moreover, the insertion loss of the device is so minimal that it is difficult to detect in experiments.

    SEM images and simulated intensity maps of bent waveguides with radii of (a) 1.4 μm and (b) 2.9 μm.

    Figure 12.SEM images and simulated intensity maps of bent waveguides with radii of (a) 1.4 μm and (b) 2.9 μm.

    APPENDIX G: SIMULATED TRANSMISSION OF THE BMRR AND IPC

    The simulated transmission spectrum of the six wavelength channels within the BMRA is shown in Fig. 13(a). The insertion losses for the resonant wavelengths are measured less than 1.5 dB, respectively. It can be observed that the spectrum from the left and right drop ports of the BMRA is not entirely overlapping. This may be attributed to crosstalk from adjacent micro-ring resonators, influencing the resonance behavior of each ring based on the transmission path. In simulations, ideal conditions are assumed, whereas manufacturing errors in actual experiments are unavoidable and cannot be perfectly replicated, leading to the spectrum difference in simulation and experiment. However, it is feasible to reduce the discrepancies between theoretical and experimental results by further optimizing the manufacturing process and improving the accuracy of the simulation models. Additionally, the simulated transmission spectrum of TE0, TE1, and TE2 modes within the IPC TE mode (de)multiplexer is shown in Fig. 13(b). The insertion losses are less than 1.6 dB, while the crosstalk is less than 17.5  dB.

    (a) Simulated transmittance spectra of wavelengths 1545.5 nm, 1550.0 nm, and 1554.5 nm decoupled from the left and right drop ports of the BMRA, respectively. (b) Simulated transmittance spectra of TE0, TE1, and TE2 modes in the IPC TE mode (de)multiplexer.

    Figure 13.(a) Simulated transmittance spectra of wavelengths 1545.5 nm, 1550.0 nm, and 1554.5 nm decoupled from the left and right drop ports of the BMRA, respectively. (b) Simulated transmittance spectra of TE0, TE1, and TE2 modes in the IPC TE mode (de)multiplexer.

    APPENDIX H: SIMULATED TRANSMISSION OF THE BMRA AND IPC

    The fabrication process for photonic crystal devices may encounter deviations in the diameter and shape of dielectric pillars due to factors such as equipment precision and simulation deviation. To address these challenges, potential error factors during fabrication and their impact on the transmission performance of the cross-connection system were thoroughly investigated. Analyzing the influence of fabrication-introduced diameter deviations of the photonic crystal air pillars on the mode cross-connector, various diameters were tested, as depicted in Fig. 14(a). The transmission efficiency of mode multiplexers was simulated and calculated, as shown in Fig. 14(b), with the standard optimized structure set at a diameter of d=120  nm. The result indicated a decrease in device performance as the diameter deviated from the reference diameter. Reducing the diameter below 120 nm resulted in a slower performance decline, while exceeding 120 nm led to a significant deterioration. Furthermore, downward deviations even exceeding 10 nm had minimal impact on the device performance. Therefore, maintaining air pillar diameters consistent with or below the design specifications is crucial for optimal device performance. Investigating the effect of shape distortion of the photonic-like crystal’s air column, the circular pillar was replaced by the internally connected ortho-hexagon, as displayed in Fig. 14(c). Varying degrees of distortion were set to assess the device’s tolerance to shape aberrations in the air columns, and corresponding transmission is shown in Fig. 14(d). The device could maintain performance well when the number of aberrations in the air column was under 10% of the total count. With the increased number of aberrations, the device’s performance gradually declined, significantly deteriorating when aberrations exceeded 20% of the total. This made it challenging to meet the transmission and communication requirements of the mode multiplexing system.

    Structural parameter deviation of the IPC TE mode multiplexer. (a) Demonstration of the mode multiplexer with varying diameters. (b) Transmission spectra of the mode multiplexers with varying diameters. (c) Demonstration of the mode multiplexer with air pillar distortion. (d) Transmission spectra of the mode multiplexer with different aberration degrees.

    Figure 14.Structural parameter deviation of the IPC TE mode multiplexer. (a) Demonstration of the mode multiplexer with varying diameters. (b) Transmission spectra of the mode multiplexers with varying diameters. (c) Demonstration of the mode multiplexer with air pillar distortion. (d) Transmission spectra of the mode multiplexer with different aberration degrees.

    APPENDIX I: EXPERIMENT SETUP OF THE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

    The communication system’s experimental setup is illustrated in Fig. 15. At the transmitter side, a multi-channel laser source emits three light beams at wavelengths of 1545.5 nm, 1550 nm, and 1555.5 nm. These are combined utilizing a wavelength division multiplexer (WDM). A polarization controller is employed to adjust the light’s polarization, thereby enhancing the coupling efficiency. A 24 Gbit/s QPSK-OFDM signal is generated by an arbitrary waveform generator, and then loaded onto the light beams via an intensity modulator, resulting in three different distinct wavelengths of lights that carry the signals. Subsequently, a WDM separates three different wavelengths of lights that carry signals. The signal lights are then amplified using erbium-doped fiber amplifiers (EDFAs). Beam splitters are used to divide signals of the same wavelength into six sub-beams, which are then connected to the corresponding ports of the vertical fiber coupling array according to the micro-ring’s resonant wavelengths. The signal lights enter the on-chip communication system through the vertical fiber coupling array. They are then transformed into the corresponding wavelength-mode signals via micro-rings and IPC, passing through the multi-mode waveguide. Finally, they are converted into fundamental mode-wavelength signals through another pair of symmetric micro-rings and IPC, completing the multiplexing and demultiplexing of wavelength and mode. This achieves a total transmission rate of 216 Gbit/s in a single direction. Subsequently, the signal lights are output from the chip through another vertical fiber coupling array. At the receiver, the output signal light is amplified by an EDFA, and the variable optical attenuator (VOA) is introduced to facilitate the subsequent data acquisition. The signal light then experiences down-conversion via a photo-detector (PD), and the waveform is captured using a real-time sampling oscilloscope. Finally, the sampled data are transmitted to a digital signal processor (DSP) for further processing.

    Communication experimental system based on PBMRA. WDM, (de)wavelength division multiplexer; PC, polarization controller; AWG, arbitrary waveform generator; IM, intensity modulator; EDFA, erbium-doped fiber amplifier; BS, beam splitter; VFCA, vertical fiber coupling array; VOA, variable optical attenuator; PD, photo-detector; Osc., oscilloscope; DSP, digital signal processor.

    Figure 15.Communication experimental system based on PBMRA. WDM, (de)wavelength division multiplexer; PC, polarization controller; AWG, arbitrary waveform generator; IM, intensity modulator; EDFA, erbium-doped fiber amplifier; BS, beam splitter; VFCA, vertical fiber coupling array; VOA, variable optical attenuator; PD, photo-detector; Osc., oscilloscope; DSP, digital signal processor.

    [21] J. Wang, S. T. Chen, S. P. Wang. Silicon hybrid wavelength/mode-division-demultiplexer with 64 channels for on-chip optical interconnects. Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC)(2015).

    [43] K. Okamoto. Chapter 2: Planar optical waveguides. Fundamentals of Optical Waveguides, 13-55(2006).

    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Zhiwei Guan, Chaofeng Wang, Chuangxin Xie, Haisheng Wu, Junmin Liu, Huapeng Ye, Dianyuan Fan, Jiangnan Xiao, Shuqing Chen, "Photonic crystal-connected bidirectional micro-ring resonator array for duplex mode and wavelength channel (de)multiplexing," Photonics Res. 12, 1802 (2024)

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Silicon Photonics

    Received: Jan. 2, 2024

    Accepted: Jun. 11, 2024

    Published Online: Aug. 2, 2024

    The Author Email: Shuqing Chen (shuqingchen@szu.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.1364/PRJ.517503

    Topics