Nowadays, virtual reality (VR) technology has attracted a great deal of interest by virtue of its imagination, immersion, and interaction characteristics[
Chinese Optics Letters, Volume. 19, Issue 1, 013301(2021)
Immersive autostereoscopic display based on curved screen and parallax barrier
In this Letter, we present a display system based on a curved screen and parallax barrier, which provides stereo images with a horizontal field of view of 360° without wearing any eyewear, to achieve an immersive autostereoscopic effect. The display principle and characteristics of this display system are studied theoretically in detail. Three consecutive pixels on a curved screen and parallax barrier form a display unit, which can generate separate viewing zones for the left and right eyes, respectively. Simulation and experimental results show that the non-crosstalk effect can be obtained in the viewing zones, which proves the effectiveness of this display system. This study provides some new ideas for the improvement of the autostereoscopic display and to enable envisioned applications in virtual reality technology.
1. Introduction
Nowadays, virtual reality (VR) technology has attracted a great deal of interest by virtue of its imagination, immersion, and interaction characteristics[
To solve these problems, autostereoscopy may be a good solution, which does not need any form of special glasses or other user-mounted devices[
In this Letter, we will present an immersive autostereoscopic display based on a curved screen and parallax barrier. Three consecutive pixels on the curved screen and parallax barrier make up a stereoscopic display unit. The pixels on both sides provide images for the left and right eyes, respectively, under the action of the curved parallax barrier. The middle pixel is set to be black to work as the second parallax barrier to prevent the crosstalk between the left and right images. The structure parameters and display characteristics of this proposed display system are investigated theoretically. The simulation and experimental results show that no crosstalk exists in the viewing zones. Moreover, the viewing direction can be freely rotated around the cylindrical center in this centrosymmetric display structure, so an immersive stereoscopic vision is achieved. This work provides an impetus towards the development of the autostereoscopic display in VR applications.
Sign up for Chinese Optics Letters TOC Get the latest issue of Advanced Photonics delivered right to you!Sign up now
2. Structure and Principle
Figure 1(a) shows the configuration of the proposed display system based on the curved screen and parallax barrier. Display pixels are connected circularly to form a curved screen. Three consecutive pixels make up a display unit: pixels “R” and “L” provide images for right and left eyes, respectively, and pixel “M” is used to prevent crosstalk. Discrete black strips are placed circularly and separated by a slit with a certain width, to obtain a curved parallax barrier. The curved screen and parallax barrier share the same center O, and the distance between them is constant, which makes the whole display structure centrosymmetric. The detailed geometrical relationship between the curved screen and parallax barrier can be described as follows: straight lines are drawn from the center O to the edges of the black strip, and the lines will intersect at the junctions between different pixels.
Figure 1.(a) Configuration of the immersive autostereoscopic display based on a curved screen and parallax barrier; (b) principle and (c) structure parameters of one display unit.
Figure 1(b) shows the display unit and its working principle. A parallax barrier is arranged in front of the three pixels. Under the effect of the parallax barrier, pixels “R” and “L” form four regions. Regions I and II correspond to the viewing zones for the right and left eyes, respectively. Region III is the crosstalk zone where the pixels “R” and “L” are visible simultaneously. In contrast to that, no pixels can be seen in region IV. To prevent the crosstalk, the middle pixel “M” is set to be black to act as the second parallax barrier[
Figure 1(c) shows the structure parameters of the display unit. The parallax barrier with slit width and black strip width is placed in front of the display pixel with a width of . The distances from the center O to the slit, black strip, and pixel are denoted by , , and , respectively. All of these distances are represented by dotted lines. is the angle of the pixel relative to the center O. represents the maximum horizontal movement distance for one eye. Beyond the allowable distance, one of the two eyes will see the wrong images. Considering that the interpupillary distance is usually about 65 mm[
On the basis of these equations, we can design an immersive autostereoscopic display and simulate its display characteristics.
3. Results and Discussion
An immersive autostereoscopic display model is developed, with the structure parameters as shown in Table 1. Considering that the angular resolution of human eye is about 1′ (0.017°), the pixel angle is set to be 0.016° to fulfill the viewing requirements. is set to be 1000 mm, which means that the viewing distance from center O to the screen is 1 m. Based on Eq. (1), is calculated to be 0.279 mm. Moreover, on the basis of the Eqs. (2)–(5), and are calculated to be 0.278 mm and 0.556 mm, respectively, which indicates that the aperture ratio of the parallax barrier is about 33.3%. and have the same value of 996.03 mm because is too small.
|
As shown in Fig. 1(b), the display unit has three pixels, so the angle of the display unit relative to center O is 0.048°. When the eyes focus on the image content, the effective horizontal field of view (FOV) is about 50°[
Figure 2.(a) Viewing zones for numerous display units; (b) viewing zones with a coordinate system.
The software LightTools is used to build up the theoretical model of the immersive autostereoscopic display and investigate its crosstalk characteristics. The structure parameters of the theoretical model are set according to Table 1. The number of light sources is 1042 in the horizontal direction corresponding to the effective horizontal FOV. A surface receiver with a size of is used to measure the illumination distribution along the axis. To achieve the simulation results as accurately as possible, the number of tracing rays is set to 500 million. Firstly, the pixels “M” and “R” are set to be non-illuminated, where only pixel “L” is set to be illuminated, and the ray tracing simulation result is shown in Fig. 3(a). It can be seen that all the received light converges in the region on the left side of center O, which is the viewing zone for the left eye. A more intuitive and accurate light distribution result is also shown in Fig. 3(b). It can be clearly seen that the light illumination keeps zero in the region on the right side of center O, that is, there is no light from pixel “L” that can enter the viewing zone for the right eye, which shows a non-crosstalk characteristic. Further, the pixels “M” and “L” are set to be non-illuminated, and only pixel “R” is illuminated; then similar but opposite results are obtained in Figs. 3(c) and 3(d). It can be seen that there is no light from pixel “R” in the viewing zone for the left eye. The simulation results shown in Fig. 3 provide a good basis to prove that the combination of the parallax barrier and pixel “M” can effectively prevent the crosstalk between the two viewing zones, which ensures a good autostereoscopic quality.
Figure 3.Simulation results when only pixel “L” is set to be illuminated: (a) ray tracing result and (b) illumination distribution on the surface of receiver. Simulation results when only pixel “R” is set to be illuminated: (c) ray tracing result and (d) illumination distribution on the surface of receiver.
Furthermore, to validate the reliability of simulation results, an experimental model of the immersive autostereoscopic display is built up, and the schematic structure is shown in Fig. 4(a). A pixels film, which is a transparent film with pixels printed on it, combined with an ambient light source is used as the curved screen. In the pixels film, pixels “R” and “M” are set to be opaque, and pixel “L” is set to be transparent. So, under the ambient light illumination, pixels “R” and “M” are non-illuminated, and pixel “L” is illuminated, which is the same as the simulation condition described above. The parallax barrier is composed of parallel, periodic opaque, and transparent parts. The pixels film and the parallax barrier film are attached to the outside and inside surface, respectively, of a piece of curved glass, so the distance between the two films and the curvature radius of the two films can be easily determined by the thickness and curvature radius of the curved glass. A camera with a horizontal FOV of 50° is used to capture the light from the pixels film. Two locations are selected for the camera, and their coordinates are () and (32.5, 0), which are used to match the usual interpupillary distance.
Figure 4.(a) Schematic structure and (b) experimental setups to test the immersive autostereoscopic display based on a curved screen and parallax barrier.
According to the schematic structure shown in Fig. 4(a), and the structure parameters shown in Table 1, the experimental setups are developed, as shown in Fig. 4(b). The curved glass is fabricated by the hot melt technique, and its height and thickness are 0.8 m and 4 mm, respectively. The curvature radius and the arc length of the outside surface of the curved glass are both 1 m. The pixels film and parallax barrier film are attached to the outside and inside surface of the curved glass, and the microscope images of the two films are also shown in Fig. 4(b). The horizontal lengths of the two films are both 0.9 m, so the two films can provide an effective horizontal FOV of 50° for the digital camera, which can move along the axis.
Figure 5(a) shows the image captured by the camera when located on the coordinate (, 0). It can be obtained that the scene under the ambient light can be seen, which indicates that the light from pixel “L” can enter the camera in the viewing zone for the left eye. When the camera is moved to the coordinate (32.5, 0), the image turns out to be all black, as shown in Fig. 5(b). The all black image demonstrates that no light from pixel “L” can enter the camera in the viewing zone for the right eye, which shows a non-crosstalk characteristic. Moreover, considering that the configuration of the experimental setups is bilaterally symmetric, it recognizes that a reversed result can be obtained when pixels “L” and “M” are set to be opaque, and pixel “R” is set to be transparent. The experimental results shown in Fig. 5, which have a good agreement with the simulation results shown in Fig. 3, provide further evidence to prove the effectiveness of the proposed immersive autostereoscopic display system. It should be noted that some black stripes can also be seen in the Fig. 5(a). It is a typical phenomenon in the autostereoscopic display based on parallax barrier[
Figure 5.Images captured by the camera at different coordinates: (a) (
4. Conclusion
We have demonstrated an immersive autostereoscopic display based on a curved screen and parallax barrier with a static and fixed structure. The display principle and structure design are investigated in detail. Three consecutive pixels and parallax barriers form a display unit. Under the action of the numerous display units, two separated viewing zones are generated for the left and right eyes. After building up a theoretical model in optical software, the simulation results show that there is no crosstalk between these two viewing zones. Moreover, the viewing direction can be freely rotated around the cylindrical center to achieve an immersive stereoscopic vision. We also build up an experimental model to test the display characteristics of this proposed display system. The results show that the left and right images can be obtained with the non-crosstalk effect, which proves the effectiveness of this display system. Therefore, we believe that this work will open a promising way to design immersive autostereoscopic displays for VR applications.
[1] G. C. Burdea, P. Coiffet. Virtual Reality Technology(2003).
[3] B. E. Riecke, J. Schulte-Pelkum, H. H. Bulthoff. Perceiving simulated ego-motions in virtual reality: comparing large screen displays with HMDs. Proc. SPIE, 5666, 344(2005).
[4] J. Melzer, C. R. Spitzer, U. Ferrell, T. Ferrell. Head-mounted displays. Digital Avionics Handbook(2014).
[7] M. McGinity, J. Shaw, V. Kuchelmeister, A. Hardjono, D. D. Favero. AVIE: a versatile multi-user stereo 360 interactive VR theatre, 2(2007).
[14] K. Tanaka, J. Hayashi, M. Inami, S. Tachi. Twister: an immersive autostereoscopic display, 59(2004).
[15] D. A. Atchison, G. Smith. Optics of the Human Eye(2000).
[16] Y. Kunita, N. Ogawa, A. Sakuma, M. Inami, T. Maeda, S. Tachi. Immersive autostereoscopic display for mutual telexistence: TWISTER I (Telexistence Wide-angle Immersive STEReoscope model I), 31(2001).
[17] H. Nishimura, T. Abe, H. Yamamoto, Y. Hayasaki, N. Nishida. Development of 140-inch autostereoscopic display by use of full-color LED panel. Proc. SPIE, 6486, 64861B(2007).
[19] J. Luo, Q. Wang, W. Zhao, Y. Tao, D. Li. Autostereoscopic three dimensional display based on two parallax barriers, 1(2010).
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Junda Guo, Zhihui Diao, Shufeng Yan, Enqi Zhang, Lingsheng Kong, "Immersive autostereoscopic display based on curved screen and parallax barrier," Chin. Opt. Lett. 19, 013301 (2021)
Category: Visual Optics and Displays
Received: Jul. 1, 2020
Accepted: Aug. 28, 2020
Published Online: Dec. 7, 2020
The Author Email: Lingsheng Kong (lingshengkong@hotmail.com)