Synthetic antiferromagnet (SAFM) consisting of two or more ferromagnetic layers that exhibit antiparallel magnetizations has been widely studied in recent years.[
Chinese Physics B, Volume. 29, Issue 10, (2020)
Magnetic characterization of a thin Co2MnSi/L10–MnGa synthetic antiferromagnetic bilayer prepared by MBE
A synthetic antiferromagnet based on a thin antiferromagnetically coupled Co2MnSi/MnGa bilayer with Pt capping is proposed in this work. Square magnetic loops measured by anomalous Hall effect reveal that a well perpendicular magnetic anisotropy is obtained in this structure. A very large coercivity of 83 kOe (1 Oe = 79.5775 A?m-1) is observed near the magnetic moment compensation point of 270 K, indicating an antiferromagnetic behavior. Moreover, the anomalous Hall signal does not go to zero even at the magnetic compensation point, for which the difficulty in detecting the conventional antiferromagnets can be overcome. By changing the temperature, the polarity of the spin–orbit torque induced switching is changed around the bilayer compensation point. This kind of thin bilayer has potential applications in spin–orbit-related effects, spintronic devices, and racetrack memories.
1. Introduction
Synthetic antiferromagnet (SAFM) consisting of two or more ferromagnetic layers that exhibit antiparallel magnetizations has been widely studied in recent years.[
Comparing with the conventional RKKY-mediated SAFM, such as [Co/Ni]/Ru/[Co/Ni],[
2. Experiments
The whole structure of our sample was epitaxially grown on a GaAs (001) substrate by molecular-beam epitaxy (MBE) as shown in Fig. 1(a), in which the Co2MnSi (0.7 nm)/L10–MnGa (3 nm) bilayer were grown at 250 °C, while the Pt (3 nm for sample A; 5 nm for sample B) layer was deposited using e-beam evaporation at room temperature in the same MBE growth chamber. The surface crystalline structure was monitored in-situ by reflection high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED). The observed streaky RHEED patterns during the growth of Co2MnSi and MnGa indicate single crystal structure of the bilayer. The x-ray diffraction spectrum of sample A is shown in Fig. 1(c), and the fitted peaks of Pt (002) and MnGa (002) are shown in Fig. 1(d). The reference sample (sample R: Co2MnSi (20 nm)/L10–MnGa (28 nm))[
Figure 1.(a) Schematic diagram of sample structure, (b) microscope photograph of Hall bar device (120 μm × 10 μm), (c) x-ray diffraction spectrum of the Co2MnSi (0.7 nm)/
3. Results and discussion
Considering the small net saturation magnetization in SAFM and the poor signal-to-noise ratio in magnetic measurement, the anomalous Hall effect (AHE) is used to characterize the magnetic properties of the SAFM. For a bilayer, the total AHE voltage is a superposition of two parallel signals, which are determined by both of magnetization and the AHE coefficient in each layer, so a nonzero AHE voltage is expected even at the magnetic moment compensation point. The anomalous Hall resistance (RAH) and the magnetic hysteresis loops of sample R are shown in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b), respectively. The magnetic field-induced magnetization rotation and switching of the Co2MnSi layer are independent of the MnGa layer in the bilayer due to their large thickness. The consistent trends of the AHE and the magnetic hysteresis loops indicate that the AHE coefficient of Co2MnSi and MnGa are both positive. And the signal ratio of Co2MnSi/MnGa is much larger in the AHE loop than in the magnetic hysteresis loop, which indicate that Co2MnSi and MnGa have different AHE coefficients. From Fig. 2(b), the saturated magnetization of Co2MnSi and MnGa are calculated to be 640 emu/cm3 and 96 emu/cm3, respectively. And the interfacial antiferromagnetic coupling constant is about –5 erg/cm2 (1 erg = 10−7 J) as reported in our previous work.[
Figure 2.(a)
The AHE loops of sample A at different temperatures are shown in Fig. 2(c). The coercivity (Hc) of the structure is very large, and a polarity reverse of RAH is obtained in a range from 250 K to 200 K. Compared with the monotonical change of Hc with temperature of MnGa single layer,[
An obvious RAH polarity transition from 250 K to 200 K of the SAFM is observed in Fig. 2(c). There are two possible reasons: one is the polarity change of AHE with temperature sweeping, which was reported in SrRuO3[
In order to further understand the magnetic dynamic properties of the thin Co2MnSi/L10–MnGa SAFM, we conduct a preliminary SOT-induced switching test. To achieve a more easily detectable SOT-induced switching, sample B (Co2MnSi (0.7 nm)/L10–MnGa (3 nm)/Pt (5 nm)) is prepared, in which the SAFM is covered with thicker Pt. As shown in Figs. 3(a) and 3(b), the polarities of RAH are reversed between 280 K and 240 K. According to the previous analysis, the polarity reversal of RAH is caused by opposite magnetic configuration, which is determined by Zeeman energy of the net magnetic moment of SAFM. Along the positive direction of the current, an external magnetic field of 2 T is applied to the system, and further studies of the SOT-induced switching are shown in Figs. 3(c) and 3(d). Considering the fact that the resistivity of L10–MnGa and Pt are approximately 100 μ Ω ⋅ cm[
Figure 3.
4. Conclusions
In this work, the perpendicular thin Co2MnSi/MnGa SAFM bilayer is epitaxially grown on a GaAs (001) substrate. The magnetic compensation point is achieved near 270 K, and an ultra-large coercivity of 83 kOe is observed around this point. Moreover, the magnetic configuration in this bilayer during technical magnetization is mainly determined by the Zeeman energy of the net magnetic moment, which is demonstrated in detail by the temperature dependence of the remnant Hall resistance at zero magnetic field. The SOT-induced switching loops also have opposite polarities at the temperatures lower and higher than the compensated temperature in Co2MnSi/MnGa/Pt structure. Our work reveals that the thin Co2MnSi/MnGa bilayer behaves like an antiferromagnet, and may promote its application in spintronic devices as an SAFM.
[1] M S Ackermann, S Emori. J. Appl. Phys., 124(2018).
[2] R Y Chen, R Q Zhang, L Y Liao, X Z Chen, Y J Zhou, Y D Gu, M S Saleem, X F Zhou, F Pan, C Song. Appl. Phys. Lett., 115(2019).
[3] A Fernandez-Pacheco, E Vedmedenko, F Ummelen, R Mansell, D Petit, R P Cowburn. Nat. Mater., 18, 679(2019).
[4] D S Han, K Lee, J P Hanke, Y Mokrousov, K W Kim, W Yoo, Y L W van Hees, T W Kim, R Lavrijsen, C Y You, H J M Swagten, M H Jung, M Klaui. Nat. Mater., 18, 703(2019).
[5] Y Li, X Jin, P Pan, F N Tan, W S Lew, F Ma. Chin. Phys. B, 27(2018).
[6] R A Duine, K J Lee, S S P Parkin, M D Stiles. Nat. Phys., 14, 217(2018).
[7] G Y Shi, C H Wan, Y S Chang, F Li, X J Zhou, P X Zhang, J W Cai, X F Han, F Pan, C Song. Phys. Rev. B, 95(2017).
[8] T Moriyama, W Zhou, T Seki, K Takanashi, T Ono. Phys. Rev. Lett., 121(2018).
[9] C Bi, H Almasi, K Price, T Newhouse-Illige, M Xu, S R Allen, X Fan, W Wang. Phys. Rev. B, 95(2017).
[10] P X Zhang, L Y Liao, G Y Shi, R Q Zhang, H Q Wu, Y Y Wang, F Pan, C Song. Phys. Rev. B, 97(2018).
[11] S H Yang, K S Ryu, S Parkin. Nat. Nanotechnol., 10, 221(2015).
[12] J Barker, O A Tretiakov. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116(2016).
[13] C Jin, C Song, J Wang, Q Liu. Appl. Phys. Lett., 109(2016).
[14] J C T Lee, J J Chess, S A Montoya, X Shi, N Tamura, S K Mishra, P Fischer, B J McMorran, S K Sinha, E E Fullerton, S D Kevan, S Roy. Appl. Phys. Lett., 109(2016).
[15] X Zhang, Y Zhou, M Ezawa. Sci. Rep., 6(2016).
[16] X Zhang, Y Zhou, M Ezawa. Nat. Commun., 7(2016).
[17] S K Kim, K J Lee, Y Tserkovnyak. Phys. Rev. B, 95(2017).
[18] H Xia, C Jin, C Song, J Wang, J Wang, Q Liu. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 50(2017).
[19] C A Akosa, O A Tretiakov, G Tatara, A Manchon. Phys. Rev. Lett., 121(2018).
[20] L Caretta, M Mann, F Buttner, K Ueda, B Pfau, C M Gunther, P Hessing, A Churikova, C Klose, M Schneider, D Engel, C Marcus, D Bono, K Bagschik, S Eisebitt, G S D Beach. Nat. Nanotechnol., 13, 1154(2018).
[21] L Xing, D Hua, W Wang. J. Appl. Phys., 124(2018).
[22] Y Hirata, D H Kim, S K Kim, D K Lee, S H Oh, D Y Kim, T Nishimura, T Okuno, Y Futakawa, H Yoshikawa, A Tsukamoto, Y Tserkovnyak, Y Shiota, T Moriyama, S B Choe, K J Lee, T Ono. Nat. Nanotechnol., 14, 232(2019).
[23] R Khoshlahni, A Qaiumzadeh, A Bergman, A Brataas. Phys. Rev. B, 99(2019).
[24] T Fache, H S Tarazona, J Liu, G L’vova, M J Applegate, J C Rojas-Sanchez, S Petit-Watelot, C V Landauro, J Quispe-Marcatoma, R Morgunov, C H W Barnes, S Mangin. Phys. Rev. B, 98(2018).
[25] R Ranjbar, K Z Suzuki, A Sugihara, Y Ando, T Miyazaki, S Mizukami. J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 433, 195(2017).
[26] R Ranjbar, K Suzuki, A Sugihara, T Miyazaki, Y Ando, S Mizukami. Materials (Basel), 8, 6531(2015).
[27] Q L Ma, S Mizukami, T Kubota, X M Zhang, Y Ando, T Miyazaki. Phys. Rev. Lett., 112(2014).
[28] S W Mao, J Lu, X P Zhao, X L Wang, D H Wei, J Liu, J B Xia, J H Zhao. Sci. Rep., 7(2017).
[29] J Lu, S W Mao, X P Zhao, X L Wang, J Liu, J B Xia, P Xiong, J H Zhao. Sci. Rep., 7(2017).
[30] S Li, J Lu, L J Wen, D Pan, H L Wang, D H Wei, J H Zhao. Chin. Phys. Lett., 37(2020).
[31] L J Zhu, D Pan, J H Zhao. Phys. Rev. B, 89(2014).
[32] L J Zhu, D Pan, S H Nie, J Lu, J H Zhao. Appl. Phys. Lett., 102(2013).
[33] J Matsuno, N Ogawa, K Yasuda, F Kagawa, W Koshibae, N Nagaosa, Y Tokura, M Kawasaki. Sci. Adv., 2(2016).
[34] D Kan, T Moriyama, K Kobayashi, Y Shimakawa. Phys. Rev. B, 98(2018).
[35] B M Ludbrook, G Dubuis, A H Puichaud, B J Ruck, S Granville. Sci. Rep., 7(2017).
[36] J Finley, L Liu. Phys. Rev. Appl., 6(2016).
[37] S A Siddiqui, J Han, J T Finley, C A Ross, L Liu. Phys. Rev. Lett., 121(2018).
[38] W H Wang, X B Ren, G H Wu, M Przybylski, J Barthel, J Kirschner. IEEE Trans. Magn., 41, 2805(2005).
[39] W H Wang, X B Ren, G H Wu, M Przybylski, J Barthel, J Kirschner. Phys. Rev. Lett., 118(2017).
[40] R Mishra, J Yu, X Qiu, M Motapothula, T Venkatesan, H Yang. Phys. Rev. Lett., 118(2017).
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Shan Li, Jun Lu, Si-Wei Mao, Da-Hai Wei, Jian-Hua Zhao. Magnetic characterization of a thin Co2MnSi/L10–MnGa synthetic antiferromagnetic bilayer prepared by MBE[J]. Chinese Physics B, 2020, 29(10):
Received: Feb. 14, 2020
Accepted: --
Published Online: Apr. 21, 2021
The Author Email: Jun Lu (lujun@semi.ac.cn)